Re: A connection between the Podesta emails and the McCanns? Well, actually, just maybe, there is: Podesta>>Richard Branson>>Jeffrey Epstein>>Ernie Allen>>Gerry McCann

by **Hobs** 07.03.17 1:50

It is tiresome that the podesta brothers keep being brought up in relation to Maddie and the non existent abduction.

The podesta brothers made an appearance after certain people deliberately or otherwise decided the 2 crimewatch e-fits looked like the two brothers, conveniently omitting the fact that the e-fits were 2 versions of ONE MAN.

They are not images of two men as it seems to be implied by supporters it is one man as described by the Smith family.

I could almost imagine that there is deliberate muddying of the waters to divert attention that at least one of the e=fits bears a STRIKING RESEMBLANCE TO GERRY, which would also explain why it was sat on for so long.

The podesta brothers are not involved in Maddie's death.
Kate and gerry and at least one of the tapas 7 are involved in Maddie's death, disposal and subsequent cover up.

No abductor would kidnap a dead child, one who has been dead for at least 90 mins for that is how long it takes for cadaverine to be able to be detected by a cadaver dog.

Why would they do so?
It would raise the risk of being caught considerably.
They would have the problem of moving said dead body, dead bodies are really heavy, literally a dead weight and, because there is now no muscle tension, very floppy and hard to move around since limbs will flop and generally get in the way.

They would then have to dispose of said body.

There is the risk of leaving incriminating evidence on the body such as hair, fibres, skin cells, sweat etc.
There is the risk of leaving evidence from the body such as hair, skin cells, body fluids, fibres from clothing if applicable not only on the abductor but also anywhere the abductor moves carrying said body, in their vehicle, any thing used to wrap the body and so on.

Why make the job harder for yourself when you can leave the body in situ and scarper, putting as much distance and time between you and the victim.

If the 'abductor' had attacked Maddie in the house, as would need to be the case since cadaverine was found in the apartment then his only choice, between 'checks' would have been either leave her in bed and hope the mccanns either didn't check before they went to bed or would only see 3 children in the apartment all apparently asleep and only learning Maddie was dead the next day when she didn't wake up.

or

Leave her behind the sofa and hope the mccanns were too drunk to check on the children and only finding Maddie the next day and hoping first thoughts would be she accidentally fell and died.

This however does not explain the cadaverine and body fluids found in the hire car.
How likely would it be the alleged abductor killed Maddie and put her body in the hire car to dispose of her, only to have her parents hire it weeks later?

No is the answer.

Everything points right back to the mccanns and chums.

No podesta brothers.
No to any of the other multiple alleged suspects.
No to some as yet unidentified mystery man or woman.

The mccanns and one or more of the tapas 7 only.

by Basil with a brush 07.03.17 3:40

Can't argue with too much you've pointed out there 'Hobs'.

I am strongly of the opinion that a certain member in particular of the said 'Tapas 7' is the real key in unlocking all of this.

by Guest 07.03.17 7:37

Verdi wrote:Why people persist with this crazy theory is totally beyond me.

It's not beyond me.

It's standard fare on any internet forum where people ask the "wrong" questions.

You just have to keep challenging them.

It's tiresome though because most times they are not there for debate.

by MayMuse 07.03.17 8:03

BlueBag wrote:
Verdi wrote:Why people persist with this crazy theory is totally beyond me.
It's not beyond me.

It's standard fare on any internet forum where people ask the "wrong" questions.

You just have to keep challenging them.

It's tiresome though because most times they are not there for debate.

Same is with the "neglect" theory, fits the agenda.

Always wondered why two efits were produced and put out in the media, why not the one? They were apparently done by different members of the Smith family so why not collate them together.

Two efits of the same man, suppressed for 5 years, why?

Another agenda?

by Guest 07.03.17 11:52

Hobs wrote:
The podesta brothers made an appearance after certain people deliberately or otherwise decided the 2 crimewatch e-fits looked like the two brothers, conveniently omitting the fact that the e-fits were 2 versions of ONE MAN.

They are not images of two men as it seems to be implied by supporters it is one man as described by the Smith family.

You beat me to it, I've just logged in to comment on the origin of this farcical myth borne out of ex-DCI Andy Redwood's legendary e-fit.

It's laughable when you think beyond the first glance - two brothers deeply embroiled in business of a Presidential Whitehouse nature, tramping the streets of down-town Praia da Luz carrying the body of an abducted child from who knows where to who know where. I was going to say you couldn't make it up but that's precisely what some joker has done

Well done - I'm delighted to see at least you have a listening audience thumbsup

. Will you be my Clarence? I can't guarantee 70,000k+ per annum but I'm now having a coffee if you'd care to join me..

by Guest 07.03.17 11:57

BlueBag wrote:
Verdi wrote:Why people persist with this crazy theory is totally beyond me.
It's not beyond me.

It's standard fare on any internet forum where people ask the "wrong" questions.

You just have to keep challenging them.

It's tiresome though because most times they are not there for debate.

You can challenge them until the cows come home but expecting them to listen is another matter.

notlistening

by Guest 07.03.17 12:31

Verdi wrote:
BlueBag wrote:
Verdi wrote:Why people persist with this crazy theory is totally beyond me.
It's not beyond me.

It's standard fare on any internet forum where people ask the "wrong" questions.

You just have to keep challenging them.

It's tiresome though because most times they are not there for debate.
You can challenge them until the cows come home but expecting them to listen is another matter.

I know - most of them are not there for debate.

But others may read it and draw sensible conclusions.

by hawkmoth 09.03.17 11:04

The e-fits are of the Podesta brothers. It's psyop to perpetuate the abduction theory.

--------

Admin Team and Mods write:

We will allow your post to stand, but only so that the entire Admin Team can state, on the record, that none of us believe that Henri Exton, in the spring of 2008, based his two e-fit images on the Podesta brothers. And neither, we believe, do the overwhelming majority of members and guests here share such a view.

The OP drew attention to Gerry McCann's long visit to Washington D.C. in July 2007, just weeks after Madeleine has been reported missing, where he spent the best part of four days being personally shown around Washington and the NCMEC Missing Children headquarters by the boss of NCMEC and ICMEC -Ernie Allen.

The OP showed clear connections between Ernie Allen, Jim Gamble, Richard Branson, Brian Epstein and, yes, the Podesta brothers and 'Pizzagate'.

It is these links and connections that are the subject of this thread, NOT the e-fits - Mod

by sallypelt 24.07.20 10:56

Maybe it's the right time to bring this thread back into play. The last time that someone posted on this thread, was back in 2017. Jeffrey Epstein was still in the land of the living in 2017. It's always good to go over "old ground" to see what, if anything, has been missed.

I'll leave this here:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by sallypelt 24.07.20 11:06

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]