Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
During her interview with Leicestershire Police, she told them:
Jane Tanner: “You see this is where now I’m really, I don’t even know whether it’s worth doing this, because there’s been so much, since then I’ve had the, when they took me round for the surveillance to look at, and I’m guessing now it’s Murat they wanted me to look at and, you know, all the other bits and bobs, I really don’t know, but I think I’d prefer just to stick with what I said in my original statement, in terms of the, because even, I mean, this is coming back to the sketch, even when I did the sketch, by that stage, you know, things were, were murky, I needed to that sketch that first night, I mean, they took me in to do the sketch, but they only had, erm, front facing software, so you know, and at that point I said, you know, is there, can I do, because the clothes and everything was the thing was the thing that was the most in my mind then and I can remember saying to the chap I met on the stairs earlier, I think it’s, is it?”
Jane Tanner: “You see this is where now I’m really, I don’t even know whether it’s worth doing this, because there’s been so much, since then I’ve had the, when they took me round for the surveillance to look at, and I’m guessing now it’s Murat they wanted me to look at and, you know, all the other bits and bobs, I really don’t know, but I think I’d prefer just to stick with what I said in my original statement, in terms of the, because even, I mean, this is coming back to the sketch, even when I did the sketch, by that stage, you know, things were, were murky, I needed to that sketch that first night, I mean, they took me in to do the sketch, but they only had, erm, front facing software, so you know, and at that point I said, you know, is there, can I do, because the clothes and everything was the thing was the thing that was the most in my mind then and I can remember saying to the chap I met on the stairs earlier, I think it’s, is it?”
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html
According to that article, she did not invent that man. The man exists but was belated in coming forward.
The man came forward 6-1/2 years later to get himself eliminated.
What seems STRANGE is he'd preserved and brought the clothes he wore that fateful night as well the pyjamas of his two-year old daughter to prove to Police he was Tanner's bundleman.
He can't not have known he was (JT's bundelman) being sought after by Police if he'd preserved those items all these years for this purpose!!
You have to question what made him think he'd to bring possessions to prove anything if he's not the snatcher and has a daughter that age to prove it.
The Police should be able to verify his identity and story against Evening Creche Record without him having to proof anything.
ETA: (1) He was Redwood's revelation moment, hence the shift of focus on a changed timeline.
(2) One is left wondering why Tanner and Friends fingered Robert Murat.
According to that article, she did not invent that man. The man exists but was belated in coming forward.
The man came forward 6-1/2 years later to get himself eliminated.
What seems STRANGE is he'd preserved and brought the clothes he wore that fateful night as well the pyjamas of his two-year old daughter to prove to Police he was Tanner's bundleman.
He can't not have known he was (JT's bundelman) being sought after by Police if he'd preserved those items all these years for this purpose!!
You have to question what made him think he'd to bring possessions to prove anything if he's not the snatcher and has a daughter that age to prove it.
The Police should be able to verify his identity and story against Evening Creche Record without him having to proof anything.
ETA: (1) He was Redwood's revelation moment, hence the shift of focus on a changed timeline.
(2) One is left wondering why Tanner and Friends fingered Robert Murat.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8WVMAazd0I
Any of Jane Tanner's ramblings remind me so much of Vicky Pollard!
Any of Jane Tanner's ramblings remind me so much of Vicky Pollard!
Guest- Guest
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
I'm sure she has many redeeming facets to her personality, but intelligence does not appear to be one of them.
It seems that she has been willingly used.
It seems that she has been willingly used.
Dr What- Posts : 249
Activity : 286
Likes received : 35
Join date : 2012-10-26
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
does any one really believe this guff.this was to let jane of the hook by syaiyoyo wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html
According to that article, she did not invent that man. The man exists but was belated in coming forward.
The man came forward 6-1/2 years later to get himself eliminated.
What seems STRANGE is he'd preserved and brought the clothes he wore that fateful night as well the pyjamas of his two-year old daughter to prove to Police he was Tanner's bundleman.
He can't not have known he was (JT's bundelman) being sought after by Police if he'd preserved those items all these years for this purpose!!
You have to question what made him think he'd to bring possessions to prove anything if he's not the snatcher and has a daughter that age to prove it.
The Police should be able to verify his identity and story against Evening Creche Record without him having to proof anything.
ETA: (1) He was Redwood's revelation moment, hence the shift of focus on a changed timeline.
(2) One is left wondering why Tanner and Friends fingered Robert Murat.
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
Well, SY did, and has been telling the world audience that the Mccanns are neither suspects nor Persons of Interest.tiny wrote:does any one really believe this guff.this was to let jane of the hook by syaiyoyo wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html
According to that article, she did not invent that man. The man exists but was belated in coming forward.
The man came forward 6-1/2 years later to get himself eliminated.
What seems STRANGE is he'd preserved and brought the clothes he wore that fateful night as well the pyjamas of his two-year old daughter to prove to Police he was Tanner's bundleman.
He can't not have known he was (JT's bundelman) being sought after by Police if he'd preserved those items all these years for this purpose!!
You have to question what made him think he'd to bring possessions to prove anything if he's not the snatcher and has a daughter that age to prove it.
The Police should be able to verify his identity and story against Evening Creche Record without him having to proof anything.
ETA: (1) He was Redwood's revelation moment, hence the shift of focus on a changed timeline.
(2) One is left wondering why Tanner and Friends fingered Robert Murat.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
I don't think sy believed her bundleman,but they did need the smiths sighting to get out,drop a sprat to catch a mackeralaiyoyo wrote:Well, SY did, and has been telling the world audience that the Mccanns are neither suspects nor Persons of Interest.tiny wrote:does any one really believe this guff.this was to let jane of the hook by syaiyoyo wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2460669/Madeleine-McCann-kidnapping-innocent-British-father-mistaken-key-suspect.html
According to that article, she did not invent that man. The man exists but was belated in coming forward.
The man came forward 6-1/2 years later to get himself eliminated.
What seems STRANGE is he'd preserved and brought the clothes he wore that fateful night as well the pyjamas of his two-year old daughter to prove to Police he was Tanner's bundleman.
He can't not have known he was (JT's bundelman) being sought after by Police if he'd preserved those items all these years for this purpose!!
You have to question what made him think he'd to bring possessions to prove anything if he's not the snatcher and has a daughter that age to prove it.
The Police should be able to verify his identity and story against Evening Creche Record without him having to proof anything.
ETA: (1) He was Redwood's revelation moment, hence the shift of focus on a changed timeline.
(2) One is left wondering why Tanner and Friends fingered Robert Murat.
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
A man carrying a child in what appears to be a sleeping or comatose state, from the direction of the McCann's apartment, in pyjamas similar to what Madeleine was said to be wearing, is eliminated from SY enquiries. How did Mr Redwoord explain that one? Oh he didn't bother.
SixMillionQuid- Posts : 436
Activity : 445
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
Why do all the Tapas group "gibber" when asked important questions.
Why can not the McCanns use standard English grammar, ( even if we are prepared to accept their ghastly whining accents.)
Why can not the McCanns use standard English grammar, ( even if we are prepared to accept their ghastly whining accents.)
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
What you posted is complete gibberish, I can imagine alot of gesticulating and expressions to engender sympathy went along with those words in an attempt to make it seem credible.
ChippyM- Posts : 1334
Activity : 1817
Likes received : 467
Join date : 2013-06-15
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
who posted gibberish ?
____________________
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
Andy said the magic word 'whoosh' and JT's sighting of bundleman/woman/abductor disappearedSixMillionQuid wrote:A man carrying a child in what appears to be a sleeping or comatose state, from the direction of the McCann's apartment, in pyjamas similar to what Madeleine was said to be wearing, is eliminated from SY enquiries. How did Mr Redwoord explain that one? Oh he didn't bother.
ultimaThule- Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
On one of the threads yesterday some one mentioned a woman on her balcony and she said that she did not see any one on the road below,
any one know where I can find this post ,please
any one know where I can find this post ,please
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
If I'm not wrong, wasn't there a teenage girl out havingtiny wrote:On one of the threads yesterday some one mentioned a woman on her balcony and she said that she did not see any one on the road below,
any one know where I can find this post ,please
a sly smoke at approx. at the time who said she didn't
see anyone?
marxman- Posts : 81
Activity : 91
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-07-11
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
I think it was said that this lady was having a drink on her balconymarxman wrote:If I'm not wrong, wasn't there a teenage girl out havingtiny wrote:On one of the threads yesterday some one mentioned a woman on her balcony and she said that she did not see any one on the road below,
any one know where I can find this post ,please
a sly smoke at approx. at the time who said she didn't
see anyone?
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
we all talk about how the twins must be feeling,but have we given any thought to the tapas children,it must be terrible for janes eldest daughter, who would be about 8 now, if when at school a child says to her "my mum said your mum lied",
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
Jane's daughter is 10 now as Madeleine was only a few weeks older than her.
Personally, I doubt that children of her age would have much awareness of the names of the other people who were there.
Personally, I doubt that children of her age would have much awareness of the names of the other people who were there.
Guest- Guest
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
no i doubt she would have but then she was only 3 at the time ,but at 10 she can use the internet and read the papers and all children have big ears:biggrin: and always hear what you don't want them to.No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:Jane's daughter is 10 now as Madeleine was only a few weeks older than her.
Personally, I doubt that children of her age would have much awareness of the names of the other people who were there.
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: Jane Tanner REALLY DID see someone - in her own words
No she wouldn't know the names of the other people from 2007 and, unless they are still in contact with each other, it's unlikely that she does now.
I meant that the screaming headlines are more about the McCanns than the other couples.
None of the Tapas children can be kept in the dark (pun fully intended) for ever though.
I meant that the screaming headlines are more about the McCanns than the other couples.
None of the Tapas children can be kept in the dark (pun fully intended) for ever though.
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Where was Gerry 9,30 - 10.00pm?
» Jane Tanner Liar?
» WHEN JANE TANNER CRIED
» Dr Martin Roberts: A Tanner in the works
» The Tapas 9: Jane Tanner
» Jane Tanner Liar?
» WHEN JANE TANNER CRIED
» Dr Martin Roberts: A Tanner in the works
» The Tapas 9: Jane Tanner
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum