Total Cost/Monies rec'd

by gavdalf 27.03.13 15:38

Hello all

I would like a total a breakdown if someone could supply the total amount of monies raised by the ltd company, as we are allowed to as they a filed in company accounts.

I read that as its close to 2 years the yard review has cost UK tax payers 2million? is this correct

As a UK taxpayer I have asked my MP to explain to me why a family that set up a ltd company days after their child went missing, should be entitled to this selective assistance, by that I mean not for all. If the 2million had simply gone to find all missing children, I would welcome it. I very much doubt I will get a response but its my right to ask
It was my choice not to donate to the ltd company and I find it totally unacceptable that my/our monies have been used this way.
I would just like to know how much in total from the world at Large and obviously all uk taxpayers have contributed to this single family of a missing child, when it was a family member herself that refused to answer questions
As stated im not against funding for missing children at all
Not a theory per say, just something that doesn't sit right with me
thanks and pleased to meet you all

by Guest 27.03.13 15:47

Maybe this independent review of the company will help?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by gavdalf 27.03.13 16:05

Thanks, so by the accts filed the Ltd company income in total is 2.94million pounds

In total close to 5m has been used to support 1 family

Interesting Ive never put the 2 totals together before, and I had no say whatsoever that my funds have been used as part of this. As I said above it was my right not to donate and its my right to ask for an explanation as it is for every taxpayer

by Guest 27.03.13 16:09

gavdalf wrote:In total close to 5m has been used to support 1 family

Not just any family. This is The McCann family. Who can get away with anything they so desire.

With knobs on. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Guest 27.03.13 16:14

I forgot to add a report for the year ending 31/3/2012.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by gavdalf 27.03.13 16:35

Thanks Jean, just noticed that myself , we can add another £856,393 of income to that, well that's just blown straight through the 5m then and is now lets call it total assistance income received £5.79m
this does not make any sense.

by Khalgregar 27.03.13 16:56

gavdalf wrote:Thanks Jean, just noticed that myself , we can add another £856,393 of income to that, well that's just blown straight through the 5m then and is now lets call it total assistance income received £5.79m
this does not make any sense.

And despite all this money, they have legal people working pro bono for them ;-)

by celtclogs 27.03.13 17:09

gavdalf wrote:Hello all

I would like a total a breakdown if someone could supply the total amount of monies raised by the ltd company, as we are allowed to as they a filed in company accounts.

I read that as its close to 2 years the yard review has cost UK tax payers 2million? is this correct

As a UK taxpayer I have asked my MP to explain to me why a family that set up a ltd company days after their child went missing, should be entitled to this selective assistance, by that I mean not for all. If the 2million had simply gone to find all missing children, I would welcome it. I very much doubt I will get a response but its my right to ask
It was my choice not to donate to the ltd company and I find it totally unacceptable that my/our monies have been used this way.
I would just like to know how much in total from the world at Large and obviously all uk taxpayers have contributed to this single family of a missing child, when it was a family member herself that refused to answer questions
As stated im not against funding for missing children at all
Not a theory per say, just something that doesn't sit right with me
thanks and pleased to meet you all

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]and [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by celtclogs 27.03.13 17:19

Khalgregar wrote:
gavdalf wrote:Thanks Jean, just noticed that myself , we can add another £856,393 of income to that, well that's just blown straight through the 5m then and is now lets call it total assistance income received £5.79m
this does not make any sense.

And despite all this money, they have legal people working pro bono for them ;-)

Some how I can't believe that, really I can't [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]& [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Guest 27.03.13 19:49

Please also add all moneys transferred from well wishing benefactors to their legal paople directly;
these are taxable income of the McCs themselves.

As I recall, mr Brian Kennedy vowed to pick up any tab of any lawyer ad infinitum for Kate (and Gerry, of course)

This constitutes a donation, to be taxed at the receiving end.

Kate?

Who benefitted from the benevolence of mr Brian Kennedy, window producer?

Kate, Gerry, or Kate & Gerry?

Hello: Inland Revenue, where are you?

by Woofer 27.03.13 21:55

And I`m sure the SY review must have gone well over 2M by now.

by Guest 27.03.13 22:10

I'd say 2 million GBP would have been easily spent in salaries, translations, administration, allowances, travel and subsistence in the first 12 months of the review ...