The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Libel?? Really?? Mm11

Libel?? Really?? Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Libel?? Really?? Mm11

Libel?? Really?? Regist10

Libel?? Really??

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Libel?? Really?? Empty Libel?? Really??

Post by Upsy Daisy 29.04.12 14:53

How can the McCann's sue ANYONE for libel/defamation ?? If this case has never gone to trial and they have never been proven innocent, beyond any reasonable doubt, then how can they say for sure that anyone is uttering false statements damaging their reputation, unless it has been proven otherwise??

How can the courts allow this to happen in the first place, surely this just contradicts the act of libelling, as in, first of all you must be sure the person claiming that someone is bringing their good name into disrepute is in fact WRONG............only one side can realistically be telling the truth.

It's obvious I know doodly-squat about libel laws, so if anyone can shed any light then please do...........

THANKS!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

____________________
Grammatical Error of The Day : It's should 'have', NOT should 'of'...... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Upsy Daisy
Upsy Daisy

Posts : 437
Activity : 469
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2011-04-11

Back to top Go down

Libel?? Really?? Empty Re: Libel?? Really??

Post by Spaniel 29.04.12 14:58

Upsy Daisy wrote:How can the McCann's sue ANYONE for libel/defamation ?? If this case has never gone to trial and they have never been proven innocent, beyond any reasonable doubt, then how can they say for sure that anyone is uttering false statements damaging their reputation, unless it has been proven otherwise??

How can the courts allow this to happen in the first place, surely this just contradicts the act of libelling, as in, first of all you must be sure the person claiming that someone is bringing their good name into disrepute is in fact WRONG............only one side can realistically be telling the truth.

It's obvious I know doodly-squat about libel laws, so if anyone can shed any light then please do...........

THANKS!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Other way round in libel. You start as guilty having to prove what you wrote was correct. More to it, but that's the gist.
Spaniel
Spaniel

Posts : 742
Activity : 769
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2012-01-24

Back to top Go down

Libel?? Really?? Empty Re: Libel?? Really??

Post by Upsy Daisy 29.04.12 15:10

right, so the Mcscams do have the upper hand then, since they can say everyone is wrong about them and nobody can point blank prove they are telling the truth. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

____________________
Grammatical Error of The Day : It's should 'have', NOT should 'of'...... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Upsy Daisy
Upsy Daisy

Posts : 437
Activity : 469
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2011-04-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum