A change of mind about the “McCanns”

August 6th, 2011 22:31

A change of mind about the “McCanns”


http://my.telegraph.co.uk/jdasp/jda/361/a-change-of-mind-about-the-mccanns/

Wow, to quote a sentence or 2:

However, I have recently spent hours watching some high quality documentaries concerning Gerry and Kate McCann and the almost endless contradictions and absurdities in their story. I have seen footage of them both which I can describe only as “disturbing”.

He does nor sugar coat it, does he?

Well guess what, this article has been whooshed as well!! Same as Spudguns!!

This blog has been archived or suspended

I wish I'd had the chance to read this article in full - it certainly sounds interesting from LJ's short extract - but sadly the McCanns' secret police seem to have struck again. I'm becoming even more pessimistic that the Scotland Yard review will be anything other than a total whitewash.

http://dontletthemhurtourchildren.blogspot.com
http://pickupthephoneandbringmadeleinehome.blogspot.com

Gillyspot found the Spudgun one, perhaps you can help again Gilly?

just found this link, is it any good?



http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t16454-a-change-of-mind-about-the-mccanns-jda

Invinoveritas wrote:just found this link, is it any good?



http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t16454-a-change-of-mind-about-the-mccanns-jda

Thank you Invinoveritas

You´re welcome

Here it is

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ORWjyHi1E2cJ:my.telegraph.co.uk/jdasp/jda/361/a-change-of-mind-about-the-mccanns/+%22a+change+of+mind+about+the+mccanns%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&source=www.google.co.uk

JDA's only other blog regarding the McCanns

"I am still coming to terms with the fact that there is a vast amount of evidence that Gerry and Kate McCann covered up the death of their child to prevent an autopsy, thereby allowing them to continue to practice medicine. Mr McCann can continue with his propaganda-by-repetition all he likes. I enjoy listenening to him whine like a teenage boy – voice halfway through breaking – that there is “no evidence Madeleine is dead”. Well, there’s no evidence she was abducted – that’s for certain.
There is, quite simply, a huge amount of evidence that she died in that apartment. A huge amount.
But what on earth are the McCann’s “detectives” actually doing? I mean to say, what, specifically, do they do each day? Who do they call and speak to? What documents are they reading? Are they following up reported sightings by visiting the scene, looking at footage of security cameras and talking to those who “spotted” the child?
The best way to discredit the two “parents” (and the Gerry-creature has a few questions to answer about whether Madeleine was the fruit of his loins at all) is to show the “search fund” is no more than a grubby, pick-nose money-making scam.
They use search funds to fly about the world having stupid publicity stunts. These are to publicise the fund – and that you can give it your money – and have nothing to do with searching for the child. The fund must keep growing because heaven forfend that Kate has to start working again. That would be unfair, given the life she has become used to.
I will continue to research the con they are pulling, and link to the best evidence on another blog.
I haven’t yet heard a guess about the body and where it is – or if it still exists.
How about this: The body of the child was flown to England under diplomatic cover.
I know, I know – it sounds fantastic. But does anyone believe conspiracies don’t happen?

This is found Here: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:j8teMia9asgJ:my.telegraph.co.uk/jdasp/jda/369/gerrymandering/+%22%22my.telegraph.co.uk/jdasp/jda%22%22&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&source=www.google.co.uk

After blogging many times and not getting whooshed. 2 against the McCanns and his blog is suspended.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:olYtXvd70IUJ:my.telegraph.co.uk/members/jda/comments/%3Fpage%3D13+%22%22my.telegraph.co.uk/jdasp/jda%22%22&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&source=www.google.co.uk

JDA wasn't told either regarding the removing of his blog.

http://my.telegraph.co.uk/jdablog/jda/4/what/

Thanks Gilly for the above two links

[quote jda]

But what on earth are the McCann’s “detectives” actually doing? I mean to say, what, specifically, do they do each day? Who do they call and speak to? What documents are they reading? Are they following up reported sightings by visiting the scene, looking at footage of security cameras and talking to those who “spotted” the child?

Who is JDA ?

Stella wrote:Who is JDA ?

Could it beJoanD'Arc (spelling?) who posts on MCF, - Just a rough guess though.

God I hope not..

9.00 Sperrey (3)

Stella wrote:God I hope not..

Eh, why?

ETA it probably isn't them anyway, just the first thing that entered my head with those initials

JDA in another blog refers to their local council as "North Somerset Council" if that helps any

So they are putting their money from the book "well" to use: one electronic book banned, 3 blogs suspended.



I feel a sequel coming on.



But the NcCanns should know: you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube, or unring a bell etc etc



More and more facts are getting out there, and more and more people see what a disgusting couple they are.

Or it is no good shutting the stable door now the horse has bolted LOL.

Seriously I have noticed on twitter that so called "antis" get a lot more followers than "Pro" McCann. This must prove something particularly as I get people regularly coming across my tweets by accident and then discussing the case with me. I can't see that happening when you talk to any so called PRO i have EVER tweeted with.
Pro:

@pinkypoo666 4442 tweets 61 followers
@greenink211 over 12.000 tweets 112 followers
@nowaymojo over 24,000 tweets 180 followers

Anti:
@spudgun01 873 tweets 301 followers
@gasparstatement 2700 tweets 195 followers
@zampos (we know who this is lol) 532 tweets 143 tollowers

It shows the mood to me of twitter at least.

Gilly, I still have to meet the person in real life who believes the McCanns. True, most people were not interested at all until for the US citizens tha Casey Anthony case came along (and we know how that ended) and on the Mexican side the Paulette case. In both cases the Name Madeleine came up and made some people look into this case with the result that now they are beyond the gutfeeling convinced the parents are involved.

slightly O/T but has anyone read the book "Faked Abduction" from Brian Johnson aka Steve Marsden? I was upto now not aware of this book



http://fakedabduction.com/2009/09/the-book/