Re: PCC Complaint Question

by ufercoffy 02.02.10 10:56

It does matter but I realise that was a question you wouldn't want to answer and I apologise for putting you on the spot.

But, you know, these forums probably wouldn't exist if the media presented both sides of the story in a fair way. Then we wouldn't be called 'ambulance chasers'. I don't think we're ambulance chasers, we just want to know the truth about what happened to Madeleine. Something isn't right with the whole case and people want to know what happened to that little girl who was abandoned every night with her siblings.

by mikegunnill 02.02.10 12:20

ufercoffy wrote:It does matter but I realise that was a question you wouldn't want to answer and I apologise for putting you on the spot.

But, you know, these forums probably wouldn't exist if the media presented both sides of the story in a fair way. Then we wouldn't be called 'ambulance chasers'. I don't think we're ambulance chasers, we just want to know the truth about what happened to Madeleine. Something isn't right with the whole case and people want to know what happened to that little girl who was abandoned every night with her siblings.

I don't feel it right to put forward my personal views, it is nothing against you or any other member. When I said " ambulance chaser" I was referring to Mr Anthony Bennett and no one else.

Newspapers and media are restricted in what they can say and report where as forums are not.

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 15:56

vaguely1 wrote:Hold up, it was Mr Bennett that said she looked like a hard cow, not the paper.....surely?

eta, Have you actually seen what has happened to Mr Gunnills web presence? If that's not stalking I don't know what is.

Mr Gunhills precence on this forum, how could that be interpreted ? Is he now stalking mr Bennett ?

by WOODWARD 02.02.10 16:01

Newspapers and media dont have to pretend a minimum walking distance of 120 metres is just like being in your garden or worse that 50yards as the crow flies means doctors can walk across a swimming pool and scale a ten foot wall in response to hearing crying children with that special supersonic hearing the middle class proffessionals have along with the ability to see through the walls of a building to a back bedroom at night. They dont have to pretend a private limited company is a charity or that undamaged shutters have been "jemmied",but the media chose to do all of those things ,repeatedly .

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 16:05

mikegunnill wrote:
ufercoffy wrote:It does matter but I realise that was a question you wouldn't want to answer and I apologise for putting you on the spot.

But, you know, these forums probably wouldn't exist if the media presented both sides of the story in a fair way. Then we wouldn't be called 'ambulance chasers'. I don't think we're ambulance chasers, we just want to know the truth about what happened to Madeleine. Something isn't right with the whole case and people want to know what happened to that little girl who was abandoned every night with her siblings.

I don't feel it right to put forward my personal views, it is nothing against you or any other member. When I said " ambulance chaser" I was referring to Mr Anthony Bennett and no one else.

Newspapers and media are restricted in what they can say and report where as forums are not.

Are you posting here as a representative of the media or as a private individual. ?

If it's the former, yes your restricted. if it's the latter, why not give your opinion, it was you who chased across Morroco on a wild goose chase, wasn't it ?

by ufercoffy 02.02.10 16:12

You've got a point there Laffin Assasin, why join a forum if you don't want to give your opinion?

Seems he only joined here to chat to TB and read what was being said, possibly alerted to this forum by a Pro. It certainly seems like he set TB up by ordering a book in an anonymous name. Will he now report him to Carter Ruck?

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 16:17

I can't speak for Mr Gunhill.

I don't know wether he'll contact C-R.

He does appear to have a "spokesman" on the JATYK forum, a peterT, IIRC.

JATYN do claim to be sending lot's of info to the McCanns and C-F .

by bellatrix 02.02.10 16:37

TB should be reported to C-R if he is indeed still selling his booklet.

by mikegunnill 02.02.10 16:41

Laffin Assasin wrote:I can't speak for Mr Gunhill.

I don't know wether he'll contact C-R.

He does appear to have a "spokesman" on the JATYK forum, a peterT, IIRC.

JATYN do claim to be sending lot's of info to the McCanns and C-F .

Grateful if you could spell my surname correctly please.

by Pascal 02.02.10 16:53

Laffin Assasin wrote:I can't speak for Mr Gunhill.

I don't know wether he'll contact C-R.

He does appear to have a "spokesman" on the JATYK forum, a peterT, IIRC.

JATYN do claim to be sending lot's of info to the McCanns and C-F .

they should send some of Bonnie's earlier comments. She was more corrosive than anyone.

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 16:57

MIKE GUNNHILL aka peterT at JATYN.

Mike and peterT, both logged off here and JATYN at 10:40am this morning.

Then both just logged on at the same time here and @JATYN, not a coincidence, is should think.

As regards the spelling, i'll try and improve it, some of my inpersonators have a habit of spelling my user name incorrectly, but I ussually don't complain as it gives them away.

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 16:58

Pascal wrote:
Laffin Assasin wrote:I can't speak for Mr Gunhill.

I don't know wether he'll contact C-R.

He does appear to have a "spokesman" on the JATYK forum, a peterT, IIRC.

JATYN do claim to be sending lot's of info to the McCanns and C-F .

they should send some of Bonnie's earlier comments. She was more corrosive than anyone.

Bonnybraes is very happy with Mike Gunnhill, he's got his own thread just started this afternoon. Do you think they confere and plan these things, or do you think it happens spontaneously. ????

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 16:59

bellatrix wrote:TB should be reported to C-R if he is indeed still selling his booklet.

It appears JATYN are in the process of doing that.

by Pascal 02.02.10 17:03

Bonnie should take a good long hard at herself before waving the flag for Carter Ruck. I think out of this whole forum debacle, she has the most to answer for. her behaviour on the early 3A was disgusting.

For her, it's either a personal war with Bren - or she's been batting for the other side all along. Either way she's a joke.

sorry, off topic.

I need vodka.

by bellatrix 02.02.10 17:13

I cant see a petert on there???

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 18:12

bellatrix wrote:I cant see a petert on there???

Check his profile and see his "last login time" thats what I did, this morning and this afternoon. I hope your not insinuating I'm lying. !!!

by bellatrix 02.02.10 18:13

Why would I? I must not have looked properly is all.

by Cath 02.02.10 18:14

You can't check his profile or see what time he's logged in unless you're a member. I just clicked his name and I couldn't see anything.

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 18:17

Inyx wrote:You can't check his profile or see what time he's logged in unless you're a member. I just clicked his name and I couldn't see anything.

you are either a liar or an incompetent.

I'm not a member there, and I can check most of the things out I need to.

by bellatrix 02.02.10 18:20

OK found it now.I was looking for a posting by him today when I looked before.

by Kololi 02.02.10 18:24

Laffin Assasin wrote:
Inyx wrote:You can't check his profile or see what time he's logged in unless you're a member. I just clicked his name and I couldn't see anything.

you are either a liar or an incompetent.

I'm not a member there, and I can check most of the things out I need to.

Is that really necessary?

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 18:32

petert's last login and post times, i'm not a member at JATYK.

Today at 6:01pm
Recent Posts: View most recent posts.
Re: STEVO - THE RETURN on Jan 27, 2010, 2:06pm
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Jan 3, 2010, 11:58am
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Jan 3, 2010, 11:02am
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Dec 23, 2009, 4:34pm
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Dec 23, 2009, 4:15pm

by bellatrix 02.02.10 18:33

Perhaps he doesnt realise we dont do insults on here,after this is not MM or the 3as.

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 18:33

Kololi wrote:
Laffin Assasin wrote:
Inyx wrote:You can't check his profile or see what time he's logged in unless you're a member. I just clicked his name and I couldn't see anything.

you are either a liar or an incompetent.

I'm not a member there, and I can check most of the things out I need to.

Is that really necessary?

it's tame when you compare it to what's been written about myself.

by Laffin Assasin 02.02.10 18:37

Laffin Assasin wrote:petert's last login and post times, i'm not a member at JATYK.

Today at 6:01pm
Recent Posts: View most recent posts.
Re: STEVO - THE RETURN on Jan 27, 2010, 2:06pm
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Jan 3, 2010, 11:58am
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Jan 3, 2010, 11:02am
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Dec 23, 2009, 4:34pm
Re: PCC AGREES - ROTHLEY STALKERS ARE "SICKOS" on Dec 23, 2009, 4:15pm

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/profile.forum?mode=viewprofile&page_profil=stats&u=189

Viewing profile :: mikegunnill

Last visit : Today at 5:56 pm

So I suspect whoever is posting as Mike Gunnhill is posting as or is closley associated with the poster known as petert, it's not rocket science. wow

Log in for more topics