The series of YouTube videos by 'Bogart'

by curioskeptio 25.01.18 11:09

These 'Case Solved' yoube vidoes that are authored by 'Bogart' - he proposes some very interesting theories and his style is quite thorough and believable - at least to me :)

I visit here often and I never hear him or them mentioned, I don't understand why? I'd have thought, similar to Richard Hall's extensive and excellent work, they'd at least be a topic of conversation?

I'm aware 'Bogart' has made some unnecessary comments about Richard, and Im sure most on here, like myself, are wholly appreciative of Richard's efforts and found it distasteful at best.

But putting that all aside, why no debate or discussion of this theories - as they unfold?

I try to keep an open mind on my theory. For some time I was very much of the opinion MM died before the 3rd. However, I'm beginning to turn now towards Pat Brown and Bogart's theory - that Matt discovered her.

by Phoebe 25.01.18 11:34

I too have watched the Bogart series. The things which most concern me about his claims are A) his insistence that the Tapas 9 spent Tuesday night at Chaplin's bar. If this were the case I believe the police would have uncovered it. B) The dogs. Would they alert to the presence of a dead body after so short a time? I can find no information about this. All research seems to focus on how long a test piece of material has to be in contact with a corpse before the dogs will alert to that item. C) His silly arguing and "destroying" tactics. This is not a competition between egos but a tragic death of a child deserving of more respect.

by **Jill Havern** 25.01.18 12:00

curioskeptio wrote:These 'Case Solved' yoube vidoes that are authored by 'Bogart' - he proposes some very interesting theories and his style is quite thorough and believable - at least to me :)

I visit here often and I never hear him or them mentioned, I don't understand why? I'd have thought, similar to Richard Hall's extensive and excellent work, they'd at least be a topic of conversation?

I'm aware 'Bogart' has made some unnecessary comments about Richard, and Im sure most on here, like myself, are wholly appreciative of Richard's efforts and found it distasteful at best.

But putting that all aside, why no debate or discussion of this theories - as they unfold?

I try to keep an open mind on my theory. For some time I was very much of the opinion MM died before the 3rd. However, I'm beginning to turn now towards Pat Brown and Bogart's theory - that Matt discovered her.

There's this one:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

There are four other threads discussing Bogart but they are in the garbage.

by Mark Willis 25.01.18 12:43

Get'emGonçalo wrote:

There are four other threads discussing Bogart but they are in the garbage.

Where they belong.

by **Philo Beddoe** 25.01.18 15:13

Seems part of the Smithman is Gerry agenda ultimately from what little I've seen.

by **sharonl** 25.01.18 20:12

It is within team McCanns interest to keep the focus on May 3rd and prevent us from looking back at their activities earlier on in the holiday. Despite having to put up with people saying that they neglected their children or even worse, concealed Madeleines' corpse, they welcome anything that points towards May 3rd because there is no evidence to suggest that anything happened to Madeleine on that night and no evidence to implicate them in her disappearance. So as long as we keep focusing on May 3rd, the McCanns are safe from prosecution.

The McCanns have recruited people to monitor social media and I strongly believe that there are a number of people out there who are portraying themselves as McCann sceptics but in fact are trying desperately to keep the Focus on the McCann safe zone, i.e May 3rd and to prevent us from getting close to a truth that may get them convicted.

Researchers on this forum have done a vast amount of research over the past 10 years and we have reached the same conclusion, that is that Madeleine died earlier in the week and that a cover up was in place from the very start - (see Steve Marsdens' screen shot showing CEOP entering a missing Madeleine post on its website days before Madeleine was reported missing). The government were heavily involved from day 1 and I strongly believe that false witnesses were put in place very early on to claim that Madeleine was alive between Apr 29 and May 3rd.

These people, dummy friends, working to protect the McCanns are nasty because they cannot supress the truth. They resort to abuse and bullyboy tactics because that is their only line of defence.

by sandancer 25.01.18 23:26

Abuse and bully boy tactics are rife on Bogarts videos , both from Bogart himself who appears to believe his intelligence and " knowledge " of the McCann case far surpass that of anyone else so anyone who disagrees or questions his " theory " is discredited and then banned and all comments deleted . He has a sidekick by the name of Secret Spy who abuses continually mostly in the vilest manner and refers to Bogart as Lord Bogart ! Consequently the comments only come from a small group of his sycophantic admirers

Around Christmas he put a video up for a short time saying he'd had a " spiritual experience " involving communication from Madeleine to continue his work !

Very reminiscent of Gerry and his vision .

Enough said about Bogart I think spin

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bogart has had his day. Thread locked.

Mod.