A boat taken out to sea on the Thursday Afternoon!!

Does anyone else think this would have been an ideal opportunity to have disposed of a body.  Dianne Webster in her interview says this of the Thursday afternoon:

”For, for err well David and Fiona. I mean Dave might be out doing something. Sometimes the men would go off and play tennis in the afternoon because you could actually go and book a court and play tennis. Err so I mean there was always somebody in the apartment, it was generally Fiona I would say, and err and I would be there as well on call I think and the children were having their afternoon nap. So afternoon activities wouldn’t start until they’d had their nap err and that particular day err Dave I know was windsurfing in the afternoon, I’ve just got a picture of him walking out of the sea in his wetsuit. Err and err Russell and Matt took out a boat because I remember err Russell, who doesn’t know anything about sailing, had to rescue Matt.”

Just a thought that I had that all 3 men were in the sea that afternoon.
She then goes on to say...

”Yeah, again I’ve got a photograph of them on the beach after that, so after the, after the girls had had their sleep we obviously went down to the beach err and we all went down apart, well again Kate and Gerry, I think they were more into tennis than the beach, so I didn’t see, see them there that day. Err so there was myself, Fiona, Rachael, and Jane with all the children. We went down to the beach that day and just played around for a bit err  and then the men came in from their activities and we then went, because it was quite late, we decided rather than rush the children, to high tea at the Ocean Club. We’d just give them high tea in this beach restaurant that we’d been to before. So the children had high tea, or their tea, in this err restaurant, beach café, err…”
 
 4078    ”Who else was there around that time?”
 Reply    ”Who else? Well it was, it was all of us err apart from Kate and Gerry and their children,

Short answer
NO.
Too many people, too involved, too conspiratorial

You already have achilles tendon injury making G invisible for a long time, then miraculously healed and playing alibi-tennis like a demon for hours into the night, so long that he cannot even spare three minutes to go and see his children being bathed and put to bed but has to send a stooge . . .

Keep it simple.  
Means, motive, opportunity
He has all three

Gutted.  Thought I was onto something there.  

inspirespirit wrote:Gutted.  Thought I was onto something there.  

I wouldn't be discouraged so quickly. Matt is recorded as having fallen in the water...It surely is something any competent police service would investigate further.

Anyway, theoretically, it doesn't have to be a body...could be incriminating material.

Okeydokey wrote:

inspirespirit wrote:Gutted.  Thought I was onto something there.  

I wouldn't be discouraged so quickly. Matt is recorded as having fallen in the water...It surely is something any competent police service would investigate further.

Anyway, theoretically, it doesn't have to be a body...could be incriminating material.

Yes, and just because they say they went sailing does not mean they actually went sailing. We really cannot believe everything that the TAPAS 9 say.

HelenMeg wrote:
Yes, and just because they say they went sailing does not mean they actually went sailing. We really cannot believe everything that the TAPAS 9 say.

The only way we could be absolutely CERTAIN that they went sailing is

If Mitchell said they DIDN'T    

PeterMac wrote:

HelenMeg wrote:
Yes, and just because they say they went sailing does not mean they actually went sailing. We really cannot believe everything that the TAPAS 9 say.

The only way we could be absolutely CERTAIN that they went sailing is

If Mitchell said they DIDN'T    

Who injured a wrist?

According to Jane Tanner it was Russell who hurt his wrist kayaking or sailing.

juliet wrote:According to Jane Tanner it was Russell who hurt his wrist kayaking or sailing.

And was that the only mention of it Juliet, apart of course the comment from Stephen Birch   

What did Birch say??

03 August 2009

Comment by Anthony Bennet on Christopher Story and Michael Shrimpton- updated

Updated: 13.08.2009

As Tony Bennett has now removed his comment from his forum, the 3Arguidos, I have decided to post up proof of his posting. His removing the comment while not replying to the question about where he obtained the information queried, speaks for itself!

Tony Bennett

Post subject: Re: Speculation on April 30 Theory

PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:15 pm

Hardened Criminal

User avatar


Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:49 pm
Posts: 1903
Location: Harlow, Essex


Estelle wrote:

chueewowee said: I just wanted to post a little background information to the EU, two quotes from Christopher Story, a respected(?) investigator, former governmental advisor etc. (you can see a bit about his credentials here: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] with sources in intelligence service. These two snippets also happen to mention Blair, and Barrosa...SOURCE: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ...
---

Tony Bennett wrote:
Christopher Story is IMO (and based on personal experience of him) NOT a trustworthy source........(etc ...edited R. ...see previous post continued below. R)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Original post by R

Tony Bennett

Post subject: Re: Speculation on April 30 Theory

Hardened Criminal

User avatar

Re: Christopher Story, a respected investigator

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ...


Comment (on the 3Arguidos porn forum) by Tony Bennet:


Christopher Story is IMO (and based on personal experience of him) NOT a trustworthy source.

Here's a sample of his writings (my emphasis in italicised bold and underlined):

QUOTE

• LATE INSERTION: The Editor had intended to WITHHOLD the identity of the senior European Commission official concerned. However, in the light of the 'triple gunshot threat voicemail' referenced above, and given that in these cricumstances, the lapse of time between the threat and the exposure must be minimised, we have been forced to reveal the top European Commission official concerned.

His hereby shamed name is Jose Manuel Barroso, the President of the European Commission.

The paedophile and abduction ring is, moreover, actually run out of the European Commission itself. The current position is that the DVD [allegedly a German secret intelligence agency - T.B.] is refusing to release the child, although our British sources have reason to believe that she remains alive [he means Madeleine McCann - T.B.].

It has been conveyed to DVD [by whom? - T.B. - this is a typical 'Storyism'] that if this child is harmed (beyond the abominable degree to which the child has already been harmed), the consequences will be extreme. This posting will serve as an immediate wake-up call and warning that this child must be released into the care of her parents forthwith and that the use of this child as hostage in any negotiations with British authorities is considered an abomination well beyond the normal range of abominations for which the Nazi pervert DVD are notorious.

UNQUOTE

cont. Tony Bennet:

I want to state that IMO this is unqualified rubbish and the work of a fantasist.

That is not to say that some of Story's work does not deal in facts, he has done some reasonable exposes of Communist organisations.

But all his wilder claims are unsubstantiated. He is forever quoting 'high-up sources in Brityish imtelligence' which of course can never be verified. Amongst his many wild claims is that Edward Heath was for most of his lifetime on the payroll of the DVD, a secret German intelligence agency that had Heath on their books for some 60 years since his days at University in the late 1930s. Some of his ideas and fantasies bear a remarkable similarity to the fantastical claims of Michael Shrimpton, who claims to have links to top officials in British intelligence.

He has posted elsewhere that Madeleine was spirited away to Belgium in a secret service boat, presumably for paedophile purposes. He also is a great believer in the alleged exploits of the DVD, and, for the record, has once posted that the Irish potato famine of the 1840s was an early experiment in biological warfare by the Prussian secret service.

I kid you not, and can produce the references if asked.

My simple advice is: Ignore totally anything that either Christopher Story and Michael Shrimpton have to say on the subject of Madeleine McCann.

'chueewowee' queried if Christopher Story is 'a respected source'.

No he is not
--

by R

Well thank you Tony Bennet, you have just made an important mistake! Michael Shrimpton did not refer to a “Secret Service Boat” spiriting away Madeleine McCann.

However, he did speak at length about the RV Naomi Corlett taking on board Madeleine McCann and sailing to Belgium.

So you are saying that the Naomi Corlett is in fact – a Secret Service Boat! You know, I do believe you could be right!

1-I wonder though how you came by that 'unrevealed ' information of the involvment of a Secret Service boat? And what your own real involvement in this affair is?

2-I notice that you are a work colleague of Michael Shrimpton who wrote the now famous Report.

3-I also notice that the emblem of Corlett Lines, already posted on an earlier article, is different from the eblem painted on the red funnel of the boat/ship of Naomi Corlett. The emblem (on funnel) appears to be either a royal emblem or the emblem of an order of knights.

--

Excerpt from the Michael Shrimpton Report:

..... THE RV NAOMI CORLETT

25. Reporting placed Madeleine on the RV Naomi ... and the Naomi Corlett, appear to be using an old covert U-Boat base in Sao Tomé and Principe...

juliet wrote:What did Birch say??

Just something I had read,

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

PeterMac wrote:

HelenMeg wrote:
Yes, and just because they say they went sailing does not mean they actually went sailing. We really cannot believe everything that the TAPAS 9 say.

The only way we could be absolutely CERTAIN that they went sailing is

If Mitchell said they DIDN'T    

Are you really a Researcher ?

P.S. What a poorly bunch they were on their hols. The eldest Tanner child had been very ill with an abscess on her foot and was brought along still unwell. Then Matt got ill....then Rachel...then Russell...(not sure of the order). The Oldfield baby was apparently suffering from diarrhoea every night and upsetting her parents with her smell and leakings. nd a Tanner child was very sick on May 3. Plus Gerry had his Achilles injury coming and going, and Russell hurt his wrist saili g. And Matt I think almost drowned. And poor poor Madeleine shed blood and cadaver odour and then....disappeared.