Facial twitches

by Harriet94 18.08.13 0:28

How could you possibly dismiss "facial twitches" isn't that a symptom not a sign?

by Harriet94 18.08.13 0:44

How would a PR bloke know the difference between signs and symptoms.

by Harriet94 18.08.13 1:11

I am sure your clients didn't really dismiss this sighting on the basis of" Madeleine didn't have a twitch"

by aiyoyo 18.08.13 9:42

PeterMac wrote:But let us never forget the words of the immortal Clarence on this very subject al those years ago . . .
From Correio da Manhã: A source connected with the investigation guaranteed that the facts told by António Castela were "investigated" and the “lead was proven false”.

Madeleine has no Twitches

Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCanns, reacted yesterday with amazement at the declarations of the taxi-driver. “The declarations of Mr. Castela are false. They are a perfect nonsense. He can only be mistaken when he says that at that time he transported Kate and Madeleine with three men”, he said, underlining the fact of being several independent witnesses who place Madeleine's parents in a completely different place. “How is that possible, if at 20h35 several witnesses say that Kate and Gerry were sitting down on a table of the Tapas restaurant”, he questioned. Clarence doubts of the intentions of the taxi-driver. “It astonishes me that only now, ten months later, [which puts it at March 2008] he talks about this. These are declarations that only cause pain to Kate and Gerry", he said, advancing that that the McCann's daughter has no facial twitches.
“The only sign to report is the one she has in the eye.”
Ah, yes, the eye./ Another foot in mouth by the spokesthing.

And that was a long time ago !

Tony Bassett of Daily Star stated this in his article "McCann family spokesman Clarence Mitchell says the taxi driver’s claims should be investigated."

It seems Clarence cannot make up his mind. Either that, or author made it up.

by jeanmonroe 18.08.13 12:47

Aiyoyo:
"It seems Clarence cannot make up his mind"

Yep! First he's a Labour Party media monitor, for many, many years, and then, lightbulb moment, discovers that he is, and always has been, a caring Conservative!