Re: Truth of the Lie to be published in England - UPDATE article from 2008

by Guest 08.08.13 20:10

Hobs wrote:
[...] "There were no body fluids"

***
And that's where perjury starts [IMO, of course]

by DIBarlow 09.08.13 10:27

Hobs wrote:from the transcripts day 6 pm

9 MRS McCANN: These were desperate times. You know, we were
10 having to try and find our daughter ourselves. We
11 needed all the help we could get, and we were faced
12 with -- I know we'll come on to headlines, but "Corpse
13 in the car"; I don't know how many times I read "Body
14 fluids in the car". And it gets repeated that often, it
15 becomes fact. There were no body fluids. We
16 desperately wanted to shout out "It's not true, it's not
17 true", but when it's your voice against the powerful
18 media, it just doesn't have a weight. We were
19 desperately shouting out internally "Please stop, what
20 are you doing? We're trying to find our daughter and
21 you're stopping our chances of finding her".

The Truth of the Lie.

Conspicuous by it's absence, a categoric statement that "there was no corpse in the car".

Betrayed by her subconscious again?

by Miraflores 09.08.13 10:55

To me lines 9 and 10 cause a question mark - "we were having to find our daughter ourselves". No mention of the people in Portugal who gave up the first week searching, whilst Kate herself admitted that she didn't search the first night at all, until 4 years later she then remembered that she had after all, when she wrote that they resumed their search the next morning.

by Guest 09.08.13 11:05

Thanks for finding that hobs,

They had been sworn in, under oath, and still not capable of telling the truth liar

Mirorflores, more liar

by jozi 09.08.13 11:57

Châtelaine wrote:
Hobs wrote:
[...] "There were no body fluids"
***
And that's where perjury starts [IMO, of course]

I knew it ! Thanks for that hobs clapping

I remember watching this on TV and having a WTF moment !!! So how did they manage to get away with this huge porkie !!!

by jeanmonroe 09.08.13 12:07

Châtelaine wrote:Everyone being questioned at the Leveson inquiry had to swear or solemnly promise to tell the truth. Under such circumstances a lie would be considered perjury.

And that is WHY the McCanns at Leveson never uttered the words 'abducted' or 'abduction' when giving the SWORN evidence they gave in any aspect, or questions, relating to the 'disappearance' of their daughter!

The first and ONLY time they have ever given 'evidence' under OATH!

ONLY Lord Leveson, Robert Jay, QC and David Sherborne (defence) said the words 'abducted or abduction' which the McCanns didn't dispute.

by **PeterMac** 09.08.13 12:46

jeanmonroe wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:Everyone being questioned at the Leveson inquiry had to swear or solemnly promise to tell the truth. Under such circumstances a lie would be considered perjury.
And that is WHY the McCanns at Leveson never uttered the words 'abducted' or 'abduction' when giving the SWORN evidence they gave in any aspect, or questions, relating to the 'disappearance' of their daughter!

The first and ONLY time they have ever given 'evidence' under OATH!

ONLY Lord Leveson, Robert Jay, QC and David Sherborne (defence) said the words 'abducted or abduction' which the McCanns didn't dispute.

And the only other person who has tried to say "abduction" under oath - Mrs Matorell - very clearly and hastily backtracked when asked the incisive question "do you have any evidence ?"
And she was being paid a small fortune to speak on behalf of her clients.

Log in for more topics