McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Legal Issues :: Carter-Ruck: McCanns v Bennett Contempt of Court
Page 1 of 1 • Share
McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
Last night, a friend of mine, who is on good terms with a London barrister, texted the barrister with some details about my impending libel trial, and asking if he might be able to help in some way, pro bono, or perhaps: 'No win, no fee'.
Here is the barrister's (no names, no pack drill) reply, texted to my friend a few minutes ago:
"Tricky one D____. The enormous amount of work and court time would make this impossible for pro bono. No win no fee can only work if a lawyer believes that there is a really good chance of success. Clearly nobody is prepared to come to this conclusion. I fear the poor devil is on his own unless funds can be raised. I wish I could be more optimistic".
Never mind.
David felled Goliath.
Just with one well-aimed blow.
Here is the barrister's (no names, no pack drill) reply, texted to my friend a few minutes ago:
"Tricky one D____. The enormous amount of work and court time would make this impossible for pro bono. No win no fee can only work if a lawyer believes that there is a really good chance of success. Clearly nobody is prepared to come to this conclusion. I fear the poor devil is on his own unless funds can be raised. I wish I could be more optimistic".
Never mind.
David felled Goliath.
Just with one well-aimed blow.
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Re: McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
Tony Bennett wrote:Last night, a friend of mine, who is on good terms with a London barrister, texted the barrister with some details about my impending libel trial, and asking if he might be able to help in some way, pro bono, or perhaps: 'No win, no fee'.
Here is the barrister's (no names, no pack drill) reply, texted to my friend a few minutes ago:
"Tricky one D____. The enormous amount of work and court time would make this impossible for pro bono. No win no fee can only work if a lawyer believes that there is a really good chance of success. Clearly nobody is prepared to come to this conclusion. I fear the poor devil is on his own unless funds can be raised. I wish I could be more optimistic".
Never mind.
David felled Goliath.
Just with one well-aimed blow.
That's the spirit Tony
I am quietly optimistic that as far truth is concerned, you won't lose this one.
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
Tony, I applaud your spirit and optimism. I wish you success, but I fear that CR and the ass UK libel laws may win out in the end.
Can I suggest that members here consider lending their support to the campaign below, it only takes a few seconds and costs nothing (unless you want to make a donation).
http://www.libelreform.org/sign
Can I suggest that members here consider lending their support to the campaign below, it only takes a few seconds and costs nothing (unless you want to make a donation).
http://www.libelreform.org/sign
Da Troof- Posts : 80
Activity : 88
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-09-29
Re: McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
I agree ShuBob.ShuBob wrote:Tony Bennett wrote:Last night, a friend of mine, who is on good terms with a London barrister, texted the barrister with some details about my impending libel trial, and asking if he might be able to help in some way, pro bono, or perhaps: 'No win, no fee'.
Here is the barrister's (no names, no pack drill) reply, texted to my friend a few minutes ago:
"Tricky one D____. The enormous amount of work and court time would make this impossible for pro bono. No win no fee can only work if a lawyer believes that there is a really good chance of success. Clearly nobody is prepared to come to this conclusion. I fear the poor devil is on his own unless funds can be raised. I wish I could be more optimistic".
Never mind.
David felled Goliath.
Just with one well-aimed blow.
That's the spirit Tony
I am quietly optimistic that as far truth is concerned, you won't lose this one.
The revelations, almost daily it seems, in this information age, can only be good news for truth-seekers and, by definition, bad news for anyone with something to hide.
I am of the opinion that there is only one party with something to hide in this case.
It also seems to me that the McCanns and their many legal and other representatives (the existence of which tells it's own story) have a penchant for misjudging the mood of 'Joe Public'.
So much so that they have managed, if nothing else, to disprove that hitherto modern-day observation that there is no such thing as 'bad publicity'.
It seems pretty clear from their efforts so far that, for them at least, there certainly is.
And what's more, they can't seem to stop themselves.
One might sum it up with this simple consideration?
IF the McCanns did successfully conclude all of their actions against Tony Bennett, to the point where he was put behind bars and they received yet more money into their already swollen coffers, would it convince anyone to change their opinion of them?
DIBarlow- Posts : 95
Activity : 95
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-10-11
Re: McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
***DIBarlow wrote:[...]
IF the McCanns did successfully conclude all of their actions against Tony Bennett, to the point where he was put behind bars and they received yet more money into their already swollen coffers, would it convince anyone to change their opinion of them?
It might change the minds of a number of fence-sitters, who wonder why such hefty action should be taken against a single person, who very publicly doesn't agree with their version of events ...
Guest- Guest
Re: McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
and who is trying to find out the truth about what happened.Châtelaine wrote:
It might change the minds of a number of fence-sitters, who wonder why such hefty action should be taken against a single person, who very publicly doesn't agree with their version of events ...
Re: McCANN v BENNETT: Barrister's opinion: 'The poor devil is on his own'.
***PeterMac wrote:and who is trying to find out the truth about what happened.Châtelaine wrote:
It might change the minds of a number of fence-sitters, who wonder why such hefty action should be taken against a single person, who very publicly doesn't agree with their version of events ...
Like all of us, PeterMac, bar some fifth column ;-). But he's one of the few, who doesn't work behind a pseudonym and that makes quite a difference, as we see in this case develop. Having said that, I actually think that if this is taken indeed to a full libel trial, he stands the best of chances now to get through. I wish him every success and will help, if I can.
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Celebrity McCann sceptic - Lisa Riley "I've changed my opinion of Kate McCann"
» Breaking news, Gerry McCann is missing [Poor spoof from the highly controversial 'Coleman Experience' - Mod].
» Facts about McCann v. Bennett
» McCann V Bennett case likely to be adjourned
» Breaking news, Gerry McCann is missing [Poor spoof from the highly controversial 'Coleman Experience' - Mod].
» Facts about McCann v. Bennett
» McCann V Bennett case likely to be adjourned
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Legal Issues :: Carter-Ruck: McCanns v Bennett Contempt of Court
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum