Just wondering...

by Guest 28.11.09 17:26

How many of the Tapas conspiritors actually know what happened to Madeleine? Do they think they are covering up neglect and believe the abduction...excluding Tanner and her husband who are in it up to their necks.
And do you think the extended family know what happened? Old mother Heally for example...fat Phil? the odious little twerp John brother of Gerry?
And what of Clarence, Do you think he knows full well or does he believe what he spouts?
Gordon Brown? Do you think he knowingly assisted the cover up of the death of a child or does he think he is helping unfortunate unlucky parents?
Opinions please.

by Guest 28.11.09 17:28

I think they all know that Amaral cocked up right from the start,that he had no interest in trying to explore other ideas that Madeleine was not murdered by the McCanns.

by Guest 28.11.09 17:30

Thanks for that...straight forward opinion without any of the acidic jibes. :flower:

Do you think any of the above think the Mcanns were neglectfull? And do you thinka ny of them thought they were putting Madeleine at risk by sharing her eye defect with the world?
Oh and do you think any of them were blown over by them playing tennis and the way they laughed on her birthday 9 Days later.

by Guest 28.11.09 17:42

Maybe some were critical of the McCanns leaving them alone, we shall never know.

As for the eye defect it was a idea to make people aware what she looked like.

As for laughing, people deal with grief different ways.

by Guest 28.11.09 17:46

murat_fan wrote:Maybe some were critical of the McCanns leaving them alone, we shall never know.

As for the eye defect it was a idea to make people aware what she looked like.

As for laughing, people deal with grief different ways.

The McCanns weren't laughing. They were smiling because people were being kind to them.

by Guest 28.11.09 17:49

I think if taken as an abduction( I dont think it was) but saying it was the eye defect was stupid and put her at danger, she would have become a liability, If the police said to me dont mention her eye because she could be killed for it, I would not want the defect publicised.
Why do you think kate didnt answer the quesions and only the one about hampering the investigation? Whhy the f*ck would the Mc's imagine they should not answer and that they should not be first to be looked at? Its normal to look within the family first.

by Guest 28.11.09 17:50

Sabot wrote:
murat_fan wrote:Maybe some were critical of the McCanns leaving them alone, we shall never know.

As for the eye defect it was a idea to make people aware what she looked like.

As for laughing, people deal with grief different ways.

The McCanns weren't laughing. They were smiling because people were being kind to them.

Are you ebing sracastic? with the absence of facial exression and tone of voice its hard to know.

by Guest 28.11.09 18:06

Nothing ever has been said that the Police said to them not to mention the eye defect.

by Guest 28.11.09 18:17

sym wrote:
Sabot wrote:
murat_fan wrote:Maybe some were critical of the McCanns leaving them alone, we shall never know.

As for the eye defect it was a idea to make people aware what she looked like.

As for laughing, people deal with grief different ways.

The McCanns weren't laughing. They were smiling because people were being kind to them.
Are you ebing sracastic? with the absence of facial exression and tone of voice its hard to know.

Are you being sarcastic? In the absence of grammar, punctuation and correct spelling, it's hard to know.

by Mike 28.11.09 18:40

the dilly must be quite tonight as most of the pro,s are here

by Guest 28.11.09 18:54

Sabot wrote:
sym wrote:
Sabot wrote:
murat_fan wrote:Maybe some were critical of the McCanns leaving them alone, we shall never know.

As for the eye defect it was a idea to make people aware what she looked like.

As for laughing, people deal with grief different ways.

The McCanns weren't laughing. They were smiling because people were being kind to them.
Are you ebing sracastic? with the absence of facial exression and tone of voice its hard to know.

Are you being sarcastic? In the absence of grammar, punctuation and correct spelling, it's hard to know.

Ahh old aesop springs to mind given that this is bin ripping arseholes..
A updated Aesoop fable.Basically the story goes...A lion is walking in the jungle,his fine mane shining in the sunlight, as he walks he hears someone shout "wanker" ( wasnt wanker in the fable but got to be more up to date!).
He looks around and see's nothing, so he carries on, he hears it again and this time see's a scabby, mangy, cowardly hyena hiding behind a bush shouting it to him.
He looked to where the insult came, shook his fine mane and continued about his business,
lol!