"The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: 'Operation Grange' set up by ex-Prime Minister David Cameron
Page 3 of 4 • Share
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
aiyoyo wrote:MRNOODLES wrote:That's the problem if the Smiths past any random person and invented the carrying child bit. You have a random innocent person drawn in, to contradict another person's statement.
Either the sighting was genuine (a random guy carrying his child) or it was a total fabrication.
I can't see it being half-half - half this, half that.
The head-scratcher that Rich Hall has illustrated and laid out so well in his latest film is the fact, you have three separate sitings of a 'person' with near as damn it, the same description. At least 2 or all 3 are cobblers, unravel the origin of who made them up, the case is crackerble.
That is the truly oddest bit - head scratcher bit indeed.
Ya, what are the chances of that ? Slim I'd say, virtually freaky.
Also, I find it strange that M Smith was keen to point out to Mr Hall the exact relationship between him and Murat. But further probing by Mr Hall he refuses to make further contact.
What are the chances of Smith hearing about Hall videos' hot from release?
Again, I'd say the chance is very slim; freaky if coincidence.
Unless he follows forum and became aware through it - very unlikely - or you'd think he'd have communicated his connaissance level of Murat sooner. More likely a malicious TB-dissenter, hot on the heels of TB on the topic of Smithman, bearing a grudge against TB and wishing to get even with him, snitched to MS, mistaken in her 'do-gooder' belief she's fighting justice for the Smiths (and at the same time hoping to get TB into a spot of bother). I tend to the belief he heard from an anti-TB.
The strange bit is not why he made contact to provide clarification, but why he communicated at all, because he didn't seem bothered by rest of the contents.
That's twice (we know of) that Mr Smith has been more bothered about Murat than anything else.
1 His urge to come forward in the first place, only got his backside in gear when Murat was fingered.
2 His urge to contact Mr Hall about 'I'm not his mate' but not fussed about anything else concerning him in the film.
MRNOODLES- Posts : 751
Activity : 1059
Likes received : 298
Join date : 2013-07-04
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Google.Gaspar.Statements wrote:Why would the police reopen a case that was already shelved just to spend over £10million to cover it up?
Good point GGS.
Glad you changed your avatar my hubby thought the last one was a bit noncy.
larsnelson- Posts : 1
Activity : 1
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2015-04-05
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
If I had all the answers aquila and the wherewith-all to do something, I wouldn't be wasting time moaning about everything and anything on this forum. I'm also realistic enough to know that the problem of child abuse can never be entirely eradicated but I can't see any reason why it can't be curtailed, even one tiny life is worth the effort!aquila wrote:Savile was charged with nothing. There is a half arsed, half-hearted inquiry that can't even find an appropriately unbiased person to head it regardless of gender or country of origin who isn't connected either professionally or maritally (is that a word?) to someone who knows someone.Verdi wrote:
It is a repulsive subject but nonetheless has to be addressed. Can't keep pretending it's not going on in the hope it will go away because it won't! The name Savile will be used now with impunity, there is no escape. it happens and will continue to grow unless it's stopped!
What do you suggest can be done?
If you bring this back to the case of Madeleine it points to me that there was someone in PDL who needed to be protected at all cost. It's logical to think this isn't it?
Prevention is always better than cure so a good starting point IMO is in the home environment. There seems to be so much wrong in the general attitude towards parenting these days, children need and deserve consistent love, care and attention, if I may use an expression I don't generally appreciate, it's their right! Children are not an extension to a parents ego, not a substitute for lost youth, they are little people with a whole life ahead. They need guidance and discipline and a happy safe environment to live.
The answer is not giving them a shilling to go play on the railway line or shutting them up in the bedroom to amuse themselves. They need time and attention. Take them out at the weekends as a family to experience the real world, not the artificial world of technology, get the air round their gills, teach them to be creative using the natural world to inspire. More importantly teach them self respect, respect for others, tolerance, self worth, individuality and teach them to be street wise without frightening them to death with tales of goolies lurking on every street corner.
I think also some form of media censorship would be beneficial to society. Not reverting back to the austere doctrine of hypocritical Victorian values but more in line with modern day living. What is considered acceptable these days, a few years ago would be classified as hard porn. I switched the TV on the other day at about 7.00 pm to record something, there was some comedy showing where two guys were ripping the guts out of a body and eating it. One was munching away at a rather suspicious sausagey looking thing "is that his **** you're eating..." I switched off at that point, bit too near dinner for my liking. What with that and these pop stars (in name only) cavorting about like cheap trash it's hardly a good example to children is it? Please don't give me all that carp about the watershed and using the switch, unfortunately all this stuff is easily accessible by kids, even on the bottom shelf magazine department.
It used to be Bill and Ben but now it Britney and Beiber, I know which I prefer and it's not the latter. This brings me to encouraging children to be sex objects, even if only by dressing them in mini versions of the young trollops that dominate the media. If parents didn't succumb to the temptation of sexualising their kids, the market would dry up very rapidly and kids might actually revert to being kids who, in addition to all my other moans, should be allowed to develop at their own pace, after all you wouldn't force feed your child if it wasn't hungry would you? Why encourage kids to be teenagers before their time or teenagers to be adults?
Bet you wish you never asked.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
@ aquila
Sorry, I know I didn't respond to your point directly. I went off on a tangent, kind of typing out loud, trying to put thoughts together starting at the very beginning (cue for a song?), until I realized it's like trying to condense the history of civilization into a few sentences or re-painting Sydney harbour bridge in a few minutes.
I do have a very strong suspicion that this case revolves around child abuse issues and that is the reason why the McCanns and their cohort are being protected. If you look at the trend of recently exposed UK child abuse horrors, as you rightly say, it's all talk and no action, exactly what is happening with the McCanns. IMO something very drastic occurred in Portugal and they were forced to contact the police, maybe as an after thought due to unforeseen circumstances, had it been in the UK like as not the incident would have been hush hushed straight off.
Sorry, I know I didn't respond to your point directly. I went off on a tangent, kind of typing out loud, trying to put thoughts together starting at the very beginning (cue for a song?), until I realized it's like trying to condense the history of civilization into a few sentences or re-painting Sydney harbour bridge in a few minutes.
I do have a very strong suspicion that this case revolves around child abuse issues and that is the reason why the McCanns and their cohort are being protected. If you look at the trend of recently exposed UK child abuse horrors, as you rightly say, it's all talk and no action, exactly what is happening with the McCanns. IMO something very drastic occurred in Portugal and they were forced to contact the police, maybe as an after thought due to unforeseen circumstances, had it been in the UK like as not the incident would have been hush hushed straight off.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Quite agree. I'm not buying into the Textusa convoluting theory about swingers, for the simple reason that it's not illegal and who gives a damn if they were screwing each other anyway? I will pick up on one point though, the Ocean Club resort. Apparently the founders of Warner holidays, originally set out to cater for adult clientèle with special needs so to speak. I know they've since branched out to all sort of theme holidays and destinations but they do pride themselves on the provision of child care arrangements at their various destinations, indicative maybe of the demand for plenty adult free time.Google.Gaspar.Statements wrote:Angelique wrote:HelenMeg
You wrote: "If so, that implies that it was done with their permission..is that what you're thinking?".
I am assuming you are talking about the molestation?
Then it was without their permission IMO. It may have been done and they may have had no choice about covering it up.
Do you honestly believe that if whatever happened to Madeleine was without their permission that they would then be seen laughing, smirking, joking within days? Really? Because if they can be that heartless then, imo, they can be heartless enough to let whatever happened to Madeleine be done with their permission.
Just a thought.
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
[size=10][color=#000000][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Anyone seen today's Daily Mail?[/font][/color][/size]
[size=10]It was at this stage that Janner turned up, unannounced, at Leicester police station in the company of his solicitor, Sir David Napley, who was famed for representing a string of high-profile figures caught up in sex scandals, including Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe, Tory MP Harvey Proctor and Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and member of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange.[/size][size=10]
Read more: [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3054583/The-rape-justice-Damning-new-evidence-Labour-peer-Lord-Janner-s-child-sex-abuse-covered-police-social-workers-20-years.html#ixzz3YGU8AuK1][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=MailOnline]@MailOnline on Twitter[/url] | [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=DailyMail]DailyMail on Facebook[/url][/size]
[size=10]It was at this stage that Janner turned up, unannounced, at Leicester police station in the company of his solicitor, Sir David Napley, who was famed for representing a string of high-profile figures caught up in sex scandals, including Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe, Tory MP Harvey Proctor and Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and member of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange.[/size][size=10]
Read more: [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3054583/The-rape-justice-Damning-new-evidence-Labour-peer-Lord-Janner-s-child-sex-abuse-covered-police-social-workers-20-years.html#ixzz3YGU8AuK1][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=MailOnline]@MailOnline on Twitter[/url] | [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=DailyMail]DailyMail on Facebook[/url][/size]
Guest- Guest
Leicester Police; Child abuse; David Napley et al
[size=10][color=#000000][font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Anyone seen today's Daily Mail?[/font][/color][/size]
[size=10][b]It was at this stage that Janner turned up, unannounced, at Leicester police station in the company of his solicitor, Sir David Napley, who was famed for representing a string of high-profile figures caught up in sex scandals, including Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe, Tory MP Harvey Proctor and Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and member of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange.[/b][/size][size=10]
Read more: [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3054583/The-rape-justice-Damning-new-evidence-Labour-peer-Lord-Janner-s-child-sex-abuse-covered-police-social-workers-20-years.html#ixzz3YGU8AuK1][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=MailOnline]@MailOnline on Twitter[/url] | [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=DailyMail]DailyMail on Facebook[/url][/size]
[size=10][b]It was at this stage that Janner turned up, unannounced, at Leicester police station in the company of his solicitor, Sir David Napley, who was famed for representing a string of high-profile figures caught up in sex scandals, including Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe, Tory MP Harvey Proctor and Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and member of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange.[/b][/size][size=10]
Read more: [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3054583/The-rape-justice-Damning-new-evidence-Labour-peer-Lord-Janner-s-child-sex-abuse-covered-police-social-workers-20-years.html#ixzz3YGU8AuK1][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Follow us: [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=MailOnline]@MailOnline on Twitter[/url] | [url=http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=DailyMail]DailyMail on Facebook[/url][/size]
Guest- Guest
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Portia today @ 11:37 pm
Very interesting, thanks for posting the link, perfect illustration of the mass cover-up that's going on and rocking the very foundations of un-Great Britain, such magnitude the McCanns are swallowed up into oblivion as mere small fry, if it's possible to turn a blind eye to key players in the running of our lives, the McCanns are an insipid garnish, a poor mans tartar source.
Still, you know what they say about sprats being bait for bit brother, the mackeral.
Very interesting, thanks for posting the link, perfect illustration of the mass cover-up that's going on and rocking the very foundations of un-Great Britain, such magnitude the McCanns are swallowed up into oblivion as mere small fry, if it's possible to turn a blind eye to key players in the running of our lives, the McCanns are an insipid garnish, a poor mans tartar source.
Still, you know what they say about sprats being bait for bit brother, the mackeral.
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Google.Gaspar.Statements wrote:Angelique wrote:HelenMeg
You wrote: "If so, that implies that it was done with their permission..is that what you're thinking?".
I am assuming you are talking about the molestation?
Then it was without their permission IMO. It may have been done and they may have had no choice about covering it up.
Do you honestly believe that if whatever happened to Madeleine was without their permission that they would then be seen laughing, smirking, joking within days? Really? Because if they can be that heartless then, imo, they can be heartless enough to let whatever happened to Madeleine be done with their permission.
I don't know why they were able to be seen "laughing, smirking, joking" - nor can I understand why they looked so completely distraught in their first interview to the media outside 5a and then seen laughing coming out of the Church. Maybe they are good actors or cold as ice. I do think they had no choice in the matter.
____________________
Things aren't always what they seem
Angelique- Posts : 1396
Activity : 1460
Likes received : 42
Join date : 2010-10-19
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
larsnelson wrote:Google.Gaspar.Statements wrote:Why would the police reopen a case that was already shelved just to spend over £10million to cover it up?
Good point GGS.
Glad you changed your avatar my hubby thought the last one was a bit noncy.
Your hubby thought a picture of Madeleine looked a bit noncy did he?
Google.Gaspar.Statements- Posts : 365
Activity : 701
Likes received : 238
Join date : 2013-05-15
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Verdi wrote:If I had all the answers aquila and the wherewith-all to do something, I wouldn't be wasting time moaning about everything and anything on this forum. I'm also realistic enough to know that the problem of child abuse can never be entirely eradicated but I can't see any reason why it can't be curtailed, even one tiny life is worth the effort!aquila wrote:Savile was charged with nothing. There is a half arsed, half-hearted inquiry that can't even find an appropriately unbiased person to head it regardless of gender or country of origin who isn't connected either professionally or maritally (is that a word?) to someone who knows someone.Verdi wrote:
It is a repulsive subject but nonetheless has to be addressed. Can't keep pretending it's not going on in the hope it will go away because it won't! The name Savile will be used now with impunity, there is no escape. it happens and will continue to grow unless it's stopped!
What do you suggest can be done?
If you bring this back to the case of Madeleine it points to me that there was someone in PDL who needed to be protected at all cost. It's logical to think this isn't it?
Prevention is always better than cure so a good starting point IMO is in the home environment. There seems to be so much wrong in the general attitude towards parenting these days, children need and deserve consistent love, care and attention, if I may use an expression I don't generally appreciate, it's their right! Children are not an extension to a parents ego, not a substitute for lost youth, they are little people with a whole life ahead. They need guidance and discipline and a happy safe environment to live.
The answer is not giving them a shilling to go play on the railway line or shutting them up in the bedroom to amuse themselves. They need time and attention. Take them out at the weekends as a family to experience the real world, not the artificial world of technology, get the air round their gills, teach them to be creative using the natural world to inspire. More importantly teach them self respect, respect for others, tolerance, self worth, individuality and teach them to be street wise without frightening them to death with tales of goolies lurking on every street corner.
I think also some form of media censorship would be beneficial to society. Not reverting back to the austere doctrine of hypocritical Victorian values but more in line with modern day living. What is considered acceptable these days, a few years ago would be classified as hard porn. I switched the TV on the other day at about 7.00 pm to record something, there was some comedy showing where two guys were ripping the guts out of a body and eating it. One was munching away at a rather suspicious sausagey looking thing "is that his **** you're eating..." I switched off at that point, bit too near dinner for my liking. What with that and these pop stars (in name only) cavorting about like cheap trash it's hardly a good example to children is it? Please don't give me all that carp about the watershed and using the switch, unfortunately all this stuff is easily accessible by kids, even on the bottom shelf magazine department.
It used to be Bill and Ben but now it Britney and Beiber, I know which I prefer and it's not the latter. This brings me to encouraging children to be sex objects, even if only by dressing them in mini versions of the young trollops that dominate the media. If parents didn't succumb to the temptation of sexualising their kids, the market would dry up very rapidly and kids might actually revert to being kids who, in addition to all my other moans, should be allowed to develop at their own pace, after all you wouldn't force feed your child if it wasn't hungry would you? Why encourage kids to be teenagers before their time or teenagers to be adults?
Bet you wish you never asked.
Great post Verdi
Google.Gaspar.Statements- Posts : 365
Activity : 701
Likes received : 238
Join date : 2013-05-15
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Not "permission", no.HelenMeg wrote:But do you think Rachel, Fiona, Jane Kate and anyone else in the know amongst the 60 guests would club together and hide the fact that a 3 year old had been sexually abused...by one of them? Obviously if Madeleine had been sexually abused and died, the perpetrators would have needed it to be covered up but what I am saying is, do you really think that all of the guests/ friends / parents would cover it up?Mark Willis wrote:Yes, I do believe they would hide it, it's not something you'd want anyone to know is it?HelenMeg wrote:"As a theory it works when you consider the Gaspars, the bathing, Payne's "Pact" his call to that child line body, the adult-applied make up to Maddie. A horrid thought but then the truth can hurt.
All that and the notorious page 129 of Kate's bewk.
I feel ill as I type this but if this is what it is all about then let's say I wouldn't be exactly surprised." snipped from above post by MarkWillis
But also please consider that this is perhaps what they, Team Mc Cann, would like you to think.
There are people who want the truth to be hidden at all costs. They will certainly be aiming that we are discussing plenty of red herrings. They will be feeding us lots of red herrings so that we spend time discussing them and being distracted by them.. How do we tell what is a red herring and what isnt ?
So if this really was about M being abused at the age of three whilst on holiday and dying from it - do you realy think all these people would have hidden it and made sure it remained hidden? I dont - not for one minute. all imo
Look at the Westminster Inquiry. May made certain she delayed; 1st by appointing a blatantly unsuitable person: 2nd she did the same again; Thirdly delayed by the forthcoming election.
Why did Blair slap a D-notice on Op Ore? That was a rhetorical question btw.
It is an entirely plausible theory although I grant you, the Mcs et al are masters of deflection, like the neglect-and-check nonsense we all swallowed for way too long.
If so, that implies that it was done with their permission..is that what you're thinking?
More like they are covering their own backsides and fear for what may happen to themselves should they break ranks.
Mark Willis- Posts : 638
Activity : 885
Likes received : 239
Join date : 2014-05-14
Age : 69
Location : Beverley
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
As someone else posted, I can't now remember who or where
IF abandoning 3 children all under the age of 4 for 5 nights in succession,
in a cold and dark and unlocked apartment, out of eyesight and earshot
in a foreign country, in a small village where you fear there may be burglars and paed*****
is their DEFENCE
What the hell is the Crime ?
IF abandoning 3 children all under the age of 4 for 5 nights in succession,
in a cold and dark and unlocked apartment, out of eyesight and earshot
in a foreign country, in a small village where you fear there may be burglars and paed*****
is their DEFENCE
What the hell is the Crime ?
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Snipped from Verdi's post:
"It used to be Bill and Ben but now it Britney and Beiber, I know which I prefer and it's not the latter. This brings me to encouraging children to be sex objects, even if only by dressing them in mini versions of the young trollops that dominate the media. If parents didn't succumb to the temptation of sexualising their kids, the market would dry up very rapidly and kids might actually revert to being kids who, in addition to all my other moans, should be allowed to develop at their own pace, after all you wouldn't force feed your child if it wasn't hungry would you? Why encourage kids to be teenagers before their time or teenagers to be adults?"
I would add to that - it used to be Nursery Rhymes now it seems some think it acceptable to sing along to Pussy Cat Doll songs such as Don't Cha.
Never heard the likes.
Don't cha wish your girlfriend was hot like me. I certainly do not think it is an appropriate song for such young children to be listening to.
"It used to be Bill and Ben but now it Britney and Beiber, I know which I prefer and it's not the latter. This brings me to encouraging children to be sex objects, even if only by dressing them in mini versions of the young trollops that dominate the media. If parents didn't succumb to the temptation of sexualising their kids, the market would dry up very rapidly and kids might actually revert to being kids who, in addition to all my other moans, should be allowed to develop at their own pace, after all you wouldn't force feed your child if it wasn't hungry would you? Why encourage kids to be teenagers before their time or teenagers to be adults?"
I would add to that - it used to be Nursery Rhymes now it seems some think it acceptable to sing along to Pussy Cat Doll songs such as Don't Cha.
Never heard the likes.
Don't cha wish your girlfriend was hot like me. I certainly do not think it is an appropriate song for such young children to be listening to.
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Nicked (pardon the word) from a press re-hash of Crimewatch 2013:PeterMac wrote:As someone else posted, I can't now remember who or where
IF abandoning 3 children all under the age of 4 for 5 nights in succession,
in a cold and dark and unlocked apartment, out of eyesight and earshot
in a foreign country, in a small village where you fear there may be burglars and paed*****
is their DEFENCE
What the hell is the Crime ?
The McCanns were asked how they dealt with their feelings from that fateful night.
Gerry said: “Maybe I’ll say it first because I think I realized really early on that ifs, buts, maybes could just eat away at you – and it doesn’t change what’s happened.
“It’s almost been a mantra for me – to look forward and always look forward at what can still be done.”
But Kate revealed that their decision to eat out at the tapas restaurant had preyed on her mind for years.
She said: “I think it took me longer to get to that point and I did persecute myself over the decision.
“Why did we think that was OK? Obviously, with hindsight, but then as Gerry said it doesn’t help.
"It doesn’t help us, it doesn’t help Madeleine and ultimately it’s not us that’s committed this crime – it’s the person who’s taken a little girl away from her family. ”
***
There you have it from the mouth of St Katherine the Grate..... It was them that done it! Or as I believe Gerry said at some stage 'if Madeleine hurt herself while we weren't there, how can that be our fault'.
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Precisely!plebgate wrote:Snipped from Verdi's post:
"It used to be Bill and Ben but now it Britney and Beiber, I know which I prefer and it's not the latter. This brings me to encouraging children to be sex objects, even if only by dressing them in mini versions of the young trollops that dominate the media. If parents didn't succumb to the temptation of sexualising their kids, the market would dry up very rapidly and kids might actually revert to being kids who, in addition to all my other moans, should be allowed to develop at their own pace, after all you wouldn't force feed your child if it wasn't hungry would you? Why encourage kids to be teenagers before their time or teenagers to be adults?"
I would add to that - it used to be Nursery Rhymes now it seems some think it acceptable to sing along to Pussy Cat Doll songs such as Don't Cha.
Never heard the likes.
Don't cha wish your girlfriend was hot like me. I certainly do not think it is an appropriate song for such young children to be listening to.
What about that dreadful creature that's always got it's tongue hanging out? I once read complaints made by parents (mostly mothers) about her disgusting performance at a live concert, that's after they had paid to go see the thing! I mean, come on! Her half naked body is frequently featured in the tabloids so what the hell did they expect, Mary Poppins?
Flicking through any brain dead magazine these days is like looking at a mail order catalogue for Victorian porcelain dolls. They all look the same, no individuality. False hair false body bits false nails false warpaint false teeth - and that's only the guys!
I'm sure there a thousand more examples waiting to be on the list but I'll get a flea in my ear for derailing the thread .
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Fair points one and all.Verdi wrote:Portia today @ 11:37 pm
Very interesting, thanks for posting the link, perfect illustration of the mass cover-up that's going on and rocking the very foundations of un-Great Britain, such magnitude the McCanns are swallowed up into oblivion as mere small fry, if it's possible to turn a blind eye to key players in the running of our lives, the McCanns are an insipid garnish, a poor mans tartar source.
Still, you know what they say about sprats being bait for bit brother, the mackeral.
There are cover ups and ' Establishment ' cover ups.
Lord Janner it appears was capable of signing for his House of Lords appearance payments but he is allegedly in
no position to answer questions to the police about the allegations the police wish to question him about.
Doanald Rumsfeld was asked by a Senate Committee as to whatt happened to roughly 2 trillion ( yes trillion ) Dollars of American peoples money and he replied that he didn't know.
He ( like Mr Janner ) was quizzed no further.
The media quizzed no further and that was that and this is this.
So, in my opinion it is the same case with the missingness of Madeleine.
Mr Amaral and his team queried it and since then it has not been queried.
There's a search alright but not the one we think it should be.
For myself it is reasonably simple:
The Public ( not media driven - nor Mitchell driven ) statement from Scotland Yard is to treat the " abduction " as if it happened in the UK.
Unless the parents of missing Madeleine were at odds over her ownership then this means that someone else abducted her.
This is how simple the investigation is to me.
Unless Operation Grange have a remit we don't know about - say: this is what we are saying officially for media and public consumption but really we are closing the net on the real perpetrators then that is all there is.
The truth is in my opinion is that you don't need a whitewash - you need time and fading memories.
From the person who was in charge of Public Safety at Hillsborough to Mr Janner et al that's all you need until you are dead.
Then they can convict all they like in the media whether the story is true or not.
The problem in this particular case is that this is going to take a long time to emerge.
p.s. As was the case with the Leicester Police initially and currently as far as I know, the Official Secrets Act is signed when you sign to be a copper.
Does it really need restating and signing?
If so- what for?
XTC- Posts : 210
Activity : 210
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2014-03-23
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
The thing I find most amazing is this .. The leicister police group who worked alongside PJ in fact totally agreed with them ,how is that not talked about today . Does it mean that out of the blue leic. policwe called back here and then no more is said about them being part of the helping pj to start with and agreeing in all matters I think .? joyce1938
joyce1938- Posts : 890
Activity : 1013
Likes received : 124
Join date : 2010-04-20
Age : 85
Location : england
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
XTC
You wrote:
"The truth is in my opinion is that you don't need a whitewash - you need time and fading memories."
Totally agree.
I have thought this for some time.
I think the bashing of doubters etc., the BL tragedy, the SP and now the JK are all about this.
We are still here, on Facebook, Twitter across the pond etc.
The way to deal with something that wont go away until all are long gone (dead) is to keep threatening them and make critical docu's about "us". They also get a slice of the ummm, takings.
You wrote:
"The truth is in my opinion is that you don't need a whitewash - you need time and fading memories."
Totally agree.
I have thought this for some time.
I think the bashing of doubters etc., the BL tragedy, the SP and now the JK are all about this.
We are still here, on Facebook, Twitter across the pond etc.
The way to deal with something that wont go away until all are long gone (dead) is to keep threatening them and make critical docu's about "us". They also get a slice of the ummm, takings.
____________________
Things aren't always what they seem
Angelique- Posts : 1396
Activity : 1460
Likes received : 42
Join date : 2010-10-19
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
it’s not us that’s committed this crime
This is close, that is distancing
This is close, that is distancing
____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
HelenMeg wrote:But do you think Rachel, Fiona, Jane Kate and anyone else in the know amongst the 60 guests would club together and hide the fact that a 3 year old had been sexually abused...by one of them? Obviously if Madeleine had been sexually abused and died, the perpetrators would have needed it to be covered up but what I am saying is, do you really think that all of the guests/ friends / parents would cover it up?Mark Willis wrote:Yes, I do believe they would hide it, it's not something you'd want anyone to know is it?HelenMeg wrote:"As a theory it works when you consider the Gaspars, the bathing, Payne's "Pact" his call to that child line body, the adult-applied make up to Maddie. A horrid thought but then the truth can hurt.
All that and the notorious page 129 of Kate's bewk.
I feel ill as I type this but if this is what it is all about then let's say I wouldn't be exactly surprised." snipped from above post by MarkWillis
But also please consider that this is perhaps what they, Team Mc Cann, would like you to think.
There are people who want the truth to be hidden at all costs. They will certainly be aiming that we are discussing plenty of red herrings. They will be feeding us lots of red herrings so that we spend time discussing them and being distracted by them.. How do we tell what is a red herring and what isnt ?
So if this really was about M being abused at the age of three whilst on holiday and dying from it - do you realy think all these people would have hidden it and made sure it remained hidden? I dont - not for one minute. all imo
Look at the Westminster Inquiry. May made certain she delayed; 1st by appointing a blatantly unsuitable person: 2nd she did the same again; Thirdly delayed by the forthcoming election.
Why did Blair slap a D-notice on Op Ore? That was a rhetorical question btw.
It is an entirely plausible theory although I grant you, the Mcs et al are masters of deflection, like the neglect-and-check nonsense we all swallowed for way too long.
If so, that implies that it was done with their permission..is that what you're thinking?
I suspect that there was abuse and then medical neglect. It's that bad, imo.
I think she was drugged and sexually abused. The hugely dodgy 'Lolita' style pictures released later also lead me to suspect that there was or had been some filming of child porn. Kate herself refers often to this very subject in her book.
I fear that Madeleine was sedated but woke up during an incident (regrettably an incident relating to the above). She became hysterical and inconsolable. Perhaps, imo, Kate or someone (Gerry?) 'clobbered' her (one of the male tapasniks actually used this word in one of the rogatories). I think both Kate and Gerry have issues with anger management and this I suspect was compounded by heavy alcohol use that week.
If the report that appeared in the Portuguese press that Madeleine is not Gerry's biological father is true, then that might explain why Madeleine was treated differently to the twins. Although I have to say that Gerry's interactions with Amelie that I have seen in the Madeleine was Here series suggest to me that he treats her very differently to Sean.
But back to the crying incident. Kate in an early media interview becomes visibly agitated when discussing the incident in which Madeleine work up one night. Kate even mimes vigorously shaking Madeleine's shoulders as she says she should have found out what woke Madeleine up. Kate repeats: "What do you mean you woke up?" in a distressed fashion. This is clearly a very sensitive subject. And I suspect Kate chose not to find out what had distressed Madeleine so deeply.
In the media interview, Gerry looks on with an expression that is not unlike that of a naughty schoolboy shrugging his shoulders as if to say: "what can you do?" and then says something like: "She just dropped it," which is supposed to convey that Madeleine just dropped the subject the next morning. It actually sounds as though he says: "She just dropped dead," which I would imagine is what he wanted to convey to those of the group who knew something terrible had happened, but did not know quite what, perhaps. (Female tapas perhaps?) Gerry and David Payne (and the other male tapas, perhaps?) could have pretended there had been an accident or an overdose - certainly to the wider family members, imo.
I suspect that by the next morning after the crying incident Madeleine was in no fit state. Hence the Mcs are so keen to make it appear that everything was fine the next morning and indeed in subsequent days right up until Thursday evening. I suspect she was very far from fine and this group of despicable doctors not only did not try to save her, but one or several of them deliberately silenced her.
The Mcs keenness to minimize the crying incident suggests to me it was pivotal to what happened that week.
It is horrible to contemplate this but this must be a scenario that is not that unusual in child abuse cases. An abused child is deliberately silenced so as not to attract attention to the perpetrator/s of the crime. Gerry strikes me as cold, manipulative - a psychopath, imo.
I theorize that Kate, at least, suspects Gerry (and David Payne, maybe even other male tapas?) are paedos but psychologically she cannot/could not admit this to herself. For all sorts of reasons not the least of which is that the father of her three (now two) children could be put behind bars. And having to confront the reality, imo, that one of her children would still be alive today if she had made a better choice of partner.
A theory, as always. And I would like to be wrong because it is horrible to contemplate such things. But every single utterance from either Kate or Gerry leads me to believe that they are BOTH complicit in what happened but just in slightly different ways.
And if my theory that Kate has adopted the ostrich approach with regard to her suspicions is correct, then that would tie in with the theory that it might have been Kate who lashed out at Madeleine in anger. Silencing the messenger. Again, I would imagine that this is not that unusual in child abuse cases where the father is very domineering and the mother of the children is in denial and/or weak/narcissistic (with regard to the latter both the Mcs are, imo).
j.rob- Posts : 2243
Activity : 2511
Likes received : 266
Join date : 2014-02-02
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
roy rovers wrote:Tony Bennett wrote:Point taken and agreed re the Apollo moon landings.roy rovers wrote:The problem with conspiracy theories is the impossibility and logistics of keeping all the actors silent after the event. Take the theory that the Apollo moon landings were faked...It would have directly involved thousands and even more thousands of others would be 'in the know'.
But, how many were involved or were 'in the know' about (Sir) Jimmy Savile?
How many were involved or were 'in the know' about (Sir) Cyril Smith?
How many were involved or were 'in the know' about, say, Lord Brittan?
And what is the common denominator in all the above?
The rape and abuse of young children.
Some of the top people who do this are devious, manipulative, and powerful - and they 'control what comes out in the media'.
Yes but these were conspiracies of silence not active conspiracies to pervert the course of justice.
I think the T9 are involved in a conspiracy to conceal the truth about what happened to MM but how wide does the conspiracy stretch? I doubt Rupert Murdoch is in on it. IMO he just wants to sell newspapers - firstly with the abduction story and no doubt later with another story that he is sitting on waiting for the public mood to change so that he can profit from that too.
I think there was a pre-arranged plan for a media abduction hoax designed to sell papers and usher in more state control. Plus induce paranoia. This got messed up, imo. Or was deliberately sabotaged. Maybe a bit of both. It got messed up by the Mcs and then someone sabotaged the hoax, realizing it was far darker than it seemed.
j.rob- Posts : 2243
Activity : 2511
Likes received : 266
Join date : 2014-02-02
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Hobs wrote:it’snotus that’s committed this crime
This is close, that is distancing
I think that quite often with TM that if you remove the negative or turn the positive into negative, you get the truth. It's that simple. TM are really very unsubtle.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
j.rob- Posts : 2243
Activity : 2511
Likes received : 266
Join date : 2014-02-02
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
j.rob today @ 5:08 pm
Excellent stuff, I can only find fault with one aspect - Kate Mccann. I know it's not unusual for a spouse or other close relative to go into denial where abuse is going on the the family home but I can't be convinced that Kate is one. Her Oscar winning performances are not true to life, I feel theatrical comedy/tragedy masks would be more appropriate to her public persona.
Her words and behaviour have shown her to be a cold and calculating, vindictive, a narcissistic all round thoroughly evil woman. Don't forget, she knows what happened because she was there! There was a pact.
Excellent stuff, I can only find fault with one aspect - Kate Mccann. I know it's not unusual for a spouse or other close relative to go into denial where abuse is going on the the family home but I can't be convinced that Kate is one. Her Oscar winning performances are not true to life, I feel theatrical comedy/tragedy masks would be more appropriate to her public persona.
Her words and behaviour have shown her to be a cold and calculating, vindictive, a narcissistic all round thoroughly evil woman. Don't forget, she knows what happened because she was there! There was a pact.
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: "The Madeleine McCann Case and Occam's Razor"
Graham Ovenden, convicted con-artiste
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Gerry and Kate McCann, unconvicted con-artists
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Gerry and Kate McCann, unconvicted con-artists
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» Why would you need to cover up a child's death?
» Was Madeleine seen after Sunday?
» Colin Sutton: Met only interested in proving McCann parents innocent
» Letters: The Madeleine McCann case (The Independent)
» Jonbenet Ramsey case vs Madeleine McCann case
» Was Madeleine seen after Sunday?
» Colin Sutton: Met only interested in proving McCann parents innocent
» Letters: The Madeleine McCann case (The Independent)
» Jonbenet Ramsey case vs Madeleine McCann case
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: 'Operation Grange' set up by ex-Prime Minister David Cameron
Page 3 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum