The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™️ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Cristobell on 23.06.14 20:42

My latest blog.  As always, no probs if someone wants to copy it over.  smilie 

http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/seven-years-on-and-still-no-evidence-of.html

Cristobell

Posts : 2436
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2011-10-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Justformaddie on 23.06.14 21:02

Cristobell wrote:My latest blog.  As always, no probs if someone wants to copy it over.  smilie 

http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/
Cristobell, I just put that on my fb page, great post and I hope you don't mind!

____________________
Parents=protection high5 
avatar
Justformaddie

Posts : 540
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2014-05-13
Location : On my iPad

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Woofer on 23.06.14 22:02

Copied over ...... thanks Cristobell - well said.

For 7 years now, the UK's great, good and influential have promoted Kate and Gerry McCann as the victims of an inferior nation's corrupt police force. They have shamelessly exploited the little englander prejudices of the nation's tabloid headline skimmers, to promote a mythical lost child and a couple who's happiness depends on the public's love for them. 

Madeleine's abduction was manna from heaven for those who would have us believe child predators lurk on every corner and that there is an all pervading evil at the heart of the internet.  Freedom of information is bad for us, but no-one's going to buy that, so they tell us our children are in danger and we all take up arms and hand over our DNA.  Therein lies the conspiracy.

The abduction 'Lie' worked as well for the authorities as it did for the parents. Here was tangible proof that our youngest and most vulnerable are at constant risk from strangers.  The government were shamelessly preying on our primal instincts to protect our young over ourselves (take note K&G). Kate and Gerry's flying the flag for Amber Alert (and eventual microchipping) went hand in hand with their 'search' for Madeleine. So too the McCanns' enthusiasm for restrictions on our 'free' press.  They volunteered for the Leveson Enquiry, wrote the scripts for Hacked Off and put on their best hang dog expressions as 'victims' of what freedom of speech can do when you let it run wild.

But lets start at the beginning.  The show case opened in a huge blaze of publicity, the like of which we have never seen before.  Everyone wanted to help, and wanted to be seen helping.  Nothing like a 'good cause' to boost one's popularity. Every canny politician,  pope, newspaper baron and dodgy policeman wanted a big slice of the popular Missing Maddie pie.  An attractive, cherubic tot, stolen from the safety of her bed hit a nerve with the public.  We all put our kids to bed and expect them to be safe, the public's outrage at the scenario put forward by the McCanns blinded many to the reality of what actually happened. 

The McCanns left 3 children under the age of 4 alone in their holiday apartment every night.  The Tapas bar, was nothing like 'eating in your back garden', it was out of sight and sound and the danger to the children was further increased by the patio doors being left open.  Their claim that they checked on their children every half hour is questionable, one witness claimed that one night she heard a child crying for over an hour. 

Normal parents don't do that, and it shames those who claimed they did.  It is child endangerment and it is cruel by any nationality's standards, including those of the British. The biggest danger to toddlers left on their own in an unfamiliar apartment is an accidental fall - it is a zillion times more likely than a random paedophile stumbling across an unlocked door.

Why did so many journalists dismiss the 'neglect' angle as an 'easy mistake' and 'something we all do'?  In their efforts to spare the parents' feelings, the neglect element of this case was completely whitewashed and with it the opportunity to point out the dangers in leaving babies unattended.  They opted to promote an irrational fear of child predators so that young families could never enjoy a relaxing holiday again. 

During the course of the original PJ investigation, and at the suggestion of the British police, Scotland Yard's top blood and cadaver dogs were brought in. They alerted behind the sofa in the front room, in the wardrobe of the parents' bedroom, to items belonging to Kate, including 'Cuddlecat' and to the hire car. They only alerted to McCann related items - nowhere else.  As they did not find a body, this is only deemed 'intelligence', but it takes a huge stretch of the imagination to accept Gerry's mantra of 'no evidence Madeleine has come any harm'.

Despite the evidence of the expert dogs, everything pointing towards a fake abduction and the Portuguese police naming Kate and Gerry as Arguidoes (suspects) in the disappearance of their daughter, the McCanns were feted in the UK as the conquering heroes of third world injustice.  The word of the two arguidoes was believed over that of the Portuguese investigating police officers and the Portuguese judiciary and the barks of the dogs.  The McCanns were officially innocent in the eyes of the British establishment and the negative publicity towards the Portuguese police began in earnest. 

But did the Portuguese police bungle the first investigation?  Lets look at the facts.  The first two policemen who arrived on the scene in PDL that night (charmingly re-named Tweedledum and Tweedledee by Kate in her book) described the parents strange behaviour in their statements, and it was later reported that they suspected a staged abduction.    

The PJ conducted the biggest search in Portugal's history for a lost child, and they conducted a thorough investigation (confirmed by the release of the files) and no evidence has ever been found of an abduction.  The only suspects at the end of the original investigation were Robert Murat and Kate and Gerry McCann. 

Contrary to the Team McCann press releases, Kate and Gerry were never cleared, in fact the final report from the Portuguese Attorney General states 'they [the McCanns] lost the opportunity to prove their innocence'

The British press have portrayed the McCanns as the grief stricken parents of a missing child who have done everything in their power to find their daughter, whilst anyone who passes even a cursory glance over the facts of the case will see that Kate McCann stopped answering police questions on 7th September 2007.  They will also see that the McCanns and and their holiday friends refused to return for a reconstruction. In this country such behaviour from a suspect would be described as not co-operating with the police, but in the topsy turvey world of McCann, the fault is seen with the Portuguese investigation rather than the suspects. 

Seven years on and no police force has been able to come up with an abductor, and if those two police forces continue to ignore that which is directly in front of them, then it will continue for another seven years.  Scotland Yard's search for an abductor has been and continues to be as fruitless as the searches by the fraudulent detectives hired by Mr and Mrs McCann. You cannot find someone who doesn't exist, how many times over do the police have to prove that to themselves, before they accept they are looking for the invisible man - a 'Bogey Man' made up by the McCanns to explain their daughter's disappearance. 

They won't find him, because he doesn't exist. He is as fake as the bogey man parents used in the past to scare kids into staying in their rooms and going to sleep.  Now, one of the world's proudest police forces are actively looking for him and the world looks on in wonder.  Perhaps they will also find Peter Pan and the witch who stole Hansel and Gretal. 

This case did not need millions of pounds invested in it, and it didn't need a 37 strong Scotland Yard task force to rubber stamp the Portuguese investigation, or whatever it is they are doing.  In what universe are suspects allowed the option of a second opinion before co-operating with a police investigation? 
The case was solved 7 years ago, indeed some might say, the case was solved that very first night.  Perhaps they should have saved a few million quid and had a quick word with Tweedledum and Tweedledee. 






No disrespect to the GNR officers intended. http://www.mccannfiles.com/id258.html
avatar
Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Woofer on 23.06.14 22:11

They love to use the `bungled` word don`t they.

If anyone botched up the investigation it was TM - right from the get go.
avatar
Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by guest. on 23.06.14 22:55

Good blog, says it all


guest.

Posts : 322
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-08-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Guest on 23.06.14 23:04

thumbup  Cristobell!
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

No evidence of abduction equals evidence of charade

Post by utahagen on 24.06.14 0:31

Great post, Cristobell! Keep telling it like it is!

utahagen

Posts : 38
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2014-02-04

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by kimHager on 24.06.14 19:10

Yes cristobell awesome blog post!! I saw the anon at 5.00 person says they were there in the tapas that night,surely they gave a statement rhen as well....so where is it? IF they were a witness to the dinner/searches why have we no idea whoi is or what they saw? I think your post hit them where it hurts and all you did was post the truth.Bravo!! Keep blogging !

____________________
Kim
avatar
kimHager

Posts : 465
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2014-01-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Iamtheseeker on 24.06.14 19:19

There was no "abduction" , why was Kate busy washing everything soon after the "disappearance? Imo These two made money out of this , they should have been charged for neglect and had the "fund" investigated imo. However , alas , greed got the better of them .Thanks to the blogs people are getting wiser and can see how the pair of doctors and their Tapas 7 , took the people for a ride . As for "pinky" he twisted tales to make them look the victims imo . As for the newspapers? id rather read the beano and get facts from the blogs . Question I ask  do doctors recommend parents to leave under 4 year old children on their own while they go out drinking with their mates? I am sure they don't .

Iamtheseeker

Posts : 93
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-06-24

Back to top Go down

What would be "evidence" of an Abduction

Post by PeterMac on 23.08.14 13:15

A little girl is not in bed
Her parents say she had been in bed

What evidence would we need before we suspected there had been an “Abduction”, as opposed to a Missing Child, or some other scenario
Perhaps we might want one or more of the following

Point of entry,
point of exit,
Broken / forced shutters,
forced window,
footprints on bed under window
scuff marks on shutters,
Intruder’s fingerprints on window
Intruder’s fingerprints on shutters
disturbance to bedding under window
disturbance to bedding used by missing child
Front door open
Intruder’s fingerprints on front door
front door forced
front door tampered with
Intruders’s DNA, anywhere


credible evidence from witness of

sighting of person entering
sighting of person leaving
sighting of person carrying child in immediate vicinity and within the Window of Opportunity

(we would then have to establish that there actually WAS a Window of opportunity - (Tannerman failed this test a long time ago))

Sighting of person disposing of child
Evidence that child had been “sold”
Evidence that a child had been “trafficked”

Discovery of living child
Discovery of body
Discovery of body part

Credible information from informer
Credible information from paid undercover agent
Credible evidence from Security Services
Credible evidence from Police and other agencies which monitor Paedo*** traffic on internet
Credible information from person responding to offer of reward

CCTV


In each case bar one, the result is NIL.
The only thing the Mccanns hung on to for so long was Tannerman - but he was clearly ludicrous given the one minute and twenty seconds, and as result many years were wasted
Small wonder therefore that they are now trying to hang onto Smithman.
Even though his exact status is, how shall one put this politely, IN QUESTION !

Each of these negatives tends to reinforce the opposite hypothesis - that there was NO ABDUCTION.
even Smithman, assuming he existed, would have had to have a Window of Opportunity, to gain entry, and to exit, and to disturb bedding, and to leave prints and DNA . . .
And he didn't

____________________

avatar
PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 171
Join date : 2010-12-06

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Grande Finale on 26.08.14 2:09

DEAD   right !!

So we either have an opportunist paedo who has committed the perfect crime.

Or we have a very clumsily covered up domestic crime.


I know where the evidence points. thumbsup
avatar
Grande Finale

Posts : 139
Reputation : 61
Join date : 2013-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Sam S on 26.08.14 7:03

The fact that they still have custody of the twins and have never been charged with child neglect shows how corrupt our system is. Pedo's and psychopaths at the very highest levels in the departments of government,justice, media and entertainment covering up for each other for decades. I have always believed there is something more than just an alleged "abduction" of a beautiful little girl going on here. I hope the truth will come out, however unpallatable it may be. My opinion only.
avatar
Sam S

Posts : 82
Reputation : 29
Join date : 2014-06-17
Location : Scotland

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by tigger on 26.08.14 17:45

The only comparable event is the abduction of the Lindbergh baby. Wasn't there a theory that Lindbergh himself  had organised it for both money and publicity?  
Well, nobody would believe that because he was a hero - but how was the money situation?  One wonders.
Lindbergh couldn't have had a hand in it because he was a doctor hero, but being good at
medicine flying doesn't mean you would never commit a crime?

The child was found dead but it was never intended to die I understand, I'll have to read up on it.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 47
Join date : 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by Guest on 26.08.14 19:57

I posted on the Lindbergh case recently, saying that the massive publicity when his son went missing was understandable as he was world-famous and considered a hero.

It's not so easy to see why the McCanns were treated in a similar way!

My mother told me that there were thoughts that it was all a publicity stunt gone wrong.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by tigger on 26.08.14 20:38

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324669104578205713435130582


Is an interesting article with photographs. Must say that the ladder against the shutter and carrying what looks to be a hefty baby who didn't cry taxes my belief system.

First time I've read that the child wasn't very healthy. Interesting.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 47
Join date : 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Seven Years On and Still No Evidence of an Abductor

Post by petunia on 26.08.14 21:11

Aww bless his little cotton socks,he does look to have quite a large head but he also looks very unhappy and as bags under his eyes imo.

petunia

Posts : 520
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum