The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Mm11

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Mm11

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Regist10

Photographs revisited - questions

Page 14 of 15 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 13, 14, 15  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket 15.04.16 10:04

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - normally outdoors in bright conditions (not necessarily sun out) the pupils (black inner circles) are at their smallest. The iris controls the amount of light getting into the eye and keeps it at an optimum level for vision - closing the pupil in light conditions and gradually opening it to its widest in the dark. 

Dilated pupils in normal outdoor light conditions (or even indoor brightly lit conditions) is abnormal. The normal response if your pupils are wide in normal daylight (anyone had dilating eyedrops at the opticians will know) is to shade or cover your eyes, as it causes discomfort. See:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Easy to check this out looking in a mirror - close your eyes for a bit or turn the light off (you've got to look quickly as the iris responds quite quickly).

The above sounds slightly patronising - not intended, just thought better to put it simply.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - just seen the photos, cheers for that (got a Mac, which is great but it doesn't like posting photos on here for some reason!).
skyrocket
skyrocket

Posts : 755
Activity : 1537
Likes received : 732
Join date : 2015-06-18

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by JRP 15.04.16 10:22

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] thanks for the link, I understand the question now in the terms you asked.
avatar
JRP

Posts : 601
Activity : 1176
Likes received : 573
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 67
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 28.04.16 22:34

April28th wrote:
Also, adding to my point about the height of Madeleine in relation to L Payne:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Madeleine is actually TALLER than L, who can quite obviously reach the veranda door handle, which we were assured by Kate was impossible.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Conclusion - Madeleine could reach the door handle in 5A easily, which supports the idea that TM were swinging wildly for the fences to make sure everyone bought the abduction theory in the beginning.


I'm having trouble finding Kate's exact quote on this. I feel as though it were a throwaway comment in a documentary but I don't have the heart to sit through hours of that voice. Anyone here able to remember where Kate 'rubbished' the idea that Madeleine could reach the patio/veranda door handle?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by sharonl 22.05.16 9:03

Bumping this this thread because I am curious about these two photographs.  I don't think that they have been tampered with but given the McCanns association with Everton I wondered whether these photos were placed in the media purely as an advert for Everton.  If that was the case, are they genuine or has the shirt been photo-shopped onto her?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
sharonl
sharonl
Forum Owner

Posts : 8643
Activity : 11282
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29

http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D 22.05.16 9:20

I've always suspected they were released as part of the 'good marketing ploy', mirroring the poor Soham girls photos in United shirts.
avatar
Doug D

Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by canada12 22.05.16 9:25

sharonl wrote:Bumping this this thread because I am curious about these two photographs.  I don't think that they have been tampered with but given the McCanns association with Everton I wondered whether these photos were placed in the media purely as an advert for Everton.  If that was the case, are they genuine or has the shirt been photo-shopped onto her?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

If you look at a larger version of the second photo, and look at Madeleine's right shoulder (as she faces us), up near the neckline of the jersey, under her hair, you can see a distinctly different patch of fabric that is a different shade of blue, as well as a different texture.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Either there was a patch job done on the original jersey, or a patch job done on the digital image.
avatar
canada12

Posts : 1461
Activity : 1698
Likes received : 211
Join date : 2013-10-28

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D 22.05.16 9:43

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.
avatar
Doug D

Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by canada12 22.05.16 9:51

Doug D wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.

Nope. Madeleine's shirt is missing the seam that runs down from the neckline along the arm. Plus her shirt is short-sleeved - it's not the same shirt at all.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
avatar
canada12

Posts : 1461
Activity : 1698
Likes received : 211
Join date : 2013-10-28

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket 22.05.16 9:54

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - I've posted this on another thread but no idea where - look at MBM's height in the kitchen shot. We are told she was 90cm but the average worktop height is 90-91cm. If the camera lens is level with her head, she looks about 97cm. If the camera is above her level she would actually be taller than that. Remember the playhouse shot where her head is the height of the door - 98/99cm? was it?
skyrocket
skyrocket

Posts : 755
Activity : 1537
Likes received : 732
Join date : 2015-06-18

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by BarryTheHatchet 22.05.16 10:24

IMO these have been released to appeal to Everton supporters, in the same way that the green and gold colour scheme was designed to appeal to Glasgow Celtic supporters.  At the very beginning, Kate said that the green and gold were the "colours of Portugal" but that story soon changed when somebody pointed out that the "colours of Portugal" are actually green and red.  Suddenly the yellow colour stood for "hope".  Load of bullsh*t, the lot of it, it's corporate marketing in it's most base and crude form.
BTW I think the bottom picture is authentic but the top one is Maddie's head on another child's body.  The angle of the head to the neck is all wrong.

____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
BarryTheHatchet
BarryTheHatchet

Posts : 187
Activity : 443
Likes received : 256
Join date : 2016-05-08

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D 22.05.16 10:32

Long sleeved or short sleeved, they are all made basically the same, with obviously less material for the kids versions which might change the lines slightly.
 
The ‘shoulder seam’ follows the line of the ‘sleeve seam’, which in the photo hits MM right at the top of her visible shoulder, which is why it doesn’t show.
 
In the other photo you can see the shoulder seam:
 
   
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

That's not to say it couldn't have been photoshopped on. I've no idea and her right arm seems remarkably out of focus in this copy of the photo
avatar
Doug D

Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D 22.05.16 10:39

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Shirt being worn.
avatar
Doug D

Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by BarryTheHatchet 22.05.16 10:47

Doug D wrote:
That's not to say it couldn't have been photoshopped on. I've no idea and her right arm seems remarkably out of focus in this copy of the photo
That could just be camera shake, but the placement of the head on top of the neck still bothers me (I would have placed it slightly further back) and there's evidence of a clone tool just above the fingers of the left hand, at the hairline.

____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
BarryTheHatchet
BarryTheHatchet

Posts : 187
Activity : 443
Likes received : 256
Join date : 2016-05-08

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 22.05.16 10:51

canada12 wrote:
Doug D wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.

Nope. Madeleine's shirt is missing the seam that runs down from the neckline along the arm. Plus her shirt is short-sleeved - it's not the same shirt at all.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
It's the same shirt.

Kids kits are sometimes cut differently.

I worked in the industry for 3 years.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by sharonl 22.05.16 10:54

Doug D wrote:Long sleeved or short sleeved, they are all made basically the same, with obviously less material for the kids versions which might change the lines slightly.
 
The ‘shoulder seam’ follows the line of the ‘sleeve seam’, which in the photo hits MM right at the top of her visible shoulder, which is why it doesn’t show.
 
In the other photo you can see the shoulder seam:
 
   
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

That's not to say it couldn't have been photoshopped on. I've no idea and her right arm seems remarkably out of focus in this copy of the photo


Funny you should mention the right arm, to me it looks slightly out of position, but  I may be wrong.
sharonl
sharonl
Forum Owner

Posts : 8643
Activity : 11282
Likes received : 1397
Join date : 2009-12-29

http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 22.05.16 10:58

Here's one on ebay.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Collar is " a different blue" as well.

Another

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by BarryTheHatchet 22.05.16 11:02

It would also depend on whether it was an authentic replica kit, or a cheap knockoff from some Leicester market stall.

____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
BarryTheHatchet
BarryTheHatchet

Posts : 187
Activity : 443
Likes received : 256
Join date : 2016-05-08

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Amy Dean 22.05.16 11:08

I can't imagine Lady Kate slumming it at a market stall!
Amy Dean
Amy Dean

Posts : 553
Activity : 665
Likes received : 108
Join date : 2014-11-13
Location : Wherever I hang my hat

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 22.05.16 11:12

The shirt is too big for her.
The seam starts at the point where the collar starts.
You can see the seam in the other picture.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by pennylane 22.05.16 11:13

Look at Wendy Murphy's head in the above banners.  You could say it looks as if it's been photo shopped onto the neck, and her neck looks rather thin for the head!  Look at John Gaunt's arm and hand, does it not look a bit strange and out of proportion, and what of his other arm, that looks really far back?   My point is you can find lots of oddities in photos if you look close enough.
avatar
pennylane

Posts : 2770
Activity : 4406
Likes received : 1638
Join date : 2009-12-07

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 22.05.16 11:17

BarryTheHatchet wrote:It would also depend on whether it was an authentic replica kit, or a cheap knockoff from some Leicester market stall.
Looks like the real deal to me.

I used to make them. Same company.

Umbro used to sell "replica" kits - not sure it they still call it that.

The actual kits worn by the players were slightly different in terms of quality, and sometimes cut and material.

Certainly in terms of manufacturing care.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by BarryTheHatchet 22.05.16 11:18

Amy Dean wrote:I can't imagine Lady Kate slumming it at a market stall!
Well at least one of her tops she was wearing in Portugal came from Asda!  I know this because I had exactly the same one.  Only bigger, because I have bigger boobs.  So there! big grin

____________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
BarryTheHatchet
BarryTheHatchet

Posts : 187
Activity : 443
Likes received : 256
Join date : 2016-05-08

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by bobbin 22.05.16 12:41

BlueBag wrote:
canada12 wrote:
Doug D wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.

Nope. Madeleine's shirt is missing the seam that runs down from the neckline along the arm. Plus her shirt is short-sleeved - it's not the same shirt at all.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
It's the same shirt.

Kids kits are sometimes cut differently.

I worked in the industry for 3 years.
BlueBag,
I'm shocked. If you worked in the industry all that time how on earth didn't you notice the different type of sleeves.
As someone who has made clothing since the age of 11, including technically the more difficult stuff including cutting on the bias, triangular inserts etc. the sleeves that Doug D's example is showing are 'raglan' style and the shirt Maddie is wearing is conventional.

I would have checked my facts out before claiming to have been in the industry for all that time, or at least kept quiet, for fear of showing such a basic ignorance.
avatar
bobbin

Posts : 2053
Activity : 2240
Likes received : 145
Join date : 2011-12-05

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D 22.05.16 13:04

Bobbin:
 
Not a clothing expert, but if you look at the photo @10.39 where the shirt is actually being worn, I don’t think this is ‘raglan’.
 
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] 

Raglan sleeve from Wiki.

Just a big shirt on a little girl imo.
avatar
Doug D

Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by bobbin 22.05.16 13:38

Not being picky DougD because as you know, I very much respect your posts, keeping us up to date on the political etc. side, including now, the Chilcott report which I hope will deliver what it is claimed to be, by the Times.

However, a raglan sleeve, [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] is one where the sleeve material is tailored and continued over the shoulder to become integrated in/ part of the neck line.

Normally, a basic T shirt will be front and back panels joined together in a seam along the shoulder and the sleeve entered into the armhole at the arm end of the shoulder seam.

A 'raglan' will be a diagonal, whether it continues from (front and back of) neck to right under the arm, to the shirt side seam, or is integrated as part of a more complicated side panel, and/or interesting design feature, with the sleeve extending at any rate into the neck line.

I do wonder if the two photos are of different T shirts nevertheless.

Neither seem to fit her well, and the one does seem to be bigger than the other.

As for the neck triangular piece, it does look like the folded back part (mini collar) of the male adult raglan type insert which constitutes the upper part of the sleeve. What it is doing on the 'conventional' sleeve cut is anybody's guess. The whole thing to my mind is 'publicity'.

I'm more concerned that Maddie has the coloboma in the one photo, which apparently she didn't really have at all, and as Kate says, they (the parents) never really made much of it anyway.
"LOOK" says Kate,  No Coloboma !! spin
avatar
bobbin

Posts : 2053
Activity : 2240
Likes received : 145
Join date : 2011-12-05

Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 22.05.16 14:28

bobbin wrote:
BlueBag wrote:
canada12 wrote:
Doug D wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.

Nope. Madeleine's shirt is missing the seam that runs down from the neckline along the arm. Plus her shirt is short-sleeved - it's not the same shirt at all.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
It's the same shirt.

Kids kits are sometimes cut differently.

I worked in the industry for 3 years.
BlueBag,
I'm shocked. If you worked in the industry all that time how on earth didn't you notice the different type of sleeves.
As someone who has made clothing since the age of 11, including technically the more difficult stuff including cutting on the bias, triangular inserts etc. the sleeves that Doug D's example is showing are 'raglan' style and the shirt Maddie is wearing is conventional.

I would have checked my facts out before claiming to have been in the industry for all that time, or at least kept quiet, for fear of showing such a basic ignorance.
It is a fact that kids kits were sometimes cut differently - they were sometimes simplified.

You can stick your "shocked".

Regardless, the shirt Madeleine is wearing has the seam starting where the collar starts - you can see the seam in one of the photos.

It is too big for her.

I don't see what the problem is, the seam is in the right place in relation to the collar and Madeleine isn't filling the thing.

The seam is in the right place in relation to the collar.

Once again people are making mountains out of molehills over photos.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 22.05.16 14:36

bobbin wrote:

BlueBag,
I'm shocked. If you worked in the industry all that time how on earth didn't you notice the different type of sleeves.
As someone who has made clothing since the age of 11, including technically the more difficult stuff including cutting on the bias, triangular inserts etc. the sleeves that Doug D's example is showing are 'raglan' style and the shirt Maddie is wearing is conventional.

I would have checked my facts out before claiming to have been in the industry for all that time, or at least kept quiet, for fear of showing such a basic ignorance.
Latest England kit from Nike.
Kids and Adults:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Got it?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 23.05.16 0:02

sharonl wrote:Bumping this this thread because I am curious about these two photographs.  I don't think that they have been tampered with but given the McCanns association with Everton I wondered whether these photos were placed in the media purely as an advert for Everton.  If that was the case, are they genuine or has the shirt been photo-shopped onto her?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
More likely something to do with this..

Official Find Madeleine website update - 3rd May 2009 (Anniversary campaign)

[color:b33e=000000]Everton and Sunderland Football Clubs kindly helped us -once again - to remind everyone about Madeleine and the fact that she is still missing. The football community as a whole has helped us hugely over the last two years and we are so grateful for this show of support and solidarity across all clubs and colours. It is incredibly uplifting to have so many supporters with all the passion and pride they display, standing by Madeleine and willing her home. Thank you!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Guest 23.05.16 7:59

bobbin wrote:

BlueBag,
I'm shocked. If you worked in the industry all that time how on earth didn't you notice the different type of sleeves.
As someone who has made clothing since the age of 11, including technically the more difficult stuff including cutting on the bias, triangular inserts etc. the sleeves that Doug D's example is showing are 'raglan' style and the shirt Maddie is wearing is conventional.

I would have checked my facts out before claiming to have been in the industry for all that time, or at least kept quiet, for fear of showing such a basic ignorance.
Seeing as bobbin hasn't bothered to respond to my post (which shows I absolutely do know what I'm talking about), I'll show who is ignorant and who isn't.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Raglan sleeve my bottom.

There is one seam and it joins the front and back panels.

It isn't in the normal place, it is slightly over the shoulder at the front.

The join starts where the collar starts.

Madeleine's collar is sitting on top of her shoulder and that is where the join is.

I'm shocked at the lack of digging some posters are prepared to do.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Photographs revisited - questions - Page 14 Empty Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by canada12 23.05.16 9:02

BlueBag wrote:
bobbin wrote:

BlueBag,
I'm shocked. If you worked in the industry all that time how on earth didn't you notice the different type of sleeves.
As someone who has made clothing since the age of 11, including technically the more difficult stuff including cutting on the bias, triangular inserts etc. the sleeves that Doug D's example is showing are 'raglan' style and the shirt Maddie is wearing is conventional.

I would have checked my facts out before claiming to have been in the industry for all that time, or at least kept quiet, for fear of showing such a basic ignorance.
Seeing as bobbin hasn't bothered to respond to my post (which shows I absolutely do know what I'm talking about), I'll show who is ignorant and who isn't.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Raglan sleeve my bottom.

There is one seam and it joins the front and back panels.

It isn't in the normal place, it is slightly over the shoulder at the front.

The join starts where the collar starts.

Madeleine's collar is sitting on top of her shoulder and that is where the join is.
Except it isn't. There's clearly no seam running from the collar edge down the sleeve. The collar edge is sitting by itself. Madeleine's sleeve is joined to the rest of her t-shirt by a seam that runs all the way around the sleeve. It's visible on both arms.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Also quite visible in this photo - seam going all the way around the sleeve:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
avatar
canada12

Posts : 1461
Activity : 1698
Likes received : 211
Join date : 2013-10-28

Back to top Go down

Page 14 of 15 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 13, 14, 15  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum