The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!

Photographs revisited - questions

Page 16 of 17 Previous  1 ... 9 ... 15, 16, 17  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by pennylane on 13.04.16 9:36

@joyce1938 wrote:The photo of maddie with family eating something, I did not at first think it was her, but realize now it most probably  is her taken from a distance.  Her pink hairband is holding all her fringe and hair back, when we are used to seeing her without and and fringe across face.  I now feel this is her.  joyce1938
Totally agree, that is little Madeleine wearing a headband in the above Donegal pictures!


pennylane

Posts : 2756
Reputation : 1588
Join date : 2009-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Verdi on 13.04.16 12:52

@Tony Bennett wrote:
@pendragon2007 wrote:

I have made a compilation of 3 photos of Madeleine. Left and middle are from Donegal and one on right from PdLuz. Given the clothing in left and middle photos these look like the same person. Does this help with matching to photo 3? Would be grateful for your views.

@ pendragon 2007

Very good. Well done.

By your simple but effective choice of just three photos, you have proved beyond doubt that Madeleine McCann was indeed in Donegal at Easter 2007.

Your post should kill off once and for all any notion that she wasn't.

Admittedly the photo on the left doesn't look like her at all. But that's just one photo, and sometimes just one random photo does not really give a very accurate impression of someone.

The middle photo makes the whole thing crystal clear - thank you again    thumbsup
Was there really ever any doubt?  The one on the left is just a rotten photograph.

The Madeleine photographed at the Ocean Club is the same Madeleine as photographed in Ireland - end of!

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Moderator/Researcher

Posts : 6817
Reputation : 3582
Join date : 2015-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by pennylane on 13.04.16 13:10

Exactly Verdi, end of! yes

pennylane

Posts : 2756
Reputation : 1588
Join date : 2009-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Verdi on 13.04.16 15:28

I can't understand how the subject ever took off - or more to the point why!  If it's some convoluted mode of trying to suggest  Madeleine never existed or there was more than one Madeleine or a substitute Madeleine was taken on that holiday or Madeleine was the result of some genetic experiment or Madeleine was a clone, then the subject is even more bizarre than I ever imagined.

It's embarrassing to witness.

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Moderator/Researcher

Posts : 6817
Reputation : 3582
Join date : 2015-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Verdi on 14.04.16 0:04

At the time of the Portuguese holiday, David Payne's children were three months short of four years and a couple of weeks short of one year.  Within the PJ files, it would seem that David Payne for some reason, had his own little niche allocated for his holiday photograph portfolio.  The first grayscale image that appears in said files features David Payne snuggling two little girls most likely on his balcony - one girl I assume to be his own three year old but who is the other he's bouncing on his knee?  Certainly not his own one year old daughter..

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GREYSCALE_SNAPS.htm

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Moderator/Researcher

Posts : 6817
Reputation : 3582
Join date : 2015-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Amy Dean on 14.04.16 9:08

Lily was coming up to 3 in 2007. The only child in the party who could be the one in the photo is Jane Tanner's daughter.

This is from David Payne's statement in 2008.

Reply "Err yes Scarlet will be two in May and Lily will be four in August.'




avatar
Amy Dean

Posts : 289
Reputation : 88
Join date : 2014-11-13
Location : Wherever I hang my hat

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by joyce1938 on 14.04.16 9:56

I must admit ,there have been times that really dopey things arise from an imagination of what happened ,and as we cant prove it ,it really is not importent.Its seems to have happened  ever,is it because some are looking for answers now.?  Its been a long time now and the same subjects come back up again.I realize we do have new people from time to time ,and i have no doubt , a lot could be answered by at first ,reading all the files that are obtainable ,the maddie case files . Its got to be very confusing and hard work if new folk are trying so hard . in regards joyce1938
avatar
joyce1938

Posts : 847
Reputation : 113
Join date : 2010-04-20
Age : 78
Location : england

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Verdi on 14.04.16 11:59

@Amy Dean wrote:Lily was coming up to 3 in 2007. The only child in the party who could be the one in the photo is Jane Tanner's daughter.

This is from David Payne's statement in 2008.

Reply "Err yes Scarlet will be two in May and Lily will be four in August.'




Yes, quite so - I stand corrected yes !  Never was much good at arifmatick.

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Moderator/Researcher

Posts : 6817
Reputation : 3582
Join date : 2015-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket on 15.04.16 8:38

Apologies can't post photos - if anyone would like to oblige with the following 2 it would be very much appreciated - thanks in advance.

Photo 1: GM and kids on holiday? - I would say summer 2005 (A&S born Feb 2005); MBM about 2 1/4years. Note colour of T Shirt and the folds on GM's right shoulder.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/49may11/SUN113511T.JPG

Photo 2: MBM 'eye shadow' photo - April 2007? Note the blue colour and what looks like a similar fold. MBM possibly sitting on someones knee - I mentioned before how I felt MBM's head may be being held up from behind. I'll also ask now - why are MBM's pupils (clearly visible on magnification) not closed small? Uncomfortable subject.  

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/3yr/mail-1-5-10-mbm.


Links have now been corrected - thanks @pendragon2007 for pointing out.
avatar
skyrocket

Posts : 610
Reputation : 599
Join date : 2015-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by JRP on 15.04.16 8:49

Does anyone else think that the "blue makeup" photo was taken during the Luz holiday?
The official story is it was taken some weeks before. I know many discussions have taken place about this image, but can it be put in the holiday time line?

JRP

Posts : 552
Reputation : 499
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 60
Location : UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket on 15.04.16 9:00

@JRP - as far as I'm aware, the only basis for it being taken in Portugal during the Luz holiday is the fact that it appears to have been taken outdoors and the style of peach stucco wall finish, which is typical of the Med. It is feasible it was taken elsewhere earlier in the month on a warm day. MBM's apparent age would suggest that it is Spring 2007.
avatar
skyrocket

Posts : 610
Reputation : 599
Join date : 2015-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by JRP on 15.04.16 9:35

@skyrocket wrote:Apologies can't post photos - if anyone would like to oblige with the following 2 it would be very much appreciated - thanks in advance.

Photo 1: GM and kids on holiday? - I would say summer 2005 (A&S born Feb 2005); MBM about 2 1/4years. Note colour of T Shirt and the folds on GM's right shoulder.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/3yr/mail-1-5-10-mbm.jpg

Photo 2: MBM 'eye shadow' photo - April 2007? Note the blue colour and what looks like a similar fold. MBM possibly sitting on someones knee - I mentioned before how I felt MBM's head may be being held up from behind. I'll also ask now - why are MBM's pupils (clearly visible on magnification) not closed small? Uncomfortable subject.  

http://portugalresident.com/sites/default/files/styles/node-detail/public/field/image/Madeleine%20McCann_0.jpg?itok=sXox1HOm

What does pupils not closed small mean? Does it indicate a state of health?

JRP

Posts : 552
Reputation : 499
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 60
Location : UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by pendragon2007 on 15.04.16 9:40

Skyrocket - tried to post your photos but both links go to different versions of same photo - will try again later if you change appropriate link. The Gerry on holiday with kids is the wrong link
avatar
pendragon2007

Posts : 50
Reputation : 91
Join date : 2016-04-09
Age : 77
Location : UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket on 15.04.16 9:53

@pendragon 2007 - ooops, thanks for pointing that out. Now corrected.
avatar
skyrocket

Posts : 610
Reputation : 599
Join date : 2015-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by pendragon2007 on 15.04.16 9:59

for skyrocket Post of the photos:-


avatar
pendragon2007

Posts : 50
Reputation : 91
Join date : 2016-04-09
Age : 77
Location : UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket on 15.04.16 10:04

@JRP - normally outdoors in bright conditions (not necessarily sun out) the pupils (black inner circles) are at their smallest. The iris controls the amount of light getting into the eye and keeps it at an optimum level for vision - closing the pupil in light conditions and gradually opening it to its widest in the dark. 

Dilated pupils in normal outdoor light conditions (or even indoor brightly lit conditions) is abnormal. The normal response if your pupils are wide in normal daylight (anyone had dilating eyedrops at the opticians will know) is to shade or cover your eyes, as it causes discomfort. See:

http://www.medicinenet.com/dilated_pupils_mydriasis/symptoms.htm

Easy to check this out looking in a mirror - close your eyes for a bit or turn the light off (you've got to look quickly as the iris responds quite quickly).

The above sounds slightly patronising - not intended, just thought better to put it simply.

@pendragon2007 - just seen the photos, cheers for that (got a Mac, which is great but it doesn't like posting photos on here for some reason!).
avatar
skyrocket

Posts : 610
Reputation : 599
Join date : 2015-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by JRP on 15.04.16 10:22

@skyrocket thanks for the link, I understand the question now in the terms you asked.

JRP

Posts : 552
Reputation : 499
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 60
Location : UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by April28th on 28.04.16 22:34

@April28th wrote:
Also, adding to my point about the height of Madeleine in relation to L Payne:



Madeleine is actually TALLER than L, who can quite obviously reach the veranda door handle, which we were assured by Kate was impossible.



Conclusion - Madeleine could reach the door handle in 5A easily, which supports the idea that TM were swinging wildly for the fences to make sure everyone bought the abduction theory in the beginning.


I'm having trouble finding Kate's exact quote on this. I feel as though it were a throwaway comment in a documentary but I don't have the heart to sit through hours of that voice. Anyone here able to remember where Kate 'rubbished' the idea that Madeleine could reach the patio/veranda door handle?
avatar
April28th

Posts : 335
Reputation : 248
Join date : 2015-07-22

View user profile https://h42a.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by sharonl on 22.05.16 9:03

Bumping this this thread because I am curious about these two photographs.  I don't think that they have been tampered with but given the McCanns association with Everton I wondered whether these photos were placed in the media purely as an advert for Everton.  If that was the case, are they genuine or has the shirt been photo-shopped onto her?




____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4355
Reputation : 774
Join date : 2009-12-29

View user profile http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D on 22.05.16 9:20

I've always suspected they were released as part of the 'good marketing ploy', mirroring the poor Soham girls photos in United shirts.

Doug D

Posts : 2461
Reputation : 847
Join date : 2013-12-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by canada12 on 22.05.16 9:25

@sharonl wrote:Bumping this this thread because I am curious about these two photographs.  I don't think that they have been tampered with but given the McCanns association with Everton I wondered whether these photos were placed in the media purely as an advert for Everton.  If that was the case, are they genuine or has the shirt been photo-shopped onto her?




If you look at a larger version of the second photo, and look at Madeleine's right shoulder (as she faces us), up near the neckline of the jersey, under her hair, you can see a distinctly different patch of fabric that is a different shade of blue, as well as a different texture.



Either there was a patch job done on the original jersey, or a patch job done on the digital image.

canada12

Posts : 1461
Reputation : 200
Join date : 2013-10-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by Doug D on 22.05.16 9:43



I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.

Doug D

Posts : 2461
Reputation : 847
Join date : 2013-12-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by canada12 on 22.05.16 9:51

@Doug D wrote:

I think you'll find it's just this shirt canada12.

Nope. Madeleine's shirt is missing the seam that runs down from the neckline along the arm. Plus her shirt is short-sleeved - it's not the same shirt at all.


canada12

Posts : 1461
Reputation : 200
Join date : 2013-10-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by skyrocket on 22.05.16 9:54

@Canada12 - I've posted this on another thread but no idea where - look at MBM's height in the kitchen shot. We are told she was 90cm but the average worktop height is 90-91cm. If the camera lens is level with her head, she looks about 97cm. If the camera is above her level she would actually be taller than that. Remember the playhouse shot where her head is the height of the door - 98/99cm? was it?
avatar
skyrocket

Posts : 610
Reputation : 599
Join date : 2015-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Photographs revisited - questions

Post by BarryTheHatchet on 22.05.16 10:24

IMO these have been released to appeal to Everton supporters, in the same way that the green and gold colour scheme was designed to appeal to Glasgow Celtic supporters.  At the very beginning, Kate said that the green and gold were the "colours of Portugal" but that story soon changed when somebody pointed out that the "colours of Portugal" are actually green and red.  Suddenly the yellow colour stood for "hope".  Load of bullsh*t, the lot of it, it's corporate marketing in it's most base and crude form.
BTW I think the bottom picture is authentic but the top one is Maddie's head on another child's body.  The angle of the head to the neck is all wrong.

____________________
avatar
BarryTheHatchet

Posts : 187
Reputation : 256
Join date : 2016-05-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 16 of 17 Previous  1 ... 9 ... 15, 16, 17  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum