The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Mm11

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Mm11

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Regist10

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Page 1 of 8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by sallypelt 07.12.13 17:26

These are interesting tweets from Jon Tait.



 

  1. [ltr]jontaito[/ltr]23m
    4/4 #mccann pic.twitter.com/Y55KDIiSNF


    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Ba5dIb6IIAAIls3



     Expand

    •  Reply 
    •  Retweet 
    •  Favorite 
    •  More
[color][font]
  • Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman 1d1767ccd2a316d79761d9d022d7d4a4_normalJon Tait ‏[ltr]@jontaito[/ltr]23m
    3/4 #mccann pic.twitter.com/gRaYQTOkBK


    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Ba5dDVTIUAAld4y



     Expand
    [/font][/color]

    •  Reply 
    •  Retweet 
    •  Favorite 
    •  More
    [color][font]
  • Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman 1d1767ccd2a316d79761d9d022d7d4a4_normalJon Tait ‏[ltr]@jontaito[/ltr]23m
    2/4 #mccann pic.twitter.com/Vpqco5iCLT


    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Ba5c8mUIIAE_SV-



     Expand
    [/font][/color]

    •  Reply 
    •  Retweet 
    •  Favorite 
    •  More

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman 1d1767ccd2a316d79761d9d022d7d4a4_normalJon Tait ‏[ltr]@jontaito[/ltr]24m
    Interesting email exchange with OFM webmaster, backs up what @trulyjudy73 said last week. #mccann 1/4 pic.twitter.com/T84gjwesrO


    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Ba5c1c0IEAATvqV



    One will have to read the tweets for themselves, as I don't know how to copy and paste the full text.

    Here is the link:

    https://twitter.com/jontaito


    •  Reply 
    •  Retweet 

  • avatar
    sallypelt

    Posts : 4004
    Activity : 5319
    Likes received : 961
    Join date : 2012-11-10

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by margaret 07.12.13 18:06

    Thanks sallypelt and well done for asking Jon Tait.  Wonder WHO told that person 'NOT' to remove tanner man from the site?
    margaret
    margaret

    Posts : 585
    Activity : 597
    Likes received : 0
    Join date : 2010-09-24

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by NickE 07.12.13 18:13

    They probably trying to draw attention away from the "GM" e-fit to the non existent "Tannerman ".
    NickE
    NickE

    Posts : 1404
    Activity : 2151
    Likes received : 499
    Join date : 2013-10-27
    Age : 49

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by tiny 07.12.13 18:20

    You seriously don't believe what the fm webmaster said,why on earth would grange ask them to keep it there IF they are
    no longer looking for him.
    tiny
    tiny

    Posts : 2274
    Activity : 2311
    Likes received : 4
    Join date : 2010-02-03

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by ultimaThule 07.12.13 18:30

    Twitter is abuzz with predictions of impending doom for dvTM which seems to be heading for the rocks.

    O to be a fly on the wall in Rothley Towers...

    Blacksmith has been channelling Peter Cook http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/notebook.html?m=1 and I'm channelling Mel & Griff https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psqQR_AnGJM big grin
    ultimaThule
    ultimaThule

    Posts : 3355
    Activity : 3376
    Likes received : 7
    Join date : 2013-09-18

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Bishop Brennan 07.12.13 18:39

    margaret wrote:Thanks sallypelt and well done for asking Jon Tait.  Wonder WHO told that person 'NOT' to remove tanner man from the site?
    You could say that the McCanns have banked everything on Tannerman being the abductor.  Right from the start, he was the one displayed in the press / PR conferences / website / media.  Gerry even remembers feeling that Tannerman was hiding in the apartment with him.  Jane was distraught at having seen the abductor with Maddie.  It happened at a time when Gerry was chatting with Jez, and Kate was at the bar.  

    If Tannerman is not the abductor - and the abduction took place much later, then nobody has an alibi (and Gerry now becomes the last person to see Maddie alive).  This is not part of the script which up till now had a very simple narrative.  No, without Tannerman we are in uncharted and uncertain waters.   The natural reaction from TM would be to hunker down and stick to the original story. Stick hard until you cannot any longer. 

    And for now - we just have Redwood's statement on Crimewatch - a statement which may well have caught the McCanns completely by surprise. They knew about the efits - but did they know that Tannerman was to be removed on-air from the story?  I suspect not.

    They (like us) may wonder if "crecheman" really does exist.  Perhaps they hope he doesn't.   So for now - keep a hold of Tannerman, and tell the webmaster (an employee and possibly a relative) to leave the site unchanged.  Makes sense to me.
    Bishop Brennan
    Bishop Brennan

    Posts : 695
    Activity : 920
    Likes received : 217
    Join date : 2013-10-27

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait 08.12.13 9:58

    It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.
    avatar
    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Activity : 21
    Likes received : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Smokeandmirrors 08.12.13 10:17

    Jontait wrote:It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.
    Welcome aboard Jon welcome2 

    D'you fancy posting that email too? My, they do get their knickers in a twist with all their anomalies don't they? How they do hate questions!

    ____________________
    The truth will out.
    Smokeandmirrors
    Smokeandmirrors

    Posts : 2458
    Activity : 2685
    Likes received : 25
    Join date : 2011-07-31

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Guest 08.12.13 10:26

    I'd love to know who the webmaster actually is....are we really in the presence of McCann royalty?
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Angelique 08.12.13 10:26

    Jontait

    A big welcome from me to the forum.

    I wonder why they are so coy about information regarding the site - they seem to be keen to advertise in other areas.


    ____________________
    Things aren't always what they seem
    Angelique
    Angelique

    Posts : 1396
    Activity : 1460
    Likes received : 42
    Join date : 2010-10-19

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by tiny 08.12.13 10:27

    Jontait wrote:It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.
    If the mccanns have nothing to hide then they have nothing to fear,post the reply you got from the webmaster just to let them know you don't like cover ups,
    tiny
    tiny

    Posts : 2274
    Activity : 2311
    Likes received : 4
    Join date : 2010-02-03

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait 08.12.13 10:50

    Not sure how to post pic from iPhone. Here is the text:

    Wish I hadn't responded to you. How dare you post my Emails without my permission. I responded to your questions in good faith and you in turn posted my replies on that horrible Controversy page.

    If you have any other questions, go to the Grange team. I will not respond to you further!
    avatar
    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Activity : 21
    Likes received : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait 08.12.13 10:52

    To which I replied:

    Yes. Sorry about that.

    I think it's important to get the truth out there.

    None of your personal details have been compromised.

    You were only following orders. People can now discuss WHOSE orders you were following.

    I have emailed Operation Grange with my concerns.

    All the best, and sorry once again for misleading you.

    Jon

    Ps I hope you are able to resolve your migratory issues with Google Checkout. I have been assured the switchover should only take 1 hour, not 15 (and counting) days. Plus the 6 months notice you were given should've provided ample time to switch.

    Just a thought. Bye now!
    avatar
    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Activity : 21
    Likes received : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Smokeandmirrors 08.12.13 11:07

    Thanks Jon.

    It would seem that even thought your correspondence was not controversial, anything that people actually wish to ask rather than wait to be told, seems to provoke anger. Now, if everything was just so "normal" why would a question be so threatening to Team McCann?

    They really have got to get the message that THEY want public support, but only if no-one questions anything, and that is simply hypocritical and one sided. 

    Have they really no understanding that it is their own behaviour and stance that creates doubt?

    After six and a half years, it seems they really are too dim to get the message.

    ____________________
    The truth will out.
    Smokeandmirrors
    Smokeandmirrors

    Posts : 2458
    Activity : 2685
    Likes received : 25
    Join date : 2011-07-31

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by sami 08.12.13 11:08

    It seems to have been taken very personally by the webmaster/mistress, whoever they might be !
    avatar
    sami

    Posts : 965
    Activity : 1019
    Likes received : 54
    Join date : 2012-04-08

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by chillyheat 08.12.13 11:13

    Is there a way to find out who the webmaster is ?
    avatar
    chillyheat

    Posts : 814
    Activity : 884
    Likes received : 4
    Join date : 2013-10-15

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by chillyheat 08.12.13 11:22



    Shows they are desperate to STILL have Tannerman and Smithman as one......The Smith sighting shown here. They show the child being carried the same way as Tannerman, when clearly the Smiths said the child was being carried over the shoulder.
    avatar
    chillyheat

    Posts : 814
    Activity : 884
    Likes received : 4
    Join date : 2013-10-15

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Mirage 08.12.13 11:23

    Jontait wrote:Not sure how to post pic from iPhone. Here is the text:

    Wish I hadn't responded to you. How dare you post my Emails without my permission. I responded to your questions in good faith and you in turn posted my replies on that horrible Controversy page.

    If you have any other questions, go to the Grange team. I will not respond to you further!
    What an oddly emotional response from a webmaster. And so early on a Sunday morning too.

    Webmasters conjure up James Bond figures for me, sequestered away, pressing buttons. Just the mechanics of the show really. 

    I noticed it wasn't the Metropolitan Police or Operation Grange, but the equivalent of a Christian name diminutive 'Grange' to whom you were directed. Almost affectionate I thought.

    Did they supply a hotline through?

    Questions questions. The everyday stuff of management. All in all, not an issue for a master to get his web in a tangle about.
    avatar
    Mirage

    Posts : 1905
    Activity : 2711
    Likes received : 764
    Join date : 2013-02-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait 08.12.13 11:26

    They did supply tel no & email yesterday. I opted to email so as to keep the phonelines free for any important calls! I await a reply from Op Grange
    avatar
    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Activity : 21
    Likes received : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by ultimaThule 08.12.13 11:27

    No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:I'd love to know who the webmaster actually is....are we really in the presence of McCann royalty?
    Shall we curtsey? scratchhead   nah I reckon it's Mr Greenink whose monitoring is ultra vigilant these days - the wagons have been circled and he's been tasked with looking out for the first sign of a fleet of black marias coming over them thar hills surrounding Rothley Towers.

    welcome Jontait - and way to go! clapping 

    TrulyAwful was up twittering at the crack of dawn this morning.  That's 3 days running her knickers have worked their way up to her neck but, sadly, not yet around it.
    ultimaThule
    ultimaThule

    Posts : 3355
    Activity : 3376
    Likes received : 7
    Join date : 2013-09-18

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Mirage 08.12.13 11:32

    Jontait wrote:They did supply tel no & email yesterday. I opted to email so as to keep the phonelines free for any important calls! I await a reply from Op Grange
    Well done. And thank you too.

    You mustn't put yourself down though, Jontait! Yours could be the call that supplies that missing piece of the jigsaw TM have been sitting on  looking for, for 6.5 years.  dance
    avatar
    Mirage

    Posts : 1905
    Activity : 2711
    Likes received : 764
    Join date : 2013-02-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by margaret 08.12.13 11:35

    Jontait wrote:Not sure how to post pic from iPhone. Here is the text:

    Wish I hadn't responded to you. How dare you post my Emails without my permission. I responded to your questions in good faith and you in turn posted my replies on that horrible Controversy page.

    If you have any other questions, go to the Grange team. I will not respond to you further!
    Awwww get them all high and mighty. spit coffee 

    Was this the same people that blacksmith posted about earlier in the year? The webmaster was going to clarify something with 'Kate' then denied doing so once blacksmith had shown up their lies.

    Well done Jon and welcome. thumbsup
    margaret
    margaret

    Posts : 585
    Activity : 597
    Likes received : 0
    Join date : 2010-09-24

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by jeanmonroe 08.12.13 11:40

    I posted this December 3rd 2013.

    WHO WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IF SOMEBODY GETS 'ATTACKED'?

    McCANNS OR SY/MET POLICE?

    WHY are the Met/SY still allowing the McCanns to portray 'Creche/Tannerman' on their website after they, SY/Met have publicly DISMISSED him as of importance?

    http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/unidentified_people.html

    FIFTY (50) days after DCI Andy Redwood 'eliminated' 'him' as relevent to investigation!

    What IF 'somebody saw somebody' dressed in similar clothing, as Creche/Tannerman, in the street, today . tomorrow, next week and 'attacked/tried to arrest' him as the possible 'abductor' of Madeleine McCann?

    Are SY/Met/ DCI Redwood going to take responsibility for that assault, they could have obviously 'prevented' by instructing the McCanns to STOP 'promoting' a 'suspect' they have dismissed?

    Or is it the case, that SY/Met were TOLD, of a 'possible assault' (worse case scenario, death, like the recent case in Bristol)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-25122280
    but, ignored the warning, and will 'apologise' AFTER an 'event' with 'we were told this might be a possibility due to our decision to leave a false suspect on our clients website.We'll refer ourselves to the IPCC and lessons will be learn't'

    WHY are SY/Met allowing the McCanns to 'display' a 'suspect' and possibly put at risk an 'innocent' man, Christmas shopping with his young, blonde daughter, DCI Redwood has dismissed publicly?

    METROPOLITAN POLICE, DCI REDWOOD, AS OF TODAY, 3RD DECEMBER 2013..........................................YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD!
    avatar
    jeanmonroe

    Posts : 5818
    Activity : 7756
    Likes received : 1674
    Join date : 2013-02-07

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Mirage 08.12.13 11:55

    jeanmonroe wrote:I posted this December 3rd 2013.

    WHO WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IF SOMEBODY GETS 'ATTACKED'?

    McCANNS OR SY/MET POLICE?

    WHY are the Met/SY still allowing the McCanns to portray 'Creche/Tannerman' on their website after they, SY/Met have publicly DISMISSED him as of importance?

    http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/unidentified_people.html

    FIFTY (50) days after DCI Andy Redwood 'eliminated' 'him' as relevent to investigation!

    What IF 'somebody saw somebody' dressed in similar clothing, as Creche/Tannerman, in the street, today . tomorrow, next week and 'attacked/tried to arrest' him as the possible 'abductor' of Madeleine McCann?

    Are SY/Met/ DCI Redwood going to take responsibility for that assault, they could have obviously 'prevented' by instructing the McCanns to STOP 'promoting' a 'suspect' they have dismissed?

    Or is it the case, that SY/Met were TOLD, of a 'possible assault' (worse case scenario, death, like the recent case in Bristol)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-25122280
    but, ignored the warning, and will 'apologise' AFTER an 'event' with 'we were told this might be a possibility due to our decision to leave a false suspect on our clients website.We'll refer ourselves to the IPCC and lessons will be learn't'

    WHY are SY/Met allowing the McCanns to 'display' a 'suspect' and possibly put at risk an 'innocent' man, Christmas shopping with his young, blonde daughter, DCI Redwood has dismissed publicly?

    METROPOLITAN POLICE, DCI REDWOOD, AS OF TODAY, 3RD DECEMBER 2013..........................................YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD!
    Yes, it could lead to a serious assault IMO, jeanmonroe. This is too high profile a case for it not to be a real possibility.

     This, along with the muddle being created in the search for MM by her family's own dedicated website, makes it imperative that someone sorts this out immediately.

     I've never heard of a precedent for such flagrant thumbing at a MET investigation - and flaunted in everyone's faces too. As a taxpayer, I want to know why it is being tolerated.

     Remind me, what is the cost of this mammoth investigation (inc CW) to date?

    Over to you Grange.
    avatar
    Mirage

    Posts : 1905
    Activity : 2711
    Likes received : 764
    Join date : 2013-02-01

    Back to top Go down

    Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman Empty Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by oakeso 08.12.13 12:07

    ChillyHeat wrote:Is there a way to find out who the webmaster is ?
    I think it's an apprentice webmaster who hasn't quite mastered the online store (donations) or linking (book linking to poster page) as yet.

    ____________________
    “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” 
    oakeso
    oakeso

    Posts : 62
    Activity : 65
    Likes received : 1
    Join date : 2013-10-11
    Location : The cellar - looking for NZ labels

    Back to top Go down

    Page 1 of 8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top

    - Similar topics

     
    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum