Pat Brown's Latest - How BundleMan Became Real

http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.fr/2013/12/how-bundleman-became-real.html


The Daily Profiler
Hosted by The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency
MONDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2013
How BundleMan Became Real

We know by now not to expect truthful reporting by such rags as The Mirror or straight talk from Chief Inspector Andy Redwood of Scotland Yard, but the "shocking revelation" presented on CrimeWatch by Redwood was the elimination of the "top suspect" - the man Jane Tanner claimed she saw crossing the street in front of her as she came up alongside the McCann's vacation flat - by "proving" that this man was but an innocent vacationer carrying his sleeping daughter back from the creche after enjoying his evening out. Redwood went on in the show to tout the 10 pm sighting by the Smith family as the more credible sighting of an abductor carrying Madeleine off towards to beach, a suspect Scotland Yard has not identified as anyone in particular, especially not Gerry McCann, the one man Mr. Smith told police the individual just might be.

Most of us wondered, quite immediately, how this vacationer could actually have been a real person, one that Jane Tanner truly did see. It doesn't take rocket scientists to note that the man was walking the wrong direction, the he should have been walking toward the McCann flat if he were coming from the creche, not walking from the McCann apartment in the direction the creche. (The yellow dot is the entrance to where the McCanns were dining at the Tapas Restaurant, the red dot is their vacation flat, and the blue dot is the creche. The supposed father carrying his daughter to the creche was crossing the road away from the red dot).


Now, the story gets weirder. It is being reported (if one can call what The Mirror prints as reporting), that the man came forward in 2007 to the  Leicestershire police and filled out a detailed questionnaire detailing his movements and that he was carrying his child back from the creche at the time of the Tanner sighting. Then, there is some inference that this information was forwarded to the Portuguese police who ignored it even though, according to the report, they were obsessed with the Tanner sighting to the exclusion of the Smith sighting.

Of course, this simply foolishness. If such a report existed, either it made no sense to the PJ that this man could be Tanner's bundleman because he was walking in the wrong direction or they were not interested in Tanner sighting because her story was not very credible (read more on this here) or because they believed the Smith sighting was the true one of Madeleine or all three of these reasons had an effect on whatever decision they made (should this man even exist). However, what is being reported is a pure rewrite of history, that the PJ truly believed the Tanner sighting was that of a man abducting Madeleine and their failure to interview this supposed person-of-interest threw the investigation off track.


This bit about the innocent father carrying his child into the pathway of Jane Tanner gets even more ridiculous. It is also claimed that Scotland Yard just interviewed him in recent months and he produced not only the clothing he was wearing that night but also the pink pajamas of his daughter! Mind you, six years has passed but not only does he remember what both of them were wearing but he still has the clothing in his possession! What a miracle!

One could think, perhaps, that this poor man, seeing all the to-do about Bundleman, how the McCanns were desperately searching for this man who they thought took their child at 9:15 pm, might have kept the clothing around just in case, one day, he needed to produce them as his alibi, clothes not only necessary to prove that he was Bundleman, but that his own daughter was in those pink pajamas and not Maddie. How kind it was for him to keep the clothing as proof and wait patiently for the police to one day call and how incredibly horrific a human being he was to not have ever contacted the McCanns or their private detectives to let them know that they should not be focusing on Bundleman as the man who took Maddie.

So, I can only surmise from these ludicrous claims of Redwood and The Mirror that either the man was early ruled out as having nothing to do with the McCann case because he was walking the wrong direction and, therefore, was not the man Tanner claims to have seen, or he doesn't exist at all and is merely a ruse to exonerate Jane Tanner from her claim to have seen the possible kidnapper (which would mean Scotland Yard is attempting to make Tanner an honest woman and bring a level of believability back to the Tapas 9) or it is a ruse to bring the time frame to 10 pm and the sighting of the Smiths which might have been a sighting of Gerry (which would mean Scotland Yard is playing a very clever card game). I wish it was the latter but I am a bit too cynical to harbor such an incredible hope.

What I do know is Sr. Amaral never believed Tanner's story and he always believed that the Smith sighting was likely the real one; how Andy Redwood, Scotland Yard, and the UK media can spin this to the complete opposite is incredible and yet another rewrite of history and we can only hope one day we will have a clear understanding as to the entire motive that lurks behind all of these misrepresentations and manipulations.

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown

December 30, 2013

It is a ruse to get Jane Tanner off the hook imo.
While she insisted that she saw a man carrying Madeleine she was an accessory to the McCann conspiracy.
But Redwood came up with the crecheman with the hoarded jimjams....and set Jane free from them all. Do you think she has been helping with enquiries?

daffodil wrote:The Daily Profiler
Hosted by The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency
MONDAY, DECEMBER 30, 2013
How BundleMan Became Real

This bit about the innocent father carrying his child into the pathway of Jane Tanner gets even more ridiculous. It is also claimed that Scotland Yard just interviewed him in recent months and he produced not only the clothing he was wearing that night...

That's not quite right. What Scotland Yard said, choosing their words carefully, was that he was photographed 'wearing clothes similar to those he was normally wearing' on his 2007 Praia da Luz holiday. 

Pat Brown also wrote: "What I do know is Sr. Amaral never believed Tanner's story and he always believed that the Smith sighting was likely the real one..."

That's a perfectly correct statement. And Amaral hinted that Gerry McCann might have been carrying Madeleine down to the beach. But maybe neither Goncalo Amaral nor Pat Brown have yet examined in detail all the circumstances and content of the three Smith family statements - otherwise they might be agreeing with former U.S. prosecutor and child abuse expert Wendy Murphy, who declared DCI Andy Redwood's collaboration with the BBC as an attempt to produce, quote: 'another fake suspect'.

juliet wrote:It is a ruse to get Jane Tanner off the hook imo.
While she insisted that she saw a man carrying Madeleine she was an accessory to the McCann conspiracy.
But Redwood came up with the crecheman with the hoarded jimjams....and set Jane free from them all. Do you think she has been helping with enquiries?

I think so Juliet. IMO, she could have been facing very serious charges if she were found to have been perverting the course of justice. And at one point Murat was going to sue her for naming him as the abductor, something all the tapas group have backtracked on, prior to that they were clearly happy to point the finger at him.

Jane's sight was probably hastily scrambled together after someone was seen by the Smith family. A complete distraction and Gerry's alibi. The McCanns have focussed everything onto the man seen by Jane Tanner, he is still on their official website while the Smith family e-fits have been replaced with a Christmas tree. If she is no longer on their side, they are scuppered.

PeterMac wrote:A propos the regurgitated Mirror stuff about the mobile phones -  ( first reported in October by the Mail with Tractorman )

"PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB 32m
I dunno, but when I'm busy kidnapping the little girl of my rapist's dreams, I don't make phone calls.

spot on Ma'am !

Reminds of the time that I think I have related on here before, when my daughter took it upon herself to go to sleep inside her wardrobe. Not once during the thirty seconds or so of blind panic that it took to find her did I think "Well at least it gives me a few moments to go through my text messages".....

Happy New year, Peter   

You're also waiting for the local fireworks to end, so that you and the dogs can go to sleep ... ?

juliet wrote:It is a ruse to get Jane Tanner off the hook imo.
While she insisted that she saw a man carrying Madeleine she was an accessory to the McCann conspiracy.
But Redwood came up with the crecheman with the hoarded jimjams....and set Jane free from them all. Do you think she has been helping with enquiries?

Let's hear how the man said he was carrying his child. We all know that he will say it was - as with the Smith sighting - up against his shoulder, like we all carry young children in such circumstances. In which case we can be sure that the Tanner "sighting" was NOT of this man.