The Ramblings of Sonia Poulton - an introduction to People's Voice

whatliesbehindthesofa wrote:I'm not sure where this forensic analysis of a few of Cristobell's (without an H) posts is leading.  Can't we work together?

candyfloss wrote:

whatliesbehindthesofa wrote:I'm not sure where this forensic analysis of a few of Cristobell's (without an H) posts is leading.  Can't we work together?

I agree, it makes me sad to see this, why should Cristobell have to keep explaining herself here.  She had the guts to go on that programme, and seems to be being questioned relentlessly  about  it and her postings, and even called a fibber,  yes she gave out information which didn't happen, but she never said it was definite anyway, it was what someone told her in a pm.   Many here I think would admire her.  Now, please let's move on.

Châtelaine wrote:A day nothing learned, is a day lost ...

Cristobell, I think that until we've had the opportunity to see your interview [I understand not many of us have and at least I have not], there's not really much to discuss here. I do, though, admire your courage to go on "camera" and give your views on a very delicate subject. I also know from experience, that there's an enormous difference between making a statement or giving a speech [and only then having Q&A] and being interviewed. In the latter the questions and possible interruptions of the interviewer often hamper your possibility to stay on your own thread. And then again, sitting in a studio  "face to face" is a easier than a distant skype-type encounter ...

Best wishes, Châtelaine










Not easy at all Chatelaine, I wish I was more assertive like those wonderful American ladies who can give us so much information in so little time.  Obviously there is a fine art to getting a conversation to a position where you can what you had planned, politicians do it beautifully - they have had much more practice!     

candyfloss wrote:

whatliesbehindthesofa wrote:I'm not sure where this forensic analysis of a few of Cristobell's (without an H) posts is leading.  Can't we work together?

I agree, it makes me sad to see this, why should Cristobell have to keep explaining herself here.  She had the guts to go on that programme, and seems to be being questioned relentlessly  about  it and her postings, and even called a fibber,  yes she gave out information which didn't happen, but she never said it was definite anyway, it was what someone told her in a pm.   Many here I think would admire her.  Now, please let's move on.



My sentiments exactly!!!    

Châtelaine wrote:It's experience, indeed, Cristobell. I had to learn the hard way too  

I also had to learn the difference between "off the record" and "don't quote me" to journalists the "hard" way.
If I think back, it still hurts ...


















I can't seem to post outside of the box, it may be my computer.

I wish I had come to you for a few tips Chatelaine     It is quite a pressurised situation, and I was aware I would be torn to shreds.  Earlier today my Avatar was photoshopped as Bald, Elvis, Ronald McDonald, Hilda Ogen and a singer from the sixties - fortunately, my gas oven is in need of cleaning and I doubt I could fit my mishappen head into it.    

Hopefully I managed to get a few good points across, for a few moments I felt as though I was 'in the zone' as my beloved Sheldon (the Big Bang) would say, determined to put an end to the hater nonsense.  Had the panic attack the next day, lol. Kind wishes Chatelaine.

 

Daisy wrote: [...] it's not a contest.

Cristobell wrote:I actually object to my work being deleted at the request of another member and hope this will not be the case.

Cristobell wrote:I actually object to my work being deleted at the request of another member and hope this will not be the case.

cristobell I do not have an issue with your work , more to the fact that nit picking was going on regarding your phrasing /wording   

Woofer wrote:

Cristobell wrote:I actually object to my work being deleted at the request of another member and hope this will not be the case.

It shouldn`t be Cristobell

Other comment deleted - do NOT make false claims about this forum - ADMIN

dragonfly wrote:

Cristobell wrote:I actually object to my work being deleted at the request of another member and hope this will not be the case.

cristobell I do not have an issue with your work , more to the fact that nit picking was going on regarding your phrasing /wording   







Thank you Dragonfly. I have been under attack for quite some time and I have taken the time and trouble to address those issues, so would not like to see it all whooshed.  

marconi wrote:Would it not be better to leave Cristobell in peace? Let us discuss the investigation!

No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:Well done Clay if you got through the whole Michael Shrimpton interview.

I nearly gave up early on when he was talking about two politicians who are being blackmailed (by the Germans of course!) because they are paedophiles.

I hung on for a bit longer but I was rapidly losing the will to live and gave up during the second part. Did he mention anything new about the McCann case?

Clay Regazzoni wrote:I watched the Michael Shrimpton one last night. Where does that guy get off?

The Michael Shrimpton report on Madeleine McCann in full:  (Note: Sent by e-mail from his home e-mail address and to many others and subsequently confirmed as authentic by Michael Shrimpton):

QUOTE

Apologies if any one is included who does not wish to be - not sure whose list this is, but if names could be deleted as requested that would be most helpful. I am merely replying to e-mails sent to me.

I do not believe our enemies can be persuaded to change their ways - so far to the contrary, sadly, I see no option other than war with Germany. I was persuaded of this before poor little Madeleine McCann was kidnapped by a DVD paedophile ring, but that case removed any doubt.

Government after government, intelligence service after intelligence service, either confirmed or did not deny that a ring was involved and that it supplied children for abuse to senior EU officials in Brussels, but all were utterly powerless. All the while the public was fed a non-stop diet of nonsense, about the poor parents killing their own child and concealing her body (somebody who should have known better even wrote a book about it, based on briefings from the Portuguese police), or a single paedophile (as though a single person could spirit away a young child acorss international frontiers and conceal her for months on end), when the operation was caught by satellite.

Even the Russians had enough satellite coverage to get a pretty clear picture, which became even clearer when some Russians working for the Germans (I call them von Russians) were had round for lunch by those nice people the SVR.

Did anyone dream of showing her desperately anxious mother the first live commercial footage of her (CCTV, a cafe near Montpelier)? Did they heck. The tape was whisked into DST in Paris and never came out, not officially at any rate (not even French Intelligence is composed entirely of inhuman automatons working for Jerry).

The number of politicians and civil servants being blackmailed or bought up by the Jerries would astonish even Bob; media control is just as effective as it was in Germany in the 30s, more subtle, yes, but you try getting a sotry about the DVD onto a mainstream outlet; no media organisation anywhere in the world was prepared to report the truth about the Madeleine kidnap, even though it was a huge story and the life of a little girl was at stake. No longer of course, because she was murdered in December, in Belgium, with a green light from GO2

UNQUOTE