The Ramblings of Sonia Poulton - an introduction to People's Voice

@Tony Bennett wrote:

@ChillyHeat wrote:http://rosaleen-thewhistler.blogspot.co.uk/2009/08/christopher-story-european-union-empire.html

I'm not quite sure why you posted that link.

Your link says this: "Christopher Story is the man who has named Barroso José Manuel as the man on whose order Maddie McCann is being held".

By contrast, Michael Shrimpton has woven a fantastical tale about Madeleine being taken all over Europe and then killed.

Michael Shrimpton wrote what is called the 'Michael Shrimpton Report' on Madeleine McCann and has admitted he was the author of it. 

So I'm not sure what your point is?

In any case, we are getting slightly off the point, which is the strange assortment of people that TPV has chosen to interview so far, especially on the disapprearance of Madeleine McCann.

Châtelaine wrote:I know Barroso  and many others at the E.C. and there are things about which I wouldn't believe them any further than I could throw them [which is a limited distance given my age, sex and condition]. But ... jeez ...

@Tony Bennett wrote:

@Cristobell wrote:Perhaps Aquila would like to set out exactly what it is she is accusing me of, as she has just, on a public forum, called me a liar.

I think this is the quote of yours Aquila was referring to:

"As mentioned in another thread, I will be appearing on Sonia Poulton's TPV on Monday to give an update of the trial in Lisbon and a picture of where we are now. Will let the forum know the time as soon as it is to hand. You may be more interested to hear that Sonia is also liaising with Martin Grimes, so fingers crossed, he will be on too".

It seems that the claim that Sonia Poulton was 'liaising with Martin Grime' [sp.] was untrue.

@Tony Bennett wrote:

@ChillyHeat wrote:Tony, in your honest opinion, how much involvement do the security services still hold in this case?

I don't know. Try asking DCI Andy Redwood

It feels like to me that MI5 have a heavy presence still. And I can't believe Special Branch were used just to be a taxi...

That's what Dr Kate McCann tells us  - but even she may not know just how hard Special Branch are working to find Madeleine

@Tony Bennett wrote:

@Cristobell wrote:Perhaps Aquila would like to set out exactly what it is she is accusing me of, as she has just, on a public forum, called me a liar.

I think this is the quote of yours Aquila was referring to:

"As mentioned in another thread, I will be appearing on Sonia Poulton's TPV on Monday to give an update of the trial in Lisbon and a picture of where we are now. Will let the forum know the time as soon as it is to hand. You may be more interested to hear that Sonia is also liaising with Martin Grimes, so fingers crossed, he will be on too".

It seems that the claim that Sonia Poulton was 'liaising with Martin Grime' [sp.] was untrue.

@Cristobell wrote:

@Tony Bennett wrote:

@Cristobell wrote:Perhaps Aquila would like to set out exactly what it is she is accusing me of, as she has just, on a public forum, called me a liar.

I think this is the quote of yours Aquila was referring to:

"As mentioned in another thread, I will be appearing on Sonia Poulton's TPV on Monday to give an update of the trial in Lisbon and a picture of where we are now. Will let the forum know the time as soon as it is to hand. You may be more interested to hear that Sonia is also liaising with Martin Grimes, so fingers crossed, he will be on too".

It seems that the claim that Sonia Poulton was 'liaising with Martin Grime' [sp.] was untrue.

I repeated something I was told by private message on twitter, that does not make me a liar - my post clearly says 'liaising' and 'fingers crossed'.  

@Woofer wrote:Glad to see Aquila has `bowed out` now after having the last word yet again.  So we`ll be seeing no more provoking of a long term valued poster who has done more than most for highlighting the discrepancies in this case.  I wish Aquila well of course.

@Tony Bennett wrote:

@Woofer wrote:Glad to see Aquila has `bowed out` now after having the last word yet again.  So we`ll be seeing no more provoking of a long term valued poster who has done more than most for highlighting the discrepancies in this case.  I wish Aquila well of course.

On a point of information:

Aquila: Join date: 3 March 2011
Cristobell: Join date: 12 October 2011.

I hope both will continue to help us solve 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann'

No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:I'm glad that I don't do Twitter (though I have been accused of twittering inanely in the past) every time I hear things like that, Cristobell.

There are always going to be sub-humans who abuse the right to free speech but I guess that's a small price to pay for all the benefits that the Internet brings.

How I agree with you about the injustices of this case.

Daisy: thank you for the links. I shall don my tin hat and pluck up courage to listen!

Cristobell wrote: wrote:I am happy for readers to make their own minds up Aquila. unquote


Christobell wrote in 2012:

Firstly, I am not a 'hater' nor am I a 'forker'. I don't hate Kate and Gerry, nor do I hate Madeleine. I would describe myself as an observer, perhaps, occasionally, a wannabe iconoclast.

( wannabe iconoclast, which icons exactly?)

This is real life however, and in real life, detectives rarely, if ever, solve homicides and missing people cases within 60 minutes, or during an ad break. I have made up my own mind, based on the evidence that exists, though I am always open to persuasion either way, but my gut feeling is, that the parents and their friends, should get themselves ruled out as suspects once and for all. I think this would have been hugely beneficial to the morale and enthusiasm for their search.
 
The above quotes are from the blog 2012, not much seems to have changed.


Last week Christobel wrote:  


For a long, long time, I was hesitant to commit myself to stating what I thought happened (I still haven't), 1) I had no wish to be unkind 2) honesty and integrity and 3) I publish in my own name and am therefore vulnerable to legal action. 

unquote

Could you explain why anyone would think you'd hate Madeleine? 
As to publish in one's own name, you're not publishing anything controversial about the McCanns as far as I can see, absolutely no need to worry then imo.



(I couldn't get a yellow box up and the font is stuck on bold for some reason)
 

@tigger wrote:

Cristobell wrote: wrote:quote: I am happy for readers to make their own minds up Aquila. unquote


tigger wrote:

Cristobell wrote in 2012:

SNIPPED
 

REPLY: tigger, you have quoted a paragraph or two from Cristobell's writings in 2012.

I have read most of Cristobell's writings on the McCanns.

In some articles she expresses her views on the case more clearly and robustly than in others.

However, if I quoted some of her strongest observations on the McCanns' version of events, I would be in breach of an undertaking.

So I won't 



P.S.  Yes, the 'yellow box' function is working worse than ever today. In fact, it's not working properly at all today. There have been loads of problems with it since 'they' introduced it

@Cristobell wrote:What I say and how it is interpreted leaves the question wide open Tigger.  One of the Hate sites for example has 21 pages of my words taken out of context and deliberately twisted in order to make me appear as an abuser of the McCanns.  

Fortunately I have thus far avoided tabloid notoriety and costly legal action by choosing my words carefully. I make no apologies for that, as a writer, I am guided by honesty and integrity, I don't want to look back on my words and feel shame. 

I'm not quite sure what it is you want of me Tigger, perhaps you could clarify?