Thanks to Kitti.

by jeanmonroe 20.11.13 11:05

kitti Today at 7:34 am
.There's one big problem....the files.

Every person they have dug up, has been dug up before and they think we have forgotten about these people...rehashing old stories won't work, so where are they going to find someone that either was in the files and been interviewed and overlooked or some person that was never their but could be a suspect !

Where?

Now....i will tell you why I think there is a big coverup and deadwood has been sent in to do it..

Man seen on beach.......remember him, the one with the stance....now go look at the SY crime watch programme at 22 mins onwards....same profile.....why have SY so blatantly lied.

Put the two men together.....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Beach man...2010

Now go to the SY recon at 22.30...-and yes same man.

Total crock off shit.

SY think we are thick.

Kitti is my STAR of the week!

by jeanmonroe 20.11.13 11:33

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

CW 'crecheman' CLEARED by Redwood.

by MarleneP 20.11.13 12:02

As I understand the "Beach man" from a video is identical with the Tanner man.

In Crime Watch this image was shown as a man who has been found. A father who has brought his child from the nursery.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Over The Hill 20.11.13 12:12

Forgive me if I've misunderstood, JeanM, but is that video still from PdL in May 2007?

by jeanmonroe 20.11.13 12:39

Over The Hill wrote:Forgive me if I've misunderstood, JeanM, but is that video still from PdL in May 2007?

COOPERMAN

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

COOPERMAN!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

TAKE YOUR PICK!

At LEAST 21 'suspects' to choose from! (so far!)

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

21 ne'er-do-wells all in PDL but the McCanns did NOT 'see' any of them!

But 'everyone' else DID!

No wonder they had to book up the tapas in advance, they would never have got in with all these 'suspects' trying to hog all the tables!

eta: NOT a black face amongst them!

by Over The Hill 20.11.13 12:52

So was Det Redwood on the the Crimewatch programme implying that the real Tannerman (aka Crecheman) is the guy in the beach video still?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim, this Beachman is a new thing altogether for me

by MoonGoddess 20.11.13 12:58

don't know if this might shed any light for people...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

hope it doesn't further confuse lol

by Liz Eagles 20.11.13 13:14

Over The Hill wrote:So was Det Redwood on the the Crimewatch programme implying that the real Tannerman (aka Crecheman) is the guy in the beach video still?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim, this Beachman is a new thing altogether for me

Don't worry Over The Hill, you're not dim, neither are most people with an IQ with a measurement above their waistline.

You are witnessing a spectacular extravaganza of treating you like a moron with no ability to think for yourself. You have a gutter press (I'm surprised they bother to write anymore, it would be better to do it cartoon fashion - they're almost there) fed by a media machine of press releases from their bosom buddies to titilate you and get your heart all mush that there is something of human interest and to be outraged by foreign buggers who do it to one of ours.

You also have the most extraordinary CrimeWatch programme in its history - from Scotland Yard!

Oh no, you're not a moron by any means. You're being treated like one imo.

by jeanmonroe 20.11.13 13:17

Over The Hill wrote:So was Det Redwood on the the Crimewatch programme implying that the real Tannerman (aka Crecheman) is the guy in the beach video still?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim, this Beachman is a new thing altogether for me

With regards to Redwood.

to use Gerry's words 'I'm not going to comment on that'

This was when they were trying to find a patsy to match JT's 'sighting' to prove their 'abduction' THEORY.

by Over The Hill 20.11.13 21:15

But if the guy in the video really is an innocent father (aka Tannerman/Crecheman) as mentioned by Det Redwood on Crimewatch, he would have been in PdL at the time, wouldn't he? Therefore he might have been caught in someone's video

Having said that, I'd be surprised at such a revelation, since I assumed he didn't actually exist

by SixMillionQuid 21.11.13 18:24

jeanmonroe wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Beach man...2010

Now go to the SY recon at 22.30...-and yes same man.

Total crock off shit.

SY think we are thick.

Kitti is my STAR of the week!

I remember this guy from the daily express. A Gail Cooper classic!
*link already provided*

by Guest 21.11.13 19:07

SY really have taken the p*** censored

by Guest 04.12.13 9:09

But if Crecheman=Tannerman=Cooperman

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Then he does exist.
And can then possibly sue.

I just don't understand how SY can present a photograph of a man 6 years later looking exactly like the one Gail Cooper photographed.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Is Crecheman Cooperman? Is Tannerman Cooperman? Is Crecheman Tannerman?
I give up, I think I will need professional help soon...

by **PeterMac** 04.12.13 10:23

dantezebu wrote:
I just don't understand how SY can present a photograph of a man 6 years later looking exactly like the one Gail Cooper photographed.

Why not ?
They are still using a 7 year old photo of Madeleine.

by Angelique 04.12.13 10:46

But I think that this is all done on purpose.

Tannerman, Crecheman and Cooperman - anyman, in fact.

They want us to GO AWAY or to put it even more bluntly, they want us to ask them to stop wasting our money.

I think they are doing it on purpose.

The only reason I can think of for the outrageously un-CrimeWatch programmes in the UK, Germany, etc are simply to garner funds. This is what I have been saying. I don't believe they are ever, ever, going to accuse anyone of anything because they want no action or investigation.

IMO its all about money for the Fund.

I hope sincerely I am wrong and that they will eventually do the right thing and find out the Truth for Madeleine's sake but I just can't see it.

Maybe 20 years or so ago SY may have meant something but now IMO they are just a waste of space.

by suzyjohnson 04.12.13 18:56

Over The Hill wrote:But if the guy in the video really is an innocent father (aka Tannerman/Crecheman) as mentioned by Det Redwood on Crimewatch, he would have been in PdL at the time, wouldn't he? Therefore he might have been caught in someone's video

So far, so good

But ..........

Express, May 2010,

Mrs Cooper, of Newark, Nottinghamshire, said last night: “I am 98 per cent certain the man in the photo was the same man who made the strange visit to our holiday villa. His hair looks neater in the photo, but he is quite far in the background.”

So, when he wasn't walking on the beach or collecting his child from the creche (on holiday), Cooperman / Tannerman was calling at villas collecting money for orphanages was he?