WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 11 of 17 • Share
Page 11 of 17 • 1 ... 7 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 17
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
That isn't how the police/law treat it though. Tell that to Nat Fraser.ProfessorPPlum wrote:From a police and legal perspective, if there's no evidence of something happening then we should proceed as if it didn't happen. If we find evidence that points to an abduction happening, then we can open that line of investigation up again.
Just imagine all of the million things that 'could have happened' and where we'd be if we took them all seriously (without any supporting evidence). That would be chaos - aka The Great British Mainstream Media.
Surely you've heard of cases were people have been jailed for murder where there's been no evidence of murder/no body.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Is this confirmed? Did GM and DP ever address it? I find this very suspicious and like I said I am more than open to persuasion. It's why I joined. I'm here to learn not to tell anybody they are wrong.jeanmonroe wrote:"If the couple found their daughter dead and impulsively agreed to cover up the death, and Smithman being GM, this would mean Gerry running to the beach with the body, hiding it so well in a strange country in the dark that even the locals and authorities couldn't find it, returning to the Tapas as though nothing happened just in time for Kate to raise the alarm."
..............................................................................................................
And GM and his friend DP going back out again only TO THE BEACH at 4:00AM, 4th May 2007,, when supposedly EVERYONE else had gone 'home' as KM said.
None of us KNOW what happened yet I'm being attacked for saying what I think.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Let me throw my pound of flesh into the mix. For those asking why anyone doubts the McCann's, this is taken from GM's statement on 4th May 2007:
QUOTE
At about 22.00 it was his wife Kate who went to check on the children. She entered the apartment by the door using the key and saw immediately that the door to the children's bedroom was completely open, the window was also open, the blinds were raised and the curtains were drawn open.
The side door leading to the living room was closed, which as previously stated, was never left locked
Now if we believe this first statement, on entering the bedroom, there would have been light coming in from the street, as GM states THE CURTAINS WERE DRAWN OPEN.
UNQUOTE
Later, this became "entered through the unlocked patio doors".
Later, bedroom curtains "closed and went whoosh"
Do you know what I called these discrepancies?? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES!
QUOTE
At about 22.00 it was his wife Kate who went to check on the children. She entered the apartment by the door using the key and saw immediately that the door to the children's bedroom was completely open, the window was also open, the blinds were raised and the curtains were drawn open.
The side door leading to the living room was closed, which as previously stated, was never left locked
Now if we believe this first statement, on entering the bedroom, there would have been light coming in from the street, as GM states THE CURTAINS WERE DRAWN OPEN.
UNQUOTE
Later, this became "entered through the unlocked patio doors".
Later, bedroom curtains "closed and went whoosh"
Do you know what I called these discrepancies?? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES!
sallypelt- Posts : 4004
Activity : 5319
Likes received : 961
Join date : 2012-11-10
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
This doesn't indicate guilt though. There are always inconsistencies like these in all cases. This is common. Wouldn't you also find it suspicious if every statement followed the same script to a T? If this is the best "proof" people have of the mccann guilt there truly is nothing.sallypelt wrote:Let me throw my pound of flesh into the mix. For those asking why anyone doubts the McCann's, this is taken from GM's statement on 4th May 2007:
QUOTE
At about 22.00 it was his wife Kate who went to check on the children. She entered the apartment by the door using the key and saw immediately that the door to the children's bedroom was completely open, the window was also open, the blinds were raised and the curtains were drawn open.
The side door leading to the living room was closed, which as previously stated, was never left locked
Now if we believe this first statement, on entering the bedroom, there would have been light coming in from the street, as GM states THE CURTAINS WERE DRAWN OPEN.
UNQUOTE
Later, this became "entered through the unlocked patio doors".
Later, bedroom curtains "closed and went whoosh"
Do you know what I called these discrepancies?? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES!
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
DAVID PAYNE ROGATORY 11 APRIL 2008 10:26Carver wrote:Is this confirmed? Did GM and DP ever address it? I find this very suspicious and like I said I am more than open to persuasion. It's why I joined. I'm here to learn not to tell anybody they are wrong.jeanmonroe wrote:"If the couple found their daughter dead and impulsively agreed to cover up the death, and Smithman being GM, this would mean Gerry running to the beach with the body, hiding it so well in a strange country in the dark that even the locals and authorities couldn't find it, returning to the Tapas as though nothing happened just in time for Kate to raise the alarm."
..............................................................................................................
And GM and his friend DP going back out again only TO THE BEACH at 4:00AM, 4th May 2007,, when supposedly EVERYONE else had gone 'home' as KM said.
00:17:28 Reply "
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
This is very suspicious indeed. Especially when you remember Gerry and Kate admitted they never physically searched! If he wasn't searching down the beach at 4am, what WAS he doing there?jd wrote:DAVID PAYNE ROGATORY 11 APRIL 2008 10:26Carver wrote:Is this confirmed? Did GM and DP ever address it? I find this very suspicious and like I said I am more than open to persuasion. It's why I joined. I'm here to learn not to tell anybody they are wrong.jeanmonroe wrote:"If the couple found their daughter dead and impulsively agreed to cover up the death, and Smithman being GM, this would mean Gerry running to the beach with the body, hiding it so well in a strange country in the dark that even the locals and authorities couldn't find it, returning to the Tapas as though nothing happened just in time for Kate to raise the alarm."
..............................................................................................................
And GM and his friend DP going back out again only TO THE BEACH at 4:00AM, 4th May 2007,, when supposedly EVERYONE else had gone 'home' as KM said.
00:17:28 Reply "Errso thenyou knowthe Police were witherryou knowKate and Gerry,you knowchatting to them andyou know looking at the apartment, etcetera, andthey,you knowI felt that they had been probably around for about an hour and then Matt met up witherrwith Kate and Gerry after. Me and Gerryyou knowI'm not sure what time it was, it wasyou knowbetween three and four o' clock when, again looking for her. We went downerrthrough past the Ocean Club reception, we went downerrto the beach ........and he broke down with me on the front,you know.You knowjust very obviously a broken man, andyou knowwe spent some timeyou know,not long, I was trying my best to console him, we went back then to theerrthe apartment,you knowit's, by around about four, four thirty in the morningyou knowthere was nothing else thatyou knowthat we could do.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
***Carver wrote:[...]
This doesn't indicate guilt though. There are always inconsistencies like these in all cases. This is common. Wouldn't you also find it suspicious if every statement followed the same script to a T?
If this is the best "proof" people have of the mccann guilt there truly is nothing.
The bizarre things is, that the McCs' early statements were indeed not "to a T". Within a day, they couldn't remember anymore through which door they left and returned G5A. Par contre, during a big part of the following 6 years the major part of their t.v. and newspaper statements were "to a T", often in exactly the same [strangely constructed] wording. Only recently they been loosening up a bit and e.g. the successfully "marketed" coloboma became actually just a little fleck, which you could only see from very nearby ...
And I'm supposed to believe them?
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Ah, so "lies do not indicate guilt". Your child has disappeared without trace, so you lie through your back teeth. Any innocent parent would KNOW if they used a key, or not, to get into the apartment.Carver wrote:This doesn't indicate guilt though. There are always inconsistencies like these in all cases. This is common. Wouldn't you also find it suspicious if every statement followed the same script to a T? If this is the best "proof" people have of the mccann guilt there truly is nothing.sallypelt wrote:Let me throw my pound of flesh into the mix. For those asking why anyone doubts the McCann's, this is taken from GM's statement on 4th May 2007:
QUOTE
At about 22.00 it was his wife Kate who went to check on the children. She entered the apartment by the door using the key and saw immediately that the door to the children's bedroom was completely open, the window was also open, the blinds were raised and the curtains were drawn open.
The side door leading to the living room was closed, which as previously stated, was never left locked
Now if we believe this first statement, on entering the bedroom, there would have been light coming in from the street, as GM states THE CURTAINS WERE DRAWN OPEN.
UNQUOTE
Later, this became "entered through the unlocked patio doors".
Later, bedroom curtains "closed and went whoosh"
Do you know what I called these discrepancies?? LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES!
Also, this is from one of Kate's statements:
QUOTE
She thinks it could be opened from the inside but not from the outside. She thinks she was wearing a cream coloured polar fleece with a zip, and on top a blue raincoat also with a zip. As regards Gerry, she doesn't know if he was wearing other items of clothing.
With respect to the objects she says they took with them: their mobile phones. Gerry might have taken a wallet with money. Not sure if they took a camera.
UNQUOTE
SO Clarence Mitchell was LYING when he said that "they didn't have their mobile phones with them". Also, Kate can't even remember what she was wearing!!!
C'mon, don't insult our intelligence!
I have said my piece, and if you have read the pj files and the LIES told, not only by the Tapas 9, but Clarence Mitchell, also, you wouldn't be asking the questions you are asking.
sallypelt- Posts : 4004
Activity : 5319
Likes received : 961
Join date : 2012-11-10
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
DP RogatoryCarver wrote:Is this confirmed? Did GM and DP ever address it? I find this very suspicious and like I said I am more than open to persuasion. It's why I joined. I'm here to learn not to tell anybody they are wrong.jeanmonroe wrote:"If the couple found their daughter dead and impulsively agreed to cover up the death, and Smithman being GM, this would mean Gerry running to the beach with the body, hiding it so well in a strange country in the dark that even the locals and authorities couldn't find it, returning to the Tapas as though nothing happened just in time for Kate to raise the alarm."
..............................................................................................................
And GM and his friend DP going back out again only TO THE BEACH at 4:00AM, 4th May 2007,, when supposedly EVERYONE else had gone 'home' as KM said.
None of us KNOW what happened yet I'm being attacked for saying what I think.
"Me and Gerry you know I’m not sure what time it was, it was you know between three and four o’ clock when, again looking for her. We went down err through past the Ocean Club reception, we went down err to the beach and in between all this you know Kate and Gerry were just breaking down you know just their behaviour was, you know was never questioned or did I ever think there was anything strange about you know their behaviour and how they would, they would act, you know in such a set of circumstances and you know Gerry’s a very stoical person and you know, I think you know its the way that he’s conducted himself over the past few months you know, and he broke down with me on the front, you know. You know just very obviously a broken man, and you know we spent some time you know, not long, I was trying my best to console him, we went back then to the err the apartment, you know it’s, by around about four, four thirty in the morning you know there was nothing else that you know that we could do".
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Carver wrote:
"None of us KNOW what happened yet I'm being attacked for saying what I think".
You really haven't read a single page of the PJ files, have you?
Now, THAT is really the last time I am going to respond to your posts!
"None of us KNOW what happened yet I'm being attacked for saying what I think".
You really haven't read a single page of the PJ files, have you?
Now, THAT is really the last time I am going to respond to your posts!
sallypelt- Posts : 4004
Activity : 5319
Likes received : 961
Join date : 2012-11-10
time in video
It should start at 10.30 ish when you start the link. The interviewer speaks. then Gerry, then Kate.Châtelaine wrote:***worriedmum wrote:
Jeezo!
Kate says a similar thing here!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=J0pBdLyJJhE#t=633
Worriedmum, can you please give an indication as at what time in this video she says that?
I'm a bit weary of going through yet another quarter of an hour of TM talk ...
worriedmum- Posts : 2062
Activity : 2819
Likes received : 583
Join date : 2012-01-17
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
It's all very well giving opinions - but you are throwing them out with absolutely no evidence.Carver wrote:I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
You ask "why immediately alert everyone"?
Looking at this hypothetically, there could be several reasons. One obvious one would be that Kate genuinely thought the MMcC had been taken and that it was only when the others went to search they found her (e.g. dead behind the sofa or outside). The commotion at the table will have been noted by restaurant staff - so they can't pretend the abduction happened during the night. It is then the have to make a very quick decision. So that's one scenario.
Another scenario of course is that MMcC died on a previous night.
Okeydokey- Posts : 938
Activity : 1013
Likes received : 31
Join date : 2013-10-18
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
The latter has always been my take on the story as the news unfoldedOkeydokey wrote:It's all very well giving opinions - but you are throwing them out with absolutely no evidence.Carver wrote:I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
You ask "why immediately alert everyone"?
Looking at this hypothetically, there could be several reasons. One obvious one would be that Kate genuinely thought the MMcC had been taken and that it was only when the others went to search they found her (e.g. dead behind the sofa or outside). The commotion at the table will have been noted by restaurant staff - so they can't pretend the abduction happened during the night. It is then the have to make a very quick decision. So that's one scenario.
Another scenario of course is that MMcC died on a previous night.
currio- Posts : 71
Activity : 79
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-29
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
If she died the night before who is this pictured on the 3rd?currio wrote:The latter has always been my take on the story as the news unfoldedOkeydokey wrote:It's all very well giving opinions - but you are throwing them out with absolutely no evidence.Carver wrote:I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
You ask "why immediately alert everyone"?
Looking at this hypothetically, there could be several reasons. One obvious one would be that Kate genuinely thought the MMcC had been taken and that it was only when the others went to search they found her (e.g. dead behind the sofa or outside). The commotion at the table will have been noted by restaurant staff - so they can't pretend the abduction happened during the night. It is then the have to make a very quick decision. So that's one scenario.
Another scenario of course is that MMcC died on a previous night.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Might it be photo-shopped ?...currio wrote:The latter has always been my take on the story as the news unfoldedOkeydokey wrote:It's all very well giving opinions - but you are throwing them out with absolutely no evidence.Carver wrote:I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
You ask "why immediately alert everyone"?
Looking at this hypothetically, there could be several reasons. One obvious one would be that Kate genuinely thought the MMcC had been taken and that it was only when the others went to search they found her (e.g. dead behind the sofa or outside). The commotion at the table will have been noted by restaurant staff - so they can't pretend the abduction happened during the night. It is then the have to make a very quick decision. So that's one scenario.
Another scenario of course is that MMcC died on a previous night.
currio- Posts : 71
Activity : 79
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-29
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
There are long discussions here and elsewhere which doubt that this photo was taken on 3rd May. I won't go into anything about it being photo-shopped but, just going by the fact that it was taken on what is clearly a blazing hot summer's day, it couldn't have been taken in PDL on 3rd May when the temperature was nowhere near as high.
Personally I think it was taken the previous summer.
Personally I think it was taken the previous summer.
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Carver, there has been much debate regarding the photo's of Madeleine. I am not saying that the 'last photo' is faked, however if you look at some of the photo's released after the 3rd there appears to be something very wrong with them.Carver wrote:If she died the night before who is this pictured on the 3rd?currio wrote:The latter has always been my take on the story as the news unfoldedOkeydokey wrote:It's all very well giving opinions - but you are throwing them out with absolutely no evidence.Carver wrote:I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
You ask "why immediately alert everyone"?
Looking at this hypothetically, there could be several reasons. One obvious one would be that Kate genuinely thought the MMcC had been taken and that it was only when the others went to search they found her (e.g. dead behind the sofa or outside). The commotion at the table will have been noted by restaurant staff - so they can't pretend the abduction happened during the night. It is then the have to make a very quick decision. So that's one scenario.
Another scenario of course is that MMcC died on a previous night.
As an example I have posted the make up photo.
What do you notice about the ears?
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/new-appeal-to-find-madeleine-mccann-247390.
____________________
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln.
Hicks- Posts : 976
Activity : 1005
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-07-16
Age : 65
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
You really think Amalie looks only a year old in this picture?No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:There are long discussions here and elsewhere which doubt that this photo was taken on 3rd May. I won't go into anything about it being photo-shopped but, just going by the fact that it was taken on what is clearly a blazing hot summer's day, it couldn't have been taken in PDL on 3rd May when the temperature was nowhere near as high.
Personally I think it was taken the previous summer.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
There's also the problem that the pool photo and the tennis court photo were supposedly taken within a day or two of each other but, assuming that they are both of Madeleine, she looks barely 3 in the first one and about 6 in the second one.
Yes I think Amelie could be about 18 months in that photo.
Yes I think Amelie could be about 18 months in that photo.
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
There is a thread dedicated to the last photo which you can use for discussing this........
https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2143-the-last-photo-the-key-questions?highlight=pool+photo
https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2143-the-last-photo-the-key-questions?highlight=pool+photo
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
@Hicks Her ears are in the wrong place, far too low but could that be because she has her head tilted back?
Must go and tilt my head and look in the mirror :)
Must go and tilt my head and look in the mirror :)
littlepixie- Posts : 1346
Activity : 1392
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2009-11-29
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Hicks wrote:Carver, there has been much debate regarding the photo's of Madeleine. I am not saying that the 'last photo' is faked, however if you look at some of the photo's released after the 3rd there appears to be something very wrong with them.Carver wrote:If she died the night before who is this pictured on the 3rd?currio wrote:The latter has always been my take on the story as the news unfoldedOkeydokey wrote:It's all very well giving opinions - but you are throwing them out with absolutely no evidence.Carver wrote:I've stated a few times now it's just my opinion. Aren't I entitled to one?russiandoll wrote:
btw no one asked you for proof of an abduction; I believe you were asked what made you conclude that a stranger abduction had taken place..I have yet to see any answer from you. How about some evidence from the files which leads to your conclusion?
The reason I've concluded this opinion is because the alternatives are - 1. The child wandering off. I rule this out because it is my opinion that she would have been spotted, or found that night in the area, harmed or otherwise.
The 2nd alternative is parent involvement/coverup, which I don't think was possible for them to carry out, and pretty incomprehensible. If they really wanted to cover up, why not wait til they got home that night and dispose of the body in the middle of the night? Why immediately alert everybody only a short time after Gerry supposedly hid the body? Wouldn't it be much easier to wake up the next morning and report their daughter had been taken while they slept?
This leaves me with a stranger going in to the apartment and taking the child, and I have yet to see anything to make me rule this out.
process of elimination really. Not sure why people are being so aggressive towards me. It's not exactly an outlandish belief I have, is it not the same conclusion that every investigating body arrived at?
I'm not Pro McCann and don't even like the couple, their child neglect disgusts me.
I'm also not some anonymous internet troll with any hidden motive. Carver is my surname. I'm 25 and from Glasgow.
You ask "why immediately alert everyone"?
Looking at this hypothetically, there could be several reasons. One obvious one would be that Kate genuinely thought the MMcC had been taken and that it was only when the others went to search they found her (e.g. dead behind the sofa or outside). The commotion at the table will have been noted by restaurant staff - so they can't pretend the abduction happened during the night. It is then the have to make a very quick decision. So that's one scenario.
Another scenario of course is that MMcC died on a previous night.
As an example I have posted the make up photo.
What do you notice about the ears?
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/new-appeal-to-find-madeleine-mccann-247390.
well that's just freaky...not only are the ears too low down, but look how the left one joins the face......either shopped or some serious deformity..
currio- Posts : 71
Activity : 79
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-29
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
This is turning into the last 'photo thread', for which there is a thread already.....please if you wish to discuss this photo, post there. I posted the link earlier.
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I've got nothing to say about that photo....candyfloss wrote:This is turning into the last 'photo thread', for which there is a thread already.....please if you wish to discuss this photo, post there. I posted the link earlier.
____________________
The prime suspects in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann cannot be permitted to dictate what can and can't be discussed about the case
ProfessorPPlum- Posts : 414
Activity : 425
Likes received : 5
Join date : 2012-05-04
Page 11 of 17 • 1 ... 7 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 17
Similar topics
» WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» Sunday Times apology
» MADELEINE: Sunday Express special investigation seven years on from disappearance
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» Sunday Times apology
» MADELEINE: Sunday Express special investigation seven years on from disappearance
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 11 of 17
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum