WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 7 of 17 • Share
Page 7 of 17 • 1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 12 ... 17
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I assume they've been CRucked. I noticed the story disappeared off Huffpost PDQ.candyfloss wrote:Nothing on the front page of Sunday Times this Sunday....
Truthandjustice- Posts : 237
Activity : 240
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-09-24
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Carver, from the Sunday Times report...
So they were told the Smithman sighting was more important, yet they chose not to issue the e-fits or have them on their website or KM's book. It would have cost nothing, and may have generated lots of information.
Their report, seen by The Sunday Times, focused on a sighting by an Irish family of a man carrying a child at about 10pm on May 3, 2007, when Madeleine went missing.
An earlier sighting by one of the McCanns’ friends was dismissed as less credible after “serious inconsistencies” were found in her evidence. The report also raised questions about “anomalies” in the statements given by the McCanns and their friends.
So they were told the Smithman sighting was more important, yet they chose not to issue the e-fits or have them on their website or KM's book. It would have cost nothing, and may have generated lots of information.
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
How can the ST have been Carter rucked if they printed the truth about that report ?
____________________
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
You knew that well before today. Good to see you still around JD.jd wrote:I've learnt something new today...No Stone Unturned actually means if you don't agree with a stone then to leave it unturned
____________________
“Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you are a mile away from them and you have their shoes.”
Unknown
“And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
Daisy- Posts : 1245
Activity : 1312
Likes received : 11
Join date : 2011-06-15
Location : Yorkshire, England
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I think the ST article was the opening shot of what is to come in the Brooks/Coulsen trial
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I didn't know you were back Daisy.....Good to see you are still around tooDaisy wrote:You knew that well before today. Good to see you still around JD.jd wrote:I've learnt something new today...No Stone Unturned actually means if you don't agree with a stone then to leave it unturned
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Please just confirm for me that you are saying it's only really become relevant because tannerman has been eliminated. Shouldn't it have been released and chased up years ago ?Carver wrote:So it's not a failure that the Portugese police didn't even discover there was a night creche across the street? Tannerman could have been ruled out at the very start if they did. And Smithman could have been chased up.SchrodingersBody wrote:Personally I think it says more about the British Police and their desire to move things along to an appropriate conclusion than it does the "failings" of the Portugese police.Carver wrote:Doesn't that say more about the Portugese police failings than anything else?sami wrote:It has taken nearly 7 years to rule it out !!Carver wrote:+ "NOW that we can rule out Tannerman"candyfloss wrote:
That's why the e-fit & sketches and new information tonight are so important to us, because that's probably the best chance we've got of finding Madeleine.
Back then they decided their friends sighting outside of the apartment was more important than a family of strangers the other side of town, who wouldn't?
SchrodingersBody- Posts : 110
Activity : 115
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-10-26
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Probably because the author signed a confidentiality agreement. Giving it to the police is one thing (and that had to be signed off by the lawyers), giving it to the press is another.russiandoll wrote:How can the ST have been Carter rucked if they printed the truth about that report ?
Truthandjustice- Posts : 237
Activity : 240
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2013-09-24
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I confirm that I'm saying I believe that's probably the parents line of thinking. Did the portugese police chase it up?SchrodingersBody wrote:Please just confirm for me that you are saying it's only really become relevant because tannerman has been eliminated. Shouldn't it have been released and chased up years ago ?Carver wrote:So it's not a failure that the Portugese police didn't even discover there was a night creche across the street? Tannerman could have been ruled out at the very start if they did. And Smithman could have been chased up.SchrodingersBody wrote:Personally I think it says more about the British Police and their desire to move things along to an appropriate conclusion than it does the "failings" of the Portugese police.Carver wrote:Doesn't that say more about the Portugese police failings than anything else?sami wrote:It has taken nearly 7 years to rule it out !!Carver wrote:+ "NOW that we can rule out Tannerman"candyfloss wrote:
That's why the e-fit & sketches and new information tonight are so important to us, because that's probably the best chance we've got of finding Madeleine.
Back then they decided their friends sighting outside of the apartment was more important than a family of strangers the other side of town, who wouldn't?
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I don;t think the ST have been carter rucked. Murdoch holds power over all these kind of people, he has his own entrance to 10 Downing Street via the back door unnoticed. He has even been behind changing laws. He allowed this article to be printed to protect his 2 little darlings in their trialTruthandjustice wrote:Probably because the author signed a confidentiality agreement. Giving it to the police is one thing (and that had to be signed off by the lawyers), giving it to the press is another.russiandoll wrote:How can the ST have been Carter rucked if they printed the truth about that report ?
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Yes they did. Amaral was bringing the Smiths back to PDL but as he was organising it he was taken off the caseCarver wrote:I confirm that I'm saying I believe that's probably the parents line of thinking. Did the portugese police chase it up?
____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
jd- Posts : 4151
Activity : 4400
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2011-07-22
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Do you feel they were justified in that way of thinking ?Carver wrote:I confirm that I'm saying I believe that's probably the parents line of thinking. Did the portugese police chase it up?SchrodingersBody wrote:Please just confirm for me that you are saying it's only really become relevant because tannerman has been eliminated. Shouldn't it have been released and chased up years ago ?Carver wrote:So it's not a failure that the Portugese police didn't even discover there was a night creche across the street? Tannerman could have been ruled out at the very start if they did. And Smithman could have been chased up.SchrodingersBody wrote:Personally I think it says more about the British Police and their desire to move things along to an appropriate conclusion than it does the "failings" of the Portugese police.Carver wrote:Doesn't that say more about the Portugese police failings than anything else?sami wrote:It has taken nearly 7 years to rule it out !!Carver wrote:+ "NOW that we can rule out Tannerman"candyfloss wrote:
That's why the e-fit & sketches and new information tonight are so important to us, because that's probably the best chance we've got of finding Madeleine.
Back then they decided their friends sighting outside of the apartment was more important than a family of strangers the other side of town, who wouldn't?
SchrodingersBody- Posts : 110
Activity : 115
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-10-26
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Well, I certainly wouldn't, since it would have meant the abduction taking place under my very nose, with the abductor hiding in the apartment while I was in it, and then him not bothering to check what direction I'd headed off in when I left so that he could avoid walking where I might see him. Tannerman was always a non-starter, whereas Smithman was - as Scotland Yard and the ex-MI5 investigators realised - much more important. Only the McCanns could employ PIs to investigate and then suppress their findings, using legal means to do so, for 5 years.Carver wrote:+ "NOW that we can rule out Tannerman"candyfloss wrote:
That's why the e-fit & sketches and new information tonight are so important to us, because that's probably the best chance we've got of finding Madeleine.
Back then they decided their friends sighting outside of the apartment was more important than a family of strangers the other side of town, who wouldn't?
Issy- Posts : 36
Activity : 36
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Can't say as I wasn't in there shoes and don't know what the report said or what advice they were given regarding what to do with it etc. I don't think it is proof of their involvement in her death though. I don't believe there is any evidence of that.SchrodingersBody wrote:Do you feel they were justified in that way of thinking ?Carver wrote:I confirm that I'm saying I believe that's probably the parents line of thinking. Did the portugese police chase it up?SchrodingersBody wrote:Please just confirm for me that you are saying it's only really become relevant because tannerman has been eliminated. Shouldn't it have been released and chased up years ago ?Carver wrote:So it's not a failure that the Portugese police didn't even discover there was a night creche across the street? Tannerman could have been ruled out at the very start if they did. And Smithman could have been chased up.SchrodingersBody wrote:Personally I think it says more about the British Police and their desire to move things along to an appropriate conclusion than it does the "failings" of the Portugese police.Carver wrote:Doesn't that say more about the Portugese police failings than anything else?sami wrote:It has taken nearly 7 years to rule it out !!Carver wrote:+ "NOW that we can rule out Tannerman"candyfloss wrote:
That's why the e-fit & sketches and new information tonight are so important to us, because that's probably the best chance we've got of finding Madeleine.
Back then they decided their friends sighting outside of the apartment was more important than a family of strangers the other side of town, who wouldn't?
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Just to remind you again Carver.candyfloss wrote:Carver, from the Sunday Times report...
Their report, seen by The Sunday Times, focused on a sighting by an Irish family of a man carrying a child at about 10pm on May 3, 2007, when Madeleine went missing.
An earlier sighting by one of the McCanns’ friends was dismissed as less credible after “serious inconsistencies” were found in her evidence. The report also raised questions about “anomalies” in the statements given by the McCanns and their friends.
So they were told the Smithman sighting was more important, yet they chose not to issue the e-fits or have them on their website or KM's book. It would have cost nothing, and may have generated lots of information.
Guest- Guest
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Again I can't comment on the decisions of the McCanns as I don't know what guidance they were receiving. I still don't think it is proof of any involvement.candyfloss wrote:Just to remind you again Carver.candyfloss wrote:Carver, from the Sunday Times report...
Their report, seen by The Sunday Times, focused on a sighting by an Irish family of a man carrying a child at about 10pm on May 3, 2007, when Madeleine went missing.
An earlier sighting by one of the McCanns’ friends was dismissed as less credible after “serious inconsistencies” were found in her evidence. The report also raised questions about “anomalies” in the statements given by the McCanns and their friends.
So they were told the Smithman sighting was more important, yet they chose not to issue the e-fits or have them on their website or KM's book. It would have cost nothing, and may have generated lots of information.
It's being suggested Smithman was Gerry? I'm sure the numerous staff and witnesses would have remembered the fact the father wasn't present at the complex when Kate was raising the alarm. There's a reason SY are adamant it's not Gerry.
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
On the lack of evidence we agree, and I think that's the crux of the whole issue. There is lots of publicly available intelligence, and no shortage of strange behaviours, and contradictions, which might lead one to reasonably believe that Madeleines parents know something they'd rather not share, but that proves nothing. As you rightly say, there is no evidence. There's not even any evidence Madeleine is dead, never mind that her parents were involved, a point which they cling to, as you would, innocent or guilty.
I'm accepting there is no evidence, there is certainly nothing public that would amount to damming evidence in a judicial process, just lots of circumstantial things. Whether there is anything evidential currently being witheld by the various authorities is a different matter.
To withold and supress the efits like the couple have, is just another tick in the circumstantial debit column, but again it's not evidence as per a courtroom, it just looks bad, very bad in this case. Another thing they have done that doesn't match the behaviour many people would expect of an innocent party, and enough to have more and more people suspect the parents of involvement.
Clearly somebody did something that week which is unacceptable, but nobody can prove who or what at the moment...which is pretty much exactly where the portugese left the case.
I'm accepting there is no evidence, there is certainly nothing public that would amount to damming evidence in a judicial process, just lots of circumstantial things. Whether there is anything evidential currently being witheld by the various authorities is a different matter.
To withold and supress the efits like the couple have, is just another tick in the circumstantial debit column, but again it's not evidence as per a courtroom, it just looks bad, very bad in this case. Another thing they have done that doesn't match the behaviour many people would expect of an innocent party, and enough to have more and more people suspect the parents of involvement.
Clearly somebody did something that week which is unacceptable, but nobody can prove who or what at the moment...which is pretty much exactly where the portugese left the case.
SchrodingersBody- Posts : 110
Activity : 115
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-10-26
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
But the fact they are reopening the case, suggests to me that they finally have some evidence.
currio- Posts : 71
Activity : 79
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-29
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
hopefully !currio wrote:But the fact they are reopening the case, suggests to me that they finally have some evidence.
SchrodingersBody- Posts : 110
Activity : 115
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-10-26
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Hey ST, we are waiting for
____________________
Mummy, why didn't you come when we were crying last night?
Sietah- Posts : 112
Activity : 112
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-17
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Wasn't the evidence that prompted the reopening regarding "Tractorman"
Carver- Posts : 55
Activity : 55
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-11-02
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
Tractorman came later in the week, I'm afraidCarver wrote:Wasn't the evidence that prompted the reopening regarding "Tractorman"
currio- Posts : 71
Activity : 79
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-29
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
I am starting to think that they have only reopened the case just to close it once and for all, I doubt they will have any real new leads, well not new in the abduction theory sense. It is quite clear the Mcann's and the Tapas crew have something to hide. I hope one day that the truth will come out and we see breaking news that a suspect has been charged, assuming again there is one of course other than the Mcann's and one or two of the Tapas 7 but I doubt it, seems like there will be no justice for Madeleine, I also doubt her body will ever be found, it's been a whitewash from the beginning.
tracey1270- Posts : 38
Activity : 38
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-23
Re: WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
What is the evidence against Tractorman?
tracey1270- Posts : 38
Activity : 38
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-23
catching up with Carver's posts
I just wanted to say, Carver, that in my lexicon, 'prioritising' does not have the same meaning as 'suppression'...
worriedmum- Posts : 2062
Activity : 2819
Likes received : 583
Join date : 2012-01-17
Page 7 of 17 • 1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 12 ... 17
Similar topics
» WOW A MUST READ -Madeleine clues hidden for five years - Sunday Times Full article now on Page 1
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» Sunday Times apology
» MADELEINE: Sunday Express special investigation seven years on from disappearance
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» An analysis of the Sunday Times article 27 Oct 2013, on the 'SMITHMAN' efits, which relied on Henri Exton as the source
» Sunday Times apology
» MADELEINE: Sunday Express special investigation seven years on from disappearance
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 7 of 17
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum