CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 2 of 22 • Share
Page 2 of 22 • 1, 2, 3 ... 12 ... 22
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Just been listening to 5Live whilst working and the Richard Bacon show - every Thursday he has a spot which follows the lead stories of the week. Two guest commentators were in to discuss the topics, one Boris Johnson's sister and a guy I didn't catch the name of. When they got to the Madeleine story - both guests seemed to think the programme bizarre but then seemed to totally change their reaction and started bleeting on about the poor Mccanns and what they'd been through, and all the horrible stories that had been written about them putting in the frame in the newspapers etc - and how they hoped this would stop now.....Bacon never said anything really, which is out of character for him...Its on a pod cast I believe, but again the BBC supporting the Mccans as per.
mouse- Posts : 330
Activity : 397
Likes received : 53
Join date : 2013-10-10
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
My thoughts exactly. To be honest I would have thought they would have gone over the mccanns and tapas statements first,but it seems like they went to the bottom of the heap and only put the smiths sighting out as they knew they couldn't get away with keeping hidden.plebgate wrote:Agree Tiny, it is getting absolutely ridiculous now imo. Setting traps and waiting WHY? Surely there have been enough changes of story to start asking WHY?tiny wrote:if its a whitwash,nothing,if it isn,t then they need to be taken in and questioned, prontoplebgate wrote:Well what are the SY to make of all these changes of story. Can't fathom it myself.
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:One question here that continues to bother me (and I am genuinely not asking this to derail the thread). I am 99% convinced of the McCann's guilt, but there is one small nag. If someone can explain this to me I am completely sold...
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
____________________
nobodythereeither- Posts : 273
Activity : 273
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
I don't buy that for a second. There are many things about this case that are a little "odd". However....nobodythereeither wrote:My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:One question here that continues to bother me (and I am genuinely not asking this to derail the thread). I am 99% convinced of the McCann's guilt, but there is one small nag. If someone can explain this to me I am completely sold...
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
But the suggestion that 9 people colluded is beyond any sense and reason and championing that "line" makes seemingly sensible people appear pretty daft.
geh007- Posts : 5
Activity : 5
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-16
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Someone asked if that was it or was there more to come, well off to Ireland next.............
Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk 12m
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."#McCann #NSYNews
Metropolitan Police
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."
Guest- Guest
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Doh I'm getting cynical again, next month!!!! No rush then.candyfloss wrote:Someone asked if that was it or was there more to come, well off to Ireland next.............
Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk 12m
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."#McCann#NSYNews
Doesn't the libel trial resume next month, and ends next month. It's now 17th October.......next month to find this man???
Guest- Guest
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
That's ok,gerry isn't going any where:biggrin:candyfloss wrote:Doh I'm getting cynical again, next month!!!! No rush then.candyfloss wrote:Someone asked if that was it or was there more to come, well off to Ireland next.............
Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk 12m
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."#McCann#NSYNews
Doesn't the libel trial resume next month, and ends next month. It's now 17th October.......next month to find this man???
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Seemingly sensible people who thought it okay to leave their kids in a holiday apartment while they went out to eat most nights of the holiday. I wouldn't call that sensible behaviour - I'm with the 'nobodytheireither' theory, always have been, and having to face the cold hard facts - if this scenario did happen - that they'd risked losing their most precious possessions - their much loved children if this all came to light, that they may face charges of neglect. Add to that their careers and the fact they'd be facing the onslaught of the world's press.....It might have appeared to be their only way out at that time.geh007 wrote:I don't buy that for a second. There are many things about this case that are a little "odd". However....nobodythereeither wrote:My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
But the suggestion that 9 people colluded is beyond any sense and reason and championing that "line" makes seemingly sensible people appear pretty daft.
mouse- Posts : 330
Activity : 397
Likes received : 53
Join date : 2013-10-10
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Just a few possibilities:intrigued89 wrote:
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
1. They share some of the responsibility, e.g. they were also sedating their own or maybe each other's kids.
2. The McCanns have something on them, e.g. they are all taking part in some kind of criminal ring.
3. They genuinely believe enough of the McCann's story such that their personal friendships are enough to bias their recollections and statements.
travesty- Posts : 5
Activity : 7
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-14
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
I consider myself a perfectly sensible person.mouse wrote:Seemingly sensible people who thought it okay to leave their kids in a holiday apartment while they went out to eat most nights of the holiday. I wouldn't call that sensible behaviour - I'm with the 'nobodytheireither' theory, always have been, and having to face the cold hard facts - if this scenario did happen - that they'd risked losing their most precious possessions - their much loved children if this all came to light, that they may face charges of neglect. Add to that their careers and the fact they'd be facing the onslaught of the world's press.....It might have appeared to be their only way out at that time.geh007 wrote:I don't buy that for a second. There are many things about this case that are a little "odd". However....nobodythereeither wrote:My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
But the suggestion that 9 people colluded is beyond any sense and reason and championing that "line" makes seemingly sensible people appear pretty daft.
What would your explanation be, geh007?
____________________
nobodythereeither- Posts : 273
Activity : 273
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Explanation for what?nobodythereeither wrote:I consider myself a perfectly sensible person.mouse wrote:Seemingly sensible people who thought it okay to leave their kids in a holiday apartment while they went out to eat most nights of the holiday. I wouldn't call that sensible behaviour - I'm with the 'nobodytheireither' theory, always have been, and having to face the cold hard facts - if this scenario did happen - that they'd risked losing their most precious possessions - their much loved children if this all came to light, that they may face charges of neglect. Add to that their careers and the fact they'd be facing the onslaught of the world's press.....It might have appeared to be their only way out at that time.geh007 wrote:I don't buy that for a second. There are many things about this case that are a little "odd". However....nobodythereeither wrote:My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
But the suggestion that 9 people colluded is beyond any sense and reason and championing that "line" makes seemingly sensible people appear pretty daft.
What would your explanation be, geh007?
geh007- Posts : 5
Activity : 5
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-10-16
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Seems that geh007 has been posting the same in two or more other threads.
I replied in the Matt Oldfield "check" one ...
I replied in the Matt Oldfield "check" one ...
Guest- Guest
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Your explanation for Intrigued89's question, which is what we are discussing ......geh007 wrote:Explanation for what?nobodythereeither wrote:I consider myself a perfectly sensible person.mouse wrote:Seemingly sensible people who thought it okay to leave their kids in a holiday apartment while they went out to eat most nights of the holiday. I wouldn't call that sensible behaviour - I'm with the 'nobodytheireither' theory, always have been, and having to face the cold hard facts - if this scenario did happen - that they'd risked losing their most precious possessions - their much loved children if this all came to light, that they may face charges of neglect. Add to that their careers and the fact they'd be facing the onslaught of the world's press.....It might have appeared to be their only way out at that time.geh007 wrote:I don't buy that for a second. There are many things about this case that are a little "odd". However....nobodythereeither wrote:My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
But the suggestion that 9 people colluded is beyond any sense and reason and championing that "line" makes seemingly sensible people appear pretty daft.
What would your explanation be, geh007?
"Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?"
You said that you didn't buy MY explanation of it for a second, so I wondered what your explanation of it would be.
____________________
nobodythereeither- Posts : 273
Activity : 273
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Oh? I notice that he or she has only just joined this forum .....Châtelaine wrote:Seems that geh007 has been posting the same in two or more other threads.
I replied in the Matt Oldfield "check" one ...
nobodythereeither- Posts : 273
Activity : 273
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Wonder if there's two different versions for Northern Ireland & Republic of Ireland? I ask this because of this post from earlier on in thread.candyfloss wrote:Doh I'm getting cynical again, next month!!!! No rush then.candyfloss wrote:Someone asked if that was it or was there more to come, well off to Ireland next.............
Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk 12m
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."#McCann#NSYNews
Doesn't the libel trial resume next month, and ends next month. It's now 17th October.......next month to find this man???
Different versions
Jauna Loca Today at 2:22 pm
Have only skimmed this topic so forgive me if info has already been posted.
I read somewhere that the Dutch/German reconstruction was paid for by the Madeleine Fund
and therefore made to Parent's specification, rather than Police version.
Any truth in this?
UK version the one that was shown here in Ireland by the way.
____________________
“Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you are a mile away from them and you have their shoes.”
Unknown
“And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
Daisy- Posts : 1245
Activity : 1312
Likes received : 11
Join date : 2011-06-15
Location : Yorkshire, England
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Not everybody knew everything AT THE TIME.
They do now.
So will they cave now or be forever waiting for that tap on the shoulder?
Once the timeline was written 'in stone' so to speak..they sealed their own fates.
Easy, in the adrenaline haze of the first hour.
Who decided to write it all down?
That's a far more interesting question. And why?
They do now.
So will they cave now or be forever waiting for that tap on the shoulder?
Once the timeline was written 'in stone' so to speak..they sealed their own fates.
Easy, in the adrenaline haze of the first hour.
Who decided to write it all down?
That's a far more interesting question. And why?
The Slave- Posts : 127
Activity : 129
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-10-05
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
***The Slave wrote:Not everybody knew everything AT THE TIME.
They do now.
So will they cave now or be forever waiting for that tap on the shoulder?
Once the timeline was written 'in stone' so to speak..they sealed their own fates.
Easy, in the adrenaline haze of the first hour.
Who decided to write it all down?
That's a far more interesting question. And why?
The most organised one? Needs some sangfroid to do that.
Guest- Guest
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
[quote="candyfloss"]Someone asked if that was it or was there more to come, well off to Ireland next.............
Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk 12m
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."#McCann #NSYNews[/quote
Planned to coincide with the resumption of the libel trial, by any chance?
Metropolitan Police
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."
Planned to coincide with the resumption of the libel trial, by any chance?
tasprin- Posts : 834
Activity : 896
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
McCanns accused of pressuring Tapas Nine to 'keep them silent' Daily Mail (no longer available online)nobodythereeither wrote:My take on this is that they had all left their children unattended night after night, and had also possibly had sedated them.intrigued89 wrote:One question here that continues to bother me (and I am genuinely not asking this to derail the thread). I am 99% convinced of the McCann's guilt, but there is one small nag. If someone can explain this to me I am completely sold...
If the version of events widely believed by posters on here and other sites is true (that the McCann's are in some way responsible for Madeleine's death and that the T7 were aware of this and helped them cover it up), my question is why? Why would the T7 risk their careers and livelihoods to protect their friends' negligence?
It is the one thing that doesn't make sense to me and I am yet to hear a rational explanation. The cadaver, the 48 questions, the lack of coherence in the relative stories all points in one direction. I have even come round to dismiss the 'why do they still keep going on tv if they are guilty' line of thought, so for me this is the one remaining question and it remains an important one.
I hope someone can help me out with this one...
If it were to come out that Madeleine had died as a result of such action (eg by accidental death whilst in a dozy state because sedated) then they could be implicated as well if they had all done the same thing.
If her body had to be hidden because an autopsy would show sedation (or - possibly - signs of something else which was too awful to come to light) then clearly it was not a straightforward accidental death which could be explained away.
I don't want to surmise more than that, but there are theories online which would explain why there is a "pact of silence" . Whether that silence has now been broken by one or more of them, who knows.
Last updated at 15:04pm on 12th November 2007
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id18.html
Also:-
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/06/pj-brought-back-to-portugal-3-of.html
In a secret visit to Portugal, three persons who had dinner at the Tapas Bar shattered the McCanns and Jane Tanner versions
1st link scroll halfway down
____________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~
MoonGoddess- Posts : 282
Activity : 284
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-09-28
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
had real problems with that last post??
@ intrigued89
the above give a couple of examples of cracks in the "pact"... I think the first link might give you a good idea... I personally think that maybe 1 or 2 know the truth, the others are just caught up in the whole mess... I think JT deliberately lied about 'bundleman', I now think she did see SC leave the tapas with his child in his arms and turned him into bundleman in order to promote the 'abduction'... in a nutshell, I think a couple got roped in early on [but not knowing what they were getting roped into.... if that makes sense?]
@ intrigued89
the above give a couple of examples of cracks in the "pact"... I think the first link might give you a good idea... I personally think that maybe 1 or 2 know the truth, the others are just caught up in the whole mess... I think JT deliberately lied about 'bundleman', I now think she did see SC leave the tapas with his child in his arms and turned him into bundleman in order to promote the 'abduction'... in a nutshell, I think a couple got roped in early on [but not knowing what they were getting roped into.... if that makes sense?]
____________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~
MoonGoddess- Posts : 282
Activity : 284
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-09-28
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
What ever time the abduction happened - 9.15 or 10.00 - there is still the question of sedation. Even the McCanns say the children were sedated but how did an abductor sedate three children without waking them? Oral or intravenous sedation would have woken them and chloroform would have left an unmistakable smell.
Sedation could very well be the reason for collusion. Fear of the consequences could have deterred them from bringing the little girl to a hospital. If she suffered a fatal injury whilst under the influence of sedatives one or more of them may have attempted to resuscitate her. It is not unknown for doctors to cover up for each other.
Sedation could very well be the reason for collusion. Fear of the consequences could have deterred them from bringing the little girl to a hospital. If she suffered a fatal injury whilst under the influence of sedatives one or more of them may have attempted to resuscitate her. It is not unknown for doctors to cover up for each other.
tasprin- Posts : 834
Activity : 896
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
I agree to the doctors do cover up for each other,but we are talking about a 3yr old little girl, what sort of people are these tapas 7 to do a thing like that unless all the children were sedated and if they were then i can see why a cover up occurred,yep Gerry and kate have got them over a barrel if this is the case.tasprin wrote:What ever time the abduction happened - 9.15 or 10.00 - there is still the question of sedation. Even the McCanns say the children were sedated but how did an abductor sedate three children without waking them? Oral or intravenous sedation would have woken them and chloroform would have left an unmistakable smell.
Sedation could very well be the reason for collusion. Fear of the consequences could have deterred them from bringing the little girl to a hospital. If she suffered a fatal injury whilst under the influence of sedatives one or more of them may have attempted to resuscitate her. It is not unknown for doctors to cover up for each other.
tiny- Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
Next month? The tweet says later in the month i.e. later THIS month (October).candyfloss wrote:Doh I'm getting cynical again, next month!!!! No rush then.candyfloss wrote:Someone asked if that was it or was there more to come, well off to Ireland next.............
Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk 12m
DCI Redwood: "The next stage of the appeal will be in Ireland later in the month."#McCann#NSYNews
Doesn't the libel trial resume next month, and ends next month. It's now 17th October.......next month to find this man???
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
I think their behaviour over the last 6 years have given us that answer...... Deletedtiny wrote:I agree to the doctors do cover do up for each other,but we are talking about a 3yr old little girl, what sort of people are these tapas 7 to do a thing like thattasprin wrote:What ever time the abduction happened - 9.15 or 10.00 - there is still the question of sedation. Even the McCanns say the children were sedated but how did an abductor sedate three children without waking them? Oral or intravenous sedation would have woken them and chloroform would have left an unmistakable smell.
Sedation could very well be the reason for collusion. Fear of the consequences could have deterred them from bringing the little girl to a hospital. If she suffered a fatal injury whilst under the influence of sedatives one or more of them may have attempted to resuscitate her. It is not unknown for doctors to cover up for each other.
____________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~
MoonGoddess- Posts : 282
Activity : 284
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2013-09-28
Re: CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 2 DISCUSSION**** including CRIMEWATCH UPDATE (for what it was worth)
There is also the possibility that she suffered an injury earlier than the 3 May and didn't seek medical assistance.tiny wrote:I agree to the doctors do cover up for each other,but we are talking about a 3yr old little girl, what sort of people are these tapas 7 to do a thing like that unless all the children were sedated and if they were then i can see why a cover up occurred,yep Gerry and kate have got them over a barrel if this is the case.tasprin wrote:What ever time the abduction happened - 9.15 or 10.00 - there is still the question of sedation. Even the McCanns say the children were sedated but how did an abductor sedate three children without waking them? Oral or intravenous sedation would have woken them and chloroform would have left an unmistakable smell.
Sedation could very well be the reason for collusion. Fear of the consequences could have deterred them from bringing the little girl to a hospital. If she suffered a fatal injury whilst under the influence of sedatives one or more of them may have attempted to resuscitate her. It is not unknown for doctors to cover up for each other.
tasprin- Posts : 834
Activity : 896
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30
Page 2 of 22 • 1, 2, 3 ... 12 ... 22
Similar topics
» CRIMEWATCH ON BBC ***Part 1 DISCUSSION****
» CRIMEWATCH Update on MadeleineMcCann case tonight 19th March
» SMITHMAN 8 - The Nine Phases of Smithman - How the Smiths became part of the McCann Team in January 2008
» Findmadeleine website update 24th October 2013 - They are STILL promoting the 'Tannerman' sighting at 9.15pm, 10 days after Crimewatch
» 2nd October - Libel trial reports and discussion *UPDATE* Gerry McCann unable to testify, must wait for Judge decision by 10th
» CRIMEWATCH Update on MadeleineMcCann case tonight 19th March
» SMITHMAN 8 - The Nine Phases of Smithman - How the Smiths became part of the McCann Team in January 2008
» Findmadeleine website update 24th October 2013 - They are STILL promoting the 'Tannerman' sighting at 9.15pm, 10 days after Crimewatch
» 2nd October - Libel trial reports and discussion *UPDATE* Gerry McCann unable to testify, must wait for Judge decision by 10th
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 2 of 22
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum