Re: NEW E-Fits?- Express Maddy: Pictures of new suspect

by MoonGoddess 13.10.13 22:59

ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting

Are there any Smith family statements on line?

by tasprin 13.10.13 23:00

Surely there'll be lots of people in Rothley and Glasgow watching this and they must know what Smith said in his statement.

by ShuBob 13.10.13 23:00

The McCanns are currently locked in a legal battle with Amaral. We know what Amaral makes of the Smiths' sighting. If Amaral takes the stand, well....... titter

by ShuBob 13.10.13 23:01

MoonGoddess wrote:
ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting
Are there any Smith family statements on line?

Here:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] yes

by The Slave 13.10.13 23:03

bobbin wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
EXACTLY what I was thinking then, make an amalgam of the two faces and it looks like a gezza to me.....so the police would like to find this man and interview him, would they.

I thought the exact same thing. Those two 'morphed into one' make our Gez.

by roy rovers 13.10.13 23:03

plebgate wrote:When I first saw that photo I thought it was Brunty.

The two e-fit pics are of the same man? I hope this isn't going to turn into yet another farce.

Obviously the same man - one has no chin the other has three.

by Woofer 13.10.13 23:04

candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!

I thought these e-fits were supposed to be the 2 Germans seen loitering near the apartment. The Smiths were walking down near the sea so how can they give an e-fit of someone near the apartment.

by MoonGoddess 13.10.13 23:05

ShuBob wrote:
MoonGoddess wrote:
ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting
Are there any Smith family statements on line?
Here:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

X just watching Sky News..... I heard it too!!!!

by Guest 13.10.13 23:05

If this is the Smith e-fit, and SY think this man is important, then when does that leave the Jane Tanner sighting. This man/abductor/witness would not walk around a resort with a child for 45 minutes. It could of course be that the new timeline could be the Smith sighting time has been changed.

by pennylane 13.10.13 23:08

candyfloss wrote:If this is the Smith e-fit, and SY think this man is important, then when does that leave the Jane Tanner sighting. This man/abductor/witness would not walk around a resort with a child for 45 minutes. It could of course be that the new timeline could be the Smith sighting time has been changed.

I'm pretty sure they said '10 o'clock sighting' on Sky News.

by Ollie1 13.10.13 23:11

candyfloss wrote:If this is the Smith e-fit, and SY think this man is important, then when does that leave the Jane Tanner sighting. This man/abductor/witness would not walk around a resort with a child for 45 minutes. It could of course be that the new timeline could be the Smith sighting time has been changed.

What I thought as well candyfloss. Posted this on the wrong thread so copying it to here.

If it is true that these e-fits are based on the Smith sighting, although they only saw one man, where does that leave Dave Edgar? He said in the Madeleine was here video that what was important was what Jane Tanner saw, which was the abductor carrying Madeleine. He never doubted that or questioned what JT claimed she saw, and he was the first professional PI who worked on the case.

by I'm not buying 13.10.13 23:13

On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.

by Woofer 13.10.13 23:16

I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.

A complaint should be made to Sky News about that - how dare they aaagh

by Searcgforthetruth 13.10.13 23:17

To requote: "I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child"...Martin Smith January 2008.

When Sky News were talking about it one could read the Express article on screen and one could read it was the Smiths they were referring to.

by Guest 13.10.13 23:19

I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.

So will half the country be, who haven't a clue about the Smith sighting either. This gives me hope because we are now getting some facts out now.

by JackieL 13.10.13 23:20

I'm shocked too that they're publicising the Smith sighting. Too easy for anyone to find out why Mr. Smith contacted the police when he saw Gerry on those plane steps. Risky business for TM.

So, is this VERY old news the revelation, then?

by I'm not buying 13.10.13 23:25

Woofer wrote:
I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.
A complaint should be made to Sky News about that - how dare they

Jaqui Hames then said 'it's clear that there were some investigative opportunites missed at the time of this happening, erm, and perhaps some of the things that as police officers in the UK, perhaps we would have done automatically, weren't actually carried out. I mean it was pretty clear from erm reports at the scene by journalists as well as police officers here in the UK, that protocols that we would have adopted weren't followed and the worry is, now, is the integrity of the evidence that was actually compiled at the time.'

by MoonGoddess 13.10.13 23:33

I'm not buying wrote:
Woofer wrote:
I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.
A complaint should be made to Sky News about that - how dare they
Jaqui Hames then said 'it's clear that there were some investigative opportunites missed at the time of this happening, erm, and perhaps some of the things that as police officers in the UK, perhaps we would have done automatically, weren't actually carried out. I mean it was pretty clear from erm reports at the scene by journalists as well as police officers here in the UK, that protocols that we would have adopted weren't followed and the worry is, now, is the integrity of the evidence that was actually compiled at the time.'

No, because of the f***ing interference from a foreign government..... Grrrrrrrr

by plebgate 13.10.13 23:37

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Is it this Jacqui Hames who was on sky news?

by I'm not buying 13.10.13 23:42

plebgate wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Is it this Jacqui Hames who was on sky news?

I believe so.
She is described as 'Crimewatch presenter'

by plebgate 13.10.13 23:43

I just wondered why she is working for Sky then?
Edited to add: Not sure from the posts if she was making comments on Sky tonight or whether the comments are from the Crimewatch trailer?

by Searcgforthetruth 13.10.13 23:45

plebgate wrote:I just wondered why she is working for Sky then?

She is an ex Crimewatch presenter

by **sharonl** 13.10.13 23:46

Can I remind everyone that according to Redwood himself, this information and the e-fits are 'new and substantive', and the press has variously described them as;

significant
very significant
breakthrough
shattering

etc. etc.

Not convinced this is the Smith sighting they are talking about yet - if it is, clearly none of those words above apply.

But with 27 minutes of reconstruction to view, who knows, there may be a lot more, which will justify the extravagant claims of the past two weeks.

I think that Tony and 'Peewit' (welcome by the way) suggested that the only way they could obtain extra time for the abduction would be to knock Jane Tanner out of the equation - thereby creating a window for the alleged abductor not of 3-5 minutes but of 45-50 minutes.

But this would cause problems for the investigation and those who relied on Tanner's statement.

The search would have to go on for 'Tanner Man'.

After all, Tanner gave a detailed description of the child's pyjamas which exactly matched what Madeleine was wearing.

Gerry and Kate would have to explain why they talked to the world on 25 May giving out Jane Tanner's description.

Russell O'Brien and the group would have to explain why they gave a misleading set of timelines written out on the ripped-out cover of Madeleine's book.

The Tapas 9 would have to explain why they retained Jane's sighting in their composite statement of 10 May.

Kate's book would have to be changed to remove Tanner Man and explain how Jane Tanner got it wrong.

The images that Melissa Little drew up for Brian Kennedy would have to be discarded.

And so on...

by plebgate 13.10.13 23:47

Searcgforthetruth wrote:
plebgate wrote:I just wondered why she is working for Sky then?
She is an ex Crimewatch presenter

So ex-crimewatch presenter now working for Sky?

by I'm not buying 13.10.13 23:48

plebgate wrote:I just wondered why she is working for Sky then?
Edited to add: Not sure from the posts if she was making comments on Sky tonight or whether the comments are from the Crimewatch trailer?

She's a guest on Sky News for their paper review slot. She was interviewed separately on the 11 o'clock news programme. The quote was from that news bulletin.

by ShuBob 13.10.13 23:51

Maybe, just maybe Tanner has changed her statement.

What I'd like to know is if the timings have changed significantly and one or more Tapas witness doesn't agree with the changes (Kate and Gerry perhaps), do they protest and insist on their original versions?

Interesting times ahead methinks!

by **Nina** 13.10.13 23:54

She is a guest on the Press Review. She has said these 2 pictures are of the same man . A man seen carrying a child down a side street by a witness called Smith. This is the Smith statement and he was up to 80% sure that it was Gerry McCann. This is fantastic news imo.

by plebgate 13.10.13 23:55

I'm not buying wrote:
plebgate wrote:I just wondered why she is working for Sky then?
Edited to add: Not sure from the posts if she was making comments on Sky tonight or whether the comments are from the Crimewatch trailer?
She's a guest on Sky News for their paper review slot. She was interviewed separately on the 11 o'clock news programme. The quote was from that news bulletin.

Thanks for info.

She was treated very badly by News International it seems.

by MRNOODLES 14.10.13 0:01

How ironic eh? So the bungling sardine muncher wanted to take the Smiths' sighting further. But when he was pulled off the job, it sort of went belly up.

by Newintown 14.10.13 0:05

I'm watching the Sky News 11.30 p.m. press review, I can't believe what I'm hearing coming out of the mouth of the brainless moron who is presenting the programme. He actually said "the Portuguese police got the timelines wrong"!!! what

I'm so mad, I feel like throwing a brick through the TV screen.

I've sat through the programme for 30 minutes now trying to catch the name of this brainless moron so I can email Sky News and complain but I don't know who he is.

He also had the audacity to say that the PJ passed over the sighting of a child being carried off.

It is truly offensive to right minded people that these so called presenters are paid hundreds of thousands of £s a year to spout such rubbish, and they are too damn lazy or can't be bothered to do any research themselves and just put their hands out for their wages every month, no matter that they are libelling innocent people and putting out false information.

I am really, really angry. aaagh

Latest topics