Re: NEW E-Fits?- Express Maddy: Pictures of new suspect

by ShuBob on 13.10.13 22:53

candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!

I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting titter

by sallypelt on 13.10.13 22:53

bbc reviewer of papers does not believe tht this is groundbreaking

by MoonGoddess on 13.10.13 22:55

All this drip feeding the press with these snippets..... I really wonder if Gezza knew the Efits were based on the Smith sighting?

Be interesting to see if they show up for this "live appeal" tomorrow...

by MoonGoddess on 13.10.13 22:56

@sallypelt wrote:bbc reviewer of papers does not believe tht this is groundbreaking

he doesn't realise it's Gerry laughat

by pennylane on 13.10.13 22:56

@ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting

Yes Sky News taking about the Smith family sighting with Jackie Haines rubbishing the Portuguese investigation claiming they did nothing about this sighting, and saying many opportunities were missed; and the poor parents were wrongly accused by the Portuguese police, and they don't like going through this all over again but they want their daughter back! Will be a 25 minute reconstruction which is very long by normal Crime Watch standards.

Not good news at all. In fact stomach churning garbage as predicted.

by MoonGoddess on 13.10.13 22:59

@ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting

Are there any Smith family statements on line?

by tasprin on 13.10.13 23:00

Surely there'll be lots of people in Rothley and Glasgow watching this and they must know what Smith said in his statement.

by ShuBob on 13.10.13 23:00

The McCanns are currently locked in a legal battle with Amaral. We know what Amaral makes of the Smiths' sighting. If Amaral takes the stand, well....... titter

by ShuBob on 13.10.13 23:01

@MoonGoddess wrote:
@ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting
Are there any Smith family statements on line?

Here:

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id162.html yes

by The Slave on 13.10.13 23:03

@bobbin wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
EXACTLY what I was thinking then, make an amalgam of the two faces and it looks like a gezza to me.....so the police would like to find this man and interview him, would they.

I thought the exact same thing. Those two 'morphed into one' make our Gez.

by roy rovers on 13.10.13 23:03

@plebgate wrote:When I first saw that photo I thought it was Brunty.

The two e-fit pics are of the same man? I hope this isn't going to turn into yet another farce.

Obviously the same man - one has no chin the other has three.

by Woofer on 13.10.13 23:04

candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!

I thought these e-fits were supposed to be the 2 Germans seen loitering near the apartment. The Smiths were walking down near the sea so how can they give an e-fit of someone near the apartment.

by MoonGoddess on 13.10.13 23:05

@ShuBob wrote:
@MoonGoddess wrote:
@ShuBob wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Putting this post in here.......

candyfloss wrote:
@Searcgforthetruth wrote:Reported on Sky the EFit are from the Smith family!
Oooo err!
I heard it with my own two ears!!! It's Smithsman

Gerry's body language tomorrow should be interesting
Are there any Smith family statements on line?
Here:

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id162.html

X just watching Sky News..... I heard it too!!!!

by Guest on 13.10.13 23:05

If this is the Smith e-fit, and SY think this man is important, then when does that leave the Jane Tanner sighting. This man/abductor/witness would not walk around a resort with a child for 45 minutes. It could of course be that the new timeline could be the Smith sighting time has been changed.

by pennylane on 13.10.13 23:08

candyfloss wrote:If this is the Smith e-fit, and SY think this man is important, then when does that leave the Jane Tanner sighting. This man/abductor/witness would not walk around a resort with a child for 45 minutes. It could of course be that the new timeline could be the Smith sighting time has been changed.

I'm pretty sure they said '10 o'clock sighting' on Sky News.

by Ollie1 on 13.10.13 23:11

candyfloss wrote:If this is the Smith e-fit, and SY think this man is important, then when does that leave the Jane Tanner sighting. This man/abductor/witness would not walk around a resort with a child for 45 minutes. It could of course be that the new timeline could be the Smith sighting time has been changed.

What I thought as well candyfloss. Posted this on the wrong thread so copying it to here.

If it is true that these e-fits are based on the Smith sighting, although they only saw one man, where does that leave Dave Edgar? He said in the Madeleine was here video that what was important was what Jane Tanner saw, which was the abductor carrying Madeleine. He never doubted that or questioned what JT claimed she saw, and he was the first professional PI who worked on the case.

by I'm not buying on 13.10.13 23:13

On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.

by Woofer on 13.10.13 23:16

@I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.

A complaint should be made to Sky News about that - how dare they aaagh

by Searcgforthetruth on 13.10.13 23:17

To requote: "I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child"...Martin Smith January 2008.

When Sky News were talking about it one could read the Express article on screen and one could read it was the Smiths they were referring to.

by Guest on 13.10.13 23:19

@I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.

So will half the country be, who haven't a clue about the Smith sighting either. This gives me hope because we are now getting some facts out now.

by JackieL on 13.10.13 23:20

I'm shocked too that they're publicising the Smith sighting. Too easy for anyone to find out why Mr. Smith contacted the police when he saw Gerry on those plane steps. Risky business for TM.

So, is this VERY old news the revelation, then?

by I'm not buying on 13.10.13 23:25

@Woofer wrote:
@I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.
A complaint should be made to Sky News about that - how dare they

Jaqui Hames then said 'it's clear that there were some investigative opportunites missed at the time of this happening, erm, and perhaps some of the things that as police officers in the UK, perhaps we would have done automatically, weren't actually carried out. I mean it was pretty clear from erm reports at the scene by journalists as well as police officers here in the UK, that protocols that we would have adopted weren't followed and the worry is, now, is the integrity of the evidence that was actually compiled at the time.'

by MoonGoddess on 13.10.13 23:33

@I'm not buying wrote:
@Woofer wrote:
@I'm not buying wrote:On Sky News they have shown a picture of tomorrow's Daily Mail front page. It shows one of the efit pictures, the iconic Madeleine picture and the banner advert at the top is '£1 million GIVEAWAY - Win your mortgage paid off'

The news anchor has described the Smith family and their sighting of a three/four year old girl in a deep sleep being carried. He said it seems extraordinary that these details were not picked up in the original investigation. I'm speechless.
A complaint should be made to Sky News about that - how dare they
Jaqui Hames then said 'it's clear that there were some investigative opportunites missed at the time of this happening, erm, and perhaps some of the things that as police officers in the UK, perhaps we would have done automatically, weren't actually carried out. I mean it was pretty clear from erm reports at the scene by journalists as well as police officers here in the UK, that protocols that we would have adopted weren't followed and the worry is, now, is the integrity of the evidence that was actually compiled at the time.'

No, because of the f***ing interference from a foreign government..... Grrrrrrrr