'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 7 of 8 • Share
Page 7 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Could we refer to the "E-fit" picture as the "E-fit UP" picture?
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB
Canada AM called to ask me about the new Scotland Yard "suspect." I told them it was bollocks. I will not be on in the morning. #McCann
Oh dear!
Canada AM called to ask me about the new Scotland Yard "suspect." I told them it was bollocks. I will not be on in the morning. #McCann
Oh dear!



jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Umm - this is a holiday resort of course there were people seen near the apartment. Unless they were acting suspiciously - ie trying to break in, or seen carrying off a small child I don't see how on earth this makes them 'suspects'!@jozi wrote:I love this little tit bit from that news article : " However, police are currently unsure how the man might be connected to the case and are appealing for more witnesses to come forward ".candyfloss wrote:Comments ARE allowed on the article from the Mail re the new e-fit (few comments there already)..........
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2450854/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-picture-released-police.html
Its probably one that's been dismissed already by the Portuguese Investigation ? Don't you just love it !!!
galena- Posts : 288
Activity : 291
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-09-23
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/435689/Madeleine-McCann-police-have-new-suspect
Madeleine McCann police have new suspect
A NEW image of a potential suspect for the kidnap of Madeleine McCann could provide a dramatic breakthrough in the case.
By: John Twomey Published: Thu, October 10, 2013
______________________
So, now MORPHED from 'possible witness, POI' to 'new' SUSPECT!
Madeleine McCann police have new suspect
A NEW image of a potential suspect for the kidnap of Madeleine McCann could provide a dramatic breakthrough in the case.
By: John Twomey Published: Thu, October 10, 2013
______________________
So, now MORPHED from 'possible witness, POI' to 'new' SUSPECT!
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
What I don't understand is this, and sorry if it's already been discussed and I've missed it.
There is - apparently an e-fit of a completely new suspect, witness, somebody hanging about somewhere near 5A at a time which SY think is relevant.
IF (and we don't know yet) the implication is that this person could be (drum roll) THE ABDUCTOR, then where does that leave Jane Tanner's story of a man (or, lest we forget, a woman) carrying a bundle/child/Maddie in the distinctive pyjamas she was definitely wearing that night away from 5A?
And IF Jane Tanner's story has been discounted in favour of e-fit story, then where does that leave Jane Tanner?
She was "mistaken"?
She was hallucinating?
She saw a ghost?
She - (whisper it) lied?
Lot of questions raised, no?
Quite apart, of course, from the ones about how e-fit man climbed out of the window carrying a child. And many others.
SallyPelt, if SY can conclusively prove that the McCanns have/had no knowledge at all of what happened to Madeleine, I'll eat my hat. But unfortunately, unlike Portugal, police files aren't made public in the UK, are they?
And it's very difficult to prove a negative, so they will have to come up with conclusive proof that there was indeed an abduction, if that's the way the wind is blowing.
There is - apparently an e-fit of a completely new suspect, witness, somebody hanging about somewhere near 5A at a time which SY think is relevant.
IF (and we don't know yet) the implication is that this person could be (drum roll) THE ABDUCTOR, then where does that leave Jane Tanner's story of a man (or, lest we forget, a woman) carrying a bundle/child/Maddie in the distinctive pyjamas she was definitely wearing that night away from 5A?
And IF Jane Tanner's story has been discounted in favour of e-fit story, then where does that leave Jane Tanner?
She was "mistaken"?
She was hallucinating?
She saw a ghost?
She - (whisper it) lied?
Lot of questions raised, no?
Quite apart, of course, from the ones about how e-fit man climbed out of the window carrying a child. And many others.
SallyPelt, if SY can conclusively prove that the McCanns have/had no knowledge at all of what happened to Madeleine, I'll eat my hat. But unfortunately, unlike Portugal, police files aren't made public in the UK, are they?
And it's very difficult to prove a negative, so they will have to come up with conclusive proof that there was indeed an abduction, if that's the way the wind is blowing.
____________________
nobodythereeither- Posts : 273
Activity : 273
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Based on the many and differing descriptions of suspicious characters hanging around 5a it must have been more like Piccadilly Circus. Cigarette man, creepy man, egg man, George Harrison, this new smart one, the mysterious blond man, the one with the van, Murat or Murat double, the list gets longer all the time.@galena wrote:Umm - this is a holiday resort of course there were people seen near the apartment. Unless they were acting suspiciously - ie trying to break in, or seen carrying off a small child I don't see how on earth this makes them 'suspects'!@jozi wrote:I love this little tit bit from that news article : " However, police are currently unsure how the man might be connected to the case and are appealing for more witnesses to come forward ".candyfloss wrote:Comments ARE allowed on the article from the Mail re the new e-fit (few comments there already)..........
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2450854/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-picture-released-police.html
Its probably one that's been dismissed already by the Portuguese Investigation ? Don't you just love it !!!
Is there a little list of people who can easily be missed?
Forgot the burglar, the burglar"s listening mate..

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
They'll have to come up with a time and location for this individual so we'll be able to check the files to see who else was there at that time and place.
tasprin- Posts : 834
Activity : 896
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
tigger:
Based on the many and differing descriptions of suspicious characters hanging around 5a it must have been more like Piccadilly Circus. Cigarette man, creepy man, egg man, George Harrison, this new smart one, the mysterious blond man, the one with the van, Murat or Murat double, the list gets longer all the time.
Is there a little list of people who can easily be missed?
Forgot the burglar, the burglar"s listening mate..
_____________________________________
Burglar man, Jigsaw man, Cleaner man, Laundry man, Taxi man and not forgetting JT's.... Invisible man.
Based on the many and differing descriptions of suspicious characters hanging around 5a it must have been more like Piccadilly Circus. Cigarette man, creepy man, egg man, George Harrison, this new smart one, the mysterious blond man, the one with the van, Murat or Murat double, the list gets longer all the time.
Is there a little list of people who can easily be missed?
Forgot the burglar, the burglar"s listening mate..
_____________________________________
Burglar man, Jigsaw man, Cleaner man, Laundry man, Taxi man and not forgetting JT's.... Invisible man.
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Good post Nobodythere.
I was also thinking that, having read the report from the Daily Express that the SY called it an Appeal could it be possible that the SY have in fact been pretty canny? No shouting at me please - I know, I know:smilie: , but I am trying to be optimistic. I will welcome being "shot down" so to speak as who knows what questions arise from debate.
A Crimewatch prog. with both parents there, giving a direct appeal to the abductor - will they have body language experts watching the parents whilst this is going on?
Maybe this appeal is the only way SY could get the parents in front of a camera with - a new suspect? We read that this was at the request of SY, but who knows?
We did read that the parents turned down a request for them to take part in the reconstruction, but of course this might just be made up report, but if it is the case that would not have gone down well imo.
Until we know for sure whether this is an appeal and not an appeal with reconstruction(not just of man outside building) I will keep my open mind hat on and will soon find out.
If there is another case to be aired on the same show, I can't see how there will be time for an indepth recon. anyway.
I was also thinking that, having read the report from the Daily Express that the SY called it an Appeal could it be possible that the SY have in fact been pretty canny? No shouting at me please - I know, I know:smilie: , but I am trying to be optimistic. I will welcome being "shot down" so to speak as who knows what questions arise from debate.
A Crimewatch prog. with both parents there, giving a direct appeal to the abductor - will they have body language experts watching the parents whilst this is going on?
Maybe this appeal is the only way SY could get the parents in front of a camera with - a new suspect? We read that this was at the request of SY, but who knows?
We did read that the parents turned down a request for them to take part in the reconstruction, but of course this might just be made up report, but if it is the case that would not have gone down well imo.
Until we know for sure whether this is an appeal and not an appeal with reconstruction(not just of man outside building) I will keep my open mind hat on and will soon find out.
If there is another case to be aired on the same show, I can't see how there will be time for an indepth recon. anyway.
____________________
Judge Judy to shifty witnesses - LOOK AT ME - Um is not an answer.
If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.

plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
...and whatever happened to those 6, 7, 8, British cleaners? the soothing couple......@jeanmonroe wrote:tigger:
Based on the many and differing descriptions of suspicious characters hanging around 5a it must have been more like Piccadilly Circus. Cigarette man, creepy man, egg man, George Harrison, this new smart one, the mysterious blond man, the one with the van, Murat or Murat double, the list gets longer all the time.
Is there a little list of people who can easily be missed?
Forgot the burglar, the burglar"s listening mate..
_____________________________________
Burglar man, Jigsaw man, Cleaner man, Laundry man and not forgetting JT's.... Invisible man.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
@ultimaThule wrote:I was so gobsmacked by this sentence "A family source said: "The time will soon come when Kate can help shut up her accuser for good" it was all I could do to simply post the article (above)
It's not at all surprising that the McCanns' have sought to up the ante over the past few weeks and it's going to get a whole worse before it gets better - but, for FFS, what is the Express thinking of by allowing itself to be used to transmit a threat of this nature to the DEFENDANT in a trial which has been initiated and pursued by the McCanns?

Guest- Guest
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
BBC ‘buried’ cuts good news
THE BBC was accused yesterday of “burying” a survey that showed people think most public services have not been made worse by spending cuts.
____________________________________________________
Had to change my nappy when i read this bit!
"A BBC spokeswoman said: “There will be disagreements about the reporting of any story. This has been reported widely across the BBC. We are satisfied that our coverage is fair, balanced and impartial.”
________________________________
So the BBC's 'coverage' of Madeleine's 'case', on 14th October, 2013, will also be, BEYOND doubt, "FAIR, BALANCED and IMPARTIAL"
Won't it?
THE BBC was accused yesterday of “burying” a survey that showed people think most public services have not been made worse by spending cuts.
____________________________________________________
Had to change my nappy when i read this bit!
"A BBC spokeswoman said: “There will be disagreements about the reporting of any story. This has been reported widely across the BBC. We are satisfied that our coverage is fair, balanced and impartial.”
________________________________
So the BBC's 'coverage' of Madeleine's 'case', on 14th October, 2013, will also be, BEYOND doubt, "FAIR, BALANCED and IMPARTIAL"
Won't it?
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
RT @JerryLawton: Madeleine #McCann parents baffled why Crimewatch special about her disappearance won't be shown in Portugal http://t.co/bR…
sallypelt- Posts : 4000
Activity : 5314
Likes received : 960
Join date : 2012-11-10
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Why aren't they baffled that it was not filmed in Portugal. I certainly am.@sallypelt wrote:RT @JerryLawton: Madeleine #McCann parents baffled why Crimewatch special about her disappearance won't be shown in Portugal http://t.co/bR…
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
They've had a long time to perfect their act. As they're always insisting Madeleine is still alive, I'd like to see them speak directly to her which is something they never do.@plebgate wrote:Good post Nobodythere.
I was also thinking that, having read the report from the Daily Express that the SY called it an Appeal could it be possible that the SY have in fact been pretty canny? No shouting at me please - I know, I know:smilie: , but I am trying to be optimistic. I will welcome being "shot down" so to speak as who knows what questions arise from debate.
A Crimewatch prog. with both parents there, giving a direct appeal to the abductor - will they have body language experts watching the parents whilst this is going on?
Maybe this appeal is the only way SY could get the parents in front of a camera with - a new suspect? We read that this was at the request of SY, but who knows?
We did read that the parents turned down a request for them to take part in the reconstruction, but of course this might just be made up report, but if it is the case that would not have gone down well imo.
Until we know for sure whether this is an appeal and not an appeal with reconstruction(not just of man outside building) I will keep my open mind hat on and will soon find out.
If there is another case to be aired on the same show, I can't see how there will be time for an indepth recon. anyway.
tasprin- Posts : 834
Activity : 896
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
O ye of little faith... of course it will.@jeanmonroe wrote:BBC ‘buried’ cuts good news
THE BBC was accused yesterday of “burying” a survey that showed people think most public services have not been made worse by spending cuts.
____________________________________________________
Had to change my nappy when i read this bit!
"A BBC spokeswoman said: “There will be disagreements about the reporting of any story. This has been reported widely across the BBC. We are satisfied that our coverage is fair, balanced and impartial.”
So 'coverage' of Madeleine's 'case' will also be, no doubt, FAIR, BALANCED and IMPARTIAL.
Won't it?
It's good ol' Aunty Beeb innit? She's a nashunul treasure an' all that. Ain't she the 1 wot does the baking? Evryfink comes out a right treat wen she's cooking up a load of cod.
'.
[waves to herd of flying pigs]
ultimaThule- Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
And offer the 'abductor' directly on TV, EVERYTHING they own, except the twins, and if that's not enough everything their families OWN in exchange for Madeleine.@tasprin wrote:They've had a long time to perfect their act. As they're always insisting Madeleine is still alive, I'd like to see them speak directly to her which is something they never do.@plebgate wrote:Good post Nobodythere.
I was also thinking that, having read the report from the Daily Express that the SY called it an Appeal could it be possible that the SY have in fact been pretty canny? No shouting at me please - I know, I know:smilie: , but I am trying to be optimistic. I will welcome being "shot down" so to speak as who knows what questions arise from debate.
A Crimewatch prog. with both parents there, giving a direct appeal to the abductor - will they have body language experts watching the parents whilst this is going on?
Maybe this appeal is the only way SY could get the parents in front of a camera with - a new suspect? We read that this was at the request of SY, but who knows?
We did read that the parents turned down a request for them to take part in the reconstruction, but of course this might just be made up report, but if it is the case that would not have gone down well imo.
Until we know for sure whether this is an appeal and not an appeal with reconstruction(not just of man outside building) I will keep my open mind hat on and will soon find out.
If there is another case to be aired on the same show, I can't see how there will be time for an indepth recon. anyway.
All the 'fund', all their houses, all their friends 'reward' money, in short, EVERYTHING they have.
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
We've got really good "substantive evidence" but we are going to wait, so that Madeleine can be raped and abused a few more times before 14th
She wil be used to it by now, so she probably won't mind . . .
CAN THIS REALLY BE THE ACTION OF A PROFESSIONAL POLICE OFFICER AND LOVING PARENTS ?
She wil be used to it by now, so she probably won't mind . . .
CAN THIS REALLY BE THE ACTION OF A PROFESSIONAL POLICE OFFICER AND LOVING PARENTS ?
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Was that a comment from a source or SY PeterM?
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
No.....unless the police know that she's no longer alive and also have a good idea of the identity/identities of the culprit(s). That's the only option that makes sense to me.@PeterMac wrote:We've got really good "substantive evidence" but we are going to wait, so that Madeleine can be raped and abused a few more times before 14th
She wil be used to it by now, so she probably won't mind . . .
CAN THIS REALLY BE THE ACTION OF A PROFESSIONAL POLICE OFFICER AND LOVING PARENTS ?
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
In common with all right-minded parents, if my child (god forbid) were to be abducted I'd crawl naked on broken glass, walk through a fiery furnace, and give everything I own to get her back - and I'd sacrifice my life for hers any day.@jeanmonroe wrote:And offer the 'abductor' directly on TV, EVERYTHING they own, except the twins, and if that's not enough everything their families OWN in exchange for Madeleine.@tasprin wrote:They've had a long time to perfect their act. As they're always insisting Madeleine is still alive, I'd like to see them speak directly to her which is something they never do.@plebgate wrote:Good post Nobodythere.
I was also thinking that, having read the report from the Daily Express that the SY called it an Appeal could it be possible that the SY have in fact been pretty canny? No shouting at me please - I know, I know:smilie: , but I am trying to be optimistic. I will welcome being "shot down" so to speak as who knows what questions arise from debate.
A Crimewatch prog. with both parents there, giving a direct appeal to the abductor - will they have body language experts watching the parents whilst this is going on?
Maybe this appeal is the only way SY could get the parents in front of a camera with - a new suspect? We read that this was at the request of SY, but who knows?
We did read that the parents turned down a request for them to take part in the reconstruction, but of course this might just be made up report, but if it is the case that would not have gone down well imo.
Until we know for sure whether this is an appeal and not an appeal with reconstruction(not just of man outside building) I will keep my open mind hat on and will soon find out.
If there is another case to be aired on the same show, I can't see how there will be time for an indepth recon. anyway.
All the 'fund', all their houses, all their friends 'reward' money, in short, EVERYTHING they have.
The McCanns could so easily have got away with it scot (no pun intended) free... they aren't as clever as they, and some others, seem to think. It ain't over till the fat lady sings and she still in the dressing room.
ultimaThule- Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18
Reconstruction In Spain
Very often I am thought to be considered to be a very non-cynical person by those who think they know me well, Sorry, can't help it:
Seems to me the only half-way credible reconstruction feasible in Spain, would be of one or more IVF fertilization efforts, performed on an anonymous Spanish sheep
Seems to me the only half-way credible reconstruction feasible in Spain, would be of one or more IVF fertilization efforts, performed on an anonymous Spanish sheep
Guest- Guest
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
And to me. Assuming that they are indeed carrying out a bona fide investigation.@ShuBob wrote:No.....unless the police know that she's no longer alive and also have a good idea of the identity/identities of the culprit(s). That's the only option that makes sense to me.@PeterMac wrote:We've got really good "substantive evidence" but we are going to wait, so that Madeleine can be raped and abused a few more times before 14th
She wil be used to it by now, so she probably won't mind . . .
CAN THIS REALLY BE THE ACTION OF A PROFESSIONAL POLICE OFFICER AND LOVING PARENTS ?
nobodythereeither- Posts : 273
Activity : 273
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
@Taspirin and JeanM - yes we have waited for that a long time.
____________________
Judge Judy to shifty witnesses - LOOK AT ME - Um is not an answer.
If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.

plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: 'Substantive' evidence promised on 14 October
Were it not for the inclusion of "loving parents" I would agree that PeteMac is initimating that all might not be as it appears. However as he has bracketed both police and parents I suspect that he is railing against the ineffectiveness of both@ShuBob wrote:No.....unless the police know that she's no longer alive and also have a good idea of the identity/identities of the culprit(s). That's the only option that makes sense to me.@PeterMac wrote:We've got really good "substantive evidence" but we are going to wait, so that Madeleine can be raped and abused a few more times before 14th
She wil be used to it by now, so she probably won't mind . . .
CAN THIS REALLY BE THE ACTION OF A PROFESSIONAL POLICE OFFICER AND LOVING PARENTS ?
AndyB- Posts : 692
Activity : 724
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2013-06-03
Age : 57
Location : Consett, County Durham
Page 7 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: British Police / Government Interference :: Smithman: Crimewatch Reconstruction and the appeal for new info / suspects
Page 7 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum