MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 4 of 13 • Share
Page 4 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11, 12, 13
UNASHAMEDLY pinched from the MM site as being a matter of considerable interest.
From MM.
with acknowledgements for good work.
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t24316p585-lisbon-libel-trial-mccanns-v-amaral
with acknowledgements for good work.
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t24316p585-lisbon-libel-trial-mccanns-v-amaral
***** wrote:
interested wrote:
Congratulations to "*****" on the superbly worded enquiry addressed to the North Yorkshire Police regarding any investigation into the alleged threat to the McCann children. (page 35 of this topic)
Eagerly awaiting the Police response!!!
Sat, 13:38 Message starred Thank You for contacting North Yorkshire Police
FROM General Enquiries TO You
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire Police. Your e mail has been received into the General Enquiries e mail Box.
14:59 Message starred RE: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat' [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
FROM General Enquiries TO You + 1 More
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
CC
DBS Unit
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear ********
I have forwarded your email to our Disclosure Unit for attention and action as necessary. They will no doubt be contacting you in due course.
Regards
Jim ****
Collar No ****
On behalf of General Enquiries In Box
Force Control Room XN
North Yorkshire Police
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
From:****@yahoo.com]
Sent: 21 September 2013 13:32
To: General Enquiries
Subject: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat'
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Mr Michael Wright, of Skipton, has stated publicly, in an open court, that the North Yorkshire Police 'investigated' several people in connection with a 'threat' to the McCann family twins.
Please could you confirm that what Mr Wright has stated is true, and that people were 'interviewed' by your force in relation to a specific 'threat'?
Mr Wright has also said that North Yorkshire Police interviewed him about this.
Mr Wright has stated that the threat originated from the now closed 3 Arguidos website forum.
Do you have an incident number for the investigation your force carried out , as Mr Wright has said, into the 'threat' to the McCann children.?
Do you also have an incident report number in relation to Mr G McCann's reporting to the North Yorkshire Police about the same specific threat to his children?
Has North Yorkshire Police retained specific information, in a very important complaint, that will confirm Mr McCann's and Mr Wright's claims are true?
Do i have to compose a Freedom of Information request to receive the information i have asked?
Yours faithfully.
*****************************************************************************************
Internet email is not to be treated as a secure means of communication.
North Yorkshire Police monitors all internet email activity and content.
This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Please notify the sender if received in error. Unauthorised use or
disclosure of the content may be unlawful. Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy.
Thank you for your co-operation.
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions........
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?
WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
I have a headache.
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions........
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?
WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
I have a headache.
____________________
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Presumably the defendants will be calling witnesses prior to their respective lawyers' closing speeches, which I assume will occur after ID has made her submissions on behalf of the plaintiffs?PeterMac wrote:The glorious thing is that he got caught out when the judge recognised that the paper wasn't standard file paper from the UK, or anywhere else, and he had to admit it was from the hotel.Portia wrote:ShuBob wrote:I'm happy that the notes have been appended to evidence presented to the court. I should imagine it'll make for interesting reading especially the bits highlighted in green ink
Written the night before ? ?
In consultation with KM ? ?
Or with ID ? ? ?
Or both ? ? ?
If not - Kevin - how would he know what he had to write down ? How did he know what the answers were supposed to be to questions which had not yet been put, so that he could underline them in GREEN.
He couldn't even try to pretend that these were "professionally prepared case notes from years ago".
No. They were written the previous evening IN THE HOTEL.
Brilliant work Madam Judge !
I cannot wait to see her comments about that in the written judgment.
Or indeed to listen to the lawyers for the 4 respondents in their final addresses.
From what appears to have taken place to date it seems to me TM have made the case for the defence.
The sheer arrogance of the McScams is breathtaking. Did they seriously think all they had to do was turn up at court, pass go, and collect 1.2 million euros?
At least cousin Michael was caught bang to rights in the middle of his 'spontaneous' and 'unscripted' testimony. Any MSM reporting of that little incident? [doesn't hold breath emoticon]
ultimaThule- Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Hasn't it been mentioned elsewhere on these postings that the Judge said upon questioning one of the witnesses that the the Public Prosecutor(?) was of the opinon that there was no evidence one way or the other to establish what happened to Madeleine?russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions........
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?
WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
I have a headache.
(Sorry it's very late so my brain is not functioning properly)
So whatever MW said is irrelevant if we are going by what the Judge stated to another witness.
____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........
"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"
Newintown- Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
My reading of this is that ID is STAGGERINGLY inept, to the extent that she should have an official complaint made against her by the McCanns with a view to striking her off.russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions........
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?
WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
I have a headache.
She is asking questions which allow the witness to give her an answer she did not want. This is a most basic and fundamental error.
She then asks questions which lead the witness into answers which are patently and PROVABLY nonsense, or false.
The one about the report after GA was removed refers clearly to the Interim report which concluded exactly the opposite of what MW stated. He had obviously not read it, but had been told a lie by the McCanns, to the effect that it concluded that there was no evidence they were involved. Which is, as we know what they have told the world. Despite its being a LIE - KEVIN.
How wrong / stupid / blind is it possible to be.
The interim report - for the benefit of KEVIN and any pros watching - says this.
BIG LETTERS FOR THE HARD OF UNDERSTANDING ! ! !From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:
A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007
B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place
C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted
D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann
E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;
From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
I've suggested before that Isabel Duarte may want out and is doing all she can to either force the McCanns to withdraw before the case concludes or the judge throws it out. I cannot believe she's even trying to defend their corner.
ShuBob- Posts : 1896
Activity : 1983
Likes received : 67
Join date : 2012-02-07
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Thank you PeterMac, I posted a few minutes before you. I thought I was having a "senior moment", but you put into words more than I could say; we were both thinking along the same lines though!PeterMac wrote:My reading of this is that ID is STAGGERINGLY inept, to the extent that she should have an official complaint made against her by the McCanns with a view to striking her off.russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions........
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?
WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
I have a headache.
She is asking questions which allow the witness to give her an answer she did not want. This is a most basic and fundamental error.
She then asks questions which lead the witness into answers which are patently and PROVABLY nonsense, or false.
The one about the report after GA was removed refers clearly to the Interim report which concluded exactly the opposite of what MW stated. He had obviously not read it, but had been told a lie by the McCanns, to the effect that it concluded that there was no evidence they were involved. Which is, as we know what they have told the world. Despite its being a LIE - KEVIN.
How wrong / stupid / blind is it possible to be.
The interim report - for the benefit of KEVIN and any pros watching - says this.BIG LETTERS FOR THE HARD OF UNDERSTANDING ! ! !From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:
A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007
B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place
C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted
D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann
E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;
From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.
____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........
"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"
Newintown- Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Perhaps she's woken up and realised that all those friends she lost and who were against her in taking on this case were right in the first place.ShuBob wrote:I've suggested before that Isabel Duarte may want out and is doing all she can to either force the McCanns to withdraw before the case concludes or the judge throws it out. I cannot believe she's even trying to defend their corner.
Oh dear.
____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........
"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"
Newintown- Posts : 1597
Activity : 1622
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2011-07-19
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter. Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'. Apologies, don't know how to show the link. By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters . So why Gerry and Kate have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
sammyc- Posts : 268
Activity : 383
Likes received : 113
Join date : 2011-10-06
Location : UK
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
And the Judge has commented "We don`t know what happened".
____________________
The constant assertion of belief is an indication of fear - Jiddu Krishnamurti
Woofer- Posts : 3390
Activity : 3508
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2012-02-06
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
This is kiko's twitter account https://twitter.com/kikorattonsammyc wrote:@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter. Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'. Apologies, don't know how to show the link. By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters . So why Gerry and Kate have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
Guest- Guest
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
The Wright Stuffed by Dr. Martin Roberts
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id232.html
Admin - please delete if already been posted.
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id232.html
Admin - please delete if already been posted.
Woofer- Posts : 3390
Activity : 3508
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2012-02-06
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Does anyone else here remember Jim Gamble being interviewed on television with the McCanns? It was the time of the release of the viral video which if I remember correctly was an appeal to the perpertrators and featured age progression photographs of Madeleine and footage of the aeroplane steps at East Midlands Airport. He was explaining to Philip Schofield that the 'perpertrator would be constantly monitoring the internet to get updates on the case. I wondered at the time which internet sites Jim Gamble meant. Here perhaps?
Harriet94- Posts : 139
Activity : 159
Likes received : 18
Join date : 2012-05-04
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
What a simply topping idea, plebgateplebgate wrote:
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.
Joins Mexican wave to Kev & Michael
Borrows refrain from well-known owner of Portuguese vineyard and sings 'Congratulations' to cousin Mike for his
ultimaThule- Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
The addition of qualifiers ( words that when removed, do not change the meaning of the sentence) weaken the statement.
A strong reply would have been a simple no, here it is weaked by the qualifiers in no way.
No is repeated twice making it sensitive.
It is worth noting that facts is mentioned twice making it sensitive to ID.
There are facts reported in his book and facts of the investigation.
If they are facts then it is proven and provable information and evidence.
What facts are there in the book that do not allegedly correspond to the investigation?
There are facts reported by Goncalo Amaral which tells us they are true in relation to the investigation and thus Madeleine McCanns disappearance and the involvement of her parents.
This phrase is unexpected since if he was libelling them as claimed then i would expect to see words such as alleged, claimed etc implying said facts were untrue. and thus libellous.
It can't be libel if the said facts are true!
If said reported facts in no way correspond to the facts of the investigation, the question then becomes what do the facts of the investigation conclude and how do they differ from the facts in the book, given he had access to all the facts of the investigation in his role as lead detective.
The facts of the investigation conclude the mccanns cannot be cleared of involvement, at this moment in time there is not even proof what particular crime or crimes have been committed and by whom.
The facts based on evidence so far uncovered indicate a death in the apartment 5a , there is probably concealment of a corpse and the filing of a false police report re: abduction.
The investigation at this time cannot decide if it was homicide, accidental homicide or even accidental death , leaving all option open as to cause of death.
Goncalo allows for an accidental death, in effect minimising their role in what happened.
I would be asking for examples of where the facts differ and their implications for the mccanns.
If the facts in no way match between book and investigation, then the book and the investigation should be diametrically opposite in every way, the facts should be mutually exclusive, either it is this or it is that, it can't be both since they would then correspond which you said the in no way do.
What say you to this?
MW says "no", in no way.
The addition of qualifiers ( words that when removed, do not change the meaning of the sentence) weaken the statement.
A strong reply would have been a simple no, here it is weaked by the qualifiers in no way.
No is repeated twice making it sensitive.
It is worth noting that facts is mentioned twice making it sensitive to ID.
There are facts reported in his book and facts of the investigation.
If they are facts then it is proven and provable information and evidence.
What facts are there in the book that do not allegedly correspond to the investigation?
There are facts reported by Goncalo Amaral which tells us they are true in relation to the investigation and thus Madeleine McCanns disappearance and the involvement of her parents.
This phrase is unexpected since if he was libelling them as claimed then i would expect to see words such as alleged, claimed etc implying said facts were untrue. and thus libellous.
It can't be libel if the said facts are true!
If said reported facts in no way correspond to the facts of the investigation, the question then becomes what do the facts of the investigation conclude and how do they differ from the facts in the book, given he had access to all the facts of the investigation in his role as lead detective.
The facts of the investigation conclude the mccanns cannot be cleared of involvement, at this moment in time there is not even proof what particular crime or crimes have been committed and by whom.
The facts based on evidence so far uncovered indicate a death in the apartment 5a , there is probably concealment of a corpse and the filing of a false police report re: abduction.
The investigation at this time cannot decide if it was homicide, accidental homicide or even accidental death , leaving all option open as to cause of death.
Goncalo allows for an accidental death, in effect minimising their role in what happened.
I would be asking for examples of where the facts differ and their implications for the mccanns.
If the facts in no way match between book and investigation, then the book and the investigation should be diametrically opposite in every way, the facts should be mutually exclusive, either it is this or it is that, it can't be both since they would then correspond which you said the in no way do.
What say you to this?
____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
He's creep . The Judge saw through that,russiandoll wrote:We really have entered the Twilight Zone.....what was this aide memoire for ? Dates? Specifics ? The type of thing you can get confused.
No...............ID - When they learnt about it, how did they react? Was it sadness or pain? Were they socially and professionally affected?
GA's lawyer, SO, interrupts asking the Judge to ask the witness what is the paper he is reading.
MW says that they are notes about feelings, etc. to remember.
The Judge asks what is actually in the notes.
MW repeats that it is to help him remember
feelings and special contacts.
He's one of the kevins, as are other family members and friends monitoring forum (fora) for the mccanns.
That came right out of the horse's mouth, proving people right all along about trolls.
Creepy kate could also be one of them (troll).
Keeping contact nr and dates on note maybe, but FEELINGS?
The note is his script, preplanned, prepared in advance with help.
Premeditated witness testimony loses credence. His deviousness was noted by other party and judge so another own goal for team Mccann.
The judge is sharp, nothing escapes her......
Should be another field day when other family members come on.
Surely cast from each of Kate & Gerry side will come on stage (court) to continue with this tale before the saga is over.......,,,,
Ye Gawd. what a deluded bunch they're.....contrive from start to finish.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
No Court in the world will consider as *evidence* note not submitted in advance for perusal.Portia wrote:Which apparently he couldn't memorise himself, when told of them; so was forced to write them down in order to be prepared;russiandoll wrote:We really have entered the Twilight Zone.....what was this aide memoire for ? Dates? Specifics ? The type of thing you can get confused.
No...............ID - When they learnt about it, how did they react? Was it sadness or pain? Were they socially and professionally affected?
GA's lawyer, SO, interrupts asking the Judge to ask the witness what is the paper he is reading.
MW says that they are notes about feelings, etc. to remember.
The Judge asks what is actually in the notes.
MW repeats that it is to help him remember
feelings and special contacts.
this in the hotel where he was/is (?) staying. Where is GM staying these days, btw? Do we know?
No Court in the world will OK a witness's reading out his notes
His testimony will be heavily discounted, if considered at all.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
I await with baited breath reply from the NY Police.PeterMac wrote:From MM.
with acknowledgements for good work.
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t24316p585-lisbon-libel-trial-mccanns-v-amaral***** wrote:
interested wrote:
Congratulations to "*****" on the superbly worded enquiry addressed to the North Yorkshire Police regarding any investigation into the alleged threat to the McCann children. (page 35 of this topic)
Eagerly awaiting the Police response!!!
Sat, 13:38 Message starred Thank You for contacting North Yorkshire Police
FROM General Enquiries TO You
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire Police. Your e mail has been received into the General Enquiries e mail Box.
14:59 Message starred RE: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat' [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
FROM General Enquiries TO You + 1 More
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
CC
DBS Unit
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear ********
I have forwarded your email to our Disclosure Unit for attention and action as necessary. They will no doubt be contacting you in due course.
Regards
Jim ****
Collar No ****
On behalf of General Enquiries In Box
Force Control Room XN
North Yorkshire Police
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
From:****@yahoo.com]
Sent: 21 September 2013 13:32
To: General Enquiries
Subject: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat'
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Mr Michael Wright, of Skipton, has stated publicly, in an open court, that the North Yorkshire Police 'investigated' several people in connection with a 'threat' to the McCann family twins.
Please could you confirm that what Mr Wright has stated is true, and that people were 'interviewed' by your force in relation to a specific 'threat'?
Mr Wright has also said that North Yorkshire Police interviewed him about this.
Mr Wright has stated that the threat originated from the now closed 3 Arguidos website forum.
Do you have an incident number for the investigation your force carried out , as Mr Wright has said, into the 'threat' to the McCann children.?
Do you also have an incident report number in relation to Mr G McCann's reporting to the North Yorkshire Police about the same specific threat to his children?
Has North Yorkshire Police retained specific information, in a very important complaint, that will confirm Mr McCann's and Mr Wright's claims are true?
Do i have to compose a Freedom of Information request to receive the information i have asked?
Yours faithfully.
*****************************************************************************************
Internet email is not to be treated as a secure means of communication.
North Yorkshire Police monitors all internet email activity and content.
This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Please notify the sender if received in error. Unauthorised use or
disclosure of the content may be unlawful. Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy.
Thank you for your co-operation.
But this is a moot point where the Judge is concerned as did she not already thrown this out as having no relevance to the case.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
ID has been a naughty girl, despite been warned by Judge to desist from posing this type of question, she ignored the Judge when she tries to put words in MW's mouth.PeterMac wrote:My reading of this is that ID is STAGGERINGLY inept, to the extent that she should have an official complaint made against her by the McCanns with a view to striking her off.russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions........
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?
WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
I have a headache.
She is asking questions which allow the witness to give her an answer she did not want. This is a most basic and fundamental error.
She then asks questions which lead the witness into answers which are patently and PROVABLY nonsense, or false.
The one about the report after GA was removed refers clearly to the Interim report which concluded exactly the opposite of what MW stated. He had obviously not read it, but had been told a lie by the McCanns, to the effect that it concluded that there was no evidence they were involved. Which is, as we know what they have told the world. Despite its being a LIE - KEVIN.
How wrong / stupid / blind is it possible to be.
The interim report - for the benefit of KEVIN and any pros watching - says this.BIG LETTERS FOR THE HARD OF UNDERSTANDING ! ! !From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:
A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007
B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place
C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted
D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann
E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;
From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.
It's crass incompetence from ID, since Kevin admitted he did not read the files, only the conclusions of Final Report ( selectively) how can he possibly give her a reply she coveted.
ETA: best part is Kevin already been told screenshots cannot form evidence.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
And, the conclusion inconclusive......Woofer wrote:And the Judge has commented "We don`t know what happened".
Yet, that does not stop Mccanns telling the world they were exonerated.......
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
plebgate wrote:
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.
Oh, we knew that since 3As that he did that for Mr&Mrs.
Question is who else is in his team? Philo? Kate? Gerry?Isabel Hudson?
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
deleted
____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry
http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0
http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/
lj- Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
W..right giving all the W rong stuff in Court......ultimaThule wrote:What a simply topping idea, plebgateplebgate wrote:
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.
Joins Mexican wave to Kev & Michael
Borrows refrain from well-known owner of Portuguese vineyard and sings 'Congratulations' to cousin Mike for hishaplessunpolished performance in the witness box
Caught with stained green fingers...still wet from green ink!
Can it get any worst?
He's biggest *catch-of-the-day* (thus far) for Court for spouting a tidal wave of lies...
.....and the Judge noted he's family member......
He should be nominated for the "Talented Liar" Award, unless someone breaks his record.....
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
For the benefit of cousin Michael, may I recommendaiyoyo wrote:He's creep . The Judge saw through that,russiandoll wrote:We really have entered the Twilight Zone.....what was this aide memoire for ? Dates? Specifics ? The type of thing you can get confused.
No...............ID - When they learnt about it, how did they react? Was it sadness or pain? Were they socially and professionally affected?
GA's lawyer, SO, interrupts asking the Judge to ask the witness what is the paper he is reading.
MW says that they are notes about feelings, etc. to remember.
The Judge asks what is actually in the notes.
MW repeats that it is to help him remember
feelings and special contacts.
He's one of the kevins, as are other family members and friends monitoring forum (fora) for the mccanns.
That came right out of the horse's mouth, proving people right all along about trolls.
Creepy kate could also be one of them (troll).
Keeping contact nr and dates on note maybe, but FEELINGS?
The note is his script, preplanned, prepared in advance with help.
Premeditated witness testimony loses credence. His deviousness was noted by other party and judge so another own goal for team Mccann.
The judge is sharp, nothing escapes her......
Should be another field day when other family members come on.
Surely cast from each of Kate & Gerry side will come on stage (court) to continue with this tale before the saga is over.......,,,,
Ye Gawd. what a deluded bunch they're.....contrive from start to finish.
Do please feel free to pass this handy tip on to any of your relatives who are awaiting their
ultimaThule- Posts : 3355
Activity : 3376
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2013-09-18
Page 4 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11, 12, 13
Similar topics
» 'Anti-McCann' websites plotted to kidnap one of Madeleine's siblings - Daily Mail INCLUDES TWEETS FROM JERRY LAWTON RE MICHAEL WRIGHT TESTIMONY
» The Role of Michael Wright
» What are Michael Wright and Gerry McCann doing here?
» MADELEINE MCCANN: THE ROLE OF MICHAEL WRIGHT
» Textusa releases new statement (6 Nov 2015) on 'The Last Photo' - says it is a photoshopped composite of THREE different photographs, two of which were taken on Friday 18 May 2007
» The Role of Michael Wright
» What are Michael Wright and Gerry McCann doing here?
» MADELEINE MCCANN: THE ROLE OF MICHAEL WRIGHT
» Textusa releases new statement (6 Nov 2015) on 'The Last Photo' - says it is a photoshopped composite of THREE different photographs, two of which were taken on Friday 18 May 2007
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 4 of 13
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum