MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 5 of 13 • Share
Page 5 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11, 12, 13
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
It's plain obvious he didn't write the book for MONEY, otherwise he would have wrote the book to please them, not to get into trouble.James wrote:Tha'ts rich coming from her.tiny wrote:was this any thing to do with martin brunt or some one else, if so any one know who its was
ID - Do you have anything else you wish to tell the Court within the questions that you have been asked?
MW says that, in terms of impact on the family, he saw in 2009 an e-mail from a British broadcaster, Channel 5, which offered Gonçalo Amaral €80,000 for an interview. He adds that Kate's reaction was that it confirmed that all this had to do with money and not justice.
ID wants to know more... but the Judge overrules because it's not known whether such an interview occurred
He should have wrote a FIRST book about the files get all the money.
After write a SECOND book stating his conclusion etc! That's how to make money.
But NO wanted he wants the world to know.
Let's hope Scotland Yard is listening to the case right now, the judge is doing well.
However, it doesn't really mean anything, even if Amaral wins, the McC**ts are always ignored anyway! And they can go ahead fooling the public, Taking the Piss.
Seek truth- Posts : 447
Activity : 449
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2013-06-04
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
What a pity this tactic wasn't used in the many interviews of the sainted couple. Reading their emotions off a crib sheet or the autocue would have helped them no end.
Failing that I can recommend glove puppets to the pink one off camera - left hand weeping and drooping, right hand condescendingly gracious to the plebs.
That lifting left cheek (indicating displeasure) was cured, Botox I presume.
All this calls up an image of a wildly semaphoring Clarrie, pinkness personified...
Michael Wright was also at Gerry's side down by the rocks, looking for what?
Failing that I can recommend glove puppets to the pink one off camera - left hand weeping and drooping, right hand condescendingly gracious to the plebs.
That lifting left cheek (indicating displeasure) was cured, Botox I presume.
All this calls up an image of a wildly semaphoring Clarrie, pinkness personified...
Michael Wright was also at Gerry's side down by the rocks, looking for what?
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Offered ( right out from the horse's mouth) not asked, two different things altogether. In any case it wasn't accepted.Seek truth wrote:It's plain obvious he didn't write the book for MONEY, otherwise he would have wrote the book to please them, not to get into trouble.James wrote:Tha'ts rich coming from her.tiny wrote:was this any thing to do with martin brunt or some one else, if so any one know who its was
ID - Do you have anything else you wish to tell the Court within the questions that you have been asked?
MW says that, in terms of impact on the family, he saw in 2009 an e-mail from a British broadcaster, Channel 5, which offered Gonçalo Amaral €80,000 for an interview. He adds that Kate's reaction was that it confirmed that all this had to do with money and not justice.
ID wants to know more... but the Judge overrules because it's not known whether such an interview occurred
He should have wrote a FIRST book about the files get all the money.
After write a SECOND book stating his conclusion etc! That's how to make money.
But NO wanted he wants the world to know.
Let's hope Scotland Yard is listening to the case right now, the judge is doing well.
However, it doesn't really mean anything, even if Amaral wins, the McC**ts are always ignored anyway! And they can go ahead fooling the public, Taking the Piss.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Is that accurate?ID - When did they read the book and watch the documentary?
MW – They read the book when I sent them the translation that was on the internet in August 2008.
Which forum had the English translated book up on site that quickly that he was able to nick it?
A few hundred pages book translated in a month or less? That cant be right, surely?
Furthermore Dr Martin Roberts observes the Mccanns themselves said during a Sept 2008 interview they'd not read the book. Kate said : "why should I"?
MW has dropped them in shit......
Hopefully team Amaral have all their interviews as reference.......
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Fancy the President of the Bar Association neglecting to observe the law - something as basic as failing to give notification in writing 10 clear days in advance?The judge said MP should have revealed his intention during the 10 legal days so lost his right because he didn't do so. It now falls to the lawyer for the plaintive to ensure that MP appears personally in order to be examined in the final allegations session.
One burning question: can someone riding on the back of his professional privilege, trying to abuse his position, be trusted as reliable/credible witness?
He's going into the house of the Judge (so to speak), will he be prepared to keep his obnoxious behavior at bay, and not end up with perjury is left to be seen.
If he can back out of it, I bet that's what he will do, but definitely WONT look good on him.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Or Mr's very good friend Mike McSpy.sammyc wrote:@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter. Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'. Apologies, don't know how to show the link. By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters . So why Gerry and Kate have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
plebgate- Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Exactly! So what precisely are SY investigating given that both the TM official abduction and the PJ hypothesis (accidental death and concealment of the body) are outwith the jurisdiction of British law enforcementHobs wrote:The facts of the investigation conclude the mccanns cannot be cleared of involvement, at this moment in time there is not even proof what particular crime or crimes have been committed and by whom.
AndyB- Posts : 692
Activity : 724
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2013-06-03
Age : 60
Location : Consett, County Durham
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
It was translated starting Monday 11 January 2010 http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/maddie-truth-of-lie.htmlaiyoyo wrote:Is that accurate?ID - When did they read the book and watch the documentary?
MW – They read the book when I sent them the translation that was on the internet in August 2008.
Which forum had the English translated book up on site that quickly that he was able to nick it?
A few hundred pages book translated in a month or less? That cant be right, surely?
(Brenda Ryan being the first to congratulate AnnaEsse for her hard work before she turned pro McCann and started attacking us all for being McCann sceptics).
Guest- Guest
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Actually that can't be right cos AnnaEsse did the foreword in August 2009 http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2009/06/madeleine-mccann-forbidden.htmladmin wrote:It was translated starting Monday 11 January 2010 http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/maddie-truth-of-lie.htmlaiyoyo wrote:Is that accurate?ID - When did they read the book and watch the documentary?
MW – They read the book when I sent them the translation that was on the internet in August 2008.
Which forum had the English translated book up on site that quickly that he was able to nick it?
A few hundred pages book translated in a month or less? That cant be right, surely?
(Brenda Ryan being the first to congratulate AnnaEsse for her hard work before she turned pro McCann and started attacking us all for being McCann sceptics).
Guest- Guest
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
By George, I've got it!
I've sussed out the McPlan.
A McPlan so fiendish and as cunning as a fox who's just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford University.
The dastardly McPlan is to, brutally and evilly, force the defence into screaming howls of helpless laughter leaving the judge no option but to have everyone (including herself) arrested for contempt of court
Oh the inhumanity of it all!
I've sussed out the McPlan.
A McPlan so fiendish and as cunning as a fox who's just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford University.
The dastardly McPlan is to, brutally and evilly, force the defence into screaming howls of helpless laughter leaving the judge no option but to have everyone (including herself) arrested for contempt of court
Oh the inhumanity of it all!
Guest- Guest
Dr Roberts - filched from Mccannfiles
This is so good, succint and focussed, that I make no apologies for putting it here.
EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com
By Dr Martin Roberts
23 September 2013
THE WRIGHT STUFFED
Is it just me, or is the behaviour of persons connected with the on-going libel contest in Lisbon truly as childish as it appears
Thanks to Anne Guedes, who has single-handedly succeeded in bringing transcripts of proceedings to the world's attention, while the press fuss about the amount of ink on their rollers, we learn, courtesy of these unofficial records of an official process, that evidence offered by Michael Wright was preceded by an 'overture', involving one António Marinho Pinto; a peculiar on, off, on again, off again episode, in which he first expressed a wish to present his evidence in writing, rather than give oral testimony. That was in January, 2012. A year later and he changes his mind (supposing perhaps that GA's silence could be bought in the meantime). Hence he is required to appear in court after all and – changes his mind once again. He really does prefer to exercise a professional privilege and submit in writing, consequently denying any opportunity for cross-examination. Sensibly the judge was having none of it, saying that this witness (AMP) should have revealed his intention during a specific 10-day legal period. Having failed to do so, he had therefore forfeited his right of privilege and would be required to appear in court.
What makes this vacillation beyond the 11th hour so totally bizarre is the status of the culprit - President of the Bar Association (bastonário da ordem dos advogados)!
After this somewhat out-of-tune rendition of a chorus from Fleetwood Mac, it was curtain up on Michael Wright.
A preliminary on the part of the judge concerned whether the witness's family relationships would influence his testimony. "Yes" came the reply. But would it prevent him from telling the truth? "No".
Of course not. Influence extends only so far after all. Well, I for one do not believe him. This from the original transcript:
ID - In which circumstances did the McCanns learn about the book and the documentary?
MW - says they knew before the shelving of the case, that a book would be published. About the documentary, they were told it had been broadcast on TV in April 2009.
ID - When did they read the book and watch the documentary?
MW - They read the book when I sent them the translation that was on the internet in August 2008.
(Later) MW objects that the book was published immediately after the release of the files and was written by a PJ Inspector. Moreover he says GA's book can be read in a day.
Oh dear, Michael. What it is to be easily led.
On 6 September 2008, Expresso published an interview with the McCanns, both of them. Whilst more than one exchange therein is of relevance to the current proceedings, the following single example is oh so pertinent:
Q – Former inspector Gonçalo Amaral remains convinced of your involvement in Madeleine's disappearance. Did you read 'The Truth of the Lie', the book that he wrote?
Kate and Gerry – No.
Kate – Why would I?
Gerry – I won't learn anything from reading it.
We have a couple with anticipatory knowledge of a potentially 'harmful' book, albeit written in Portuguese, who, in August 2008, receive a translation via the internet that can be read in a day, and who, according to court witness Michael Wright (who is under oath to tell the truth don't forget), read it at that time, presumably in the one day required to do so. And yet, when asked about it publicly in September, both denied having read the book at all.
Someone else has clearly been listening to that FM song. Either Michael Wright was wrong about his friends' August 2008 access and reaction to Goncalo Amaral's ostensibly contentious book or the McCanns were lying to Expresso; par for the course in the latter case.
There are instances during Wright's testimony when he refers to his 'understanding' which has obviously to derive from third-party input given his own lack of first-hand knowledge:
ID - asks whether the investigation was hampered because of GA's book and an article in the Correio da Manhã (Portuguese Morning Post newspaper).
MW - says it's what he understood.
TVI - They were collaborating in the realisation of another documentary, theirs. This documentary wasn't broadcast by TVI, in spite of the agreement between TVI and Channel 4.
MW - says they decided it wasn't appropriate to broadcast their documentary on the same channel that would broadcast GA's documentary (they being 'Kate and Gerry').
Thus are we afforded a subtle glimpse or two into the 'influence' the McCanns have had upon this witness in particular.
There is only one thing to add. If, Michael, someone tells you a lie in the street, they are not committing a crime – merely telling lies.
Represent that information in court as the truth however and the crime is yours."
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Great piece.
____________________
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy
russiandoll- Posts : 3942
Activity : 4058
Likes received : 15
Join date : 2011-09-11
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
What is the going rate for giving false testimony ?
How are the Trustees and Directors, the Lawyers and the Auditors of the Fund going to record it ?
Item 3.5
Wright, M
To giving False testimony in Court in Lisbon - 30 Pieces of SIlver
?
How are the Trustees and Directors, the Lawyers and the Auditors of the Fund going to record it ?
Item 3.5
Wright, M
To giving False testimony in Court in Lisbon - 30 Pieces of SIlver
?
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
The main point IMO is that the threat of kidnap has already hit the press in UK. It has done it's job.
____________________
Things aren't always what they seem
Angelique- Posts : 1396
Activity : 1460
Likes received : 42
Join date : 2010-10-19
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
That's if one believes it is the UK press who will decide if the McCanns are guilty of anything?Angelique wrote:The main point IMO is that the threat of kidnap has already hit the press in UK. It has done it's job.
Did not MW formally refer this alleged kidnap 'incident' to LP? And what did they do in response?
DIBarlow- Posts : 95
Activity : 95
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-10-11
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Greenink? MW?plebgate wrote:sammyc wrote:@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter. Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'.Or Mr's very good friend Mike McSpy.sammyc wrote: Apologies, don't know how to show the link. By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters . So why Gerry and Kate have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
The last person known to have taken 30 pieces of silver committed suicide shortly afterwardsPeterMac wrote:What is the going rate for giving false testimony ?
How are the Trustees and Directors, the Lawyers and the Auditors of the Fund going to record it ?
Item 3.5
Wright, M
To giving False testimony in Court in Lisbon - 30 Pieces of SIlver
?
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16906
Activity : 24770
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 76
Location : Shropshire
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Gerry could not go on anymore - MW
"The fact that people in Praia da Luz believed the conclusions of the book was terrible for them because they were already depressed. It was a time of great anger and sadness. During the week-end we talked about the effect of the book.
ID - What did they say?
MW That was the first time I ever heard Gerry say he couldn't manage going on any more. I never heard him speak that way before. It was an upsetting conversation.
ID - Why?
MW He and Kate are incredibly strong. They had been dealing with it all for two years. There had been the media backlash when they were made arguidos. But they always left the rest of the family and the helpers out of it. Now Gerry was saying that it was too much to carry on. It was a great shock for me. It was at the end of a night. The following day Gerry said he had no choice. I wondered how much more they could take.
ID - How did the revelations of that week-end evolve?
MW says he had a similar conversation with Gerry about being down because people believed Madeleine was dead."
IMO these words supposedly spoken by Gerry don`t necessarily indicate suicidal thoughts. My interpretation was that he could not go on with the deception, whether for KM`s benefit or someone else`s.
"The fact that people in Praia da Luz believed the conclusions of the book was terrible for them because they were already depressed. It was a time of great anger and sadness. During the week-end we talked about the effect of the book.
ID - What did they say?
MW That was the first time I ever heard Gerry say he couldn't manage going on any more. I never heard him speak that way before. It was an upsetting conversation.
ID - Why?
MW He and Kate are incredibly strong. They had been dealing with it all for two years. There had been the media backlash when they were made arguidos. But they always left the rest of the family and the helpers out of it. Now Gerry was saying that it was too much to carry on. It was a great shock for me. It was at the end of a night. The following day Gerry said he had no choice. I wondered how much more they could take.
ID - How did the revelations of that week-end evolve?
MW says he had a similar conversation with Gerry about being down because people believed Madeleine was dead."
IMO these words supposedly spoken by Gerry don`t necessarily indicate suicidal thoughts. My interpretation was that he could not go on with the deception, whether for KM`s benefit or someone else`s.
Woofer- Posts : 3390
Activity : 3508
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2012-02-06
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Question to Admin.aiyoyo wrote:Greenink? MW?plebgate wrote:sammyc wrote:@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter. Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'.Or Mr's very good friend Mike McSpy.sammyc wrote: Apologies, don't know how to show the link. By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters . So why Gerry and Kate have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
When I want to try to assess a 'troll' or not, I often look at all of 'its' posts to see the general sense of direction.
Is it possible for anyone on 'twitter' to access, or post up on this site (if permitted by admin, and by law) the 'posts' by @greenink2L1. It may just give an indication of a line of thinking, worthy of looking over by members of this forum. not asking, just asking.....
bobbin- Posts : 2053
Activity : 2240
Likes received : 145
Join date : 2011-12-05
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
I second your idea Bobbin. From the evidence of MW, the McCann family and friends have been active on the forums and social network sites since May 2007. Those of us on the receiving end of their malicious campaign would be very interested to see who is at the bottom of it.bobbin wrote:Question to Admin.aiyoyo wrote:Greenink? MW?plebgate wrote:sammyc wrote:@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter. Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'.Or Mr's very good friend Mike McSpy.sammyc wrote: Apologies, don't know how to show the link. By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters . So why Gerry and Kate have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
When I want to try to assess a 'troll' or not, I often look at all of 'its' posts to see the general sense of direction.
Is it possible for anyone on 'twitter' to access, or post up on this site (if permitted by admin, and by law) the 'posts' by @greenink2L1. It may just give an indication of a line of thinking, worthy of looking over by members of this forum. not asking, just asking.....
Cristobell- Posts : 2436
Activity : 2552
Likes received : 6
Join date : 2011-10-12
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Not techy enough to post a link but I agree these tweets are pretty interesting, this greenink individual seems very hate filled.
Rufus T- Posts : 269
Activity : 312
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2013-06-18
Location : Glasgow
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
And has NOT been mentioned once, in papers or TV, since that 'revelation'!Angelique wrote:The main point IMO is that the threat of kidnap has already hit the press in UK. It has done it's job.
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Obviously I am not a lawyer, but if any person posts up tweets on a hashtag available for anyone to read on the net, then I would think that it is ok to post them elsewhere? They, obviously whoever it is, are not keeping it private by posting on a well known hashtag for all to see.
Guest- Guest
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
greenink2l1
Senior Academic (UK) currently researching Online Interaction and Abuse in conjunction with a Midlands Authority.
Birmingham
Woofer- Posts : 3390
Activity : 3508
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2012-02-06
Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT
Good grief! A senior academic behaving like that on a very public platform???Woofer wrote:
greenink2l1@greenink2l1
Senior Academic (UK) currently researching Online Interaction and Abuse in conjunction with a Midlands Authority.
Birmingham
https://twitter.com/greenink2l1
Guest- Guest
Page 5 of 13 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11, 12, 13
Similar topics
» 'Anti-McCann' websites plotted to kidnap one of Madeleine's siblings - Daily Mail INCLUDES TWEETS FROM JERRY LAWTON RE MICHAEL WRIGHT TESTIMONY
» The Role of Michael Wright
» What are Michael Wright and Gerry McCann doing here?
» MADELEINE MCCANN: THE ROLE OF MICHAEL WRIGHT
» Textusa releases new statement (6 Nov 2015) on 'The Last Photo' - says it is a photoshopped composite of THREE different photographs, two of which were taken on Friday 18 May 2007
» The Role of Michael Wright
» What are Michael Wright and Gerry McCann doing here?
» MADELEINE MCCANN: THE ROLE OF MICHAEL WRIGHT
» Textusa releases new statement (6 Nov 2015) on 'The Last Photo' - says it is a photoshopped composite of THREE different photographs, two of which were taken on Friday 18 May 2007
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 5 of 13
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum