The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

Post by Who?What?Where? on 29.06.13 1:21

These must have been designed to silence the press.


I thought that I had read , it was, supposedly, illegal to even mention a super injunction at one point.

Not to get to the stage of mentioning what the super junction was actually about.

Just to mention that it even existed, was illegal.


How could a member of the public possibly know that a super injunction even existed?
There is no way that they could have known that. They could not possibly have been prosecuted. It was meant to be a secret, withheld from them.


So, why make it illegal in the first place?


It can only be an attempt to silence the press pre Levenson.


That should , at least, force the question of whether the press are tip toeing around the McCann case because of some ruling the public do not yet know about, post Levenson.

Based on previous evidence, that has to be at least a possibility, doesn't it?

Who?What?Where?

Posts : 187
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-06-15

Back to top Go down

Re: D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

Post by Guest on 29.06.13 7:03

I agree the MSM are tip toeing around the mystery of Madeliene McCann, maybe the parents have a super injunction out or perhaps they are being told what they can print/say by people a lot higher up than CM.



Rumours abound that certain British celebs have paid thousands of pounds to wangle themselves a super-injunction
A super-injunction is a legal ‘ gagging order’ that prevents the press from reporting on certain stories.
It appears that many celebs don’t want the public to know about their filthy predilections.
For some unknown reason it also appears that Britain’s whiter-than-white judges are more than happy to go along with this heinous charade.
Super-injunctions should only be used in extreme cases.
They should only be used to protect the identity of vulnerable children and adults.
Why the hell are High Court judges granting injunctions for wealthy celebs who have been up to filth?
It doesn’t make sense.
Even top judge Neuberger said it is ”impossible to verify” the number of rulings being handed down which make it a criminal offence to publish certain information about individuals.
His report into injunctions stated:
“The absence of evidence has encouraged a view that an entirely secret process has developed in the civil courts, and that this is improper in principle, risks neutering press freedom to report matters of public interest and undermines the public’s right to be informed of court proceedings.”
According to an explosive investigation by the Independent there are hundreds of gagging-orders in place today.
They include the following cases:
* A footballer alleging blackmail after a group-sex session in a hotel was captured on mobile phone video
* A male celebrity with a disabled son
* At least four child abusers protecting their new identities
* A company accused of pollution
* A member of the public who didn’t want the press to report his sex change
* A television personality who received death threats
* A woman who had a laptop containing her sex videos stolen
* A paedophile who gained an injunction prohibiting reporting of his rehabilitation trips
* A football manager who strayed
* A gambling spouse
* A betting company that obtained an injunction against disclosing information about its clients’ betting
* A murderer’s ex-girlfriend given a new identity – and the psychiatrist who assessed her
* A blackmailed aristocrat
* A “leading actor” who slept with Helen Wood (only she can be named)
* Tens of Premier League footballers who are family men in public but who are in reality promiscuous cheats
* A media personality who denied alcohol addiction
* A sportsman’s child who is subject to court proceedings
* An actress whose laptop containing intimate photographs was stolen
* At least half a dozen since unmasked, among them the commodities trader Trafigura, Andrew Marr (who broke his own injunction), Sir Fred Goodwin, John Terry, Ryan Giggs (named in Parliament), and the News of the World’s “Fake Sheikh” Mazher Mahmood (the paper tried to stop photos of him from being distributed).

* And hundreds of anonymity orders preventing the media from doing anything that would lead to the identification of children whose parents or carers are accused of murder, child abuse or other crimes.
http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/06/08/the-untold-scandal-of-british-celebrities-and-high-court-super-injunctions/

More reading:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/the-untold-story-of-gagging-orders-2288607.html

 The D Notice
http://www.serendipity.li/cda/dnot.html
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

Post by plebgate on 29.06.13 14:10

I would like MPs to name names in Parliament, but I should think that once Giggs was named, MPs have been "advised" to keep their traps shut.

plebgate

Posts : 6072
Reputation : 1734
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

Post by Who?What?Where? on 30.06.13 1:43

Thank you very much for that info Cherry Blossom, I'll look into it.

I am wondering now,when the McCanns' attended the Leveson inquiry if they actually testified under oath?

In the eyes of the public they were appearing in front of a judge. In the mind's of the public they may have been assumed to have promised to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Does anyone know if anyone testifying at the Leveson enquiry was actually under oath?

If not, then this look's like an illusion of a Court, to me.

Who?What?Where?

Posts : 187
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-06-15

Back to top Go down

Re: D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

Post by Who?What?Where? on 30.06.13 2:08

From what i have read so far , super injunction's seem to be a well intentioned law, but one that has been misused by greedy Lawyer's and their rich client's.

Are lawyers' under oath in a court of law or can they tell as many lies as they want, in order to defend their client/client's?

Who?What?Where?

Posts : 187
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-06-15

Back to top Go down

Re: D- Notices and Super Injunction's.

Post by Guest on 30.06.13 9:29

Who?What?Where? wrote: [...]

Does anyone know if anyone testifying at the Leveson enquiry was actually under oath? [...]
***
Yes, they were sworn in before testifying.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum