Court Appeal Hearing - Live text from court - January 2010
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Court Appeal Hearing - Live text from court - January 2010
Interesting read for those that haven't seen this from 2010, lots of information...........
Court Appeal Hearing - Live Text
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id297.html
Court Appeal Hearing - Live Text
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id297.html
Guest- Guest
Re: Court Appeal Hearing - Live text from court - January 2010
Yum! Full of interesting information such as this:
1:36-- De almeida: british police kept information about the mcanns to themselves.
1:39-- De almeida: Forensic lab technicians from birmingham came to portugal so it is strange concerns were raised about contamination.
1:53-- De almeida: british authorities other than police hindered investigation by withholding information.
1:54-- De almeida: when we asked uk for info on mccanns we got a single side of a4.
2:05-- The mcanns' lawyer is getting quite worked up in her cross examination of de almeida
2:09-- The mcanns' lawyer is rebuked for saying de almeida was accused of torturing suspects - he was never charged.
1:36-- De almeida: british police kept information about the mcanns to themselves.
1:39-- De almeida: Forensic lab technicians from birmingham came to portugal so it is strange concerns were raised about contamination.
1:53-- De almeida: british authorities other than police hindered investigation by withholding information.
1:54-- De almeida: when we asked uk for info on mccanns we got a single side of a4.
2:05-- The mcanns' lawyer is getting quite worked up in her cross examination of de almeida
2:09-- The mcanns' lawyer is rebuked for saying de almeida was accused of torturing suspects - he was never charged.
____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
Re: Court Appeal Hearing - Live text from court - January 2010
I wonder if SY have seen these texts that were not allowed as they were never admitted as evidence.........
11:20-- The first witness is being called by videoconference.
11:23-- It is the attorney who was in charge of the original inqury into Madeleine's disappearance, Jose Magalhaes e Menezes.
11:57-- He claimed that although the parents had been checking on Madeleine, it was not as often as every 30 minutes.
12:01-- Police intercepted text messages sent by the McCanns because they were suspicious of the parents' role in Madeleine's disappearance.
12:02-- The text messages sent by Kate and Gerry were never admitted as evidence gathered as part of the investigation.
12:38-- Who suggested the checking of the McCanns' text messages, Mr Menezes is asked. The police, he replies.
12:39-- The text messages were never considered as part of the investigation because the judge did not allow it, the court hears.
11:20-- The first witness is being called by videoconference.
11:23-- It is the attorney who was in charge of the original inqury into Madeleine's disappearance, Jose Magalhaes e Menezes.
11:57-- He claimed that although the parents had been checking on Madeleine, it was not as often as every 30 minutes.
12:01-- Police intercepted text messages sent by the McCanns because they were suspicious of the parents' role in Madeleine's disappearance.
12:02-- The text messages sent by Kate and Gerry were never admitted as evidence gathered as part of the investigation.
12:38-- Who suggested the checking of the McCanns' text messages, Mr Menezes is asked. The police, he replies.
12:39-- The text messages were never considered as part of the investigation because the judge did not allow it, the court hears.
Guest- Guest
Re: Court Appeal Hearing - Live text from court - January 2010
What's betting the contents of deleted text messages were incriminating, else what would be the point of Police trying to use it in Court? Think about it!
The deny in permission for use in Court may be due to a technical flaw rather than lack of merits.
I'm guessing the Portuguese law obliges that Police operation carried out must be guided /led/cleared by Public Prosecutors Office (CPS equivalent), hence evidence gathered without strict adherence to this procedure breaches the rules hence can't be used.
If that be the case, then there is no reason why this evidence cant be used by CPS.
The deny in permission for use in Court may be due to a technical flaw rather than lack of merits.
I'm guessing the Portuguese law obliges that Police operation carried out must be guided /led/cleared by Public Prosecutors Office (CPS equivalent), hence evidence gathered without strict adherence to this procedure breaches the rules hence can't be used.
If that be the case, then there is no reason why this evidence cant be used by CPS.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Similar topics
» The January 2015 McCanns v Amaral hearing on the facts - what did the Portuguese Court of Appeal say about the facts?
» Appeal has been accepted by the Appellate Court
» McCanns v Amaral: That October 2010 Court of Appeal decision in full
» Justice denied again - Les Balkwell shut out of court hearing - Hearing held before the advertised time
» *NEW!* Judge Tugendhat will hear McCanns' CONTEMPT application 10.30am Wednesday 8 February
» Appeal has been accepted by the Appellate Court
» McCanns v Amaral: That October 2010 Court of Appeal decision in full
» Justice denied again - Les Balkwell shut out of court hearing - Hearing held before the advertised time
» *NEW!* Judge Tugendhat will hear McCanns' CONTEMPT application 10.30am Wednesday 8 February
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Portuguese Police Investigation :: McCanns v Dr Gonçalo Amaral + ECHR
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum