The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!


"The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

View previous topic View next topic Go down

"The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

Post by Tony Bennett on 05.06.13 0:32

Post-Leveson, politicians increasingly think they have the right to tell the Press what it can print. Yesterday it was the turn of Lib Dem Minister Ed Davey, who said it was wrong for the Press to give a 'platform‘ to anybody daring to question the political orthodoxy on climate change. The fact is the influence of the printed Press is tiny compared to the power of the BBC, which, in its global warming crusade, has dropped any claim to objectivity. But then we know what this is about: it‘s a cynical exercise in softening up voters not to complain when swingeing green taxes are added to their energy bills. --Editorial, Daily Mail, 4 June 2013 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2335434/Gay-marriage-peers-vote-principle.html)


Germany‘s Science Press Association (Wissenschafts-Pressekonferenz e.V. — WPK) considers it unacceptable that individual journalists are publicly paraded by the German Environment Agency and presented as incompetent just because they criticise leading climate scientists. In its latest brochure on climate change (”And yet, it warms"), the Agency published the names of journalists whose positions ”are not consistent with the state of knowledge of climate science." ”It is not the task of a government agency to determine which opinions may be expressed and which are not, said WPK CEO Martin Schneider. ”Journalists may and must voice different positions, and they may and must question well-established scientists again and again." Moreover, it cannot be the task of a public institution to quasi officially declare certain scientific positions as true. --Wissenschaftjournalisten, 3 June 2013 (http://idw-online.de/pages/de/news536360)


Later today, Ed Davey is due to launch an extraordinary attack on climate change sceptics and "some sections of the press" for publishing their views. It's completely inappropriate for a senior politician to criticise the editorial policy of any newspaper, however much he or she disagrees with it. Even if we put the moral objections to state censorship to one side, there's a good practical reason for not muzzling your intellectual opponents. As JS Mill points out in On Liberty, either they are right, in which case you shouldn't try and suppress the truth, or they are wrong, in which case you have nothing to fear from the publication of their views since their wrong-headedness will then be plain for everyone to see. If Ed Davey really believes that the truth is on his side in this debate, he should encourage his opponents to air their views in public as often as possible, not criticise "some sections of the press" for giving them a platform. --Toby Young, The Daily Telegraph,
3 June 2013 (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100219925/lib-dem-energy-secretary-tells-newspapers-to-stop-publishing-views-of-climate-change-sceptics/)


This evening on my LBC show we discussed Ed Davey‘s outrageous idea that newspapers and broadcasters should refrain from giving a platform to climate change sceptics. How very 'liberal‘ of him. I remember at 18 Doughty Street back in 2007 I phoned Greenpeace to invite them to take part in a panel discussion on climate change. They refused on the basis that the argument was won and there was nothing to debate. It‘s attitudes like this that make me very suspicious of this climate change industry, which is supported by people whose fanaticism borders on the religious. --Iain Dale, 3 June 2013 (http://www.iaindale.com/posts/2013/06/03/the-intolerance-of-climate-change-zealots)

____________________

The amazing symbiosis between bees and flowers:

https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/god-created-plant-pollinator-partners/  

avatar
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 14899
Reputation : 2991
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 70
Location : Shropshire

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: "The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

Post by jd on 05.06.13 0:40

Ed Davey should look at skies every day....He will see the the chemtrails the planes are spraying us with. Today (and past few days) I saw 3 planes flying parallel to each other with 4 jetsprays on each pouring from the back of the plane just spraying the whole city. Since we've had no cloud blue skies I have seen this every time...take a look up there tomorrow, they normally start around 7am and finish mid afternoon


____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare
avatar
jd

Posts : 4151
Reputation : 26
Join date : 2011-07-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: "The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

Post by plebgate on 05.06.13 7:23

Quite right that comment - how very liberal of him.

A government minister because of the coalition, no hope of ever governing on an outright win and yet he thinks he can tell the press what to print.

Ed Davey along with the other turncoat liberals will be out next election, they wont get the student vote next time.

Nigel Lawson will make sure he gets on tv and the papers over this no doubt, I hope so.

They are put in government to do the best for the public, not to force THEIR beliefs on the country. Why should his beliefs be listened to any more than people who don't believe in the climate change dung.

Who does he think he is - a Minister in a weak coalition government, bringing this country to it's knees and he thinks we should defer to his "superior" knowledge without debate. Sounds about right for this supposedly free country. pah.

plebgate

Posts : 6185
Reputation : 1845
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: "The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

Post by tigger on 05.06.13 7:30

From TB's post:
They refused on the basis that the argument was won and there was nothing to debate. It‘s attitudes like this that make me very suspicious of this climate change industry, which is supported by people whose fanaticism borders on the religious. --Iain Dale, 3 June 2013 (http://www.iaindale.com/posts/2013/06/03/the-intolerance-of-climate-change-zealots)
unquote

This is the trouble - it does turn into a religion and religious fanatics have always been useful to the powers that be.

The true prophets of Climate Change are in it for the money - take the wind farms. The energy it costs to produce, install and maintain the thing
over its lifetime is not 'paid' for by the energy it produces during that time.
Selling the land, producing the wind mills is lots of money for everyone. Preaching climate change is big business.
It would be cheaper and environmentally better to use a lot of geothermal energy linked with solar panels.
Why are solar panels so ridiculously expensive still? Because they don't want individuals to have them. Don't want a population where each household can provide a large or even small part of their energy and food for themselves.

Here with apologies for the length are 100 reasons:

CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL: 100 REASONS WHY

HERE are the 100 reasons, released in a dossier issued by the European Foundation, why climate change is natural and not man-made:
1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activities.


2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.


3) Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO2 levels.


4) After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO2 emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.

5) Throughout the Earth’s history, temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO2 levels have often been higher – more than ten times as high. 


6) Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time. 


7) The 0.7C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends.
8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favourable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.


9) Leaked e-mails from British climate scientists – in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that that has been manipulated to exaggerate global warming


10) A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years.


11) Politicians and activiists claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago


12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds


13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that “fewer people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political class—predominantly—are more committed to it than their counterparts in any other country in the world”. 


14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric, wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO2 emissions


15) Professor Plimer, Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity” 


16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate crisis caused by global warming.


17) The science of what determines the earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.


18) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapour which is tied to climate concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control


19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.


20) It is claimed the average global temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees C per century - within natural rates 


21) Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.


22) There is strong evidence from solar studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades


23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for many centuries 


24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder


25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are simply not supported by scientific research


26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles 


27) Research goes strongly against claims that CO2-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets. 


28) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels are our best hope of raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population


29) The biggest climate change ever experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago


30) The slight increase in temperature which has been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term natural climate cycles


31) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels of some so-called “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global cooling, not warming


32) Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures


33) Today’s CO2 concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history – we actually live in a carbon-deficient atmosphere


34) It is a myth that CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume, and CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere


35) It is a myth that computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify” anything 


36) There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes 


37) One statement deleted from a UN report in 1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”


38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC


39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally


40) Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms


41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and cold periods harmful

42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect if the climate is cyclical


43) Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests


44) The historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years 


45) The increase of the air’s CO2 content has probably helped lengthen human lifespans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution


46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO2 levels has helped global populations


47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no scientific grounding at all.


48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists who opposed the belief that CO2 emissions were causing climate change
 

49) The head of Britain’s climate change watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets for cutting carbon emissions.


50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according to a recent OFGEM report.
 

51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of 75 per cent back-up power is required. 
 

52) Global temperatures are below the low end of IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”
 

53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have noted that the composition of ocean water – including CO2, calcium, and water – can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans. 
 

54) The UN’s IPCC computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a “hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics.  Former researcher in the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no evidence of such a hotspot


55) The argument that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity is the argument of flat Earthers.   
 

56) The manner in which US President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress to order emission cuts shows how undemocratic and irrational the entire international decision-making process has become with regards to emission-target setting. 

57) William Kininmonth, a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation, wrote “the likely extent of global temperature rise from a doubling of CO2 is less than 1C. Such warming is well within the envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years, when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice sheets.”
 

58) Canada has shown the world targets derived from the existing Kyoto commitments were always unrealistic and did not work for the country. 
 

59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit, David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but we are continuing along the same lines.


60) The UK ’s environmental policy has a long-term price tag of about £55 billion, before taking into account the impact on its economic growth.  
 

61) The UN’s panel on climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at Ontario Trent University, claims this inaccurate stating the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years. 
 

62) Under existing Kyoto obligations the EU has attempted to claim success, while actually increasing emissions by 13 per cent, according to Lord Lawson. In addition the EU has pursued this scheme by purchasing “offsets” from countries such as China paying them billions of dollars to destroy atmospheric pollutants, such as CFC-23, which were manufactured purely in order to be destroyed.
 

63) It is claimed that the average global temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years according to Penn State University researcher Michael Mann. There is no convincing empirical evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20th century changes in average global temperature were unusual or unnatural. 
 

64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which produced the “hockey stick graph” which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn. 
 

65) The globe’s current approach to climate change in which major industrialised countries agree to nonsensical targets for their CO2 emissions by a given date, as it has been under the Kyoto system, is very expensive.
 

66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the Earth’s temperature.  
 

67) Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”. 
 

68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme weather events. 
 

69) In explaining the average temperature standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years – so it expects global warming to resume swiftly.


70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote: “The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope.  Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.” 
 

71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure. 
 

72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all.  
 

73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means paying for cuts to be made overseas instead. 
 

74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have done almost nothing to reduce emissions. 
 

75) In the United States , the cap-and-trade is an approach designed to control carbon emissions and will impose huge costs upon American citizens via a carbon tax on all goods and services produced in the United States. The average family of four can expect to pay an additional $1700, or £1,043, more each year. It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap-and-trade schemes.  
 

76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback – and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years. 
 

77) Why should politicians devote our scarce resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem, while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty, hunger, disease or terrorism.
 

78) A proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases in CO2 by hundreds of years. 
 

79) Since the cause of global warming is mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it. (We are still not able to control the sun).
 

80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500 climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.
 

81) The UK’s Met Office has been forced this year to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by revelations about the data. 
 

82)  Politicians and activists push for renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate change, but it is essentially about money – under the system of Renewable Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills. It amounts to £1 billion a year.
 

83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors.   
 

84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for political purposes. 
 

85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO2 change. Thus, there appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of CO2 are the cause of past temperature and climate change. 
 

86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures – in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water. 
 

87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only £4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.
 

88) Whilst CO2 levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years. 
 

89) It is a myth that CO2 is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO2 is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is and CO2 is essential to life. 


90) Politicians and climate activists make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area to measure in Hong Kong that is subsiding. They used the record reading of 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level. 


91) The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.
 

92) If one factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent). 
 

93) US President Barack Obama pledged to cut emissions by 2050 to equal those of 1910 when there were 92 million Americans. In 2050, there will be 420 million Americans, so Obama’s promise means that emissions per head will be approximately what they were in 1875. It simply will not happen. 
 

94) The European Union has already agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are known to be well above the Kyoto goal. 
 

95) Australia has stated it wants to slash greenhouse emissions by up to 25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but the pledges were so unpopular that the country’s Senate has voted against the carbon trading Bill, and the Opposition’s Party leader has now been ousted by a climate change sceptic. 
 

96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by 20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3 percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita emissions setters. 
 

97) India plans to reduce the ratio of emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is driven by carbon. 
 

98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said: “We – along with many of our fellow citizens – are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.” 


99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated “We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO2, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”
 
100) A report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change concluded “We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect on climate.” 
 







____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 50
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile http://fytton.blogspot.nl/

Back to top Go down

Re: "The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

Post by bobbin on 05.06.13 7:52

@plebgate wrote:Quite right that comment - how very liberal of him.

A government minister because of the coalition, no hope of ever governing on an outright win and yet he thinks he can tell the press what to print.

Ed Davey along with the other turncoat liberals will be out next election, they wont get the student vote next time.

Nigel Lawson will make sure he gets on tv and the papers over this no doubt, I hope so.

They are put in government to do the best for the public, not to force THEIR beliefs on the country. Why should his beliefs be listened to any more than people who don't believe in the climate change dung.

Who does he think he is - a Minister in a weak coalition government, bringing this country to it's knees and he thinks we should defer to his "superior" knowledge without debate. Sounds about right for this supposedly free country. pah.
Thanks tigger so much, for your last post with so much 'valid' information. It puts it into real perspective and the populace is not fooled, in spite of the propaganda.
Re plebgate above, it is not their 'beliefs', it's the brown packages with 'wads a munny' in them that gets them spouting this rubbish out and putting their necks and reputations on the line.
Which bank on which distant shore will be securing their dirty money. There are enough bankers at the Watford (secret) assembly to pick and choose from.
When force has to be used to 'enforce' an opinion, then you know it's got some corrupt link somewhere, it's about as patent as a flashing lighthouse beacon.
Now, an enforced story, about greenhouse gasses is the perfect precursor for imposing a global 'energy' tax. Well, How convenient is that?. Life couldn't be easier for the elected 'one brain celled specimens' that turn their coats the moment they are in their seats.

bobbin

Posts : 2053
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2011-12-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: "The Leveson Effect": LibDem Minister tells press not to report the views of climate change sceptics

Post by lj on 05.06.13 17:54

Sadly it is not just the Leveson effect. See how in the US the Justice Dep holds off the record meetings with the press about what can and cannot be published.

Freedom of speech is gagged everywhere, and all those in power are lying so much they themselves don't even know the truth anymore.

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/
avatar
lj

Posts : 3327
Reputation : 200
Join date : 2009-12-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum