The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!


View previous topic View next topic Go down


Post by russiandoll on 17.05.13 22:25

A disgrace that the UK government is obfuscating in the case of the murder of Alexander Litvinenko. An act of nuclear terrorism on UK soil, and things have to be kept hidden from the inquest.
Have read a wonderful book about this case, and it stinks.

from BBC website :
The inquest into the 2006 death in London of former KGB spy Alexander Litvinenko has been thrown into doubt.

A coroner is seeking views on whether to hold a form of
public inquiry instead, during which evidence about Russia's alleged
role in the killing could be heard in secret.

This follows him accepting a Foreign Office application to keep certain information under wraps.

Mr Litvinenko's widow said she was "utterly dismayed" by the ruling.

In a written ruling, the coroner Sir Robert Owen said the inquest could not take evidence on the Russian state on grounds of national security.

He also agreed to exclude any material relating to whether
the British security and intelligence services could have prevented Mr
Litvinenko's death from radioactive poisoning.

Without such material any verdict would be "potentially misleading and unfair", he said.

He said he now wanted to hear submissions from all parties,
including Mr Litvinenko's widow and son, on the proposed semi-secret

Mrs Litvinenko felt the coroner had made a "decision to
abandon his search for the truth about Russian state responsibility for
her husband's death", her solicitors said in a statement.

She had previously claimed the UK and Russia were trying to shut down the inquest to preserve trade interests.

'Matter of urgency'
The statement continued: "All those concerned with exposing
the truth will be shocked and saddened that a political deal has been
done between the two governments to prevent the truth from ever seeing
the light of day.

"The only way now that the truth can be exposed will be for
the justice secretary to order a full public inquiry which can consider
the secret evidence in closed session.

"We will be pressing the coroner immediately to request that such an inquiry should now be established as a matter of urgency."

Mr Litvinenko, 43, died after he had been poisoned with polonium-210 while drinking tea at a London meeting.

The better course is arguably not to
address the issues at all rather than to do so an incomplete, inadequate
and potentially misleading basis”

Sir Robert Owen

He was working for MI6 alongside Spanish spies in the days before his death.

Police have sought the arrest of two Russian nationals in
relation to the death - Andrei Lugovoy and Dmitri Kovtun - but the
Russian authorities have refused to hand them over.

The inquest has already faced major delays because both the UK and Russian governments have been slow to disclose documents.

In a pre-inquest hearing, Foreign Secretary William Hague
asked Sir Robert to exclude material from the eventual hearing under a
power called Public Interest Immunity.

The PII process allows ministers to ask courts to withhold
information from a hearing if its disclosure could be damaging to
national security.

BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera said the government
had claimed PII in order to remove certain documents most likely
originating with the intelligence services.

'Fair and fearless'
In his ruling, Sir Robert said that he had partly agreed to Mr
Hague's request for secrecy in relation to the role of the Russian
state and whether the UK could have done anything to prevent the death.

But he said addressing these issues at the inquest without
the material could mean a verdict would be potentially misleading and

Sir Robert said: "My decision to uphold the PII claim... in
relation to material relevant to the issue I have listed including those
of Russian state responsibility and of preventability, has obvious
implications as to the scope of the inquest and the manner in which I
should now proceed.

"In this regard it has to be borne in mind that in conducting
an inquest I have no power to take evidence in closed proceedings in
the absence of the [interested parties]."

Sir Robert said that there was material in the public domain
about the events surrounding the death - but considering them alone
would be insufficient.

"My provisional view is that to entertain these issues on the
basis of the available open evidence, but to disregard the [national
security] evidence... would be to fail to discharge my duty to undertake
a full, fair and fearless inquiry into the circumstances of Mr
Litvinenko's death.

"The same could be said of a decision to remove the issues
from scope. But the better course is arguably not to address the issues
at all rather than to do so an incomplete, inadequate and potentially
misleading basis."


             The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
~John F. Kennedy


Posts : 3942
Reputation : 13
Join date : 2011-09-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum