Re: Jenny Murat on Kate McCanns book

by Guest 29.12.12 18:41

Inspectorfrost wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:Joyce, good evening :-)
Corpse banding is a fine, but easily detectable under a microscope, dark line in a hair, indicating that it comes from a dead person ...

And Rebelo asked for corpse banding tests, there is nothing in the files to say they were done

***
Indeed. Either they weren't done or they're mentioned in withheld files, though the latter doesn't make sense to me as it would be an all exclusive proof of a dead person in the rented car ...

by Inspectorfrost 29.12.12 18:50

Châtelaine wrote:
Inspectorfrost wrote:
Châtelaine wrote:Joyce, good evening :-)
Corpse banding is a fine, but easily detectable under a microscope, dark line in a hair, indicating that it comes from a dead person ...

And Rebelo asked for corpse banding tests, there is nothing in the files to say they were done
***

Indeed. Either they weren't done or they're mentioned in withheld files, though the latter doesn't make sense to me as it would be an all exclusive proof of a dead person in the rented car ...

Exactly. I think they were not done. Shameful at best. Wickedly corrupt and a perversion of the course of justice at worst.

by Guest 31.12.12 9:16

"yeah but yeah but no"

The find alone of a corpse banded hair in the car is not the all exclusive proof that a dead body was in that car.
It is the evidence that a hair of an already deceased person ended up in that car. Which might in itself be just as important.

Amaral writes something like ' they (uk officers) seem to be in no hurry' .
IMO in this case all moments and opportunities to solve at least a little of the riddle were missed, omitted or aborted.

Still much can be done. And I sincerely hope SY will look into all information available.
Unlike those hair samples, that must have been destroyed by now there are records still existing that could be checked. For instance Gerry's 2nd UK visit, his stolen and returned wallet, only mentioned by the McCanns.

His bank details, requested by the PJ and denied by the HO, must still exist.
It would be interesting to know if any unusual transaction was made on any of his accounts in that particular period... A story to cover the possible detection of such transactions.. by faking 'they had taken it''.

Still hoping the truth will come out one day

parapono

'what you sow, you'll harvest'

by mank 31.12.12 23:45

I agree, the truth needs to be out now, A very happy New Year to everyone on the forum, and a wish that 2013 will bring that,hopefully through the libel trial

by whmon 07.04.13 1:13

Justicemm wrote:
ShuBob wrote:According to Clarence Mitchell, the undisclosed payment made to Kate for the unauthorised publication of her diary by NoTW was £125,000. Interestingly, Kate then went on to choose the Sun- of all the papers in the UK- to serialize her book.

The Sun of all the newspapers she could have used . And she's supposed to be a Scouser !

I am sorry if I appear snobbish here as I am not snobbish by any means but it was just your 'Scouser' remark. When the story first unfolded and it became apparent that the parents were both doctors I felt that they were totally innocent, Then, they were on tv and I became aware that they were simply working class individuals who had 'made good' by going to university (same as me.) What is all the 'they are middle class therefore they are blameless' stance about?

They have come up- kicking and squealing on the dirty working class streets. Nothing wrong with that, I did that myself (and at a damned good university I may add), but WHY do people assume that doctors or anybody else for that matter who have undergone a period of university study have higher morals than anybody who has not gone to university?

by plebgate 07.04.13 7:59

I think the scouser remark was because of the way the Sun reported on the Hillsborough disaster and a real/true scouser would never ever again buy the Sun newspaper let alone take money from it????