The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Full Text Affidavit Mm11

Full Text Affidavit Regist10

Full Text Affidavit

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Full Text Affidavit Empty Full Text Affidavit

Post by Guest on 02.09.12 14:42

Dear Mr Bennett,


I'm going over the full Affidavit myself now, finding a number of quite significant pages missing. This concerns the Court undertaking in November 2009, how it came about.

Could I trouble you to supply the full text?

Thanks!

Funny how IH stresses the McCs reluctance to take you to court. How does she know, how can she swear to that? Proof?

How nice of 'well wishers' to trawl the internet in order to snitch to CR. Can IH swear to the existence of these people, who they are and what their motives are?

I mean, just deny their existence and see what happens!

What if it came to light in Court, that this is yet a(nother) case of deliberate entrapment, by paid snitches instead of spontaneous info by as yet anonymous well wishers? This to me seems a genuine point of concern for the CR camp.
Ask for these well wishers to be heard as witnesses, for their motives to be challenged, if they were paid for their efforts. And by whom!

And what if it came to light that it's not paid snitches, but CR themselves that set TB up? Nice touch, that.

OK. Please let's have the full text. Such nice hunting.

Oh, and by the way, Kevin, just for the record, I consider the McCanns totally innocent of killing their daughter, and of disposing of her remains.

Now, as for those dogs.....
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Full Text Affidavit Empty Reply to Portia

Post by Tony Bennett on 02.09.12 15:44

@Portia wrote:Dear Mr Bennett,

I'm going over the full Affidavit myself now, finding a number of quite significant pages missing. This concerns the Court undertaking in November 2009, how it came about.

Could I trouble you to supply the full text?

Thanks!

REPLY: There's a problem about that. I deliberately left out several passages from Isabel Hudson's Affidvait, when I published it, because Carter-Ruck seem to insist that my saying "I am not allowed to say the McCanns x-y-z" amounts to repetition of the libel' 'x-y-z', if you see what I mean. However, I do not honestly think that the judge would mind me (in view of your past help to me) sending it to you by 'pm' for comment so I shall try to do that in due course, though I think it's only on a pdf. - and I am no tecchie at copying those.

Funny how IH stresses the McCs reluctance to take you to court. How does she know, how can she swear to that? Proof?

REPLY: I suppose she might say something like: "Several times I advised the McCanns that they had a very good case against Mr Bennett, but they repeatedly told me that they didn't really want to bring any action against him, not wishing to dignify his utterances and actions. But in the end his breaches of his own voluntary undertaking were so numerous and so outrageous that the McCanns overcame their reluctance and decided, with great hestitation, that they had no alternative but to bring contempt of court proceedings against him".

How nice of 'well wishers' to trawl the internet in order to snitch to CR. Can IH swear to the existence of these people, who they are and what their motives are?

REPLY: I doubt if the court will be interested, as what these well-wishers have done is copy and 'screenshot' some of my postings, which I admit to.

I mean, just deny their existence and see what happens!


REPLY: See above.

What if it came to light in Court, that this is yet a(nother) case of deliberate entrapment, by paid snitches instead of spontaneous info by as yet anonymous well wishers? This to me seems a genuine point of concern for the CR camp.

REPLY: I suppose you are referring to something like 'goading'. I am not sure that will afford me any defence, though the blatant entrapment by Michael 'look-at-all-my-pics-of Haut-la-Garenne' Gunnill is another matter altogether.

Ask for these well wishers to be heard as witnesses, for their motives to be challenged, if they were paid for their efforts. And by whom!

REPLY: I do not think I have sufficient grounds to apply for witness summonses against them. I did however apply for Gunnill to be summonsed. And he was!

And what if it came to light that it's not paid snitches, but CR themselves that set TB up? Nice touch, that.

OK. Please let's have the full text. Such nice hunting.

Oh, and by the way, Kevin, just for the record, I consider the McCanns totally innocent of killing their daughter, and of disposing of her remains.

Now, as for those dogs...

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie Mcann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 15593
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 72
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Full Text Affidavit Empty I

Post by aniandr on 02.09.12 21:55


A screenshot is useless. I at any time on any forum Can change my name to tony bennett and write whatever i want claiming im you. If i change my name to Bill Clinton whatever i write cant be used against Bill Clinton just becoz someone take a screendump
avatar
aniandr

Posts : 162
Join date : 2012-06-02

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum