The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

Please note that when you register your username must be different from your email address!


tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by sharonl on 30.05.12 22:24

To be fair we should really have a seperate forum entitled "Evidence supporting the McCanns claim that Madeleine was abducted" we should put this up there and if ever any other evidence materialises we can add it.

Who on earth would take a camera and drive through Luz on a Sunday afternoon in a bungled attempt to prove a point?

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4713
Reputation : 870
Join date : 2009-12-29

View user profile http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by PeterMac on 30.05.12 22:31

What an utterly BIZARRE thing to post on YouTube.
A hand held video of the, sorry 'a', route from 5a out onto the main road.
And that is it.
I agree we should being to collect the evidence of abduction together.

I offer one incontrovertible FACT to start it off

Madeleine McCann is no longer in apartment 5A.

____________________

avatar
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 177
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by Guest on 30.05.12 22:34

@PeterMac wrote:What an utterly BIZARRE thing to post on YouTube.
A hand held video of the, sorry 'a', route from 5a out onto the main road.
And that is it.
I agree we should being to collect the evidence of abduction together.

I offer one incontrovertible FACT to start it off

Madeleine McCann is no longer in apartment 5A.

Hello Peter Mac!

Are you sure about that?
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by PeterMac on 30.05.12 22:53

@anil39200 wrote:Can we also add, she is missing?
I not sure that we can.
She has been reported missing by her parents.
And that is about it.

____________________

avatar
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 177
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by sharonl on 30.05.12 23:03

A McCann supporter called Firestarter on Twitter is going to help us out here, apparently there is loads of evidence supporting the abduction claim.

I will post it here as soon as Firestarter provides it

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4713
Reputation : 870
Join date : 2009-12-29

View user profile http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by jd on 31.05.12 0:14

@sharonl wrote:A McCann supporter called Firestarter on Twitter is going to help us out here, apparently there is loads of evidence supporting the abduction claim.

I will post it here as soon as Firestarter provides it

This will be interesting as there has never been a single shred of evidence after 5 years!
avatar
jd

Posts : 4151
Reputation : 26
Join date : 2011-07-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by Hummingbird on 31.05.12 9:42

I think the idea for the thread is a good one, even though at this moment in time I can think of nothing to add to it!

As for the video, what a complete waste of just over 4 minutes of your life and sunshine!!

He isn't even carrying anything similar in weight to a child of nearly 4years old so how does he know that this wouldn't have slowed him down or even stopped him hopping over walls like some keep fit enthusiast.

All it tells me is he can drive a car and he has been to PDL and seen apartment 5A!


Hummingbird

Posts : 248
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-05-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by tigger on 31.05.12 11:16

- and he's not very good at making a video or handling the camera.

Also: just because he didn't see anyone, it doesn't mean nobody saw him.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.
avatar
tigger

Posts : 8114
Reputation : 50
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile http://fytton.blogspot.nl/

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by sharonl on 05.06.12 16:34

@jd wrote:
@sharonl wrote:A McCann supporter called Firestarter on Twitter is going to help us out here, apparently there is loads of evidence supporting the abduction claim.

I will post it here as soon as Firestarter provides it

This will be interesting as there has never been a single shred of evidence after 5 years!

I know that you'll all be shocked and stunned,(not) but despite a number of requests, the McCann supporters have failed to come up with one shred of evidence that supports the McCanns claim of abduction.

Firestar claims to have provided the answers once (in a tweet) and doesn't seem to want to redo that despite my not having received it

Sara refuses to provide the evidence because if Maddie was found tomorrow we would come up with some weird theory of cloning or somethings

Apart from that a load of abuse

I was very polite, I asked nicely and still they cannot give me one shred of evidence - we can only conclude that there most certainly isn't any.

If Madeleine had been abducted team McCann and their supporters would be shouting this evidence from the roof tops.

There is a lot of money to be made from these Madeleine stories in the press, stories that would fail if we were heard by a wider audience. I wonder if any of these trolls have had dealings with the media, Brooks, Mitchell & co.

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4713
Reputation : 870
Join date : 2009-12-29

View user profile http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by sharonl on 05.06.12 16:39

At Last we have something - eye witnesses

(Probably the ones who waited 4 years and then went straight to Rebekah Brooks Sun)



Sara@SafariSara

@5haronl Yes, the eye witnesses are evidence, you have no other evidence. You have only peddled lies all along. #McCann


View conversation Hide conversation

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
avatar
sharonl


Posts : 4713
Reputation : 870
Join date : 2009-12-29

View user profile http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by jd on 05.06.12 16:49

"eye witnesses"?....Do they mean jane tanner? lol! They should learn to read more
avatar
jd

Posts : 4151
Reputation : 26
Join date : 2011-07-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by friedtomatoes on 05.06.12 17:35

jane tanner says she saw a man carrying a child, there was nothing to prove it was madeleine, end of, so no one can state as a fact madeleines alledged abduction was witnessed.


friedtomatoes

Posts : 591
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-04-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by Harry Junior on 14.07.12 15:20

It may be badly filmed but the point here is to illustrate just how quickly someone can escape the resort. Everything else is immaterial. I think it's good factual evidence. goodpost

Harry Junior

Posts : 1
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2012-07-14
Age : 48
Location : Britain

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: tinman918 explains how ridiculously easy it would have been for an abductor to snatch Madeleine, without being seen or heard by anybody, and then drive off immediately in a car

Post by Guest on 14.07.12 16:59

@Harry Junior wrote:It may be badly filmed but the point here is to illustrate just how quickly someone can escape the resort. Everything else is immaterial. I think it's good factual evidence. goodpost
***
If the abduction would be true, can you explain WHY Jane Tanner saw someone WALKING with Madeleine and crossing the street [and then getting into a car, which was further away?] There's nothing suspicious about a car parked in a car park, which was as it happens right in front of apartment 5A ...
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum