SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Legal Issues :: Carter-Ruck: McCanns v Bennett Contempt of Court
Page 2 of 2 • Share
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
gerry's remark that "freedom of speech does not include freedom to distort" surely applies to him and them as well!
Until they are exonerated by a Court of Law, who is to say which theorist side is distorting?
Each side can say the other side is distorting depending on which theory they believe in.
Team mccanns are so at home with distortion themselves - take the latest Leh sighting for example - both the Leh police and mccanns cant be right. So who's is distorting. Again depending on who you believe and there
can be only one side which is lying.
Take their tale of the shutter as another example - complete distortion.
What about the true purpose of their fund -- did they tell donors they used the fund to pay for two mortgage payments or did they inform the donors bulk of it will goes to legal fees against their critics? Their distortion list goes on......
I will be damn if some alleged child murderer come on and tell me I must stop my brain functioning.
Is casey anthony going to sue half the country for having disbelieving her for example?
Is MJ's estate going to sue half the world for questioning his behavior with boys?
If anyone should sue in this whole saga surrounding Maddie's disappearance it should Amaral and the PJs. They
are so most maligned ones in the whole saga. Who was it who called them "f...king t........sers"?
Talking about freedom of speech and not freedom to distort, well they should look into the mirror first.
They preach one thing and do another, so who proved themselves to be bigger f........king ...t.....ssers?
Until they are exonerated by a Court of Law, who is to say which theorist side is distorting?
Each side can say the other side is distorting depending on which theory they believe in.
Team mccanns are so at home with distortion themselves - take the latest Leh sighting for example - both the Leh police and mccanns cant be right. So who's is distorting. Again depending on who you believe and there
can be only one side which is lying.
Take their tale of the shutter as another example - complete distortion.
What about the true purpose of their fund -- did they tell donors they used the fund to pay for two mortgage payments or did they inform the donors bulk of it will goes to legal fees against their critics? Their distortion list goes on......
I will be damn if some alleged child murderer come on and tell me I must stop my brain functioning.
Is casey anthony going to sue half the country for having disbelieving her for example?
Is MJ's estate going to sue half the world for questioning his behavior with boys?
If anyone should sue in this whole saga surrounding Maddie's disappearance it should Amaral and the PJs. They
are so most maligned ones in the whole saga. Who was it who called them "f...king t........sers"?
Talking about freedom of speech and not freedom to distort, well they should look into the mirror first.
They preach one thing and do another, so who proved themselves to be bigger f........king ...t.....ssers?
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Dr_Evil wrote:This is how i see it. If Tony does not remove the offending posts, then Carter Ruck will continue with the proceddings. If Tony does comply then nothing will get done. People do need to understand though, like i have said before, the difference between libel and free speech, if the mark is overstepped, then there will always be trouble.
I wonder why I get a bad vibes about you?
Your statements are innonence (not) - I can spot you from miles off.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Oh btw, just want to add Ed Smethurst has yet to prove he isnt just distorting TB's post just to sue him because of hidden agenda. From a neutral bystander viewpoint I dont see TB defaming him in any of his posts. Neither did I see ES saying he's reported depraved posters to the authorities.
Power of scorn and spite is worst than power of money - One is hatred and the other is the enabler.
Power of scorn and spite is worst than power of money - One is hatred and the other is the enabler.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
aiyoyo wrote:Dr_Evil wrote:This is how i see it. If Tony does not remove the offending posts, then Carter Ruck will continue with the proceddings. If Tony does comply then nothing will get done. People do need to understand though, like i have said before, the difference between libel and free speech, if the mark is overstepped, then there will always be trouble.
I wonder why I get a bad vibes about you?
Your statements are innonence (not) - I can spot you from miles off.
I spotted this one a long time ago.
____________________
Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive
Big Vern- Posts : 121
Activity : 124
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2010-10-28
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Dr_Evil wrote:Willo wrote:It would be interesting to see a list of all the libelous and defamatory statements that Gerry, Kate, Mitchell and their cohorts have made over the last 4 years particularly towards Amaral the PJ and even the dogs.
You cannot libel dogs as far as i am aware.
True but by libelling the dogs you're also by extension libelling the handler.
Me- Posts : 683
Activity : 698
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Big Vern wrote:aiyoyo wrote:Dr_Evil wrote:This is how i see it. If Tony does not remove the offending posts, then Carter Ruck will continue with the proceddings. If Tony does comply then nothing will get done. People do need to understand though, like i have said before, the difference between libel and free speech, if the mark is overstepped, then there will always be trouble.
I wonder why I get a bad vibes about you?
Your statements are innonence (not) - I can spot you from miles off.
I spotted this one a long time ago.
Yep
____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry
http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0
http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/
lj- Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Me wrote:Dr_Evil wrote:Willo wrote:It would be interesting to see a list of all the libelous and defamatory statements that Gerry, Kate, Mitchell and their cohorts have made over the last 4 years particularly towards Amaral the PJ and even the dogs.
You cannot libel dogs as far as i am aware.
True but by libelling the dogs you're also by extension libelling the handler.
Precisely Me, the dogs are his tools and welcome back !!
Guest- Guest
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Sheep - tuned into Sky, Virgin or THE SUN
listener- Posts : 643
Activity : 681
Likes received : 18
Join date : 2010-01-10
Re: SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
listener wrote:Sheep - tuned into Sky, Virgin or THE SUN
Basically richard branson and rupert murdoch, both their supporters.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Carter-Ruck's letter to T Bennett, 15 Jul 2010
» Legal Services Commission's blunder re Legal Aid - The actual letter ++PLUS++ Carter-Ruck's 'To Whom it May Concern' Letter
» Carter-Ruck registered anonymously as a member on this forum on 8 August 2011
» JATYK - 100 replies on the topic of that letter to Carter-Ruck - but not one dealing with all the inconsistencies
» The letter of concession to Carter-Ruck re Brian Kennedy - IN FULL
» Legal Services Commission's blunder re Legal Aid - The actual letter ++PLUS++ Carter-Ruck's 'To Whom it May Concern' Letter
» Carter-Ruck registered anonymously as a member on this forum on 8 August 2011
» JATYK - 100 replies on the topic of that letter to Carter-Ruck - but not one dealing with all the inconsistencies
» The letter of concession to Carter-Ruck re Brian Kennedy - IN FULL
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Legal Issues :: Carter-Ruck: McCanns v Bennett Contempt of Court
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum