The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: McCann: Latest News & Discussion :: McCann Case: Latest News
Page 2 of 3 • Share •
Page 2 of 3 • 
1, 2, 3 
EDDIE THE INFALLIBLE - THE REAL SCANDAL OF CUDDLE CAT - 21st Feb 2011
by Autumn on 25.02.11 1:53
The McCanns post up the latest update link to 'our friends' at The Writing of The Wrongs Blog
EDDIE THE INFALLIBLE? - THE REAL SCANDAL OF CUDDLE CAT
Martin Grime, dog handler of British sniffer dogs, Keela and Eddie, never did say that Eddie, the cadaver dog, was always right. He said that, in operation, Eddie had never once alerted falsely to the cadaver scent of a dead, wild, animal or food stuffs. That became corrupted on-line, to never been wrong or (even in a PJ report, written mid-way through the case) to, 100% accurate. If Eddie, in fact, ever had an unblemished record (impossible to prove or disprove) he certainly lost it in Praia da Luz.
When the British press revealed that Kate had washed cuddle-cat, there was on-line outrage. Kate was accused of having washed away forensic evidence crucial to the investigation. Beyond dispute, when Madeleine vanished, her toy was left, lying on the bed. But then Kate is a medical doctor, not a police woman or forensic scientist.
Portugal has a perfectly good forensic laboratory, used in the Madeleine investigation, but its forensic report says nothing about the toy. That was the first missed opportunity by the PJ to take the toy for forensic examination. The second was following the British forensic sweep with the sniffer dogs. In the villa the McCanns rented after vacating the holiday apartment, clothes and the toy were canine-inspected. Both dogs tested the area to check for scents before the inspections and there was none. On Eddie’s first encounter with Cuddle-cat, he sniffed it, picked it up and played with it. But he didn’t bark (his official signal of a scent). Then the toy was hidden in a cupboard and Eddie barked. That was an error, but whether of omission (not barking when he should have) or commission (barking when he shouldn’t have) we can only guess.
From Martin Grime’s rogatory interview, we perhaps get a glimpse of the view of Amaral’s successor, Paulo Rebelo, of the dogs’ performance in Praia da Luz.
“Can you confirm if the signal given regarding the stuffed toy corresponds to a concrete alert of detection of a cadaver, or a mere trick played by the dog”
From Grime’s predictably indignant response, we learn something else startling:
The dogs were not taught any ‘tricks’. The cadaver dog, Eddie, reacted to the toy, which at my request was retained by the Judicial Police for future forensic analysis. I have no knowledge of the results of any forensic analysis on the toy.
Grime recommended that the toy be tested.
John Lowe, from the Forensic Science Service in Birmingham, wrote a long and detailed report of all tests carried out on items or artefacts forwarded to the forensic laboratory, including the ignition card of the McCanns’ Renault hire car and cuttings from the flower bed. But with John Lowe’s report, as with the report from the Portuguese forensic laboratory, there is no mention of cuddle-cat. It was never forwarded to Birmingham. Grime’s instruction was ignored.
Why? In the meanwhile, if the PJ saw no reason to suppose that the toy might hold vital forensic clues, why should Kate have thought any different? And how (and why!) did the PJ come to the conclusions they did?
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/21/eddie-the-infallible-%E2%80%93-the-real-scandal-of-cuddle-cat/
EDDIE THE INFALLIBLE? - THE REAL SCANDAL OF CUDDLE CAT
Martin Grime, dog handler of British sniffer dogs, Keela and Eddie, never did say that Eddie, the cadaver dog, was always right. He said that, in operation, Eddie had never once alerted falsely to the cadaver scent of a dead, wild, animal or food stuffs. That became corrupted on-line, to never been wrong or (even in a PJ report, written mid-way through the case) to, 100% accurate. If Eddie, in fact, ever had an unblemished record (impossible to prove or disprove) he certainly lost it in Praia da Luz.
When the British press revealed that Kate had washed cuddle-cat, there was on-line outrage. Kate was accused of having washed away forensic evidence crucial to the investigation. Beyond dispute, when Madeleine vanished, her toy was left, lying on the bed. But then Kate is a medical doctor, not a police woman or forensic scientist.
Portugal has a perfectly good forensic laboratory, used in the Madeleine investigation, but its forensic report says nothing about the toy. That was the first missed opportunity by the PJ to take the toy for forensic examination. The second was following the British forensic sweep with the sniffer dogs. In the villa the McCanns rented after vacating the holiday apartment, clothes and the toy were canine-inspected. Both dogs tested the area to check for scents before the inspections and there was none. On Eddie’s first encounter with Cuddle-cat, he sniffed it, picked it up and played with it. But he didn’t bark (his official signal of a scent). Then the toy was hidden in a cupboard and Eddie barked. That was an error, but whether of omission (not barking when he should have) or commission (barking when he shouldn’t have) we can only guess.
From Martin Grime’s rogatory interview, we perhaps get a glimpse of the view of Amaral’s successor, Paulo Rebelo, of the dogs’ performance in Praia da Luz.
“Can you confirm if the signal given regarding the stuffed toy corresponds to a concrete alert of detection of a cadaver, or a mere trick played by the dog”
From Grime’s predictably indignant response, we learn something else startling:
The dogs were not taught any ‘tricks’. The cadaver dog, Eddie, reacted to the toy, which at my request was retained by the Judicial Police for future forensic analysis. I have no knowledge of the results of any forensic analysis on the toy.
Grime recommended that the toy be tested.
John Lowe, from the Forensic Science Service in Birmingham, wrote a long and detailed report of all tests carried out on items or artefacts forwarded to the forensic laboratory, including the ignition card of the McCanns’ Renault hire car and cuttings from the flower bed. But with John Lowe’s report, as with the report from the Portuguese forensic laboratory, there is no mention of cuddle-cat. It was never forwarded to Birmingham. Grime’s instruction was ignored.
Why? In the meanwhile, if the PJ saw no reason to suppose that the toy might hold vital forensic clues, why should Kate have thought any different? And how (and why!) did the PJ come to the conclusions they did?
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/21/eddie-the-infallible-%E2%80%93-the-real-scandal-of-cuddle-cat/
Autumn- Posts : 2603
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25 
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by YNG on 25.02.11 7:53
@Autumn wrote:The McCanns post up the latest update link to 'our friends' at The Writing of The Wrongs Blog
EDDIE THE INFALLIBLE? - THE REAL SCANDAL OF CUDDLE CAT
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/21/eddie-the-infallible-%E2%80%93-the-real-scandal-of-cuddle-cat/
" On Eddie’s first encounter with Cuddle-cat, he sniffed it, picked it up and played with it. But he didn’t bark (his official signal of a scent). Then the toy was hidden in a cupboard and Eddie barked. That was an error, but whether of omission (not barking when he should have) or commission (barking when he shouldn’t have) we can only guess"
Yes they can 'only guess ' .... lol .... no explanation then as to why they 'guess ' this was an error on the cannine teams part
____________________
KM : "They want me to lie - I'm being framed. Police don't want a murder in Portugal”
YNG- Posts : 410
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-11-02 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by zodiac on 26.02.11 18:01
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/21/eddie-the-infallible-%E2%80%93-the-real-scandal-of-cuddle-cat/[/quote[/url]]@Autumn wrote:The McCanns post up the latest update link to 'our friends' at The Writing of The Wrongs Blog
EDDIE THE INFALLIBLE? - THE REAL SCANDAL OF CUDDLE CAT
Martin Grime, dog handler of British sniffer dogs, Keela and Eddie, never did say that Eddie, the cadaver dog, was always right. He said that, in operation, Eddie had never once alerted falsely to the cadaver scent of a dead, wild, animal or food stuffs. That became corrupted on-line, to never been wrong or (even in a PJ report, written mid-way through the case) to, 100% accurate. If Eddie, in fact, ever had an unblemished record (impossible to prove or disprove) he certainly lost it in Praia da Luz.
When the British press revealed that Kate had washed cuddle-cat, there was on-line outrage. Kate was accused of having washed away forensic evidence crucial to the investigation. Beyond dispute, when Madeleine vanished, her toy was left, lying on the bed. But then Kate is a medical doctor, not a police woman or forensic scientist.
Portugal has a perfectly good forensic laboratory, used in the Madeleine investigation, but its forensic report says nothing about the toy. That was the first missed opportunity by the PJ to take the toy for forensic examination. The second was following the British forensic sweep with the sniffer dogs. In the villa the McCanns rented after vacating the holiday apartment, clothes and the toy were canine-inspected. Both dogs tested the area to check for scents before the inspections and there was none. On Eddie’s first encounter with Cuddle-cat, he sniffed it, picked it up and played with it. But he didn’t bark (his official signal of a scent). Then the toy was hidden in a cupboard and Eddie barked. That was an error, but whether of omission (not barking when he should have) or commission (barking when he shouldn’t have) we can only guess.
From Martin Grime’s rogatory interview, we perhaps get a glimpse of the view of Amaral’s successor, Paulo Rebelo, of the dogs’ performance in Praia da Luz.
“Can you confirm if the signal given regarding the stuffed toy corresponds to a concrete alert of detection of a cadaver, or a mere trick played by the dog”
From Grime’s predictably indignant response, we learn something else startling:
The dogs were not taught any ‘tricks’. The cadaver dog, Eddie, reacted to the toy, which at my request was retained by the Judicial Police for future forensic analysis. I have no knowledge of the results of any forensic analysis on the toy.
Grime recommended that the toy be tested.
John Lowe, from the Forensic Science Service in Birmingham, wrote a long and detailed report of all tests carried out on items or artefacts forwarded to the forensic laboratory, including the ignition card of the McCanns’ Renault hire car and cuttings from the flower bed. But with John Lowe’s report, as with the report from the Portuguese forensic laboratory, there is no mention of cuddle-cat. It was never forwarded to Birmingham. Grime’s instruction was ignored.
Why? In the meanwhile, if the PJ saw no reason to suppose that the toy might hold vital forensic clues, why should Kate have thought any different? And how (and why!) did the PJ come to the conclusions they did?
[url=http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/21/eddie-the-infallible-%E2%80%93-the-real-scandal-of-cuddle-cat/
"there is no mention of cuddle-cat. It was never forwarded to Birmingham. Grime’s instruction was ignored."
How do they know CC was never forwarded to Birmingham? How do they know that the instruction Mr Grime gave was ignored? How do we know if the CC that KM carried around after the sniffer dogs alerted is the same CC? Two sisters could each have had a CC. The CC in the cupboard could have been sent for testing. The results may not have been released (just like all of the dogs video was not released) and the PJ could perhaps still have that CC. The McCanns do not have all of the polices files! So how would they know?
zodiac- Posts : 73
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-01-31 -
Friends in Birmingham
by Tony Bennett on 26.02.11 18:29
A 'friend' within the FSS at Birmingham told them?@zodiac wrote:How do they know CuddleCat was never forwarded to Birmingham? How do they know that the instruction Mr Grime gave was ignored? How do we know if the CC that KM carried around after the sniffer dogs alerted is the same CC? Two sisters could each have had a CC. The CC in the cupboard could have been sent for testing. The results may not have been released (just like all of the dogs video was not released) and the PJ could perhaps still have that CC. The McCanns do not have all of the polices files! So how would they know?
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 14901
Reputation : 2996
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 70
Location : Shropshire -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by emilyb3 on 26.02.11 18:58
@zodiac
How do they know CC was never forwarded to Birmingham? How do they know that the instruction Mr Grime gave was ignored?
if it was wouldn't the results have been in the fss report?
How do they know CC was never forwarded to Birmingham? How do they know that the instruction Mr Grime gave was ignored?
if it was wouldn't the results have been in the fss report?
emilyb3- Posts : 8
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2010-08-28 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by zodiac on 27.02.11 16:48
@emilyb3 wrote:@zodiac
How do they know CC was never forwarded to Birmingham? How do they know that the instruction Mr Grime gave was ignored?
if it was wouldn't the results have been in the fss report?
"there is no mention of cuddle-cat. It was never forwarded to Birmingham. Grime’s instruction was ignored."
How do they know CC was never forwarded to Birmingham? How do they know that the instruction Mr Grime gave was ignored? How do we know if the CC that KM carried around after the sniffer dogs alerted is the same CC? Two sisters could each have had a CC. The CC in the cupboard could have been sent for testing. The results may not have been released (just like all of the dogs video was not released) and the PJ could perhaps still have that CC. The McCanns do not have all of the polices files! So how would they know?
emilyb3,
in my original post (above) I mention perhaps the full report may not have been released. IIRC all the video of the dogs alerting has not been released either such as irrc Keela the CSI dog helping to locate the tiles which were to be lifted for forensic testing. Even if CC was not forwarded to Birmingham it does necessarily mean the instruction by Mr Grime was ignored. Perhaps the alerted CC was retained for evidence? Perhaps it is still retained . Even if CC was not forwarded it does not mean that Eddie did not signal cadver. IIRC the CSI dog did not alert to CC therefore if CC was not sent to Birmingham perhaps that is the reason why. One wonders if perhaps the Portuguese could still have the cadaver CC. Why is CC not being carted around the way CC was in Portugal? Hmm wonder if CC will now take to the stage again? IIRC the PJ copied KM's diary. Were those copies released with the files?Martin Grime and Eddie and Keela
“Can you confirm if the signal given regarding the stuffed toy corresponds to a concrete alert of detection of a cadaver, or a mere trick played by the dog?”
The dogs were not taught any “tricks”.EVRD “signalled” the toy, which at my request was retained by the Judicial Police for future forensic analysis. I have no knowledge of the results of any forensic analysis on the toy.
http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic35.html
zodiac- Posts : 73
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-01-31 -
LET'S FIND HER - 23rd February 2011
by Autumn on 01.03.11 14:47
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/23/let%E2%80%99s-find-her/
LET'S FIND HER
My belief is that there is a huge likelihood that in some way Madeleine’s abductors will conform to the behaviour of other abductors of successfully recovered children e.g. (from currently limited knowledge but I am on the case with researching this subject much more deeply)
1. There is a tendency for children to be held remarkably close to where they were taken.
2. Often they have been exposed to public view.
3. In retrospect, neighbours/colleagues/associates all comment on ‘odd’ elements they’d noted regarding the case, but hadn’t necessarily reported or pushed the point on.
4. The child taken had tried to communicate the fact to strangers that they were being held or trapped or in one or two instances had seen coverage regarding their own abduction.
Surely this means that with a bit of research this blog can help to communicate a) how incredibly possible it is to find and get Madeleine back b) how perfectly possible it is that anyone can actually help c) that if anyone with doubts should act now rather than regret later and d) sometimes cries for help can be missed or dismissed
Watch this space, I can see already it makes for interesting reading.
'My belief is that there is a huge likelihood that in some way Madeleine’s abductors will conform to the behaviour of other abductors of successfully recovered children e.g. (from currently limited knowledge but I am on the case with researching this subject much more deeply)'
What on earth do they mean?
LET'S FIND HER
My belief is that there is a huge likelihood that in some way Madeleine’s abductors will conform to the behaviour of other abductors of successfully recovered children e.g. (from currently limited knowledge but I am on the case with researching this subject much more deeply)
1. There is a tendency for children to be held remarkably close to where they were taken.
2. Often they have been exposed to public view.
3. In retrospect, neighbours/colleagues/associates all comment on ‘odd’ elements they’d noted regarding the case, but hadn’t necessarily reported or pushed the point on.
4. The child taken had tried to communicate the fact to strangers that they were being held or trapped or in one or two instances had seen coverage regarding their own abduction.
Surely this means that with a bit of research this blog can help to communicate a) how incredibly possible it is to find and get Madeleine back b) how perfectly possible it is that anyone can actually help c) that if anyone with doubts should act now rather than regret later and d) sometimes cries for help can be missed or dismissed
Watch this space, I can see already it makes for interesting reading.
'My belief is that there is a huge likelihood that in some way Madeleine’s abductors will conform to the behaviour of other abductors of successfully recovered children e.g. (from currently limited knowledge but I am on the case with researching this subject much more deeply)'
What on earth do they mean?
Autumn- Posts : 2603
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25 -
COMMUNITY CHARGE - 28th Feb 2011
by Autumn on 01.03.11 15:00
Their rants are getting increasingly bizarre 
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/28/community-charge/
COMMUNITY CHARGE
I was reading the BBC news site the other day and noticed an article relating to an exhibition of photography around London over the ages. The first image – which is the only one relevant to this blog – was of one of three children, all of them no more than five years old, taken in 1892. The threesome are sat on the edge of a kerb, two have no shoes on, all are pretty grubby and certainly not in the immediate care of an adult. In the background of the shot there is a ladder, seemingly randomly leaned against a wall. I bet no-one told them not to climb that ladder in case it toppled, I bet no-one told them not to walk about barefoot in case of injuring their feet, I bet no-one had to tell them to stay close, not get lost, come home before dark, not miss tea. I bet all of this because no-one expected any of it to be otherwise. I certainly bet no one expected them to be abducted by a stranger.
I’ll bet that if any one of the dangers that could have befallen them had done so – and pray God they didn’t – one thing that wouldn’t have happened was that the parents would have been blamed. The community would have pulled together, someone would have helped them, tended them, got them home, taken them in and sent someone to find their folks. I’ll bet that those children felt safe, that their parents knew they weren’t alone, that if anyone tried to take or harm their children, the community (be it street, village, town, city, county, country or continent) would have sided with the parents and turned against the offenders and done all in their power to right any wrong.
So what happened in the case of Madeleine? and why isn’t the ‘community’ (be it street, village, town, city, county, country, continent) able to influence the powers that be, to right the wrong?
Help them. Sign the petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/madeleinemccann_case_review/
Does anyone know when they intend to hand their 'petition' in?
Tony, not sure if you have seen it but your name is on page 1.
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/28/community-charge/
COMMUNITY CHARGE
I was reading the BBC news site the other day and noticed an article relating to an exhibition of photography around London over the ages. The first image – which is the only one relevant to this blog – was of one of three children, all of them no more than five years old, taken in 1892. The threesome are sat on the edge of a kerb, two have no shoes on, all are pretty grubby and certainly not in the immediate care of an adult. In the background of the shot there is a ladder, seemingly randomly leaned against a wall. I bet no-one told them not to climb that ladder in case it toppled, I bet no-one told them not to walk about barefoot in case of injuring their feet, I bet no-one had to tell them to stay close, not get lost, come home before dark, not miss tea. I bet all of this because no-one expected any of it to be otherwise. I certainly bet no one expected them to be abducted by a stranger.
I’ll bet that if any one of the dangers that could have befallen them had done so – and pray God they didn’t – one thing that wouldn’t have happened was that the parents would have been blamed. The community would have pulled together, someone would have helped them, tended them, got them home, taken them in and sent someone to find their folks. I’ll bet that those children felt safe, that their parents knew they weren’t alone, that if anyone tried to take or harm their children, the community (be it street, village, town, city, county, country or continent) would have sided with the parents and turned against the offenders and done all in their power to right any wrong.
So what happened in the case of Madeleine? and why isn’t the ‘community’ (be it street, village, town, city, county, country, continent) able to influence the powers that be, to right the wrong?
Help them. Sign the petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/madeleinemccann_case_review/
Does anyone know when they intend to hand their 'petition' in?
Tony, not sure if you have seen it but your name is on page 1.
Autumn- Posts : 2603
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by littlepixie on 01.03.11 16:08
Some of the comments on the McCanns petition are very worrying.
"Comments: PLEASE do all you can for this child and her family.
I would gladly give up my own life to save her, that's how strong I feel.
"Comments: PLEASE do all you can for this child and her family.
I would gladly give up my own life to save her, that's how strong I feel.
littlepixie- Posts : 1344
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2009-11-29 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by Judge Mental on 01.03.11 17:49
@littlepixie wrote:Some of the comments on the McCanns petition are very worrying.
"Comments: PLEASE do all you can for this child and her family.
I would gladly give up my own life to save her, that's how strong I feel.
One would like to say that we have increasingly bizarre situation. However, everything to do with this case has been most bizarre since the very beginning.
There appears to be a number of people involved in this case who are prepared to die in the name of it.
It would therefore be interesting to find out if they all share the same psychiatrists and hospital ward. Or is it the case that those with dubious shared interests are just simply trying to protect each other?
Judge Mental- Posts : 2763
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2010-03-17
Age : 81
Location : Chambers -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by zodiac on 01.03.11 17:54
@Autumn wrote:
Their rants are getting increasingly bizarre
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/02/28/community-charge/
COMMUNITY CHARGE
I was reading the BBC news site the other day and noticed an article relating to an exhibition of photography around London over the ages. The first image – which is the only one relevant to this blog – was of one of three children, all of them no more than five years old, taken in 1892. The threesome are sat on the edge of a kerb, two have no shoes on, all are pretty grubby and certainly not in the immediate care of an adult. In the background of the shot there is a ladder, seemingly randomly leaned against a wall. I bet no-one told them not to climb that ladder in case it toppled, I bet no-one told them not to walk about barefoot in case of injuring their feet, I bet no-one had to tell them to stay close, not get lost, come home before dark, not miss tea. I bet all of this because no-one expected any of it to be otherwise. I certainly bet no one expected them to be abducted by a stranger.
I’ll bet that if any one of the dangers that could have befallen them had done so – and pray God they didn’t – one thing that wouldn’t have happened was that the parents would have been blamed. The community would have pulled together, someone would have helped them, tended them, got them home, taken them in and sent someone to find their folks. I’ll bet that those children felt safe, that their parents knew they weren’t alone, that if anyone tried to take or harm their children, the community (be it street, village, town, city, county, country or continent) would have sided with the parents and turned against the offenders and done all in their power to right any wrong.
So what happened in the case of Madeleine? and why isn’t the ‘community’ (be it street, village, town, city, county, country, continent) able to influence the powers that be, to right the wrong?
Help them. Sign the petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/madeleinemccann_case_review/
Does anyone know when they intend to hand their 'petition' in?
Tony, not sure if you have seen it but your name is on page 1, probably put there by Nessling or Upshon as their names are on same page.
The above from ranting the wrongs sounds likes r/pops drivel. I hope the above is not a taster of the up and coming book content.
that is what the McCanns are linking to via iirc their site, FB and twitter! Poor MBM let down on holiday by her parents, still being let down by her parents!
zodiac- Posts : 73
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-01-31 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by zodiac on 01.03.11 18:01
@Judge Mental wrote:@littlepixie wrote:Some of the comments on the McCanns petition are very worrying.
"Comments: PLEASE do all you can for this child and her family.
I would gladly give up my own life to save her, that's how strong I feel.
One would like to say that we have increasingly bizarre situation. However, everything to do with this case has been most bizarre since the very beginning.
There appears to be a number of people involved in this case who are prepared to die in the name of it.
It would therefore be interesting to find out if they all share the same psychiatrists and hospital ward. Or is it the case that those with dubious shared interests are just simply trying to protect each other?
Someone needs to inform the person who would give up their own life to save her that the mysteriously disappeared child's parents can re-open the case. The parents can re-open it however the faketition cannot no matter how many signatures false or otherwise!
zodiac- Posts : 73
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-01-31 -
WHY ARE THERE SUCH PEOPLE? - 2nd March 2011
by Autumn on 03.03.11 13:38
WHY ARE THERE SUCH PEOPLE?
As we know, the McCanns have started a petition asking for an Independent Review of Madeleine’s case.
Here is the link – http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/madeleinemccann_case_review/
At the time of writing this there are 45,614 signatures with hopefully more to come. There are also the paper petition signatures to add to this figure.
Personally I am shocked that it is up to Madeleine’s parents to initiate a review. A British citizen, a small child, is missing – no official body in either Portugal or the UK is looking for her.
Incredibly sad to note that in an attempt by some people to add to the McCann family pain and distress, certain quarters are trying to ruin this petition. On their “forums”, and on Twitter, they make false claims regarding duplicate or fake signatures. Now I KNOW first hand from people involved that this petition is scrupulously checked and any anomalies or repeats when obvious are deleted. This wording actually appears on the petition: “Duplicate signatures from the same person/email address will be deleted from the petition before it is finalized.”
In fact I would hope that the people who sign on behalf of their whole family would encourage them to go and sign individually. I have seen this a few times and think some signatures are “lost” this way.
It confuses me as to why unkind people want to try and damage this petition? They say they want justice – well, don’t we all? We all want to know what happened to little Madeleine McCann and by whom. Madeleine’s family want this more than any of us.
To my, and many others way of thinking -the best way forward is to achieve an independent review, which in turn could hopefully lead to a re-opening of the investigation into finding and bringing Madeleine back home where she belongs.
My question is: Why are these heartless people trying to sabotage this attempt to get things moving? I just don’t understand their warped thinking.
Please, if you haven’t already done so – sign this Petition and encourage others to sign and pass on.
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/03/02/why-are-there-such-people/
Autumn- Posts : 2603
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by sharonl on 04.03.11 8:31
Could these blogs have been set up and maintained by a group of people? The book "Incompetence or corruption" was written on behalf of the team if I remember correctly.
Here is Upshon on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1062079610
Notice his contact details:
Contact Information
If he is not the author of the blog, he is probably involved in maintaining it.
Here is Upshon on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1062079610
Notice his contact details:
Contact Information
____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
sharonl- Posts : 4718
Reputation : 871
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by Autumn on 04.03.11 15:21
@sharonl wrote:Could these blogs have been set up and maintained by a group of people? The book "Incompetence or corruption" was written on behalf of the team if I remember correctly.
Here is Upshon on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1062079610
Notice his contact details:
Contact InformationIf he is not the author of the blog, he is probably involved in maintaining it.
Website
Certainly seems that way as the site is listed on his FB contact details. And we know that Upshon has worked closely with Nessling with his other blog, 'Madeleine: A Destiny Begun' its a fair bet they are both involved.
Autumn- Posts : 2603
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by sharonl on 04.03.11 16:54
I know that I have posted this once before but I thought that I may help to establish the link between Upshon and Nessling.
Modnrodders is an entusiasts car club, apparrently run by Adrian Upshon and Nigel Nessling
http://www.modsandrodders.co.uk/club.htm
Welcome to the Mods’n’rodders non-conformist car club!
Modnrodders is an entusiasts car club, apparrently run by Adrian Upshon and Nigel Nessling
http://www.modsandrodders.co.uk/club.htm
Welcome to the Mods’n’rodders non-conformist car club!
Club Moderators
Irene Upshon. Her Royal Highness, The Honorary Chairlady (l'il Deuce)
The 'Queen Bee's' Loyal Subjects!!
Nigel 'Nessie' Nessling. (vee8)
Adrian Upshon. (Deuce)
Kevin Grimwade.
Jason Sims. (Happytruck)
[size=16]Welcome to Mods 'n' Rodders
Are you a vehicle enthusiast who regards customising, restoring and showing vehicles as a part of your lifestyle? If you enjoy yourself at classic car , hot rod, custom, lowrider, chopper, bike, yank, retro or modified shows and can appreciate the differences in styles and culture from the very first hot rods, specials and classics through to the latest cutting edge technology modified vehicles then we would like you to feel very welcome here.
We meet at the Wheatsheaf Inn, Church Rd, Tattingstone, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP9 2LY, 2nd Tuesday of each month
Irene Upshon. Her Royal Highness, The Honorary Chairlady (l'il Deuce)
The 'Queen Bee's' Loyal Subjects!!
Nigel 'Nessie' Nessling. (vee8)
Adrian Upshon. (Deuce)
Kevin Grimwade.
Jason Sims. (Happytruck)
[size=16]Welcome to Mods 'n' Rodders
Are you a vehicle enthusiast who regards customising, restoring and showing vehicles as a part of your lifestyle? If you enjoy yourself at classic car , hot rod, custom, lowrider, chopper, bike, yank, retro or modified shows and can appreciate the differences in styles and culture from the very first hot rods, specials and classics through to the latest cutting edge technology modified vehicles then we would like you to feel very welcome here.
We meet at the Wheatsheaf Inn, Church Rd, Tattingstone, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP9 2LY, 2nd Tuesday of each month
____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron
sharonl- Posts : 4718
Reputation : 871
Join date : 2009-12-29 -
FIVE DEGREES OF SEPARATION, SOCIAL MEDIA AND HOW THINGS CHANGE - 15th March 2011
by Autumn on 18.03.11 14:58
Writing of the Wrongs Update - 15th March 2011
FIVE DEGREES OF SEPARATION, SOCIAL MEDIA AND HOW THINGS CHANGE
Through the course of our work my husband and I meet lots of ‘new’ people. The yellow and yellow and green wrist bands that we always wear to signify our support for the search for Madeleine sometimes (sadly less now than in the earlier days) generate interest and offer up an opportunity to remind people that Madeleine is still missing.
There is no proof that she is anything other than missing, therefore there is a huge chance that she is still alive and living somewhere: Possibly somewhere near you, and very possibly with someone with whom you have a connection…
Remember the saying there is only ever Five Degrees of Separation? I remember playing it with my niece years ago, we would name a celebrity, politician or otherwise famous name and work out how we might be connected to them and how many ‘degrees’ of separation it took to get to them. Often you only needed one good connection to make all the others possible. Personally – though this is supposition rather than based on any evidence – I suspect that connections are reducing their ‘degree-age’ all the time, even I can now get to Barack Obama in four. This is in the main down to knowing who our own connections are connected to and through the phenomenon that is the internet suddenly having much more knowledge of our connections and or connections’ connections than ever before. Social Media networking for business and pleasure gives us more insight than ever about who we’re connected to, linked with, associated with. And also how easy we are to find, target, celebrate, congratulate or even abuse.
This is great in our celebrity obsessed world, fun when we’re showing off to young relatives and conversely chilling when we realise how connected we are to more dubious or infamous characters. Try the same game in reverse, with high profile criminals as the targets and you might be surprised to find yourself almost as easily connected. Sadly I find I can get to Jeffrey Epstein (someone I’d never heard of until this week) in three – less than Barack Obama. It’s been a topical issue this week, sometimes when you’re connected, even loosely or distantly with the high life, you’re often unwittingly connected with the lowlife too.
For the family and network of friends connected to Madeleine McCann – who can never give hope until given a clear reason to do so, it means that a link or lead into the world of the person that took Madeleine away from her family, is tantalizingly close. Probably less than five degrees of separation away from being re-connected… It sounds so simple. Can you help? At the least add to the numbers looking with the most connections of all? Just sign the petition at the link below to get those most officially connected, back on the case:
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/03/15/five-degrees-of-separation-social-media-and-how-things-change/
FIVE DEGREES OF SEPARATION, SOCIAL MEDIA AND HOW THINGS CHANGE
Through the course of our work my husband and I meet lots of ‘new’ people. The yellow and yellow and green wrist bands that we always wear to signify our support for the search for Madeleine sometimes (sadly less now than in the earlier days) generate interest and offer up an opportunity to remind people that Madeleine is still missing.
There is no proof that she is anything other than missing, therefore there is a huge chance that she is still alive and living somewhere: Possibly somewhere near you, and very possibly with someone with whom you have a connection…
Remember the saying there is only ever Five Degrees of Separation? I remember playing it with my niece years ago, we would name a celebrity, politician or otherwise famous name and work out how we might be connected to them and how many ‘degrees’ of separation it took to get to them. Often you only needed one good connection to make all the others possible. Personally – though this is supposition rather than based on any evidence – I suspect that connections are reducing their ‘degree-age’ all the time, even I can now get to Barack Obama in four. This is in the main down to knowing who our own connections are connected to and through the phenomenon that is the internet suddenly having much more knowledge of our connections and or connections’ connections than ever before. Social Media networking for business and pleasure gives us more insight than ever about who we’re connected to, linked with, associated with. And also how easy we are to find, target, celebrate, congratulate or even abuse.
This is great in our celebrity obsessed world, fun when we’re showing off to young relatives and conversely chilling when we realise how connected we are to more dubious or infamous characters. Try the same game in reverse, with high profile criminals as the targets and you might be surprised to find yourself almost as easily connected. Sadly I find I can get to Jeffrey Epstein (someone I’d never heard of until this week) in three – less than Barack Obama. It’s been a topical issue this week, sometimes when you’re connected, even loosely or distantly with the high life, you’re often unwittingly connected with the lowlife too.
For the family and network of friends connected to Madeleine McCann – who can never give hope until given a clear reason to do so, it means that a link or lead into the world of the person that took Madeleine away from her family, is tantalizingly close. Probably less than five degrees of separation away from being re-connected… It sounds so simple. Can you help? At the least add to the numbers looking with the most connections of all? Just sign the petition at the link below to get those most officially connected, back on the case:
http://madeleine-writingthewrongs.com/2011/03/15/five-degrees-of-separation-social-media-and-how-things-change/
Autumn- Posts : 2603
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2009-11-25 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by littlepixie on 18.03.11 15:35
Whoever wrote that needs to see a shrink
littlepixie- Posts : 1344
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2009-11-29 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by theolivebranch on 18.03.11 18:53
Does this mean that I am connected to the McCanns ? My Mum, God rest her soul, would be most annoyed with me for the company I was involved in 
if this is the case.
if this is the case.
theolivebranch- Posts : 557
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2010-09-19 -
The writing of the wrongs post April 14th blog
by dragonfly on 17.04.11 19:26
Blog - from April 14th -The writing of the wrongs
OK, I’ll keep this short and sweet. I am getting more and more irritated and infuriated by being constantly told I need to read the files. Every time I go onto anywhere on the web that allows people from both sides of the argument to post together, such as newspaper comments section, and I make a comment in support of Kate and Gerry I get replies like, “You need to read the files, they are very illuminating.” Or, “Check the files, then you wouldn’t be so keen to support a couple of child murderers.” Well, for the information of all those who parrot this phrase over and over, I HAVE read the files, VERY carefully. Also the rogatory interviews, the Gaspar statements and a ton of other stuff to do with the case.
And guess what? It all leads me to the inevitable and inarguable conclusion that the Portuguese Attorney General, a man who has forgotten far more about the due process of the law than all of us keyboard warriors ever knew, was RIGHT. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night, which in itself leads me to another inescapable conclusion. All of those people, all the McCann critics who have ever told ME to read the files have clearly and obviously NOT read the files themselves. Perhaps it is because they are so over-confident in their belief that the McCanns are guilty of something that they have utterly convinced themselves that there MUST be something incriminating somewhere in the files, so it is not necessary for them to read them but it is vital that us supporters do, so as to educate us to the ‘Truth.’ This, on their part, is either the very heights of arrogance or the very depths of stupidity, though I am not quite sure which.
So, can all those critics of the McCanns who continually tell people like me to read the files please do me a favour. YOU read them, because you are quite right, they ARE very illuminating.
OK, I’ll keep this short and sweet. I am getting more and more irritated and infuriated by being constantly told I need to read the files. Every time I go onto anywhere on the web that allows people from both sides of the argument to post together, such as newspaper comments section, and I make a comment in support of Kate and Gerry I get replies like, “You need to read the files, they are very illuminating.” Or, “Check the files, then you wouldn’t be so keen to support a couple of child murderers.” Well, for the information of all those who parrot this phrase over and over, I HAVE read the files, VERY carefully. Also the rogatory interviews, the Gaspar statements and a ton of other stuff to do with the case.
And guess what? It all leads me to the inevitable and inarguable conclusion that the Portuguese Attorney General, a man who has forgotten far more about the due process of the law than all of us keyboard warriors ever knew, was RIGHT. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night, which in itself leads me to another inescapable conclusion. All of those people, all the McCann critics who have ever told ME to read the files have clearly and obviously NOT read the files themselves. Perhaps it is because they are so over-confident in their belief that the McCanns are guilty of something that they have utterly convinced themselves that there MUST be something incriminating somewhere in the files, so it is not necessary for them to read them but it is vital that us supporters do, so as to educate us to the ‘Truth.’ This, on their part, is either the very heights of arrogance or the very depths of stupidity, though I am not quite sure which.
So, can all those critics of the McCanns who continually tell people like me to read the files please do me a favour. YOU read them, because you are quite right, they ARE very illuminating.
dragonfly- Posts : 318
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-03-01 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by Wendy on 17.04.11 19:29
@dragonfly wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?
Wendy- Posts : 60
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-02-02 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by dragonfly on 17.04.11 19:41
[quote="Wendy"]
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?[/quote
Mccanns admitted most nights they were left
nspcc website - Neglect involves failure to meet a child's needs that does or could harm the child.
That explains the constant quote of 'There is no suggestion that Madeleine has come to any harm'
@dragonfly wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?[/quote
Mccanns admitted most nights they were left
nspcc website - Neglect involves failure to meet a child's needs that does or could harm the child.
That explains the constant quote of 'There is no suggestion that Madeleine has come to any harm'
dragonfly- Posts : 318
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-03-01 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by Wendy on 17.04.11 19:43
[quote="dragonfly"]
She's apparently with a friggin' paedophile isn't she? What's he supposed to be doing with her? You McCann supporters make me sick to my stomach.
@Wendy wrote:@dragonfly wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Kate or Gerry ever committed any crime that night
Did they not leave 3 children alone that night? Is that not a crime? If not, then why are other people in jail for doing the same?[/quote
Mccanns admitted most nights they were left
nspcc website - Neglect involves failure to meet a child's needs that does or could harm the child.
That explains the constant quote of 'There is no suggestion that Madeleine has come to any harm'
She's apparently with a friggin' paedophile isn't she? What's he supposed to be doing with her? You McCann supporters make me sick to my stomach.
Wendy- Posts : 60
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-02-02 -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by maebee on 17.04.11 20:33
Hi Wendy,
Gerry McCann once described his daughter's disappearance as "The situation she finds herself in."
See, it's Madeleine's fault, not her parents'.
Gerry McCann once described his daughter's disappearance as "The situation she finds herself in."
See, it's Madeleine's fault, not her parents'.
maebee- Madeleine Foundation
- Posts : 491
Reputation : 89
Join date : 2009-12-03
Location : Ireland -
Re: The Writing of the Wrongs Articles - promoted on The McCanns' Official Facebook
by ufercoffy on 17.04.11 20:41
Of course it was Madeleine's fault. She was the babysitter! At just under 4 years old she was the designated child minder who was left in charge of two babies even whilst under the influence of drugs herself.
Madeleine failed abysmally. No wonder she found herself in a situation with paedophiles.
Kate and Gerry McCann, please don't think that we will ever go away until Madeleine's 'paedophile' is behind bars.
Madeleine failed abysmally. No wonder she found herself in a situation with paedophiles.
Kate and Gerry McCann, please don't think that we will ever go away until Madeleine's 'paedophile' is behind bars.
____________________
Whose cadaver scent and bodily fluid was found in the McCann's apartment and hire car if not Madeleine's?
ufercoffy- Posts : 1646
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2010-01-04 -
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: McCann: Latest News & Discussion :: McCann Case: Latest News
Page 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
