Does anyone disagree with the possibility of what I believe happened based on 17 Years of Research

• 
   EMAL SENT TO: Policia Judiciaria
  
  With respect to your investigation of Madeleine McCann's disappearance, please find enclosed a small portion of my research that may be of interest regarding the possibility that something happened to Maddie earlier in the week...
  
  For four years I did in-depth research on the witness statements (2008 -2012) analysing and comparing each day of the holiday and compiling them into timelines and timetables.  
  
  From this, I was able to see the many discrepancies that seemed to start occurring on Tuesday morning of the holiday and continued until after the police arrived on Thursday night.
  
  I did not focus on simple memory issues but discovered many questionable contradictions, leading me to believe that the 'story' given for that week was contrived to 'fit' with a 'narrative'.
  
  The first question I asked myself was 'Why?' 
  
   A normal holiday timeline related from several people would have many differences, whether affected by memory or perception but the details would be trivial and follow a basic timeline agreed by all the Tapas 9 according to their individual activities.
  
  From those timetables comparing all of the Tapas 9, sometimes with 15-minute intervals. the DISCREPANCIES showed me some highly suspicious inconsistencies.  I recorded many of these discrepancies into graphics and subsequently into reference videos compiled in 2011 and 2012.
  
  I will include a few examples but had MANY timetables, timelines, (300 or more) graphics and videos.  I have never looked to make anything 'fit' I relied on the files and the information I compiled, telling me the 'story'.
  
  The discrepancies I discovered (from Tuesday morning onward) 'told' me that something seemed to be 'amiss' and there may have been a need to cover up the truth.
  
  At that point, I asked myself WHY? Had something happened to Maddie earlier in the week?  
  
  One MAJOR thing to keep in mind is that after 15 years of research I have NEVER found anything that contradicts my thoughts on what happened.  It only ever explains some of the questions.
  
  A few years ago I compiled a 'creche' graphic to put all the details into an easy-to-view format, not realising how IMPORTANT it would become.
  
  For those of us that believe something happened to Maddie earlier in the week, I felt it was our responsibility to explain the CRECHE DECEIT but up until about 4 years ago, any explanations eluded me until one day while posting in a forum (using the 'Creche' graphic') I had a 'lightbulb moment' and having retained details of the week in my head I realised how they all fitted into place and that my belief of how they would have been able to deceive everyone into thinking Maddie was in the creche was really quite simple and cunning.
  
  I am fully aware that the files we have available are a MINIMAL amount compared to the 'intelligence' and details known by the police, but from the info, we DO have I feel very confident about my findings from the research I have done, and, as mentioned, have never been advised of ANYTHING that contradicts my findings.
  
  The premise of the creche deceit that I could see from the creche deceit graphic is that many times Gerry and Russel O'Brien would drop off and pick up at approximately the same time as each other, regardless that they spent their days in different activities and travelled to the Kids Club from different locations.
  
  Since 2008 I had recognised that very often, one child had been signed in and only one child was signed out (Madeleine and Russel's daughter,) but it wasn't until Wednesday morning that the routine was slightly different and questionable.
  
  It was raining that morning so no tennis and the twins were dropped off earlier than usual, but Madeleine was not dropped off 10 mins later at her creche as usual..... Instead, it was sometime later and even though Russel was at breakfast at the Millenium and Gerry was at the ocean club, both Gerry and Russel dropped off their daughters at the same time.
  
  At this point, I recalled that Dianne Webster had made a comment in her statement that she saw Gerry and Kate at the Millenium that morning, but didn't recall them eating breakfast.  
  
  I realised it was possible that after dropping the twins off they went to the Millenium and immediately, along with Russel and his daughter, walked to Maddie's Kids club together.
  
  I then realised that THIS is how they may have accomplished the creche deceit if something happened to Maddie earlier...
  
  Russel O'Briens's daughter and Maddie were very similar in appearance and only three months apart in age..... Is it possible that Russel sent his daughter into the creche and Gerry walked in alongside, giving the illusion to the nannies that it was Maddie he entered into the creche with and subsequently when they were later asked in their interviews, they would recall seeing Gerry and PRESUMED he was with Maddie when in reality it was Russel O'Brien's daughter!!
  
  I have a graphic compiled with EVERY witness statement declaring they had seen Maddie but not ONE (except Fatima the cleaner's daughter) have details that show PROOF it was Maddie that they saw.
  
  I have compiled a PLAYLIST of video clips taken from my Youtube Live Streams and wherever possible I have rerecorded with Portuguese translations to make them available for Gonçalo Amaral to view if he chooses.
  
  Following his last book release, I saw an interview with Hernani Carvalho where Gonçalo claimed it was POSSIBLE that something happened to Maddie earlier in the week but could not be considered because the creche deceit could not be explained.
  
  I feel very confident that the details I have produced may explain.
  
  In closing, I am hoping that my research may be of interest and, in particular, may help explain how the McCanns were able to deceive everyone into believing Maddie was still active in the Ocean club that week.
  
  There are of course hundreds of my graphics and videos showing the HUGE discrepancies of the week and why I believe it was likely that something happened earlier.
  
  I stand behind everything I have compiled and have never tried to make any of the details fit a theory,  I have always allowed the files to tell me the 'story'.
  
  I want to thank the Portuguese Police and Gonçalo Amaral for the huge effort to find the truth in this case and for Portugal having to endure the financial strain of this disappearance.
  
  I realised the need for the McCanns to promote an inept investigation and made a video to highlight the respect I have for the reality of the  Police investigation.
  
  Thanks to everyone for taking the time to read the summary of a small part of my research.
  
  Lizzy Taylor
  
  lizzytaylor@hotmail.com
  
  
   
  
  HiDeHo4 CHANNEL
  https://www.youtube.com/user/HiDeHo4/videos
  
   
  
  PLAYLIST
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s60qKLe0vwM&list=PLvtmlFOtf24izAWoi3VyeSCBNWPS0P1AJ
  
  

Bluebagthepirate wrote:

HiDeHo wrote:We are aware that Goncalo Amaral suggested the possibility that she may have been moved to an apartment with a freezer as the forensic showed body fluids leaking over a wheel from the McCann’s car onto the curb and the cause of this was likely that her body was frozen but when being moved in the heat of the summer.

Can we start with this one?


"Possibility" 
"May"
"Likely"


Are you treating this as a FACT that she was kept in a freezer and moved to/from an apartment?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:Does that make it a FACT?

As gruesome as it sounds, the body may have been moved decomposed. 
If it was in the bin bag.

Is that impossible?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:That's not really answering my question.

Are you treating it as FACT?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:So you are accepting of the possibility that there was no freezer and the body was moved in a decomposed state?
I believe it's pretty cold in a tomb by the way.

How much does your theory hinge on this possibility of a freezer?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:It's just the first part of your post.

We can do them bit by bit.

So.. is it possible that the body was moved in a decomposed state in a large  (plastic) bag without having been in a freezer or an apartment?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:Yes I'm very familiar.

17 years familiar.

So if anything is possible... you agree that the involvement of a fridge/apartment is not essential and that moving a decomposed body in a plastic bag is?

This a simple yes/no question.

Bluebagthepirate wrote:So I'll take that as a yes.

You agree that the a freezer/apartment may not have happened and that a decomposed body in a plastic bag hidden in some other place and moved to a burial place is possible?

I'm trying to be crystal clear before we move on.

Again..it's a yes/no answer.

Bluebagthepirate wrote:It is a yes/no question.

Are you saying its impossible for a decomposing body in a plastic bag to leak fluids in the car?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:

HiDeHo wrote:

Bluebagthepirate wrote:It is a yes/no question.

Are you saying its impossible for a decomposing body in a plastic bag to leak fluids in the car?

This thread is to discuss my research and decide if it could be possible...so no need for me to make yes or no comments based on a different scenario unless it links to my research.

We are discussing the very first thing you mentioned in the opening post - totally on topic.

Once we are crystal clear on that point we can move onto the next one.

So for clarity... you agree that it is possible that a decomposing body in a plastic bag could be responsible for leaked fluids in the car and there is no need for a refrigerator?

Yes/no?

When we agree on this we can move on to the next thing.

Bluebagthepirate wrote:

I base my research on a credible source that it was likely held  in a freezer and subsequently leaked.

'I don't get why you think a freezer needed to be involved' rather than just a decomposing body in a plastic bag?

Isn't the latter more likely because there is less complexity?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:HideHo,

I'm going to write something now and it's your chance to disagree. We can move onto your second point when agreed.

You think it IS possible that the body fluids could have got in the car from a decomposing body that had never been in a freezer!

I'm eager to continue so a nice unequivocal response would be good.

Bluebagthepirate wrote:OK so we agree that you think the body fluids could have got in the car without the need for a freezer/apartment and that makes any timeline based on the freezer is completely subjective and none factual.

Great!

Next point.

HiDeHo wrote:There are those that believe she may have been moved to the beach initially.

Are you one of those who say it?

Bluebagthepirate wrote:Lizzy you said this right at the top of your post:

HiDeHi wrote:I WILL BE CREATING A VIDEO AND ADDING ALL THE DETAILS, GRAPHICS ETC TO SUPPORT THIS TIMELINE BASED ON MY RESEARCH
After 17 years of research it suddenly occurred to me that there was a ‘timeline’ in place that seemed to show that Maddie’s body was moved on different occasions.
 
We are aware that Goncalo Amaral suggested the possibility that she may have been moved to an apartment with a freezer as the forensic showed body fluids leaking over a wheel from the McCann’s car onto the curb and the cause of this was likely that her body was frozen but when being moved in the heat of the summer.
 
There are those that believe she may have been moved to the beach initially.

From the get-go you are literally including the moving the body to the apartment/freezer and then moving the body to the beach (I assume not chronologically).

This thread is about your timeline for moving the body.

And you don't want to discuss what you said about moving the body to these places?