Re: Bernt Stellander interview

by pinkgladioli 09.12.24 18:07

Jill Havern wrote:But if James lives in Scotland, which is in the UK, why would he put the wrong time on his video?

It probably would have been better if the podcast advert stated 17.00 GMT,

by Justice for Maddie 09.12.24 18:08

For me, the premiere starts at 6 PM CET (Berlin) (in the corner of the video). The UK is one hour behind, so the time in the corner of the video should be 5 PM.

by **Jill Havern** 09.12.24 18:21

Justice for Maddie wrote:For me, the premiere starts at 6 PM CET (Berlin) (in the corner of the video). The UK is one hour behind, so the time in the corner of the video should be 5 PM.

For me the time in the corner says 6PM, so maybe it'll be 7PM for you? think

by **Ladyinred** 09.12.24 18:24

Justice for Maddie wrote:WOW, it's coming. We can't wait.

17.00 here

by **Jill Havern** 09.12.24 18:25

You're right I've just checked again and it does now say 5PM.

It definitely said 6PM on Peter's picture

Bernt Stellander interview - Page 13 Img_1810

by pinkgladioli 09.12.24 18:51

Ladyinred wrote:
Justice for Maddie wrote:WOW, it's coming. We can't wait.

17.00 here

and it also says premiers in 2 days!
Mind you it will be 2 days now it’s after 5pm today

by **Silentscope** 09.12.24 19:41

Bernt Stellander interview - Page 13 Img_0511

I hope the House of Cards collapses.

Good luck

by **AnneCGuedes** 09.12.24 23:16

PeterMac wrote:
It was vital for Fülscher that they were exposed before the book was released, so their testimony is now on the official Court records and cannot be altered.

IF .... H Wolters choses to have a go at Brückner over Madeleine, then he has
No evidence of Abduction
No evidence of Harm
No evidence of Murder
Just the uncorroborated and contradictory ramblings of a couple of career criminals who tried to set him up for two other offences, but failed.
And nothing else.

Book released or not, from the start there was no evidence of abduction, murder etc. So why was it "vital" for FF ?

by **AnneCGuedes** 09.12.24 23:38

Silentscope wrote:A Court Stenographer is the ony way to have Cross Examinations of Witnesses entered into Court Records.

Lawyers are not allowed to take Notes, or Record Witness Testimonies in the German Courts.

Such Notes if taken, would be inadmissable as Evidence.

Aren't hearings recorded as a support for the court clerk ?

by **AnneCGuedes** 09.12.24 23:43

Silentscope wrote:If Bernt was to give away any Secret Information to the Witnesses, they might change their Statements to Suit.

In effect they could Invent BETTER STORIES to use against CB.

The two "witnesses" gave away information they allegedly kept secret for years without any evidence to support it and changing their versions as well !

by **AnneCGuedes** 09.12.24 23:48

Silentscope wrote:What would the outcome have been if Herr Wolters had dug up Praia da Rocha?

What if he actually found Madeleine in an Area that Bernt suspects?

With a Body Wolters could at least prove Madeleine was Dead.

Whether the Body would reveal any cause of Death, or other Clues might be up for Debate.

You mean if HCW had obtained through a LOR the excavation, under the PJ authority, of the top of the Rocha Negra ?

by **AnneCGuedes** 09.12.24 23:52

Justice for Maddie wrote:Wait. Was Stellander in contact with Wolters or Fülscher?

Thanks Jill. So Bernt was in contact with Fülscher. Interesting.

It seems FF replied to BS's anonymous email, whereas HCW didn't.

by **AnneCGuedes** 10.12.24 0:02

Jill Havern wrote:Maybe Fulscher needed his help, especially after reading the first draft and learning about the field cameras.

That might be true, a picture of M dead, and not impossible meiner Ansicht nach (unless of course one believes the body was concealed in the cemetery). But nothing to indicate the place, the photographer (certainly not G) and furthermore the circumstances.

by JB2024 10.12.24 5:56

Thanks all for posting on the 2nd Interview, yes let's hope the house of cards collapses.

by **Silentscope** 10.12.24 7:10

Bon Dia Anne,

Q. Aren't hearings recorded as a support for the Court Clerk?
A. The Judge decides if, how, and when to Record the Proceedings.

Q. The two "witnesses" gave away information they allegedly kept secret for years without any evidence to support it and changing their versions as well.
A. Years after any Event, there will be mistakes made and errors corrected.
The problem is getting enough Corroberation of the ‘Claims’ to make them solid Evidence.

Q. You mean if HCW had obtained through a LOR the excavation, under the PJ authority, of the top of the Rocha Negra ?
A. Yes.

by Justice for Maddie 10.12.24 9:35

Silentscope wrote:Bon Dia Anne,

Q. Aren't hearings recorded as a support for the Court Clerk?
A. The Judge decides if, how, and when to Record the Proceedings.

Q. The two "witnesses" gave away information they allegedly kept secret for years without any evidence to support it and changing their versions as well.
A. Years after any Event, there will be mistakes made and errors corrected.
The problem is getting enough Corroberation of the ‘Claims’ to make them solid Evidence.

Q. You mean if HCW had obtained through a LOR the excavation, under the PJ authority, of the top of the Rocha Negra ?
A. Yes.

BKA and PJ investigated in the reservoir last year. Do you think they also investigated on the Rocha Negra and in other places in PdL?

by **Silentscope** 10.12.24 9:47

@Justice for Maddie

The BKA are known to have ‘Timed’ the Search at the Hannover Allotment for dramatic effect.
I would Suspect they did the same with the Resevoir search, in the hope of turning up something ‘relevant to the Enquiry’ or giving the Public the Impression that they were really on to something.

There are no Searches reported on the Rocha Negra Site.

The ‘Maddie in a Well’ searches were all to do with looking for the Murder weapon in the Case of a Dutch National found Dead in his home.

All lies and distractions to Fuel the CB bonfire…

by **Silentscope** 10.12.24 10:14

The BKA would have had to get Permission to enter Portugal and Dig.

The PJ were probably Ordered to attend / supervise the Operation by the Politicos.

To make sure what it was the BKA found, and that the BKA also did not plant anything?

by **Jill Havern** 10.12.24 10:28

Which, of course, is why Bernt hasn't dug the Rocha Negra site himself...despite many people on facebook asking him why he hasn't done it yet.

by wallace 'n grommit 10.12.24 13:43

I haven't read the book but I have watched his videos, does Bernt say why he is involved with the BKA?

by **Jill Havern** 10.12.24 13:49

Because Wolters wants to charge CB with a particular crime he didn't commit and Bernt doesn't want the case 'solved' with a patsy...from what I gather from the book.

Welcome, by the way thumbsup

by wallace 'n grommit 10.12.24 13:51

Thank you.

by JB2024 13.12.24 6:59

Cracking 2nd Interview with a new reveal on witnesses and potential new lines of inquiry. Let's hope and trust the case gets re-opened.

by Milo 13.12.24 7:14

Stellander second JE interview: BS is spectacular. JE doesn’t understand the scientific method. But I could listen to Stellander all day.

Although I have read Stellander’s book (and Amaral’s book), I am getting more excited about Stellander’s insights into the whole catastrophe and evidence to date, than I am about the foliage on the hill. I am now going to do a reconciliation with my own theory, piece by piece, incident by incident.

Btw, I believe Madeleine died in the apartment but I believe she had an accident (well you could call it an accident) elsewhere. On the 2nd not the 3rd.

None of my theories, however, explains the coverup in high places in the UK.

by JB2024 13.12.24 7:36

Thanks for posting. The Brick is excellent I highly recommend listening to it in audio (for which there is discussion/direction within this forum).

I understand your comment "None of my theories, however, explains the coverup in high places in the UK." Tbis is perfectly understandable. I agree with BS on this in that we have 4 Doctor families who have all locked their children in their apartments. Bear in mind that when they did this - sometimes they were not all at Tapas but some of the group were at another venue 400m away whcih would stand up in UK court as child negligence. That is even taking the alleged sedation even out of the discussion. Their established pattern of behaviour and the cirumstances of this would not be great for the UK. Just a view of course - open to discussion / ideas from others too of course.

by **Jill Havern** 13.12.24 8:14

Milo wrote:Stellander second JE interview: BS is spectacular. JE doesn’t understand the scientific method. But I could listen to Stellander all day.

Yes, I agree. I could also listen to him all day (I've listened to his new interview 3 times now)...even though I didn't like reading his words in his ranty emails - just as I'm sure he didn't like reading my words when I lost my rag with him here on the forum.

Bernt does have a stroppy way with him (as can I) - BUT I appreciate the immense pressure he has been under to get his work and interviews exactly right...and exactly timed. I also appreciate that trust, once broken, can be impossible to mend.

I would like to think Bernt and I can put our handbags away, but that he will continue to work with PeterMac, whilst many of us continue to support the fruition of The Brick.

pursefight

I wish him all the best with his next moves. singlerose

by **Bluebagthepirate** 13.12.24 8:20

I hope Bernt appreciates how gracious some of the members are here.

by **Ladyinred** 13.12.24 8:28

I don't think he cares.

That's a nice post, Bluebag thumbsup

by **Jill Havern** 13.12.24 8:43

Bluebagthepirate wrote:I hope Bernt appreciates how gracious some of the members are here.

He does.

I think we went some way to mending fences in our last few emails. But I won't push it. He knows where I am if he wishes. But I will leave it there, step back, and just let him and Peter get on with it. There's still much to do, but Bernt said in his interview that new evidence has now been submitted to the PJ.

I will continue to allow posts with reference to The Brick, and civil debate, here on CMOMM.

by pinkgladioli 13.12.24 9:01

Jill Havern wrote:
Bluebagthepirate wrote:I hope Bernt appreciates how gracious some of the members are here.
He does.

I think we went some way to mending fences in our last few emails. But I won't push it. He knows where I am if he wishes. But I will leave it there, step back, and just let him and Peter get on with it. There's still much to do, but Bernt said in his interview that new evidence has now been submitted to the PJ.

I will continue to allow posts with reference to The Brick, and civil debate, here on CMOMM.

I bet he only shared a little titbit of the new evidence to us and rightly so, let’s hope the PJ take it further

Latest topics