Re: The love between Mother and Baby

by **pauloalexandre** on 03.10.20 1:17

It is true that people like Dr. Todd Grande add nothing of value to the case, but to say that he's making money on the back of a missing child, simply because he made a video about it, is unfair to say the least. He talks about numerous different subjects, and I would argue that he's mainly naive and doesn't have any agenda. Not that I like him or his videos, anyway. They are mostly pointless and he does behave in a very unprofessional way for someone who claims to be a "licensed profissional [in mental health]".

But whilst we're on the subject of "making money on the back of a missing child", let's take a look at how the McCanns behaved since their daughter disappeared. Not only have they set up a fund to allegedly help the search for Madeleine, but they also were critical in kickstarting the psychological operation that is known as "Operation Grange", which is still getting British taxpayer money to continue their bogus investigation into the disappearance, and to this day, they still aren't the least fazed by the use of poor Madeleine's name in the sensational frontpage of every famous newspaper in Britain, not only for media gossip but also for diversion tactics. This was after continuously lying to the Portuguese police and covering up the truth of what happened that holiday. In other words, the prime suspects in the disappearence of Madeleine McCann have received millions and millions of pounds from the public to deceive the public.

This not love between a mother and a baby. No loving parent, guilty or innocent, would ever let their precious child's name to be plastered all over sensational media headlines like this.

by **Verdi** on 03.10.20 1:49

Are you on the right thread here ^^^ Paulo?

by **pauloalexandre** on 03.10.20 1:53

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Are you on the right thread here ^^^ Paulo?

Yes, I am.

by miffy8 on 03.10.20 10:51

On the face of it Paulo yes, I agree with you. But I believe if you analyse a little further what we are witnessing here, by fair means or foul, is one of the fiercest demonstrations of self preservation at work. The remit: To concentrate on the preservation of the lives of the living IE: theirs and their remaining children's as there is nothing that can be done for the dead.

by **Verdi** on 03.10.20 12:23

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Are you on the right thread here ^^^ Paulo?
Yes, I am.

It was the reference to the videos of Dr Todd Grande that confounded me. I couldn't see the relevance - I can't see it now $i don\'t know$ .

by **pauloalexandre** on 03.10.20 13:24

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:On the face of it Paulo yes, I agree with you. But I believe if you analyse a little further what we are witnessing here, by fair means or foul, is one of the fiercest demonstrations of self preservation at work. The remit: To concentrate on the preservation of the lives of the living IE: theirs and their remaining children's as there is nothing that can be done for the dead.

Maybe, but I doubt it. It's been clear, at least for me, that the McCanns are highly protected, so whether they do this to preserve the lives of their family or not, it still is inexcusable that they let their own daughter's name be dragged into media circus.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:It was the reference to the videos of Dr Todd Grande that confounded me. I couldn't see the relevance - I can't see it now [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] .

The reason why I brought that up, besides being connected to the point I made in the second paragraph, was because I didn't want to start an entirely different discussion in the "VIDEO OF THE DAY" thread, which is mainly for video display.