Re: New TWITTER Poll on the LAST PHOTO

by Verity 16.06.18 13:39

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The photo dated 3rd May 2007, was taken from Flickr

What may we deduce ?
We observe that apart from the girl who took the photo, the beach is EMPTY
This little beach should look like this

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

From Peter mac's book. The two photos that tell an important story chapter.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Then Peter mac goes on to say:

IT BOILS DOWN TO ONE SIMPLE QUESTION

Was this photo

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

taken on this day ?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

or on this day ?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

As they say in school exams . . .”show your reasoning”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Guest 16.06.18 13:42

In my view, what can't be seen is a darn sight more important than what can be seen.

The absence of McCann family photographs during that week - that's the key here, not whether or not someone can see a hair out of place, or a ghostly errant dog!

by Guest 16.06.18 13:44

Some images are etched for all time on my brain. Madeleine that lunchtime is one of them [Thursday 3rd May]. She was wearing an outfit I’d bought especially for her holiday: a peach coloured smock top from Gap and some white broderie-anglaise shorts from Monsoon – a small extravagance, perhaps, but I’d pictured how lovely she would look in them and I’d been right. She was striding ahead of Fiona and me, swinging her bare arms to and fro. The weather was a little on the cool side and I remember thinking I should have brought a cardigan for her, although she seemed oblivious of the temperature, just happy and carefree. I was following her with my eyes, admiring her. I wonder now, the nausea rising in my throat, if someone else was doing the same.

madeleine by KATE MCCANN

by Verity 16.06.18 13:52

Verdi wrote:
Verity wrote:If Gerry McCann had sensitive eyes surely he would be wearing them all the time he was out in sun, yet most of the pictures of him in PdL he is seen not wearing them.

The issue here is the reflection in the lens of the sunglasses, not why Gerry McCann was wearing sunglasses at that particular moment.

Maybe they are the cheap pair he bought at the street market stall - maybe during the manufacture they stuck one lens in sideways .

Whatever, again this subject has been discussed in the past to the ninth degree, culminating in an exercise by forum member and expert, Darren 'knitted' Ware..

Thanks to Darren Ware for taking the time and trouble to explain the anomaly in simple lay terms. Your technical expertise is very much appreciated.

Thanks Verdi! That's the first time I've seen that clapping

by Guest 16.06.18 14:19

Verity wrote:
Verdi wrote:
Verity wrote:If Gerry McCann had sensitive eyes surely he would be wearing them all the time he was out in sun, yet most of the pictures of him in PdL he is seen not wearing them.

The issue here is the reflection in the lens of the sunglasses, not why Gerry McCann was wearing sunglasses at that particular moment.

Maybe they are the cheap pair he bought at the street market stall - maybe during the manufacture they stuck one lens in sideways .

Whatever, again this subject has been discussed in the past to the ninth degree, culminating in an exercise by forum member and expert, Darren 'knitted' Ware..

Thanks to Darren Ware for taking the time and trouble to explain the anomaly in simple lay terms. Your technical expertise is very much appreciated.
Thanks Verdi! That's the first time I've seen that

At your service hat

Verity!

by **sandancer** 16.06.18 15:03

Verdi wrote:Some images are etched for all time on my brain. Madeleine that lunchtime is one of them [Thursday 3rd May]. She was wearing an outfit I’d bought especially for her holiday: a peach coloured smock top from Gap and some white broderie-anglaise shorts from Monsoon – a small extravagance, perhaps, but I’d pictured how lovely she would look in them and I’d been right. She was striding ahead of Fiona and me, swinging her bare arms to and fro. The weather was a little on the cool side and I remember thinking I should have brought a cardigan for her, although she seemed oblivious of the temperature, just happy and carefree. I was following her with my eyes, admiring her. I wonder now, the nausea rising in my throat, if someone else was doing the same.

madeleine by KATE MCCANN

I know this has been gone over many times , but Kate refers to a " peach coloured smock top " Madeleines top is clearly pink , white shorts yes , but a strappy pink top .

Amelie is wearing a peach/ orange t-shirt style top with small frills we can't see what type of shorts or if she is wearing any .
So for an image " that is etched on my brain for all time " she got it wrong ! Still she got many things wrong in her " account of the truth " !

by Guest 16.06.18 16:26

Maybe she's colour blind as well as blind to telling the truth titter

.

As also said before now, her lovely new trendy holiday outfit left until Thursday 3rd May? A three year old little girl with a new frock - would she want to wait five days before wearing? I doubt it!

She'd have that on first day I'll wager.

by **sandancer** 16.06.18 18:12

I wonder why happened to this " small extravagance " ?

Did they end up with Amelie , you know like " Maddie's jammies " ?

Like all Maddie's clothes , never seen again or available for tracker dogs or DNA !