The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by MayMuse on 19.02.17 2:44

In the Mirror it states that they have half a million in investments and around 200k in the fund , besides the fund is to search for their daughter, when are they going to do that?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1606
Reputation : 1150
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by Hobs on 19.02.17 4:17

The problem the mccanns have with their alleged attempt to have the Supreme Court verdict overturned is one of their own making.

The mccanns had every chance to prove their non involvement in the disappearance (death, disposal and subsequent cover up) of Maddie.

Kate could have answered the 48 questions she refused to answer (although technically it was more since several were multiple questions)

The mccanns and chums could have participated in the requested police reconstruction.

The mccanns themselves as arguidos were compelled to participate, the only way they could get out of doing so was by their chums setting out restrictions as to what they would do and when and making it impossible to accede to the Police requests.

By the chums not taking part in the reconstruction as required and expected, it was pointless for the mccanns to be compelled to participate.

The who group were required in order for Police to see who was where and when, what they did where and when and for witnesses to also corroborate or refute what was portrayed.

Actors could not have taken part since they would not know who was where, when and doing what with/to whom.

It would also have been an aid memoir to the group and may have caused them/witnesses to recollect something previously forgotten or glimpsed/heard and also allowed the Police to see if what they claimed they did where and when was believable and practical.

An example being the checks, according to the group they would have been up and down like yoyo's and having them do the checks would allow the police to see routes taken and time taken.
It would have also showed if the tanner sighting was physically possible given where she claims she was standing as well as her walking past gerry and Wilkins and not being seen by them.

it would also have allowed the Police to open the shutters at the time of night is was allegedly to have happened and to see what the noise level would have been and if it could be heard from where gerry,Wilkins and tanner were standing.

If it could have been heard given their closeness to the apartment and the time of night and the street being quiet, then the fact no one mentioned hearing shutters being raised or lowered then that is a big red flag as to kate seeing the window open and shutter raised whilst gerry saw neither on his check immediately prior to the alleged abduction.

They also have to contend with the issue of them refusing to keep the case open when given the opportunity to do so and instead them getting it shelved.

The mccanns would have to tell any appeal court/tribunal that the reason the Supreme Court and by default the PJ, Dr. Amaral etc found that they had not been cleared of involvement was because they did nothing to help show their innocence, rather they showed every indication in both language and behavior that they were involved up to their eyeballs in the death, disposal and subsequent cover up of Maddie, to wit, homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report and, subsequent to that obtaining money and services by deception, fraud and electronic fraud (wire fraud in America) libel, defamation, obstruction of justice, perverting the course of justice, aiding and abetting an offender (tapas chums and possibly clarrie with previous crimes) and perjury in relation to the Leveson Inquiry and anything they said on oath in the Portuguese court.

Until the mccanns are interviewed by the PJ under oath and answer each and every question, take part with their chums in the police reconstruction and assist the Police in both Portugal and the UK with the various aspects of the case (fraud in the UK since the homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report took place in Portugal and thus comes under their jurisdiction) then the mccanns will remain suspects and not cleared of involvement.

If they manage to get it appealed, they will lose as soon as they are asked if they cooperated as required and expected and they have to say no.

I wonder if they will seek to blame the tapas chums for making the reconstruction impossible by their demands?

____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.
avatar
Hobs

Posts : 836
Reputation : 487
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 53
Location : uk

http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by MayMuse on 19.02.17 4:32

Perhaps it's all hot air and media spin, why tell their Pj lawyer not to comment on the ruling and then tell the world of their plans? That is IF the McCanns did tell the media,?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1606
Reputation : 1150
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by Lands_end on 19.02.17 11:23

Why is there no journo out there that can just publicise the facts.:
1. Madeleine McCann was left in an apartment whilst her parents went out on the lash. Neglect in anybody's eyes? Mine certainly.
2. Madeleine McCanns parents lied to the Police and the press after the incident.
3. The colleagues of Madeleine McCann's parents lied to the Police and the press and also since have released a pact of silence hampering any future investigation prospects. 
You can drivel away about Robert Murats, chinos wearing child carriers, photograph tampering, overwhelmed police, paedophile associates, credit card theives, drugged children, pissed up adults, crying babies , hired cars the only thing I would say is don't ignore cadaver dogs. 
This odious couple along with their equally odious friends need to be dismissed as vile unwanted creatures from our very society. Social workers and teachers take note if you have any responsability for the children of this group now growing in to their teenage years.

Lands_end

Posts : 164
Reputation : 86
Join date : 2015-03-08

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by jeanmonroe on 19.02.17 11:57

It was known they had 10 days to file an objection with court officials. (from 31st January 2017?)
----------------------------------

"We delivered it'

WITHIN the 10 'days'? (or did they just, erm, 'accidentally' um, just 'miss the deadline'.....AGAIN!)

jta: The PJ SHOULD 'SHELVE/ARCHIVE' their second investigation, immediately, and release the 'files' into the public 'domain' so the world can 'see' EXACTLY the 'co-operation, or not' of SY's 'collaboration' with them, and how SY have 'kept the McCan'ts 'informed' of every 'developement'!.

CM: "He needs to know lawyers are watching.”

Could that be 'constituted' as 'a threat'?




----

Latest media headlineMETRO:  New Legal Battle for McCanns against claims they faked Madeleine's Abduction >   http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/19/new-legal-battle-for-mccanns-against-claims-they-faked-madeleines-abduction-6458128/

Added by Mod

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5815
Reputation : 1657
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by MayMuse on 19.02.17 15:29

Mirror article from 2014 , Portuguese authorities used and abused by Uk , no change there then, SC take notice! 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-uk-cops-slammed-3806229



------

Latest media headline:  Liverpool Echo:  Madeleine McCann's parents fighting to overturn court ruling on disappearance
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/madeleine-mccanns-parents-fighting-overturn-12626163

Added by Mod

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1606
Reputation : 1150
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

McCanns confirm: WE WILL raid the Find Madeleine Fund for our legal costs (despite previous promises)

Post by Tony Bennett on 19.02.17 19:43

Lots more media stories coming out about the McCanns' 'fightback'.

This one from the Independent looks important as it confirms that the McCanns WILL use the Find Madeleine Fund for their legal expenses:

 
Madeleine McCann's parents launch fresh legal battle over police claims they faked daughter's abduction

Lawyer confirms money from 'Find Madeleine' fund will be used to fight ruling that failed to clear couple of involvement in child's disappearance 

Lucy Pasha-Robinson   @lucypasha  8 mins ago  0 comments





 

 

 

 

 
Pic - Madeleine's parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, were named as suspects at one point by Portuguese police - Getty

Madeleine McCann’s parents have launched a fresh legal battle to overturn a Portuguese court ruling that failed to clear them of involvement in their daughter’s disappearance. 

Kate and Gerry McCann’s lawyer confirmed they would use money from the “Find Madeleine” fund in a bid to overturn the ruling, and challenge claims by former police chief Goncalo Amaral that they had faked their daughter's abduction. 

Portugal’s Supreme Court rejected their libel appeal last month relating to Mr Amaral’s 2008 book, “The Truth of the Lie”, that alleged their three-year-old daughter had died in their holiday flat and they had faked her kidnapping to cover up the tragedy.

The couple were successful in their 2015 libel action against the former police chief on the case, however a lower court overturned the decision in April 2016, opening them up to huge legal costs and the possibility of being sued by Mr Amaral. 

The McCanns, both 48, reportedly decided to launch the new challenge based on comments made by the judges in the 76-page ruling, which stated the decision “was determined by the fact that public prosecutors hadn't managed to obtain sufficient evidence of the crimes by the appellants.”

The McCanns were considered official suspects at one stage, however their “arguido” status was lifted on the same day it was issued in July 2008. 

Judges said the archiving of the criminal case did not equate to the McCanns being cleared of criminal responsibility. 

Pic - Kate and Gerry McCann believe that Madeleine is alive - PA

"In truth, that ruling was not made in virtue of Portugal's Public Prosecution Service having acquired the conviction that the appellants hadn't committed a crime," they wrote.

“Even the archive ruling raises serious concerns relating to the truth of the allegation that Madeleine was kidnapped."

They also found Mr Amaral had not acted "illicitly" ruling the content of his book had no "defamatory intention" behind it. 

"Our opinion is that rather than an injurious animus, the intention was informative and defensive,” they wrote. 

The McCanns said in a statement after the ruling: ​"What we have been told by our lawyers is obviously extremely disappointing.

"We will of course be discussing the implications of the Supreme Court ruling with our lawyers in due course."
 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/madeleine-mccann-missing-abduction-parents-legal-battle-goncalo-amaral-police-claims-portugal-a7588281.html




-

____________________

 Daily Mail journalist Daniel Bates wrote: “Kate and Gerry McCann have released a new picture of their daughter Madeleine as they prepare to commemorate tomorrow’s third anniversary of her disappearance. The photo shows her when she was three after a raid on the dressing-up box. She has a pink bow in her hair and a gold bead necklace and is wearing blue eyeshadow. It was taken weeks before the fateful family holiday to the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz when Madeleine vanished”

avatar
Tony Bennett

Posts : 14662
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by BlueBag on 19.02.17 19:53

This is so ridiculously stupid.

They were never cleared.

We all know it.

They know it.

They are going to get embarrassed yet again.

That's if they find a legal route to take, which I doubt.
avatar
BlueBag

Posts : 4273
Reputation : 2067
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by jeanmonroe on 19.02.17 20:04

Lawyer confirms money from 'Find Madeleine' fund will be used to fight ruling that failed to clear couple of involvement in child's disappearance.

Kate and Gerry McCann’s lawyer confirmed they would use money from the “Find Madeleine” fund in a bid to overturn the ruling, and challenge claims by former police chief Goncalo Amaral that they had faked their daughter's abduction.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/madeleine-mccann-missing-abduction-parents-legal-battle-goncalo-amaral-police-claims-portugal-a7588281.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, FINALLY!

McC's 'spokesman' PROVEN, to BE a 'LIAR'

Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCann couple, LIES on NZ Radio

By admin, on April 19th, 2009

On September 20th, 2007, Clarence Mitchell was interviewed on Radio Live in New Zealand by Marcus Lush.

Near the end of the interview Clarence says this:

"I’d stress as well that the money that people have donated from around the world is only being spent on that campaign and Kate and Gerry’s legal costs and media management in the shape of me that’s all coming from the financial benefactors who are contributing quite separately so that anybody who has given money to help find Madeleine (fund) need have no fear that their money is being spent on lawyers fees or anything like that."

This statement is quite clear and worth repeating, ad infinitum:. “....so that anybody who has given money to help find Madeleine (fund) need have no fear that their money is being spent on lawyers fees or anything like that."

After reviewing the money spent on lawyers in the Madeleine Fund accounts, it is quite obvious that Mitchell’s statement is a bare faced lie.

Ooopps!

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5815
Reputation : 1657
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by Casey5 on 19.02.17 20:23

"Lands_end Today at 11:23 am
Why is there no journo out there that can just publicise the facts.:
1. Madeleine McCann was left in an apartment whilst her parents went out on the lash. Neglect in anybody's eyes? Mine certainly.
2. Madeleine McCanns parents lied to the Police and the press after the incident."
             ----------------------------
Madeleine and siblings left on their own = abduction. Neglect yes but a necessary trade off
The dogs = no abduction. But then they're very unreliable according to Gerry McCann
You can't believe both but so many people still follow the McCanns agreeing they left their kids alone; as if.  It was the best  they could come up with that, yes, they had left their kids but were very responsible parents who could never have expected  an abductor who had watched the apartment, done a trial run the night before, swooped in on the 3rd of May, left no dna, clues or evidence of him being there, all this in a tiny timescale. Probably part of a paedophile gang operating in the tiny holiday village etc, etc.
Also, not forgetting the Leicestershire police also failed to "clear" the McCanns.
The Assistant Chief Constable made a statement:-
"while one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance."

Casey5

Posts : 333
Reputation : 31
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by jeanmonroe on 19.02.17 20:43

Also, not forgetting the Leicestershire police also failed to "clear" the McCanns.
The Assistant Chief Constable made a statement:-

"while one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance."
-----------------------------------------

And that's their next 'option' for their lawyers Farter Cluck to issue a 'writ' against!

Shouldn't be to long before they issue a 'writ' against ex SY DCI, A Redwood for saying: "that there was a possibility that she had not left her family's holiday apartment alive when she disappeared, in May 2007"

and "the assumption that Madeleine was abducted, may not follow with all our thinking on the case."

'Sleep well, Andy'... 'they' wouldn't do 'that' to YOU.........would they?

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5815
Reputation : 1657
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by MayMuse on 19.02.17 22:03

What is clear,in my opinion, is that the McCanns are hiding behind lawyers, and media spin.

So who is pulling whose strings?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1606
Reputation : 1150
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

WORLD-WIDE HEADLINES ABOUT THE McCANNS' CHALLENGE TO THE SUPREME COURT >>> 'COVER-UP', 'SHE DIED', 'FAKED', 'STAGED' ABDUCTION

Post by Tony Bennett on 20.02.17 8:15

The McCanns' challenge to the Portuguese Supreme Court's ruling as 'invalid' is now being covered world-wide..some examples from the overnight headlines, which highlight the words:

COVER-UP...

DIED...

FAKED ABDUCTION...

STAGED ABDUCTION...:

-------
McCann parents likely heading back to court after losing appeal on alleged 'cover-up'
Yahoo7 News
The parents of missing British girl Madeline McCann are gearing up again to fight claims made by a former Portuguese detective that they faked their ...
Madeleine McCann parents
Mamamia
The parents of missing child Madeleine McCann have vowed to continue fighting the release of a book accusing them of covering up the death of their ... 

Madeleine McCann's parents to fight claims they faked daughter's disappearance
9news.com.au
Madeleine McCann's parents have launched a legal battle in a bid to overturn a court ruling that failed to clear them of involvement in their daughter's ... 

Madeleine McCann's Parents Fight Claims That They Staged Her Abduction
Hit Network
Madeleine McCann's parents Kate and Gerry McCann are fighting claims from a Portuguese police figure that they staged her abduction.
Madeleine McCann's parents will fight claims she 'died', they 'staged'
The New Zealand Herald - NZ Herald
The parents of Madeleine McCann are fighting claims from a senior Portuguese police figure that their daughter died and they staged her abduction to ...
Madeleine McCann's parents will fight claims she 'died', they 'staged' her abduction to cover it up
NEWS.com.au
THE parents of Madeleine McCann are fighting shocking claims from a senior Portuguese police figure that they faked their daughter's abduction.

____________________

 Daily Mail journalist Daniel Bates wrote: “Kate and Gerry McCann have released a new picture of their daughter Madeleine as they prepare to commemorate tomorrow’s third anniversary of her disappearance. The photo shows her when she was three after a raid on the dressing-up box. She has a pink bow in her hair and a gold bead necklace and is wearing blue eyeshadow. It was taken weeks before the fateful family holiday to the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz when Madeleine vanished”

avatar
Tony Bennett

Posts : 14662
Reputation : 2801
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by Portia on 20.02.17 9:48

The Independent nailed it: the Fund will be drained to pay legal costs and fees. 

But how could that be? Surely the parents will not be so dastardly as to scupper their eldest born chances of being found by means of the heartwarming donations from pensioners and schoolchildren? The Independent is slandering McCann? Beware Indy, before you know you'll find Carter Ruck rucking on your doorstep!

Remember: the participants in the litigation so far were:

Side McCann: Gerry, Kate, Sean, Amelie AND Maddie. 5 litigants in all. 
Side Dr. Amaral: Dr. Amaral, Guerra y Paz and Broadcaster. 3 litigants. 

This means, in a grown-up world: that all five McCann are liable to reimburse all 3 parties in the Amaral side. 

My conservative guess is, that poor Sean and Amelie will be forced to work for donkeys years to make up for their parents mistakes. Oh, and poor Maddie, of course. Lets not forget HER!
avatar
Portia

Posts : 55
Reputation : 69
Join date : 2016-04-20

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by plebgate on 20.02.17 9:53

Oh dear it's gone viral - fund being used for lawyers, staged abduction, etc.  Sometimes it's better to shut up and carry on quietly but oh no, it appears they want another fight and we all know that Rocky doesn't throw the towel into the ring.

Meanwhile whilst they are furious, seething and hurt, etc. Rocky is enjoying a well earned beer, chatting to the locals and it seems generally chilling out.

Forca Rocky.

____________________
Judge Judy to shifty  witnesses   -    LOOK AT ME  -   Um is not an answer.

If I forget to add it to a post everything is In My Opinion and I don't know anything for sure.
Rolling Eyes

plebgate

Posts : 6022
Reputation : 1712
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by puzzled on 20.02.17 10:01

I wonder, do the McCanns ever read things like news messageboards or the comments sections of newspapers. If they do, they must know that the general opinion is: "the lady doth protest too much" now. Still, at least the public know what the fund's being spent on now.

____________________
...how did you feel the last time you squashed a bug? -psychopathic criminal, quoted in Robert Hare, Without Conscience

puzzled

Posts : 198
Reputation : 20
Join date : 2011-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 20.02.17 10:10

@puzzled wrote:I wonder, do the McCanns ever read things like news messageboards or the comments sections of newspapers. If they do, they must know that the general opinion is: "the lady doth protest too much" now. Still, at least the public know what the fund's being spent on now.

Not such a "tiny minority" who are "criticising" them now.

All brought on by themselves, and richly deserved.
avatar
Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 9415
Reputation : 4734
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by MayMuse on 20.02.17 10:23

@Tony Bennett wrote:The McCanns' challenge to the Portuguese Supreme Court's ruling as 'invalid' is now being covered world-wide..some examples from the overnight headlines, which highlight the words:

COVER-UP...

DIED...

FAKED ABDUCTION...

STAGED ABDUCTION...:

-------
McCann parents likely heading back to court after losing appeal on alleged 'cover-up'
Yahoo7 News
The parents of missing British girl Madeline McCann are gearing up again to fight claims made by a former Portuguese detective that they faked their ...
Madeleine McCann parents
Mamamia
The parents of missing child Madeleine McCann have vowed to continue fighting the release of a book accusing them of covering up the death of their ... 

Madeleine McCann's parents to fight claims they faked daughter's disappearance
9news.com.au
Madeleine McCann's parents have launched a legal battle in a bid to overturn a court ruling that failed to clear them of involvement in their daughter's ... 

Madeleine McCann's Parents Fight Claims That They Staged Her Abduction
Hit Network
Madeleine McCann's parents Kate and Gerry McCann are fighting claims from a Portuguese police figure that they staged her abduction.
Madeleine McCann's parents will fight claims she 'died', they 'staged'
The New Zealand Herald - NZ Herald
The parents of Madeleine McCann are fighting claims from a senior Portuguese police figure that their daughter died and they staged her abduction to ...
Madeleine McCann's parents will fight claims she 'died', they 'staged' her abduction to cover it up
NEWS.com.au
THE parents of Madeleine McCann are fighting shocking claims from a senior Portuguese police figure that they faked their daughter's abduction.


Appears a clear message from MSM, doesn't it?

Are the McCanns fighting the whole of the PJ involved in the investigations ?


A report by Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida to the Coordinator of the Criminal Investigation


Where he concludes, after analyzing all the evidence gathered, that the child is dead and the parents were responsible for cadaver occultation, and the entire GROUP was lying since the first day of the investigation.

10 September 2007
(Processo: VOL ,X, p. [url=tel-2602]2587-2602[/url])


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAVARES_ALMEIDA.htm





The future cannot be changed by pretending the past did not happen! 

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1606
Reputation : 1150
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by JimbobJones on 20.02.17 10:31

@jeanmonroe wrote:

CM: "He needs to know lawyers are watching.”

Could that be 'constituted' as 'a threat'?




----
I would say that is a BLATANT threat of futher legal action. Another Malicious Prosecution ( which is in itself a crime). I can see no other interpretation of it. Clarence is using words to "shake a fist" . It is harassment.

JimbobJones

Posts : 54
Reputation : 72
Join date : 2016-05-05

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by JRP on 20.02.17 10:58

I'm just wondering if I've understood what's happening now.
I understood that the Supreme Court sided with Goncalo and they gave their reasons, so I presumed that was it, game over, time to pay the legal fees McCanns.

So, if the Supreme Court is the highest court, who the 'kinell are they complaining to? It's not very likely that after deliberating over what to say alongside their judgement, the same court judges are going to take back what they said, seeing as what they said is true. 

Surely this complaint, which is like an appeal but isn't an appeal, because there is no court left to appeal to, is just bravado backed up by bullpoop?

I may be wrong, but I presume it was Duart who let the cat out of the bag about the Fund Company Ltd being to be used to pay legal fees. That makes a huge difference to public opinion, the McCanns pal is no doubt "seething" and "perplexed" at being found out to be a liar.

JRP

Posts : 463
Reputation : 404
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 60
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by MayMuse on 20.02.17 11:09

@JRP wrote:I'm just wondering if I've understood what's happening now.
I understood that the Supreme Court sided with Goncalo and they gave their reasons, so I presumed that was it, game over, time to pay the legal fees McCanns.

So, if the Supreme Court is the highest court, who the 'kinell are they complaining to? It's not very likely that after deliberating over what to say alongside their judgement, the same court judges are going to take back what they said, seeing as what they said is true. 

Surely this complaint, which is like an appeal but isn't an appeal, because there is no court left to appeal to, is just bravado backed up by bullpoop?

I may be wrong, but I presume it was Duart who let the cat out of the bag about the Fund Company Ltd being to be used to pay legal fees. That makes a huge difference to public opinion, the McCanns pal is no doubt "seething" and "perplexed" at being found out to be a liar.
  big grin A frivolous complaint on wording, maybe? 

With yet more money taken from the fund for legal expenses ?
Ahh, yes remember the fund and the amendment (removal) to provide financial assistance to the family in 2011.

 Amendment to the “Amendments”: It seems almost all of the Articles listed bellow give an identical level of financial control over the fund's assets and have been present in the Company's statutes since its  incorporation date on May 15, 2007. The most interesting change is the complete removal from the Fund's objects of an article that has appeared in all the Accounts (including in the latest) and Articles for the years of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 & 2011 - “To provide support, including financial assistance, to Madeleine's family”. Which raises at least one question: “What happened around November 29, 2011 that made the fund directors circulate an amendment to remove that article in particular?” Is it a mere case of excluding a superfluous article or could there be something else behind this modification?
http://gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/RESOLUTION.htm



Not a charity, A BUSINESS in the name of Madeleine McCann!

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1606
Reputation : 1150
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by JRP on 20.02.17 11:23

@MayMuse

A business in the name of Madeleine McCann, but not necessarily for her benefit, me thinks.

JRP

Posts : 463
Reputation : 404
Join date : 2016-03-07
Age : 60
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by Reggiregg on 20.02.17 12:58

The McCanns have their "people" monitoring social media. On the digital spy McCann discussion, for example, there are contributors who deliberately insult,mock and try to derail those who are against the McCann storyline. The more pertinent the comment (about the dogs, or the missing fridge, or the blue bag etc) the more frenzied the insults. The comments all have the same rather woman-y tone, so it could be one person under different names. But definitely a McCann or someone working for them.
avatar
Reggiregg

Posts : 30
Reputation : 45
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

Re: McCanns: "The Supreme Court decision was INVALID" - Madeleine McCann's parents 'plan to fight Portuguese court ruling that they haven't been cleared of involvement in their daughter's disappearance' (Daily Mail, 18 Feb 2017)

Post by ChippyM on 20.02.17 13:19

@Reggiregg wrote:The McCanns have their "people" monitoring social media. On the digital spy McCann discussion, for example, there are contributors who deliberately insult,mock and try to derail those who are against the McCann storyline. The more pertinent the comment (about the dogs, or the missing fridge, or the blue bag etc) the more frenzied the insults. The comments all have the same rather woman-y tone, so it could be one person under different names. But definitely a McCann or  someone working for them.

There are definitely 2 or 3 people on there that are fervent defenders of everything the McCanns did and say. I don't think that means they have to be working for them or family members though. There are going to be some die-hard 'fans' who don't want to admit that they could have been fooled.

ChippyM

Posts : 1268
Reputation : 415
Join date : 2013-06-15

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum