The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Andy Hopkins: Why must the McCanns be seen as God-like in the public's eye?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Andy Hopkins: Why must the McCanns be seen as God-like in the public's eye?

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 02.02.17 19:07

Posted by Andy (love this bloke!) Hopkins on CMOMM facebook:


Andy Hopkins1 hr


(All my opinion hereafter) Great result for Mr Amaral but the expected backlash from the McCann friendly, misinforming, child neglect supporting sometimes completely inaccurate press has people up and down the country angry again at just how exactly do 2 people, 2 nobodies have so much power and influence that they can attempt to mass indoctrinate the entire British public into thinking that they are wholly innocent, they are victims, they did nothing wrong, Portugal is a cesspit of a country with a wholly useless justice and investigation system in place, all because the police of 2 countries followed the evidence and established facts which pointed to these 2 nobodies as THE main suspects in all of this.

Let’s cast our minds back to April 29th 2015 and the Daily Express’s sub-headline of “Maddy Detective did lie about death cover up claim”. This headline followed the last McCann victory in this long running trial on April 28th 2015 within the judgement nowhere was it stated that this was the case, not that it stopped the Daily Express from exaggerating and pushing this lie onto the unsuspecting British public. How do we know this was a lie? The Daily Express were forced to correct this disgusting piece of propaganda a mere 222 days – that’s 7 months and 8 days after the original article was mass produced and distributed to the largely unsuspecting public thanks to some sterling work from Tony Bennett (whether or not you like him is not the point here).

But of course the damage was already done, together with other articles from the rest of the media. Oh and in case you were wondering where the correction article was in the Daily Express on the 7th December 2015, it was slap bang in the middle of the front page.... Oh hang on that’s not right, this is the McCann’s we’re talking about... It was actually pushed all the way back to page 21 on the lower left corner of the page. Anyway let’s now jump back to the present day and on the day of the breaking news that Mr Amaral had won January 31st 2017, media outlets are probably somewhat reluctant to print the news of the McCann’s defeat. All of them couldn’t resist printing inaccurate and potentially libellous comments about Mr Amaral, the apparent way the investigation was conducted etc.

Even though the news was about Mr Amaral winning, it still had to be made out in a sympathetic pro-McCann way, none more so than the Daily Telegraph headline of “Madeleine McCann’s parents could be sued by Police chief who falsely accused them of covering up death”. This headline was from a supposed “crime correspondent” Martin Evans and Chief Reporter Robert Mendick, a crime correspondent who is not familiar with the concept of evidence and facts in crime. Mr Amaral did not falsely accuse them of covering up Madeleine’s death. This was the conclusion that the PJ came to after assessing ALL evidence and facts. Several high profile people within the Portuguese justice system have said the same thing based on the official conclusion of the official police investigation files.

To make such a statement of “falsely accused” indicates that the Daily Telegraph must have concrete evidence that this is the case to make such a comment – Where is it?? Is this another breach of the IPSO code of practice, I suspect so because again there is NO determination that this is the case. Apart from one Daily Mirror excerpt, none of them have told people about the publicly available police files. They are now regurgitating a very public threat to ALL distribution companies about selling The Truth of the Lie in the UK albeit with a few extra bolt on sentences, the original threat made around April 24th 2016.

Just who are these people to be able to issue such demands to multi-million/billion pound companies that have to take heed from them??? Most of us know that the McCann’s have paid PR companies to keep them in the media, to give them a good image, they’ve had Clarence “to control what comes out in the media“ Mitchell working for them full time, then on reserve since the beginning, but why do I feel like it’s someone else manipulating the press in all this?

There has to be a reason how these 2 people must be seen as god like in the public’s eye (of which they most certainly aren’t), perhaps that is the answer or maybe the answer lies elsewhere?
avatar
Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 9298
Reputation : 4671
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: Andy Hopkins: Why must the McCanns be seen as God-like in the public's eye?

Post by suzyjohnson on 02.02.17 19:26

It's just the Emperor's New Clothes I think. People only see what they want to see. 

Remember Doctor Shipman? Nobody questioned that a doctor could do anything wrong.

And in this case, the McCann's have been helped by the fact that this happened in Portugal. It must all be the fault of the Portuguese, not the British.

People's own biased opinions stop them seeing what is right in front of them.

(Not saying the McCanns are guilty of anything, but that's what happens)

____________________


suzyjohnson

Posts : 1192
Reputation : 261
Join date : 2013-03-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Andy Hopkins: Why must the McCanns be seen as God-like in the public's eye?

Post by BlueBag on 02.02.17 19:31

There has to be a reason how these 2 people must be seen as god like in the public’s eye (of which they most certainly aren’t), perhaps that is the answer or maybe the answer lies elsewhere?
It's probably a "national security issue".


That's the level this seems to be at.

"National security issues" are normally anything embarrassing to the establishment.
avatar
BlueBag

Posts : 4191
Reputation : 2000
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Re: Andy Hopkins: Why must the McCanns be seen as God-like in the public's eye?

Post by MayMuse on 02.02.17 19:32

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4180046/Kate-Gerry-McCann-fury-libel-battle-defeat.html#ixzz4XT2tN8sT

There is a photo of the Mc's sitting on rocks in this article. I have never seen this image before... does anyone know if this was taken in 2007 or later?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1565
Reputation : 1113
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

Re: Andy Hopkins: Why must the McCanns be seen as God-like in the public's eye?

Post by MayMuse on 02.02.17 19:33

@BlueBag wrote:
There has to be a reason how these 2 people must be seen as god like in the public’s eye (of which they most certainly aren’t), perhaps that is the answer or maybe the answer lies elsewhere?
It's probably a "national security issue".


That's the level this seems to be at.

"National security issues" are normally anything embarrassing to the establishment.
How much of an embarrassment would a 3 year old little girl be?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1565
Reputation : 1113
Join date : 2016-04-15

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
McCanns apt & hire car


Blood and cadaver alerts
dismissed by UK Government


Retired DCI Gonçalo Amaral: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened - they don't need to investigate anything. All this is now a mere 'show off'."

Retired murder DCI Colin Sutton: "I would also like to make the point that Operation Grange was so restricted from the start as to be destined to fail."

Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley made public on national TV that Operation Grange is a complete fraud.

Ex-DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window of opportunity', in accordance with their remit, to allow the fake abduction to happen.

Despite "irrelevant behaviour" from blood and cadaver dogs in the McCann's apartment, on Kate McCann's clothes, and in the car they hired three weeks after Maddie disappeared, Ex-Chief Inspector, Ian Horrocks, said: "The thought that Kate and Gerry McCann had anything to do with the death of their daughter is frankly preposterous."

Gerry McCann called for example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY News reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room. Brenda paid the price. She paid with her life.

Ex-Deputy Chief Constable, Jim Gamble QPM, congratulated SKY reporter, Martin Brunt, on twitter for doorstepping Brenda Leyland on behalf of Gerry McCann.

Prime Minister Theresa May introduces Prime Suspect Kate McCann to Royalty: The Duchess of Gloucester.

Good Cop Down: The reality of being a police whistleblower
https://goodcopdown.wordpress.com/