Twitter (News and important information only please)

PJGA @PJ_GA
Confirmation: the appeal has been accepted by the Appellate Court http://pjga.blogspot.nl/2015/09/confirmation.html … #McCann

Hilarious thing going on at the moment.
A pro-Child Neglect-Child Murder  arguing that the EDVR dog cannot distinguish between the scent of a dead piglet and that of a dead human.
Can anyone remember the McCanns or their Mendacious Mitchell saying . . .

' Oh, yes, the night we arrived there was a terrible smell and we traced it to a rotting piglet under the sofa,
so we put it in the wardrobe in the blue bag overnight, and then waited until we
hired a car and took it to the tip . .  along with the Blue bag . . and the fridge- freezer . . ."

Pity they didn't, really, as that might have 'solved' the mystery from the start.

How much did Mitchell get paid ?  Pathetic.

Interesting tweet from Kikoratton. Not sure if posted elsewhere already. I don't do twitter but keep an eye on this feed.

https://twitter.com/kikoratton

Kikoratton has mapped many of the agencies associated with TM's in central London. It is interesting how close they all are !

PeterMac wrote:Hilarious thing going on at the moment.
A pro-Child Neglect-Child Murder  arguing that the EDVR dog cannot distinguish between the scent of a dead piglet and that of a dead human.
Can anyone remember the McCanns or their Mendacious Mitchell saying . . .

' Oh, yes, the night we arrived there was a terrible smell and we traced it to a rotting piglet under the sofa,
so we put it in the wardrobe in the blue bag overnight, and then waited until we
hired a car and took it to the tip . .  along with the Blue bag . . and the fridge- freezer . . ."

Pity they didn't, really, as that might have 'solved' the mystery from the start.

How much did Mitchell get paid ?  Pathetic.

Enough to sell his soul to the devils.
His soul isn't worth a lot by the looks of it.

He must be up to his neck in it.  
Mendacious boss begets mendacious porte-parole , it goes hand in hand.

Dogs don't lie.  Everyone on planet earth knows that except for this pathetic mendacious trio.

Retweet from Kikoratton
Two police forces @metpoliceuk + @PJudiciaria frozen, powerless, inventing stupid "suspects" and digging up a patch of land! To cover WHAT?

A wall of silence for 8 months long .....since DCI Wall took over.
And still funded by Home Office.
Something is not adding up.
Are the two police forces waiting for miracle to happen?

So, there you have it. Those who have read the PJ files have been wasting their time, because "Brain of Britain" has stated:

Jasmine  @alfibab3
@Jobaker46 @miffedchi SY have the real files not the files translated by an anti #McCann.

We DEMAND the "REAL files"

This is a corker:

Dara Anthony @dara_amthony
Take money out, give it to someone who then gives it back to the "fund". Fund appears to increase but no new money involved #McCann

• Reply
  
• Retweet
  

When I take money out of my bank account, the total goes down, not up. Am I being scammed?

• 
  

sallypelt wrote:This is a corker:

Dara Anthony @dara_amthony
Take money out, give it to someone who then gives it back to the "fund". Fund appears to increase but no new money involved #McCann

• Reply
  
• Retweet
  

When I take money out of my bank account, the total goes down, not up. Am I being scammed?

• 
  

 Dara may have a point. The fund total is simply the total amount that has been donated. Withdrawals to not affect this total so it would, in theory, be possible for the fund admin to withdraw money & use it to make a new donation or donations thereby increasing the total amount donated without any new money coming into the fund.
I have no idea whether such a thing has been done in this case, but it is theoretically possible.

I'm sorry but you are incorrect.

During the history of the Go Fund Me site a donation was made, by a person who wishes to remain anonymous, and then they requested a refund of their donation. 

It was duly made and the total amount in the fund fell by the amount refunded.

A certain contingent continue to try to cast aspersions regarding running / legality of the Go Fund Me site - to date they have failed at every attempt.

LG wrote:I'm sorry but you are incorrect.

During the history of the Go Fund Me site a donation was made, by a person who wishes to remain anonymous, and then they requested a refund of their donation. 

It was duly made and the total amount in the fund fell by the amount refunded.

A certain contingent continue to try to cast aspersions regarding running / legality of the Go Fund Me site - to date they have failed at every attempt.

The same happened when that truly awful post about Leanne Baulch being dead was rejected and the total went down by the £5 that was donated.

Or is that the anonymous donation you are referring to?

No, the one I was referring to was before that (the person is now an ex-member of this site) - I had actually forgotten about that disgusting "donation" - but it just credence to that fact that spreading untruths serves no purpose.  The truth will out!

LG wrote:No, the one I was referring to was before that (the person is now an ex-member of this site) - I had actually forgotten about that disgusting "donation" - but it just credence to that fact that spreading untruths serves no purpose.  The truth will out!

Oh, come on. Let's not beat about the bush. He donated £5 for whatever reason (though he/she tried to convince those on Twitter that he had donated £500) then immediately asked for the £5 back. The id of the person in question is David Steel. A disgusting perv.

There! I've got that off my chest.

Now I have to go out into the big wide world.

sallypelt wrote:

LG wrote:No, the one I was referring to was before that (the person is now an ex-member of this site) - I had actually forgotten about that disgusting "donation" - but it just credence to that fact that spreading untruths serves no purpose.  The truth will out!

Oh, come on. Let's not beat about the bush. He donated £5 for whatever reason (though he/she tried to convince those on Twitter that he had donated £500) then immediately asked for the £5 back. The id of the person in question is David Steel. A disgusting perv.

There! I've got that off my chest.

Now I have to go out into the big wide world.

I didn't know it was David Steel who wrote that! Jeez!

I wonder how true this is:

Annienonymous2 @annienonymouss
Why are the #mccann couple so reluctant to let the public know about their recent re-interviews under caution?
Retweeted by ditsychick

sallypelt wrote:I wonder how true this is:

Annienonymous2 @annienonymouss
Why are the #mccann couple so reluctant to let the public know about their recent re-interviews under caution?
Retweeted by ditsychick

The hagtag/mccann attracts loads of trolling, so who knows if this is not another one of those !
Even if true, it would have to be someone very close to Mccanns to leak it, and I can't see that happening.

Getermgoncalo,
Let us hope that all files relating to the CMoMM site are safely stored as a back up file, after all the fuss of the wayback CEOP poster,shenanigans at work?

sallypelt wrote:So, there you have it. Those who have read the PJ files have been wasting their time, because "Brain of Britain" has stated:

Jasmine  @alfibab3
@Jobaker46 @miffedchi SY have the real files not the files translated by an anti #McCann.

We DEMAND the "REAL files"

This tickled me.
The mccann supporters claim the files  translated by the mccann 'anti's' is incorrect and has been wrongly translated.
The mccanns claimed they spent £100,000 having the files translated into English.

I pointed out, that, if the files had been wrongly translated as claimed, and that the mccanns version of the selfsame files were in fact correctly translated as claimed, then why have the mccanns not published the correctly translated files.
They could then point out where the files had been wrongly translated and publish the correct translation which would paint them in a position of innocence, truthfullness and doing everything they can to find Maddie.

To date, the mccanns have failed to publish said correctly translated files.

This means that the files that the anti's are claiming to be wrongly translated are, in fact, correctly translated.

It also leads to the assumption that the £100,000 allegedly spent by the mccanns on having the files translated, was not in fact spent on said translations, rather it was possibly whoosh clucked away somewhere 'safe' or spent on something for which is was not intended.
Not a surprise given their avarice and  continuous deception regarding searching, ongoing litigation against anyone who disbelieves their version of events

It also leads to the assumption that the mccanns actually used the translated files as provided freely and willingly by Portuguese speakers who support Maddie, whilst claiming otherwise.

If the mccanns have the correctly translated files why have they still not released them, given it would support their version of events and their cooperation.
It would be in their best interest to have them out in the public arena.

Could it be that such files allegedly paid for by the mccanns do not exist and the files translated by 'anti mccanns' are the only ones available and are correctly translated, revealing the mccanns and chums to be the liars they truly are, involved in the death and subsequent disposal and cover up of Madeleine McCann?

I call you out on the files kate and gerry and chums.

If you have your own translated files, files which support your claims of innocence, release them to us, the public.
Show us where our translations are erroneous.

If you don't, then I and the world at large know you are liars (no surprise there) and, if you can lie about having files translated at a cost of £100,000, what else are you lying about?

If the mccann supporters claim regarding the translations being wrong is correct, when can i expect to see the 'correctly' translated files, paid for from the fund, released to the public and all the incorrect translations highlighted and the correct translations provided.
their 'correctly' translated files which prove they played no part in Maddie's death and subsequent disposal?

Tony Bennett was hauled before a British criminal court by them.

I believe there would have been every opportunity for their legal team to have told the court that Tony had based his opinions on wrongly tranlated files were that the case.   I have to wonder why this was not done if in fact the files are incorrect.

I also wonder why Mr. Clarence Mitchel (as their spokesperson) has not, to my knowledge,  made it perfectly clear that the files are incorrect.
 
Detective Andy Redwood reportedly told S&S to look up the online files when they were after info. for their "best selling"   book.  As far as I know the only files on line are the translated ones done free of charge.

If I am wrong, would some kind person please post a link to the correct £100,000 version.

Thanks in advance.

Not sure if posted already......

From Kikorattan (Dewi Lennard)

https://twitter.com/kikoratton


In two interviews, two months apart, Robert Murat furnished the PJ with two very different accounts of his activities on 2 and 3 May 2007. The PJ spotted the inconsistencies - they could hardly miss them - but were never allowed to follow up. There are several interesting features of Murat's conflicting accounts, but the most obvious is that he was told to make himself scarce from his home, Casa Liliana, during practically the whole of 3 May. Which, of course, was the day when Kate McCann declared the abduction-that-never-was. He was also ordered not to use his mobile, for the good reason that it would have sent signals to the antennas wherever he went, thus giving away his movements, for which he could be held to account. Better to be able to tell half a story (even if you forget it two months later), than to be found out in a direct lie.
For me, the crucial question is: why did Murat have to spend the day driving aimlessly around, and wasting the time of an acquaintance whom he unaccountably invited to spend the afternoon with him at a local Golf Club? The answer, as demonstrated by a curious pattern of calls on the fixed line of Casa Liliana, is that the Murat house was being used for a purpose related to the imminent declaration of "abduction", by a group of people who I take to include the brains behind the scam. Gerry McCann doesn't qualify for that description, though I strongly suspect that he was present. It is very possible that the person who left 12 (sometimes said to be 14) voicemail messages on Gerry's mobile on the previous day, was amongst those present.

N.M ‏@AdirenM


I have no boundaries as I don't work with/for the Justice system anymore. I can talk about whatever I want! #McCann won't appreciate it.

N.M ‏@AdirenM  2h2 hours ago  
Unlike #McCann defenders I have no master. I've worked many years for the state, and still do as a professor.But I can now speak about crime

https://twitter.com/AdirenM

He has no master but WILL he speak about whatever it is he is hinting at?

I hope it is not just another "teaser".   I do wish people would just say what they have to say.

Katie Hopkins ‏@KTHopkins 16 mins16 minutes ago
Katie Hopkins Retweeted Katie Hopkins
Time to tell the truth behind the lies around Kate & Gerry McCann. My new column @MailOnline out soon

Re Katie Hopkins ,just wondering whose " truth and lies " she will be accounting in the column she is paid to write.Katie Hopkins has quite of following,maybe she's just the person to put people" straight" and appeal to the less informed.

sallypelt wrote:Katie Hopkins ‏@KTHopkins 16 mins16 minutes ago
Katie Hopkins Retweeted Katie Hopkins
Time to tell the truth behind the lies around Kate & Gerry McCann. My new column @MailOnline out soon

Don't tell me KH is going to steal SP's thunder  Or maybe she's a big fan of RDH 

Joannep43 wrote:Re Katie Hopkins ,just wondering whose " truth and lies " she will be accounting  in the column she is paid to write.Katie Hopkins has quite of following,maybe she's just the person to put people" straight" and appeal to the less informed.

She lives to offend, so not sure she will sway minds one way or the other, but the more people speak out regarding the McCann farce, the better.