Suggestions for Richard D. Hall's next Madeleine film

@Realist wrote:

@Knitted wrote:

For example: The BBC, that hallowed organisation and 'champion' of the free-press, in a free-world world, is anything but...

Fact 1: It's Director General is appointed by the BBC Trust

Fact 2: It's BBC Trust is made up of Trustees. All Trustees are appointed by the Queen on advice from Ministers after an open selection process. The Trust is the sovereign body within the BBC. It is independent from the BBC's Executive Board, which is led by the Director-General.

So... Its Director is appointed by the BBC Trust...and the BBC Trust is led by the Director... A little bit of a conflict of interest isn't it? But let's not forget the richest woman in the world, the Queen, approves ALL members. 

We laughed at the old USSR 'Pravda'...We laugh now at North Korea's TV...and we laughed in 1991 at Iraqi TV's sycophantic, song-singing, flag-waving, idolisation of Saddam... But what amazes me is why, in turn, anyone takes, the BBC remotely seriously!?!?! The BBC is (so we are told) impartial, and (so we are told) often 'anti-Establishment' and (so we are told) 'anti-Conservative', and (so we are told) 'prides itself at protecting its independence'...

What a charade. 
What a scam. 
What a joke.

...but people still fall for it...by the millions!!

George Orwell,(ex BBC), is turning in his grave, incredulous, and telling us that he "told us so".

Just look at the Dando case and the surprisingly closed 'social circle of "Bruce/Eakin/Mitchell" . That's just life in the *coughs* 'passionately impartial', 'Public Service Broadcaster', that we know as the BBC'... Let's just imagine how very much worse it is in the commercial media industry, personified and promulgated by the self-proclaimed 'KingMaker' Murdoch?

In summary anything that Richard can do to wake people up the constant, all encompassing, media brainwashing that smothers us all and tells us what to think and how to act would be welcome.

N.B. The tragically sad case of poor Madeleine, and the subsequent Establishment machine that was bought to bear to cover up her death is an important catalyst that will wake people up to what's going on. An innocent child, who had barely begun to experience the world, and who is sadly no longer with us, will prove to be so very important in exposing the endemic, self-serving, corruption and lies that permeate and control all of our lives.

I don't watch any news propaganda broadcasts, in fact I don't even own a TV set. Neither do I read any newspapers, not even the broadsheets and haven't done so for many yrs. I have found that adopting this stance to have been particularly therapeutic and thoroughly recommend others try it.

Nevertheless, however nauseatingly patronising the BBC may be, its positively liberal when compared to other broadcasting stations, particularly those across the Atlantic, whereby one is forced to suffer the indignity of enduring patent propaganda in between adverts. none less so than Gruppenfurher Murdoch's, Fox News.

At the end of the day, one can't really blame governments, because people get the governments they deserve. In the immortal words of Uncle Joe Stalin, 'Give the people what they want' and what they want is detritus. If they didn't want the aforementioned, then surely they wouldn't continue to subscribe to it, any more they they would voluntarily walk around with GPS tracking devices, euphemistically referred to as mobile phones.

@BlueBag wrote:Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?

@MsJoppie wrote:What if.... McCanns were controlled on forehand

The church is known to be a perfect place to wash money and childtrade. Church and politics work together. High profile names like Prince Charles and Prince Bernard (Netherlands) are very much named in crimes. Especially with children.

The dissapearence of Madeleine was at least as big as the killing of lady Diana. Even the press makes this connection.

Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Is it media control by McCanns or are the McCanns contolled by the media.

Because they are high profile freemasions, they could have whitnessed something and should be controlled to keep a secret.....

Maybe farfetched, but as we learned how it seems to be, It is very possible. I was surprised that there was so little corpseodeur in the appartment....

@Get'emGonçalo wrote:

@BlueBag wrote:Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?

MsJoppie may have been taken in by Brian Ladd years ago https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12842-i-am-obsessed-with-this-case-since-day-one

Ladyinred wrote:

@MsJoppie wrote:What if.... McCanns were controlled on forehand

The church is known to be a perfect place to wash money and childtrade. Church and politics work together. High profile names like Prince Charles and Prince Bernard (Netherlands) are very much named in crimes. Especially with children.

The dissapearence of Madeleine was at least as big as the killing of lady Diana. Even the press makes this connection.

Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Is it media control by McCanns or are the McCanns contolled by the media.

Because they are high profile freemasions, they could have whitnessed something and should be controlled to keep a secret.....

Maybe farfetched, but as we learned how it seems to be, It is very possible. I was surprised that there was so little corpseodeur in the appartment....

@Msjoppie, you've derailed this topic.  It's titled, "Suggestions for Richard's next film", so stay on topic, please.

@BarryTheHatchet wrote:The BBC have an in-house staff magazine called "Aerial" that even the staff refer to as "Pravda".
Maybe Richard could do a nice film all about the BBC and the liars and toerags that infest it (and are paid with Government money).

@BlueBag wrote:


Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?

@bettylou wrote:THE LACK OF MADDY'S DNA IN APARTMENT. HOW COULD THAT BE ?

@notlongnow wrote:Robert Murat would be my choice for the next film.

@hogwash wrote:The fund.