Re: Suggestions for Richard D. Hall's next Madeleine film

by Roxyroo 16.05.16 21:31

Realist wrote:
Knitted wrote:

For example: The BBC, that hallowed organisation and 'champion' of the free-press, in a free-world world, is anything but...

Fact 1: It's Director General is appointed by the BBC Trust

Fact 2: It's BBC Trust is made up of Trustees. All Trustees are appointed by the Queen on advice from Ministers after an open selection process. The Trust is the sovereign body within the BBC. It is independent from the BBC's Executive Board, which is led by the Director-General.

So... Its Director is appointed by the BBC Trust...and the BBC Trust is led by the Director... A little bit of a conflict of interest isn't it? But let's not forget the richest woman in the world, the Queen, approves ALL members.

We laughed at the old USSR 'Pravda'...We laugh now at North Korea's TV...and we laughed in 1991 at Iraqi TV's sycophantic, song-singing, flag-waving, idolisation of Saddam... But what amazes me is why, in turn, anyone takes, the BBC remotely seriously!?!?! The BBC is (so we are told) impartial, and (so we are told) often 'anti-Establishment' and (so we are told) 'anti-Conservative', and (so we are told) 'prides itself at protecting its independence'...

What a charade.
What a scam.
What a joke.

...but people still fall for it...by the millions!!

George Orwell,(ex BBC), is turning in his grave, incredulous, and telling us that he "told us so".

Just look at the Dando case and the surprisingly closed 'social circle of "Bruce/Eakin/Mitchell" . That's just life in the *coughs* 'passionately impartial', 'Public Service Broadcaster', that we know as the BBC'... Let's just imagine how very much worse it is in the commercial media industry, personified and promulgated by the self-proclaimed 'KingMaker' Murdoch?

In summary anything that Richard can do to wake people up the constant, all encompassing, media brainwashing that smothers us all and tells us what to think and how to act would be welcome.

N.B. The tragically sad case of poor Madeleine, and the subsequent Establishment machine that was bought to bear to cover up her death is an important catalyst that will wake people up to what's going on. An innocent child, who had barely begun to experience the world, and who is sadly no longer with us, will prove to be so very important in exposing the endemic, self-serving, corruption and lies that permeate and control all of our lives.
I don't watch any news propaganda broadcasts, in fact I don't even own a TV set. Neither do I read any newspapers, not even the broadsheets and haven't done so for many yrs. I have found that adopting this stance to have been particularly therapeutic and thoroughly recommend others try it.

Nevertheless, however nauseatingly patronising the BBC may be, its positively liberal when compared to other broadcasting stations, particularly those across the Atlantic, whereby one is forced to suffer the indignity of enduring patent propaganda in between adverts. none less so than Gruppenfurher Murdoch's, Fox News.

At the end of the day, one can't really blame governments, because people get the governments they deserve. In the immortal words of Uncle Joe Stalin, 'Give the people what they want' and what they want is detritus. If they didn't want the aforementioned, then surely they wouldn't continue to subscribe to it, any more they they would voluntarily walk around with GPS tracking devices, euphemistically referred to as mobile phones.

Yup, the BBC that makes millions out of branded children's toys connected to their television shows, that claims to be impartial! The very same BBC that was fined by the media watchdog for faking a Syrian hospital being bombed. What a joke the BBC truly is!

by Roxyroo 16.05.16 21:34

I would like him to cover the micro-chipping aspect ( which I have come to believe is the whole reason for the mm mystery)

by MsJoppie 16.05.16 21:58

What if.... McCanns were controlled on forehand

The church is known to be a perfect place to wash money and childtrade. Church and politics work together. High profile names like Prince Charles and Prince Bernard (Netherlands) are very much named in crimes. Especially with children.

The dissapearence of Madeleine was at least as big as the killing of lady Diana. Even the press makes this connection.

Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Is it media control by McCanns or are the McCanns contolled by the media.

Because they are high profile freemasions, they could have whitnessed something and should be controlled to keep a secret.....

Maybe farfetched, but as we learned how it seems to be, It is very possible. I was surprised that there was so little corpseodeur in the appartment....

by Guest 16.05.16 22:02

MsJoppie wrote:Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Really?

I mean... really?

by MsJoppie 16.05.16 22:10

It is as possibillity, eveything seems possible in this case eek

by Guest 16.05.16 22:11

So you think the McCanns were set up?

by MsJoppie 16.05.16 22:12

No, I just mention posibillities. It would not surprise me to be hounest

by Guest 16.05.16 22:14

So who had access to the flat, the car, the clothes and cuddlecat to do this potential stitching up?

by Guest 16.05.16 22:16

MsJoppie wrote:What if.... McCanns were controlled on forehand

The church is known to be a perfect place to wash money and childtrade. Church and politics work together. High profile names like Prince Charles and Prince Bernard (Netherlands) are very much named in crimes. Especially with children.

The dissapearence of Madeleine was at least as big as the killing of lady Diana. Even the press makes this connection.

Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Is it media control by McCanns or are the McCanns contolled by the media.

Because they are high profile freemasions, they could have whitnessed something and should be controlled to keep a secret.....

Maybe farfetched, but as we learned how it seems to be, It is very possible. I was surprised that there was so little corpseodeur in the appartment....

Prince Charles?

Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?

by **Jill Havern** 16.05.16 22:20

BlueBag wrote:Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?

MsJoppie may have been taken in by Brian Ladd years ago https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12842-i-am-obsessed-with-this-case-since-day-one

by Guest 16.05.16 22:21

MsJoppie wrote:What if.... McCanns were controlled on forehand

The church is known to be a perfect place to wash money and childtrade. Church and politics work together. High profile names like Prince Charles and Prince Bernard (Netherlands) are very much named in crimes. Especially with children.

The dissapearence of Madeleine was at least as big as the killing of lady Diana. Even the press makes this connection.

Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Is it media control by McCanns or are the McCanns contolled by the media.

Because they are high profile freemasions, they could have whitnessed something and should be controlled to keep a secret.....

Maybe farfetched, but as we learned how it seems to be, It is very possible. I was surprised that there was so little corpseodeur in the appartment....

@Msjoppie, you've derailed this topic. It's titled, "Suggestions for Richard's next film", so stay on topic, please.

by MsJoppie 16.05.16 22:22

Get'emGonçalo wrote:
BlueBag wrote:Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?
MsJoppie may have been taken in by Brian Ladd years ago https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12842-i-am-obsessed-with-this-case-since-day-one

Not sure what you mean

by Guest 16.05.16 22:24

Get'emGonçalo wrote:
BlueBag wrote:Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?
MsJoppie may have been taken in by Brian Ladd years ago https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12842-i-am-obsessed-with-this-case-since-day-one

Personally I'd be checking the ip address.

Not that I'm trying to teach grandmother how to suck eggs.

by Guest 16.05.16 22:26

by MsJoppie 16.05.16 22:30

Deleted. Off topic.

by MayMuse 17.05.16 2:55

Ladyinred wrote:
MsJoppie wrote:What if.... McCanns were controlled on forehand

The church is known to be a perfect place to wash money and childtrade. Church and politics work together. High profile names like Prince Charles and Prince Bernard (Netherlands) are very much named in crimes. Especially with children.

The dissapearence of Madeleine was at least as big as the killing of lady Diana. Even the press makes this connection.

Who was able to plant evidence in appartment 5 A .

Is it media control by McCanns or are the McCanns contolled by the media.

Because they are high profile freemasions, they could have whitnessed something and should be controlled to keep a secret.....

Maybe farfetched, but as we learned how it seems to be, It is very possible. I was surprised that there was so little corpseodeur in the appartment....
@Msjoppie, you've derailed this topic. It's titled, "Suggestions for Richard's next film", so stay on topic, please.

Maybe Richard Hall could visit this suggestion of "planting evidence" and show how vacuous & improbable it is! Just a thought...

by BarryTheHatchet 17.05.16 7:43

The BBC have an in-house staff magazine called "Aerial" that even the staff refer to as "Pravda".
Maybe Richard could do a nice film all about the BBC and the liars and toerags that infest it (and are paid with Government money).

by plebgate 17.05.16 8:36

BarryTheHatchet wrote:The BBC have an in-house staff magazine called "Aerial" that even the staff refer to as "Pravda".
Maybe Richard could do a nice film all about the BBC and the liars and toerags that infest it (and are paid with Government money).

ref. red highlighting - I think that should read - (and are paid with TAXPAYERS money). Disgraceful how they are all allowed to do as they like, cover ups etc. and still receive our money.

by Realist 17.05.16 10:23

BlueBag wrote:

Tell me... I'm not the only one who thinks that MsJoppie is having a laugh?

You are not alone, Bluebag, you'll no doubt excuse me for desisting from greeting you with the term 'Dr. Livingstone, I presume.'

by notlongnow 17.05.16 14:27

Robert Murat would be my choice for the next film.

by jeanmonroe 17.05.16 14:42

bettylou wrote:THE LACK OF MADDY'S DNA IN APARTMENT. HOW COULD THAT BE ?

'Bleach, cleaning fluids, laundering clothes'?

Didn't 'work' though, did it?

Eddie and Keela 'saw to that'!

If Maddie did NOT 'die' (ala DCI Redwood) in THAT McCan't 'apartment'...................WHO 'DID'?

by MsJoppie 19.05.16 15:00

Kate thought immediatly about abduction by a pedophile ring.

I cant help it but according the high level of politic involvement it seems to be alot of cover up, the one way or another.

I keep thinking about that.

Dutroux (Belgium) has been proven he could not do it alone (check the many docs on youtube)

McCanns know something but that can go the one way or the other. And again.. the church is involved and knows more.

I will pass this question directly to Richard, and I highly doubt there ever will be an answer. Alot of witnesses already died.