The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by pennylane on 21.11.15 20:41

(sorry posted under wrong thread, so have brought it over)
HiDeHo, great thread 

Due to this topic being such a bone of contention in the past, many posters who strongly believe it all happened on 3rd May (as I do) have left or been banned due to strong disagreements arising. So I'm pleased to see it back on the table, not that it was ever off the table.

As I have mentioned before, I believe that everything happened fast and furious that night, and that G ran into the Smiths, hence Tanner was roped in to give him an alibi in the event he was identified. Her pathetic abductor sighting/alibi for Gerry, are so dire that even Op Grange couldn't make it work (lol), forcing the beleaguered Redwood to have his embarrassing “revelation.”


A commotion was heard as early as 9:10-9:15 by independent witnesses and I believe Maddie's name was heard being called. I believe she may have been found around this time. I'm told 'it's absurd' to suggest G would carry M through the streets, but I beg to differ.  Faced with imminent arrest and loss of everything, what else could he do without a car if the ball was already rolling? It's quite possible G had a specific place in mind, and was forced to take the fastest route, and (imo) was seen! The discrediting of endless witnesses in order to make a specific theory fit, doesn't work for me I'm afraid.

Pat Brown has tested the timing on foot for a last minute scenario, and has confirmed it is possible for G to have pulled it off. The Mc's remained hauled up whilst others were out searching, in spite of knowing the massive red flags that would raise. I believe they had no choice as they had to back fit a story. The time lines written on M's book, the un-gemmied window, M's bed barely slept in, the pink blanket and blue sports bag still being there, the Mc's not searching, flip flopping Jane, etc. combined with the almost comedic version of events just doesn't stack up to a pre-planned crime. The entire night is a massive mess that reeks of last minute pandemonium.  I also believe it possible M was indeed bare armed and bare foot, as described, because she was found suddenly and moved quickly. I believe she was moved again later, and that is when the blanket and blue sports bag disappeared and was used.

I value your work HDH and, as I said previously, there could well be another element that would explain the earlier discrepancies you have diligently outlined. For me, at least, the last minute scenario remains the most likely.


all in mho of course

pennylane

Posts : 2756
Reputation : 1584
Join date : 2009-12-07

Back to top Go down

pennylane

Post by worriedmum on 21.11.15 20:47

pennylane''The discrediting of endless witnesses in order to make a specific theory fit, doesn't work for me I'm afraid.'' agree
avatar
worriedmum

Posts : 1788
Reputation : 388
Join date : 2012-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by HiDeHo on 22.11.15 15:58

@worriedmum wrote:pennylane''The discrediting of endless witnesses in order to make a specific theory fit, doesn't work for me I'm afraid.'' agree


I do not decide on a theory and make anything 'fit'.  When I looked at the witness statements I DID NOT KNOW if there would be one that was (relative) PROOF.  My research is based on what I FIND, not to fit some preconceived idea. 

I don't need to be right... I ONLY WANT THE TRUTH and if that proves me wrong then thats how it has to be.

It's not meant to be about discrediting.  I looked at each one individually and NOT ONE was credible PROOF she was seen..

Some were mistaken.  We KNOW that Maddie was easily mistaken for one of the other T7 children.  Miguel Matias was CONVINCED it was Maddie at the Paraiso on Thursday afternoon.  We know from CCTV footage that she WASN'T there

How many other people were mistaken?


I would WELCOME someone to point out a witness statement that is specific to Madeleine (as opposed she was in a group) but as yet noone has been able to produce one.

This isn't a quick 'guess' either. I spent a LOT of time researching and compiling MANY threads on the subject as the FACTS are what is important to me.


Any one of these threads confims the extensive research (and they are just a FEW  of the threads available)

Category: When Did Madeleine 'Disappear' BEFORE 5.30pm or AFTER?
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/When-Did-Madeleine-Disappear-BEFORE-5-30pm-or-AFTER-1-69230


Title: Title: BEFORE 5.30pm Thursday or AFTER - Opinion HiDeHo (From Remembering Madeleine Forum)
http://forum4.aimoo.com/madeleinemccanncontroversy/category/Title-BEFORE-5-30pm-Thursday-or-AFTER-Opinion-HiDeHo-From-Remembering-Madeleine-Forum-1-2309201.html


Title: Summary of Witnesses that 'saw' Madeleine
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/DIscrepancies-by-Topic/Summary-of-Witnesses-that-saw-Madeleine-1-837083.html


From one of the above links.....

I'm not looking to prove she WASN'T there, I'm looking for proof that SHE WAS. - Big Difference!
avatar
HiDeHo
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 2514
Reputation : 696
Join date : 2010-05-07

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by pennylane on 22.11.15 16:49

@HiDeHo wrote:
@worriedmum wrote:pennylane''The discrediting of endless witnesses in order to make a specific theory fit, doesn't work for me I'm afraid.'' agree


I do not decide on a theory and make anything 'fit'.  When I looked at the witness statements I DID NOT KNOW if there would be one that was (relative) PROOF.  My research is based on what I FIND, not to fit some preconceived idea. 

I don't need to be right... I ONLY WANT THE TRUTH and if that proves me wrong then thats how it has to be.

It's not meant to be about discrediting.  I looked at each one individually and NOT ONE was credible PROOF she was seen..

Some were mistaken.  We KNOW that Maddie was easily mistaken for one of the other T7 children.  Miguel Matias was CONVINCED it was Maddie at the Paraiso on Thursday afternoon.  We know from CCTV footage that she WASN'T there

How many other people were mistaken?


I would WELCOME someone to point out a witness statement that is specific to Madeleine (as opposed she was in a group) but as yet noone has been able to produce one.

This isn't a quick 'guess' either. I spent a LOT of time researching and compiling MANY threads on the subject as the FACTS are what is important to me.


Any one of these threads confims the extensive research (and they are just a FEW  of the threads available)

Category: When Did Madeleine 'Disappear' BEFORE 5.30pm or AFTER?
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/When-Did-Madeleine-Disappear-BEFORE-5-30pm-or-AFTER-1-69230


Title: Title: BEFORE 5.30pm Thursday or AFTER - Opinion HiDeHo (From Remembering Madeleine Forum)
http://forum4.aimoo.com/madeleinemccanncontroversy/category/Title-BEFORE-5-30pm-Thursday-or-AFTER-Opinion-HiDeHo-From-Remembering-Madeleine-Forum-1-2309201.html


Title: Summary of Witnesses that 'saw' Madeleine
http://forum2.aimoo.com/MadeleineMcCann/DIscrepancies-by-Topic/Summary-of-Witnesses-that-saw-Madeleine-1-837083.html


From one of the above links.....

I'm not looking to prove she WASN'T there, I'm looking for proof that SHE WAS. - Big Difference!
HiDeHo, I never meant to imply you have any other agenda than finding the truth!  In fact I'm 100% certain you don't, and I'm also 100% certain you are a humble and diligent person, without any ego to be right, just an honest desire to find the truth of what happened to Madeleine. roses  

You ask 'how many other people were mistaken?'  That's the question, maybe they were, maybe they weren't.

Why is the nanny, Catriona Baker not credible? 

pennylane

Posts : 2756
Reputation : 1584
Join date : 2009-12-07

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by worriedmum on 22.11.15 20:14

Pennylane, Hideho, I agree we are all just trying to get to the truth. Few have worked so tirelessly as Lizzie. I applaud her wholeheartedly.
avatar
worriedmum

Posts : 1788
Reputation : 388
Join date : 2012-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by pennylane on 22.11.15 20:59

@worriedmum wrote:Pennylane, Hideho, I agree we are all just trying to get to the truth. Few have worked so tirelessly as Lizzie. I applaud her wholeheartedly.
Ditto!

I understand some alleged witnesses can be mistaken, or confused as to whether they saw Maddie or not, but where I disagree is that the Smith family, Mrs Fenn, the nanny, et al, are all lying and hence don't give a stuff about a missing 3 year old child. I simply don't see the motive for such a heinous lie. Where the tapasniks are concerned I feel there is strong motive to mislead/lie, and I definitely believe Ms Tanner is lying.

pennylane

Posts : 2756
Reputation : 1584
Join date : 2009-12-07

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by worriedmum on 22.11.15 21:35

Yes I believe the Smiths
avatar
worriedmum

Posts : 1788
Reputation : 388
Join date : 2012-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Amy Dean on 22.11.15 21:44

There is certainly no reason (that we know about anyway) for them to lie.




ontopic
avatar
Amy Dean

Posts : 281
Reputation : 83
Join date : 2014-11-13
Location : Wherever I hang my hat

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by jeanmonroe on 26.11.15 10:36

@Amy Dean wrote:There is certainly no reason (that we know about anyway) for them to lie.

ontopic

Then, WHY DID they 'lie'.?

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5815
Reputation : 1655
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Tony Bennett on 26.11.15 11:05

@jeanmonroe wrote:
@Amy Dean wrote:There is certainly no reason (that we know about anyway) for them to lie.

ontopic

Then, WHY DID they 'lie'.?

Just to recap on the evidence of fabrication by all three, here are six threads (two for each) which present some of the best arguments:
 
MRS FENN

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11939-10-reasons-which-suggest-that-pamela-fenn-did-not-hear-any-child-crying-on-tuesday-1-may-2007

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11905-was-there-an-attempted-burglary-of-mrs-pamela-fenns-flat-in-the-weeks-before-madeleine-was-reported-missing

MARTIN SMITH

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t10354-smithman-4-a-summary-of-discrepancies-in-what-the-smiths-say-about-their-sighting

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11056-smithman-5-the-evidence-of-the-smith-family-from-drogheda-ireland-the-twelve-sets-of-contradictions

CAT BAKER

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3908-catriona-baker

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t6263-the-last-confirmed-location-of-the-child-believed-to-be-madeleine-mccann-apart-from-t9-was-at-the-creche  



In the case of Pamela Fenn, the arguments centre around multiple queries about the alleged burglary and the alleged crying incident on 1 May.

In the case of Martin Smith, the FIVE wholly different reasons the family give for doing nothing about reporting their sighting for 13 days, until the day after Murat was made an arguido, coupled with all manner of discrepancies I've set out on the 'SMITHMAN 4' and 'SMITHMAN 5' threads, ought to make most people reconsider whether they are witnesses of truth

In the case of Catriona Baker, there is clear evidence that she lied about (a) the 'high tea' on 3 May (b) the claim that Madeleine went sailing on that Thursday morning ,and (c) about seeing the children having lunch in the eating area each date (which the McCanns themselves contradict.

As for them having 'no reason' to lie, I think the proposition is this:

1. Something nasty, immoral or illegal was going on in Praia da Luz that week.

2. If so, both the McCanns and Robert Murat might somehow be connected with that, and

3. Mrs Fenn and Martin Smith had clear connections to Robert Murat, and Cat Baker seems to have been known to the McCanns before April 2007.                

____________________

Sonia Poulton, friend of Ben Thompson of Northallerton for 8 years, and regular contributor to Rupert Murdoch's the Sun and SKY News, wrote to Chris Roberts on 26 June 2017:   "BENNETT IS FILTH.  NOT TO BE TRUSTED.  IT'S ABOUT TIME HE WAS EXPOSED".

avatar
Tony Bennett

Posts : 14617
Reputation : 2774
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Richard IV on 26.11.15 11:20

@Tony Bennett wrote "3. Mrs Fenn and Martin Smith had clear connections to Robert Murat,"


I disagree about the use of the words `clear connections`.  It makes it sound as if they were more close than they actually were.  As far as we know the connections were only loose, no more than a passing hello to a local resident.  Perhaps you have inside knowledge of their closer relationships in which case I am mistaken.
avatar
Richard IV

Posts : 552
Reputation : 261
Join date : 2015-03-06

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Carrry On Doctor on 26.11.15 11:51

I am still on the fence re Smithman, but the wholesale lying (that is gradually unravelling) from so many quarters suggests that apparent 'loose connections' might well be as TB has suggested, clear connections.

If they were indeed loose at the start they appear now to have become rock solid. All to keep a lid on what was going on, and what took place that week.

IMO
avatar
Carrry On Doctor

Posts : 385
Reputation : 186
Join date : 2014-01-31

Back to top Go down

Fake Abduction

Post by willowthewisp on 26.11.15 12:02

@Richard IV wrote:@Tony Bennett wrote "3. Mrs Fenn and Martin Smith had clear connections to Robert Murat,"


I disagree about the use of the words `clear connections`.  It makes it sound as if they were more close than they actually were.  As far as we know the connections were only loose, no more than a passing hello to a local resident.  Perhaps you have inside knowledge of their closer relationships in which case I am mistaken.
We know Gerry knows more about Robert Murat,eg the video,"I'm not going to comment on that ,Cough".
Did Gerry know Robert Murat before the holiday?

willowthewisp

Posts : 1684
Reputation : 666
Join date : 2015-05-07

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Tony Bennett on 26.11.15 14:20

@Carrry On Doctor wrote:I am still on the fence re Smithman, but the wholesale lying (that is gradually unravelling) from so many quarters suggests that apparent 'loose connections' might well be as TB has suggested, clear connections. If they were indeed loose at the start they appear now to have become rock solid. All to keep a lid on what was going on, and what took place that week.

Yes. We have recently had a lot of statements, previously thought to be honest witness statements, that have come under intense scrutiny and have been found to be questionable at best and clearly dishonest at worst.

In addition to the ones mentioned, the outstanding example is the statement of Nuno Lourenco, in which he framed Wojchiech Krokowski as a paedophile kidnapper. Textusa's brilliant and thorough analysis of his lies in her 'Sagresman' article lays that bare. 

On top of that we have: (a) the careful choreography of only informing the police about this allegedly dreadful event just as Krokowski's plane was taking of from Faro Airport (SIX whole days after the alleged incident took place), and (b) the impossible 'coincidence' that Lourenco's description of Krokowski/'Sagresman' matched that of Tannerman in 17 different respects...'didn't look like a tourist', clothes made of thick cloth, classic shoes, beige/cream trousers etc. etc. 

All of this at least suggests evidence of a great deal of pre-planning.        

------

Richard IV wrote: I disagree about the use of the words `clear connections`.  It makes it sound as if they were more close than they actually were.  As far as we know the connections were only loose, no more than a passing hello to a local resident.  Perhaps you have inside knowledge of their closer relationships in which case I am mistaken.

REPLY: You make a valid point and I will try and answer it.

No, I have no ‘inside’ knowledge of these relationships, beyond what we all have from the PJ files, mccannfiles, pamalam’s site, the forums, newspaper reports etc. etc.  

The specific evidence we have from two out of the four statements made about Martin Smith’s acquaintance with Murat state that the two had ‘known each other for 2 years’ and had ‘met several times’. This alone suggests quite a lot more than just the odd ‘passing hello’.

Apart from that, what we have is a certain amount of circumstantial evidence, namely:

1. That Martin Smith made no effort to report his claimed ‘sighting’ until the day after someone he knew – Murat – was made a suspect on an extremely serious charge

2. That he was able to be so adamant, on giving his statement to the PJ, that the man he said he saw was definitely not Murat

3. His overreaction when an Irish newspaper published an article reporting on his relationship with Murat – he saw a solicitor, threatened legal action and forced the newspaper to withdraw the article, and

4. Inconsistent and I suggest evasive statements about his acquaintance with Murat.

As for Mrs Fenn, the one thing we know for certain is that she and Mrs Jennifer Murat were both members of the local Residents Committee. Beyond that, we know that both had lived in Praia da Luz for a long time.        

____________________

Sonia Poulton, friend of Ben Thompson of Northallerton for 8 years, and regular contributor to Rupert Murdoch's the Sun and SKY News, wrote to Chris Roberts on 26 June 2017:   "BENNETT IS FILTH.  NOT TO BE TRUSTED.  IT'S ABOUT TIME HE WAS EXPOSED".

avatar
Tony Bennett

Posts : 14617
Reputation : 2774
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by pennylane on 26.11.15 16:12

@Tony says: The specific evidence we have from two out of the four statements made about Martin Smith’s acquaintance with Murat state that the two had ‘known each other for 2 years’ and had ‘met several times’. This alone suggests quite a lot more than just the odd ‘passing hello’.


Sorry Tony, I have to disagree with the above. I've known some of my neighbours for nearly 20 years, and met them many times in the village shop or walking through the village, and still only know them by a passing hello.





Posters - stay on topic, please.  Mod.

pennylane

Posts : 2756
Reputation : 1584
Join date : 2009-12-07

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by woodpecker on 26.11.15 18:16

I agree Pennylane.

I have lived in the same road for 25 years and mainly I know other residents as casual acquaintances. A few I know better because their children were at school with mine, they played in our house and I met the parents that way. Some I wouldn't even know by sight because their working lives were different to mine and they'd be leaving/returning from work at different times to me.

Wasn't Mr Smith only the co-owner of the property which would mean he wasn't there that much? He might have 'known Mr Murat for 2 years' but that doesn't mean 2 years continously; he would only have had interaction with Mr Murat when he was actually in PDL.

I didn't know that Mrs Murat and Mrs fenn were on the local residents committee. I was on our local committee for years on and off, and there'd be committee members who rarely turned up, and they'd be times when I didn't attend which meant there'd be a few members I could pass in the street and not be sure who they were! Most people, in my experience, left promptly at the end of meetings (which were often boring). If I was friendly with a fellow committee member it was because I knew them anyway. Usually there was always a couple of members I didn't like who talked all the time or who made stupid contributions. What I'm trying to say is that being on a residents committee together does not mean necessarily that Mrs Murat and Mrs Fenn were good friends.




ontopic

woodpecker

Posts : 52
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2014-10-09

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Richard IV on 26.11.15 21:07

If this thread is about how a faked abduction could be achieved in less than an hour, it`s inevitable that the Smith sighting is going to crop up again.  If the thread is now going off on a tangent, I will just thank Tony for replying to my post and leave it at that.



@Richard IV - Thread is drifting off topic, but do continue if you want to respond.

There are many Smith sighting threads, six of which are posted up-thread by Tony Bennett.  Mod.
avatar
Richard IV

Posts : 552
Reputation : 261
Join date : 2015-03-06

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by sonic72 on 26.11.15 22:45

I've always thought it's impossible for them to have concocted a cover up on the night, on the spur of the moment. 
They would need to put some thought into it, even if it wasn't a master plan. 

This ties in with the cadaver detection in their apartment, that needed would also need time to develop.

So, IMO Madeleine 'disappeared' earlier than we are being told.
avatar
sonic72

Posts : 341
Reputation : 70
Join date : 2012-09-09

Back to top Go down

Re: How could the FAKE abduction be achieved in less than an hour - and WHY?

Post by Verdi on 26.11.15 22:59

@sonic72 wrote:I've always thought it's impossible for them to have concocted a cover up on the night, on the spur of the moment. 
They would need to put some thought into it, even if it wasn't a master plan. 

This ties in with the cadaver detection in their apartment, that needed would also need time to develop.

So, IMO Madeleine 'disappeared' earlier than we are being told.
Too contrived don't you think?  Outdated photographs of Madeleine readily available, time-line scribbled on Madeleine's sticker book, unlocked patio door, hazy child check arrangements that could never be confirmed, stained pyjama top, child crying or not crying, elderly woman in apartment above, absence of any reliable independent witness who can confirm a living Madeleine on 3rd May (or days leading up to the 3rd), contradictory accounts of the groups movements during the week - shall I go on?

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 5403
Reputation : 3203
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
McCanns apt & hire car


Blood and cadaver alerts
dismissed by UK Government


Retired DCI Gonçalo Amaral: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened - they don't need to investigate anything. All this is now a mere 'show off'."

Retired murder DCI Colin Sutton: "I would also like to make the point that Operation Grange was so restricted from the start as to be destined to fail."

Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley made public on national TV that Operation Grange is a complete fraud.

Ex-DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window of opportunity', in accordance with their remit, to allow the fake abduction to happen.

Despite "irrelevant behaviour" from blood and cadaver dogs in the McCann's apartment, on Kate McCann's clothes, and in the car they hired three weeks after Maddie disappeared, Ex-Chief Inspector, Ian Horrocks, said: "The thought that Kate and Gerry McCann had anything to do with the death of their daughter is frankly preposterous."

Gerry McCann called for example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY News reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room. Brenda paid the price. She paid with her life.

Ex-Deputy Chief Constable, Jim Gamble QPM, congratulated SKY reporter, Martin Brunt, on twitter for doorstepping Brenda Leyland on behalf of Gerry McCann.

Prime Minister Theresa May introduces Prime Suspect Kate McCann to Royalty: The Duchess of Gloucester.

Good Cop Down: The reality of being a police whistleblower
https://goodcopdown.wordpress.com/