10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: McCann Case: The most important areas of research
Page 3 of 7 • Share
Page 3 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Mrs Pamela Fenn's Witness Statement of 20th August 2007...
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
I didn't see this question before. As I am, so to speak, the Smiths' chief accuser, I am quite happy to answer it. And I will give the same answer to it as I have many times before on CMOMM and elsewhere over the years.jazega wrote:Asked the question several days ago, as to why would the Smith family lie and make false statements,got no replies.
First, some facts. The PJ in their final report described the Smith family's evidence as 'unreliable', and I fully agree with that.
Further, the Smiths' evidence is shot through with contradictions and changes of story that I've covered in depth on the SMITHMAN1 to SMITHMAN12 threads, so much so that I cannot believe them.
Third, those who say that Gerry McCann is Smithman must believe
1 He did walk past all the Smith family at 10pm 3 May carrying Madeleine's dead body...
2 ...at the same time (approximately) as the alarm was raised
3 He and his team then engaged Martin Smith and his family to draw up efits of himself
4 He and his team then milked the Smith sighting on the C4 doc, on their website & in Kate's book...
5 ... and finally they co-operated with Operation Grange to present efits of himself on BBC Crimewatch (2013).
This is unbelievably far-fetched. I therefore come to the conclusion that either the Smiths saw somebody completely different (which I consider very unlikely) or, more likely, they were not telling the truth.
Moreover, if Martin Smith seriously believed that Gerry McCann was carrying his dead or dying daughter somewhere on the night of 3 May, why on earth would be go on to co-operate with the McCann Team? There is a giant mystery at the heart of Smithman.
Now, I do not know why they may not have told the truth.
I have investigated two hoaxes in depth, the alleged 'drowning' of Stuart Lubbock and the alleged concrete mixer 'accident' that is said to have killed Lee Balkwell. In both cases, I have seen an almost unbelievable capacity of people to lie...those involved, others connected to the case, even senior police officers.
People lie for all kinds of reasons. Fear, money, loyalty to others for example. On that last point, I consider there is sufficient evidence at least to suspect that when Martin Smith 'phoned the Irish police on 16 May, that - in view of his association with Robert Murat - he may initially have been acting for him, to protect him.
Children can lie. Children can be - and are - coached by their parents to lie.
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16920
Activity : 24786
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
I wonder if anyone ever told the truth ...
Eleanor Rigby- Posts : 5
Activity : 7
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2014-05-02
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Tony Bennett wrote:I didn't see this question before. As I am, so to speak, the Smiths' chief accuser, I am quite happy to answer it. And I will give the same answer to it as I have many times before on CMOMM and elsewhere over the years.jazega wrote:Asked the question several days ago, as to why would the Smith family lie and make false statements,got no replies.
First, some facts. The PJ in their final report described the Smith family's evidence as 'unreliable', and I fully agree with that.
Further, the Smiths' evidence is shot through with contradictions and changes of story that I've covered in depth on the SMITHMAN1 to SMITHMAN12 threads, so much so that I cannot believe them.
Third, those who say that Gerry McCann is Smithman must believe
1 He did walk past all the Smith family at 10pm 3 May carrying Madeleine's dead body...
2 ...at the same time (approximately) as the alarm was raised
3 He and his team then engaged Martin Smith and his family to draw up efits of himself
4 He and his team then milked the Smith sighting on the C4 doc, on their website & in Kate's book...
5 ... and finally they co-operated with Operation Grange to present efits of himself on BBC Crimewatch (2013).
This is unbelievably far-fetched. I therefore come to the conclusion that either the Smiths saw somebody completely different (which I consider very unlikely) or, more likely, they were not telling the truth.
Moreover, if Martin Smith seriously believed that Gerry McCann was carrying his dead or dying daughter somewhere on the night of 3 May, why on earth would be go on to co-operate with the McCann Team? There is a giant mystery at the heart of Smithman.
Now, I do not know why they may not have told the truth.
I have investigated two hoaxes in depth, the alleged 'drowning' of Stuart Lubbock and the alleged concrete mixer 'accident' that is said to have killed Lee Balkwell. In both cases, I have seen an almost unbelievable capacity of people to lie...those involved, others connected to the case, even senior police officers.
People lie for all kinds of reasons. Fear, money, loyalty to others for example. On that last point, I consider there is sufficient evidence at least to suspect that when Martin Smith 'phoned the Irish police on 16 May, that - in view of his association with Robert Murat - he may initially have been acting for him, to protect him.
Children can lie. Children can be - and are - coached by their parents to lie.
The Smith family did not say Gerry was carrying the dead body of Madeleine.
jazega- Posts : 84
Activity : 137
Likes received : 49
Join date : 2017-03-08
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Copying part of this post which I put on another thread earlier as it should have been put on here.
IMO opinion, Mrs.Fenn's information was not directly connected to the alleged crime of abduction. It referred to an incident two nights previous to this "crime" and contributed little information that the P.J.did not already know ie. that the children were left unattended. The Tapas 9 and various O.C. employees and other witnesses had already informed the police of this.
What it did suggest was that the alleged checks on the children were less frequent than they claimed. As far as the P.J. were concerned what happened on Tuesday night was relatively unimportant, save for this suggestion of the children being left unchecked for much longer periods. They are of the opinion that Madeleine was last seen alive and well at 5.30 p.m. on May 3rd. Therefore, whether Madeleine was crying on Tuesday night was only important because of the alleged duration of this crying and what this implied for the claims of frequent checking.
Mrs Fenn neither saw nor heard anything suspicious or of interest on the crucial night. Therefore, the only role her evidence could play was in building up a picture of how true were the checking claims and the claim that Madeleine always remained soundly safe asleep while her parents dined.
I imagine that the police had more pressing investigations pertaining to the night of the crime to attend to first, and that Mrs. Fenn's evidence was very much secondary in importance to this. She was also a permanent resident in the area and therefore there was no urgent need to take her statement before she left. If she had already been spoken to (and I believe she had) she would have made the police aware of her future ready availability whenever they got around to needing her statement. I see nothing unusual or sinister in this.
IMO opinion, Mrs.Fenn's information was not directly connected to the alleged crime of abduction. It referred to an incident two nights previous to this "crime" and contributed little information that the P.J.did not already know ie. that the children were left unattended. The Tapas 9 and various O.C. employees and other witnesses had already informed the police of this.
What it did suggest was that the alleged checks on the children were less frequent than they claimed. As far as the P.J. were concerned what happened on Tuesday night was relatively unimportant, save for this suggestion of the children being left unchecked for much longer periods. They are of the opinion that Madeleine was last seen alive and well at 5.30 p.m. on May 3rd. Therefore, whether Madeleine was crying on Tuesday night was only important because of the alleged duration of this crying and what this implied for the claims of frequent checking.
Mrs Fenn neither saw nor heard anything suspicious or of interest on the crucial night. Therefore, the only role her evidence could play was in building up a picture of how true were the checking claims and the claim that Madeleine always remained soundly safe asleep while her parents dined.
I imagine that the police had more pressing investigations pertaining to the night of the crime to attend to first, and that Mrs. Fenn's evidence was very much secondary in importance to this. She was also a permanent resident in the area and therefore there was no urgent need to take her statement before she left. If she had already been spoken to (and I believe she had) she would have made the police aware of her future ready availability whenever they got around to needing her statement. I see nothing unusual or sinister in this.
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
I agree Phoebe and also think that Mrs. Fenn is another character in this that had no reason to lie. Her testimony was corroborated by the McCanns themselves, either truthfully or retrospectively reacting to her evidence with an account of their own. It may be that this somewhat incongruous conversation with Madeleine never took place, but was a reaction fabricated by them, hence the bizarre facial expressions and recounting during one of the interviews. I have no explanation for her account of the burglar, maybe an octaganarian embellishing the truth?
Edit: Actually, thinking about that interview, I can't remember which it was, but if I got to that part and the interviewer asked about the 'crying', and my child was actually missing at that point, I'd crack up right there. I wouldn't be able to continue with sheer pain of missing my child. The fact that at that very point they were both so disdainful and dismissive, with Kates contemptuous curly lip and Gerry with the multiple sideways glances, speak volumes for me.
Off topic, apologies.
Edit: Actually, thinking about that interview, I can't remember which it was, but if I got to that part and the interviewer asked about the 'crying', and my child was actually missing at that point, I'd crack up right there. I wouldn't be able to continue with sheer pain of missing my child. The fact that at that very point they were both so disdainful and dismissive, with Kates contemptuous curly lip and Gerry with the multiple sideways glances, speak volumes for me.
Off topic, apologies.
Sundance- Posts : 105
Activity : 187
Likes received : 82
Join date : 2018-08-23
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Sundance wrote: Her testimony was corroborated by the McCanns themselves, either truthfully or retrospectively reacting to her evidence with an account of their own.
Kate McCann's witness statement - 4th May 2007
Between the day of the arrival, April 28th, and the time that Madeleine's disappearance was discovered, the interviewee says that she noticed nothing unusual. She reports only one episode where, on the morning of Thursday May 3rd, Madeleine asked the interviewee why she had not come to look in the bedroom when the twins were crying. The interviewee states that she had heard nothing and had therefore not gone into the bedroom. She thought her daughter's comment strange because it was the first time she had talked about it.
....................
Pamela Fenn's witness statement was taken on 20th August 2007 - the PJ files were released into the public domain in July 2008. The McCanns couldn't possibly have known the content of Pamela Fenn's witness statement.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
So truthfully then. Lends credence to Mrs Fenn.
Sundance- Posts : 105
Activity : 187
Likes received : 82
Join date : 2018-08-23
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Verdi wrote:Sundance wrote: Her testimony was corroborated by the McCanns themselves, either truthfully or retrospectively reacting to her evidence with an account of their own.
Kate McCann's witness statement - 4th May 2007
Between the day of the arrival, April 28th, and the time that Madeleine's disappearance was discovered, the interviewee says that she noticed nothing unusual. She reports only one episode where, on the morning of Thursday May 3rd, Madeleine asked the interviewee why she had not come to look in the bedroom when the twins were crying. The interviewee states that she had heard nothing and had therefore not gone into the bedroom. She thought her daughter's comment strange because it was the first time she had talked about it.
....................
Pamela Fenn's witness statement was taken on 20th August 2007 - the PJ files were released into the public domain in July 2008. The McCanns couldn't possibly have known the content of Pamela Fenn's witness statement.
But Mrs Fenn could have known about the Kate's comment regarding the crying incident.
Who knows what those dodgy PI's may have got up to. Blackmail, Bribery? Either way, it appears that Mrs Fenn, months later, decides to back up the McCanns claims that Madeleine was alive and that there were burglaries in the area. Later she says, "its all rubbish".
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
If Mrs.Fenn was part of some conspiracy to help prove that Madeleine was alive on the Tuesday night then the hatchers of such a conspiracy must be completely stupid. Why would n't they simply have asked Mrs Fenn to say that she SAW Madeleine. If she were part of the conspiracy to defraud, it would be the simplest thing in the world for them to have got Mrs. Fenn to say "Oh yes, I saw the McCanns going into or out of their apartment on ... (pick the necessary day!). There was the Mum, the Dad and three children, an older girl and two younger children". Hey presto - job done!
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Sundance wrote:So truthfully then. Lends credence to Mrs Fenn.
No, it lends credence to the McCanns claim that Madeleine had been crying on one or more occasions, which likewise lends credence to Madeleine being alive and well after Monday 30th April 2007.
Do your homework, it all started to happen on Tuesday 1st May 2007.
Stick to the point - your words Sundance..
Sundance wrote:Her testimony was corroborated by the McCanns themselves, either truthfully or retrospectively reacting to her evidence with an account of their own.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Pamela Fenn lived above apartment 5a occupied by the McCann family. She would have been questioned informally during the police door to door routine inquiries - to think otherwise if but folly. As there is no recording of any informal interview , nor a later formal interview as a witness, it can be safely said that she had nothing to say that would assist the investigation.
This raises the question - why, many weeks later, did it occur to Pamela Fenn that she might have some useful information to impart that could assist the investigation. It can be said with a degree of certainty that Pamela Fenn was known to Robert Murat's mother, Jenny Murat. Same generation, same locality, both residents - it would be extremely unlikely they didn't know each other, probably quite intimately. Did Mrs Fenn report anything to Jenny Murat when she had her street market stall, inviting people that were shy of the police to impart evidence?
Nothing about this case is simple. It's so much easier to exonerate specific people because they look nice, or they're old, or they are well respected in the community. No doubt the same has been said of the McCanns in and around their home environment.
This raises the question - why, many weeks later, did it occur to Pamela Fenn that she might have some useful information to impart that could assist the investigation. It can be said with a degree of certainty that Pamela Fenn was known to Robert Murat's mother, Jenny Murat. Same generation, same locality, both residents - it would be extremely unlikely they didn't know each other, probably quite intimately. Did Mrs Fenn report anything to Jenny Murat when she had her street market stall, inviting people that were shy of the police to impart evidence?
Nothing about this case is simple. It's so much easier to exonerate specific people because they look nice, or they're old, or they are well respected in the community. No doubt the same has been said of the McCanns in and around their home environment.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Susan Moyes told a radio program (BBC Stoke and Staffordshire August 14th 2007) that she and her husband Paul arrived in P. de L. on Wednesday May 2nd, the day before Madeleine disappeared and stayed "for a month". Their apartment was directly above that of Mrs. Fenn and the McCanns and Susan Moyes claims they had been sitting on their balcony at around 9.15 p.m. on the night of May 3rd.
What I find truly astonishing is that there is no statement from the Moyes anywhere in the released P.J. files! Now, the Moyes could have been important witnesses, yet it appears that they were never interviewed in any depth about what they had or had not seen.
In this radio interview Susan Moyes makes no reference whatsoever to any contact (informal or otherwise) with the police, although she mentions the P.J. investigation and the subsequent criticism of it from certain quarters.
We know that the P.J. and certainly Dr. Amaral doubted Jane Tanner's story from very early on. And yet, the very people who were in a position to corroborate or contradict Jane's story re. walking up the road and passing Gerry and J. Wilkins were never asked about this during the whole month they were in Portugal!
For me, this puts the delay in taking Pamela Fenn's statement into perspective. I can only assume that basic police work initially saw both the Moyes and Mrs. Fenn being asked very anodyne questions along the lines of "Did you see or hear of anything suspicious that night" and that when they answered negatively, attention was focused elsewhere. By the time they got round to speaking to Mrs. Fenn again, the Moyes had already returned home to the U.K. If they stayed a month, that would have seen them returning home during the first week of August and Mrs. Fenn did not give her evidence until August 20th. There does not seem to have been an urgency to uncover further potential information from the McCanns' neighbours.
What I find truly astonishing is that there is no statement from the Moyes anywhere in the released P.J. files! Now, the Moyes could have been important witnesses, yet it appears that they were never interviewed in any depth about what they had or had not seen.
In this radio interview Susan Moyes makes no reference whatsoever to any contact (informal or otherwise) with the police, although she mentions the P.J. investigation and the subsequent criticism of it from certain quarters.
We know that the P.J. and certainly Dr. Amaral doubted Jane Tanner's story from very early on. And yet, the very people who were in a position to corroborate or contradict Jane's story re. walking up the road and passing Gerry and J. Wilkins were never asked about this during the whole month they were in Portugal!
For me, this puts the delay in taking Pamela Fenn's statement into perspective. I can only assume that basic police work initially saw both the Moyes and Mrs. Fenn being asked very anodyne questions along the lines of "Did you see or hear of anything suspicious that night" and that when they answered negatively, attention was focused elsewhere. By the time they got round to speaking to Mrs. Fenn again, the Moyes had already returned home to the U.K. If they stayed a month, that would have seen them returning home during the first week of August and Mrs. Fenn did not give her evidence until August 20th. There does not seem to have been an urgency to uncover further potential information from the McCanns' neighbours.
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
When considering the position of Pamela Fenn in this web of intrigue, it's very important to factor in that of her niece Carole Tranmer...
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
In the interests of clarity, I think it important to point out that this is a RADIO interview with Mrs. Moyes which she gave to Radio Stoke & Staffordshire after returning home from Portugal. There is no record of, nor reference to, any interview with the P.J. although she claims to have been on the top balcony of the McCanns' apartment block at 9.15. p.m. on May 3rd. and, consequently, would have been in a perfect position to see Jane Tanner, J. Wilkins and Gerry McCann, either as they came toward 5A or walked away from that conversation. Strangely, it appears that she and her husband were never interviewed by the P.J. about what they had or had not seen, despite being in P. de L. until the first week of June.!Verdi wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Phoebe wrote:In the interests of clarity, I think it important to point out that this is a RADIO interview with Mrs. Moyes which she gave to Radio Stoke & Staffordshire after returning home from Portugal. There is no record of, nor reference to, any interview with the P.J. although she claims to have been on the top balcony of the McCanns' apartment block at 9.15. p.m. on May 3rd. and, consequently, would have been in a perfect position to see Jane Tanner, J. Wilkins and Gerry McCann, either as they came toward 5A or walked away from that conversation. Strangely, it appears that she and her husband were never interviewed by the P.J. about what they had or had not seen, despite being in P. de L. until the first week of June.!Verdi wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The linked thread is about media interview transcripts, not witness statement transcripts. The Moyes interview transcript is clearly headed ....
Search for Maddie BBC - Stoke and Staffordshire
The balconies for the apartment block are at the rear of the building facing the pool area, playground, tennis courts, Tapas bar/restaurant etc. The claimed encounter between Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins and Jane Tanner's alleged sighting were at the opposite side, i.e. the front of the building.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Rear facing pool and Tapas
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Front on roadside.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Verdi:
‘The claimed encounter between Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins and Jane Tanner's alleged sighting were at the opposite side, i.e. the front of the building.’
No.
They were at the side somewhere between the Mc’s side gate and the secondary OC reception.
It was only Tannerman walking left to right at the top of the hill that was at the front of the building.
JW:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
‘I have drawn a map of the complex and marked an X where I saw Jerry on Thursday evening ' JW 1.’
JT:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
‘Five minutes later, the witness left, to go to her apartment to see whether her daughters were OK. At this moment she saw Gerry talking to an Englishman called Jez whom they had got to know during the holidays. They played tennis with him.
She passed by them knowing that Gerry had already been in the apartment (1) to check his children.
Meanwhile a man appeared ( * ) carrying a child (**), with a hurried walk, it being this detail together with the fact that the child dressed in pyjamas, without being wrapped up in a blanket, that caught her attention. She only managed to see him from the side, with the child in his arms. She noticed the individual's presence exactly when she had just passed by Gerry and Jez who were talking, having seen this person step off the pavement that borders on the apartment block where they were staying and rapidly cross the road.’
‘The claimed encounter between Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins and Jane Tanner's alleged sighting were at the opposite side, i.e. the front of the building.’
No.
They were at the side somewhere between the Mc’s side gate and the secondary OC reception.
It was only Tannerman walking left to right at the top of the hill that was at the front of the building.
JW:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
‘I have drawn a map of the complex and marked an X where I saw Jerry on Thursday evening ' JW 1.’
JT:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
‘Five minutes later, the witness left, to go to her apartment to see whether her daughters were OK. At this moment she saw Gerry talking to an Englishman called Jez whom they had got to know during the holidays. They played tennis with him.
She passed by them knowing that Gerry had already been in the apartment (1) to check his children.
Meanwhile a man appeared ( * ) carrying a child (**), with a hurried walk, it being this detail together with the fact that the child dressed in pyjamas, without being wrapped up in a blanket, that caught her attention. She only managed to see him from the side, with the child in his arms. She noticed the individual's presence exactly when she had just passed by Gerry and Jez who were talking, having seen this person step off the pavement that borders on the apartment block where they were staying and rapidly cross the road.’
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
@ Doug D. Agreed. The Moyes balcony was directly above Mrs. Fenn's.
According to Jane Tanner's statement (May 10th '07) -
"About 21h10 GM left the restaurant having gone to the apartment to see his children. Five or ten minutes later (21h15 - 21h20) the deponent (Jane T.) left, having gone to her apartment to check all was well with her girls. At that time (21h15 - 21h20) she observed GM talking to an English citizen called Jez that they had met on these holidays"...."after having gone to see the child she returned to the restaurant. on her return GM was no longer talking where she had seen him. When she arrived at the restaurant GM was already seated at the table accompanied by his wife KH and all the others."
Firstly, given that the Moyes, at 9h15, were on their balcony which overlooks the Tapas Bar and the route from it to 5A, they were perfectly positioned to confirm whether they had seen -
A) Gerry, either leaving the Tapas Bar on his way TO 5A or returning to the Tapas bar FROM 5A.
B) They would have seen Jane exit the Tapas Bar through the reception entrance and make her way uphill toward the block.
C) As Doug D points out, the conversation between Jez and Gerry (which Jane places at 9h15 - 9h20) took place at the side gate, which lead to the steps up into 5A. This was just off to the side of the Moyes balcony. Not only could they possibly have seen the actual encounter between Gerry and Wilkins, they would - given that they were seated almost directly above it - have heard the sound of voices conversing beneath them.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
According to Jane Tanner's statement (May 10th '07) -
"About 21h10 GM left the restaurant having gone to the apartment to see his children. Five or ten minutes later (21h15 - 21h20) the deponent (Jane T.) left, having gone to her apartment to check all was well with her girls. At that time (21h15 - 21h20) she observed GM talking to an English citizen called Jez that they had met on these holidays"...."after having gone to see the child she returned to the restaurant. on her return GM was no longer talking where she had seen him. When she arrived at the restaurant GM was already seated at the table accompanied by his wife KH and all the others."
Firstly, given that the Moyes, at 9h15, were on their balcony which overlooks the Tapas Bar and the route from it to 5A, they were perfectly positioned to confirm whether they had seen -
A) Gerry, either leaving the Tapas Bar on his way TO 5A or returning to the Tapas bar FROM 5A.
B) They would have seen Jane exit the Tapas Bar through the reception entrance and make her way uphill toward the block.
C) As Doug D points out, the conversation between Jez and Gerry (which Jane places at 9h15 - 9h20) took place at the side gate, which lead to the steps up into 5A. This was just off to the side of the Moyes balcony. Not only could they possibly have seen the actual encounter between Gerry and Wilkins, they would - given that they were seated almost directly above it - have heard the sound of voices conversing beneath them.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Susan Moyes: "Sure. We went out for a meal about 7 o'clock, down in the town, we walked back about 9 o'clock, round past, errm... the... the church, round past the supermarket, back to the apartment, went out on the balcony about quarter past nine - everywhere was peaceful, everywhere was lovely - we then went to bed."
Moyes states in this radio interview, she and her husband arrived at the Ocean Club just before Madeleine disappeared and stayed for one month. If this be true, they would have returned to their homeland at the beginning of June, not August. The interview, the first time a Moye has been heard in public, was a matter of days before Pamela Fenn gave her witness statement to the PJ.
I strongly suggest this interview was 'arranged' with pecunary incentive. Reading the interview, this person is less than convincing - I doubt they know anything. There isn't even any evidence that they were there at the Ocean Club when they claimed to be.
Susan Moyes: "Sure. We went out for a meal about 7 o'clock, down in the town, we walked back about 9 o'clock, round past, errm... the... the church, round past the supermarket, back to the apartment, went out on the balcony about quarter past nine - everywhere was peaceful, everywhere was lovely - we then went to bed."
Moyes states in this radio interview, she and her husband arrived at the Ocean Club just before Madeleine disappeared and stayed for one month. If this be true, they would have returned to their homeland at the beginning of June, not August. The interview, the first time a Moye has been heard in public, was a matter of days before Pamela Fenn gave her witness statement to the PJ.
I strongly suggest this interview was 'arranged' with pecunary incentive. Reading the interview, this person is less than convincing - I doubt they know anything. There isn't even any evidence that they were there at the Ocean Club when they claimed to be.
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
@ Verdi You state above -
"Moyes states in this radio interview, she and her husband arrived at the Ocean Club just before Madeleine disappeared and stayed for one month. If this be true, they would have returned to their homeland at the beginning of June, not August"
This is perfectly correct. Unfortunately, I was unable to amend my original post of 24th Sept @ 1.05 so I posted again today at 18h19 with the correct month -
"In the interests of clarity, I think it important to point out that this is a RADIO interview with Mrs. Moyes which she gave to Radio Stoke & Staffordshire after returning home from Portugal. There is no record of, nor reference to, any interview with the P.J. although she claims to have been on the top balcony of the McCanns' apartment block at 9.15. p.m. on May 3rd. and, consequently, would have been in a perfect position to see Jane Tanner, J. Wilkins and Gerry McCann, either as they came toward 5A or walked away from that conversation. Strangely, it appears that she and her husband were never interviewed by the P.J. about what they had or had not seen, despite being in P. de L. until the first week of JUNE.!
"Moyes states in this radio interview, she and her husband arrived at the Ocean Club just before Madeleine disappeared and stayed for one month. If this be true, they would have returned to their homeland at the beginning of June, not August"
This is perfectly correct. Unfortunately, I was unable to amend my original post of 24th Sept @ 1.05 so I posted again today at 18h19 with the correct month -
"In the interests of clarity, I think it important to point out that this is a RADIO interview with Mrs. Moyes which she gave to Radio Stoke & Staffordshire after returning home from Portugal. There is no record of, nor reference to, any interview with the P.J. although she claims to have been on the top balcony of the McCanns' apartment block at 9.15. p.m. on May 3rd. and, consequently, would have been in a perfect position to see Jane Tanner, J. Wilkins and Gerry McCann, either as they came toward 5A or walked away from that conversation. Strangely, it appears that she and her husband were never interviewed by the P.J. about what they had or had not seen, despite being in P. de L. until the first week of JUNE.!
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
@ Verdi You state above -
"I strongly suggest this interview was 'arranged' with pecunary incentive. Reading the interview, this person is less than convincing - I doubt they know anything. There isn't even any evidence that they were there at the Ocean Club when they claimed to be"
I can't imagine that the Moyes told lies a on Radio show for a few quid. By all accounts I 've seen, they were financially comfortable. If the suggestion is that they too (like Mrs Fenn) were "plants" working for team McCann then the latter should demand a refund! The Moyes' interview merely adds to doubts about Jane's version of events, and the confirmation that both apartments above the McCanns' flat were occupied from shortly after 9 p.m. onward casts further doubt on the notion that someone would risk breaking into 5A. at that time.
"I strongly suggest this interview was 'arranged' with pecunary incentive. Reading the interview, this person is less than convincing - I doubt they know anything. There isn't even any evidence that they were there at the Ocean Club when they claimed to be"
I can't imagine that the Moyes told lies a on Radio show for a few quid. By all accounts I 've seen, they were financially comfortable. If the suggestion is that they too (like Mrs Fenn) were "plants" working for team McCann then the latter should demand a refund! The Moyes' interview merely adds to doubts about Jane's version of events, and the confirmation that both apartments above the McCanns' flat were occupied from shortly after 9 p.m. onward casts further doubt on the notion that someone would risk breaking into 5A. at that time.
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Here is a tweet on the subject from one of the most notorious Pro-McCann tweeter,some says this tweeter is close to the family.
"Indeed, it COULD NOT have been" Madeleine Mrs Fenn heard.
Already gone?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
"Indeed, it COULD NOT have been" Madeleine Mrs Fenn heard.
Already gone?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1405
Activity : 2152
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
NickE wrote:Here is a tweet on the subject from one of the most notorious Pro-McCann tweeter,some says this tweeter is close to the family.
"Indeed, it COULD NOT have been" Madeleine Mrs Fenn heard.
Already gone?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
That is one of the many troubles with Twitter.
Who knows what exactly is meant by those 11 words posted by 'Killa Dog'.
If, as you say, the person is a McCann-supporter, maybe it is what we would call a 'Freudian slip'? (don't know if you have the same expression in your language?)
Has 'Killa Dog' been asked for an explanation?
I stand by my assertions about Mrs Fenn's evidence, including
(1) It was first given over three-and-a-half months after the McCanns' holiday
(2) Her evidence appeared in several British newspapers on 18 & 19 August before she even made a statement to the PJ on Monday 20 August
(3) She clearly told local news reporters that what had been said about her evidence in the media was "rubbish" - yet the media were only reporting exactly what she said in her statement
(4) Her statement is unbelievable on the face of it (a child crying ever louder for 75 minutes, nobody else hearing the crying, Mrs Fenn failing to report it etc.
(5) Her statement has a number of inconsistencies
(6) Her statement looks very much contrived in order to 'fit' Madeleine: "a child of more than two years of age" - how can she tell the difference between the4 crying of a two-year-old and a three-year-old?!
(7) Multiple contradictions in the varying accounts of the alleged attempted burglary she is supposed to have suffered e.g. 1 week or 2 weeks or 3 weeks or 'several' weeks before the McCanns' holiday
(8) Implausibility of the event as described e.g. an 82-year-old leaping across the room to try and grab the mythical burglar by the ankles as he leapt from a first-floor window.
How any rational person, having carefully examined all the evidence, can take Mrs Fenn's statement seriously, is quite beyond me
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16920
Activity : 24786
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
The McCanns claimed that they had checked on their children at least every half hour. If Mrs. Fenn heard Madeleine cry for an hour and a half then the McCanns schedule of checking must be a lie. I believe this is what is at issue in the tweet quoted above by Killa Dog. He is defending the McCanns' "checking regularly" tale. In simple terms if the McCanns are not liars then they would have come across Madeleine crying during one of their half-hourly checks on the Tuesday night and, presumably, would have stayed with their distressed child.
Mrs. Fenn stated that she had never spoken to any reporters, about her statement or any burglary thwarting. I believe this is what she meant when she claimed that, as she had never spoken to any reporters, what they claimed she had told them was all rubbish.The ridiculous stories of her allegedly explaining to the press how she grabbed a burglar by the ankle as he tried to escape through a high window are indeed "rubbish".
Mrs. Fenn stated that she had never spoken to any reporters, about her statement or any burglary thwarting. I believe this is what she meant when she claimed that, as she had never spoken to any reporters, what they claimed she had told them was all rubbish.The ridiculous stories of her allegedly explaining to the press how she grabbed a burglar by the ankle as he tried to escape through a high window are indeed "rubbish".
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
Yes, "freudian slip" is the same in Swedish.Tony Bennett wrote:NickE wrote:Here is a tweet on the subject from one of the most notorious Pro-McCann tweeter,some says this tweeter is close to the family.
"Indeed, it COULD NOT have been" Madeleine Mrs Fenn heard.
Already gone?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
That is one of the many troubles with Twitter.
Who knows what exactly is meant by those 11 words posted by 'Killa Dog'.
If, as you say, the person is a McCann-supporter, maybe it is what we would call a 'Freudian slip'? (don't know if you have the same expression in your language?)
Has 'Killa Dog' been asked for an explanation?
I stand by my assertions about Mrs Fenn's evidence, including
(1) It was first given over three-and-a-half months after the McCanns' holiday
(2) Her evidence appeared in several British newspapers on 18 & 19 August before she even made a statement to the PJ on Monday 20 August
(3) She clearly told local news reporters that what had been said about her evidence in the media was "rubbish" - yet the media were only reporting exactly what she said in her statement
(4) Her statement is unbelievable on the face of it (a child crying ever louder for 75 minutes, nobody else hearing the crying, Mrs Fenn failing to report it etc.
(5) Her statement has a number of inconsistencies
(6) Her statement looks very much contrived in order to 'fit' Madeleine: "a child of more than two years of age" - how can she tell the difference between the4 crying of a two-year-old and a three-year-old?!
(7) Multiple contradictions in the varying accounts of the alleged attempted burglary she is supposed to have suffered e.g. 1 week or 2 weeks or 3 weeks or 'several' weeks before the McCanns' holiday
(8) Implausibility of the event as described e.g. an 82-year-old leaping across the room to try and grab the mythical burglar by the ankles as he leapt from a first-floor window.
How any rational person, having carefully examined all the evidence, can take Mrs Fenn's statement seriously, is quite beyond me
I've asked him why it could not have been Madeleine Mrs Fenn heard.
He has been active all the time but no reply so far.
____________________
Goncalo Amaral: "Then there's the window we found Kate's finger prints.
She said she had never touched that window and the cleaning lady assured that she had cleaned it on the previous day....it doesn't add up"
NickE- Posts : 1405
Activity : 2152
Likes received : 499
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 49
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
@ Phoebe Thank you for your reply. Thank you for addressing one of the nine points about Mrs Fenn's evidence that I listed.Phoebe wrote:The McCanns claimed that they had checked on their children at least every half hour. If Mrs. Fenn heard Madeleine cry for an hour and a half then the McCanns schedule of checking must be a lie. I believe this is what is at issue in the tweet quoted above by Killa Dog. He is defending the McCanns' "checking regularly" tale. In simple terms if the McCanns are not liars then they would have come across Madeleine crying during one of their half-hourly checks on the Tuesday night and, presumably, would have stayed with their distressed child.
Mrs. Fenn stated that she had never spoken to any reporters, about her statement or any burglary thwarting. I believe this is what she meant when she claimed that, as she had never spoken to any reporters, what they claimed she had told them was all rubbish.The ridiculous stories of her allegedly explaining to the press how she grabbed a burglar by the ankle as he tried to escape through a high window are indeed "rubbish".
We have the facts about the alleged burglary mainly from the media reports of 18 and 19 August 2007, on that I agree with you. But we also have her statement, which on its face has multiple problems with it that seriously undermine its credibility.
The fact is that she claims she had a burglar, and the media reports have, it seems, embellished this, with a whole series of different accounts of this burglary, when it happened, what happened, when and if it was reported to police etc. etc.
Mrs Fenn said it was all rubbish. Your claim that she was saying it was rubbish because of the exaggerated reports of the burglary is just a guess on your part, isn't it? It is a bit of speculation without any evidence whatsoever. You may be right. But you may well be entirely wrong.
Do you agree that the very fact that we have had all these varied claims about when the burglary happened (1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, several weeks before), about how the burglar got in, what he did when was in the apartment, whether Mrs Fenn leapt to grab him etc. - do you agree that this suggests the very real possibility that this burglary story is an invention by the McCann camp and their advisers to put in people's minds that Praia da Luz was a place prone to break-ins and burglaries?
If this burglary really happened, Mrs Fenn and the media would have surely have given a coherent account of it, don't you agree?
WHEN it happened.
HOW he got in.
WHAT he did when he was there.
WHETHER he leapt out of the window or got out through the door.
WHEN it was reported to the police and WHAT the police did about it.
But we have none of this. We have a mass of inconsistencies instead. On this basis I suggest again that this burglary never happened.
It follows from what I say that it is possible that persons unknown 'leaned on' Mrs Fenn to claim a burglary. Who they were, and why Mrs Fenn complied (if she did), I cannot say.
Finally, you have at least tried to address one of my nine points.
I am not sure if you believe that Mrs Fenn was a truthful and reliable witness?
If you do, I would find it helpful if you addressed the other eight points I listed - thanks!
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Researcher
- Posts : 16920
Activity : 24786
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
When considering the authenticity of Pamela Fenn's testimony and associated reports, it essential to factor in the witness statement of her niece, Carole Tranmer.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
If anything is going to cast doubt, this cements the deal. Carole Tranmer was but a visitor, a passing non-entity - but just look how much she had to say !?!
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
If anything is going to cast doubt, this cements the deal. Carole Tranmer was but a visitor, a passing non-entity - but just look how much she had to say !?!
____________________
“ The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
Verdi- ex moderator
- Posts : 34677
Activity : 41927
Likes received : 5932
Join date : 2015-02-02
Location : Flossery
Re: 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
@ Tony Bennett. Actually Tony, my post above was not intended as a reply to you but rather to a post by NickE, in which he pointed out that a pro McCann tweeter had claimed that Mrs. Fenn could not have heard Madeleine cry for an hour and a half on the Tuesday night. He seemed to be pondering whether this meant that "Killa Dog" knew that Madeleine wasn't alive in order to do so. My post was to offer another simpler explanation which Killa Dog might have intended ie that as the McCanns claimed to have checked their children half-hourly they would have encountered Madeleine crying and done something about it.
With regard to Mrs. Fenn having said that the press reports were "all rubbish" well, if she hadn't spoken to them and they had printed nonsense about the attempted robbery, when it occurred and what allegedly happened, then I find her comment perfectly
normal.
All she told the police in her statement was that there had been an attempted robbery a week previously at her apartment, that it was unsuccessful and that nothing was taken.
Mrs Fenn cannot be held responsible for the timing of her police interview. It is clear from her statement of August 20th that there had already been contact between her family and the police and that her niece Carol Tranmer had already, at that stage, spoken to the police.
It is not unreasonable to believe that the P.J. had already spoken to Mrs Fenn well before they invited her in to give her official statement on August 20th '07. She lived directly above the crime scene after all, and was at home when the alleged crime occurred!
Her information wasn't that important. All she could confirm for them was that a child had been crying and therefore unsupervised for an hour and a half two nights before Madeleine went missing.
I do agree that the media attempted to exaggerate Mrs. Fenn's robbery to support the abduction claim but cannot see that she is to blame for this. Nor can I see how her claim to have heard Madeleine crying is anything but detrimental to the McCanns' cause.
With regard to Mrs. Fenn having said that the press reports were "all rubbish" well, if she hadn't spoken to them and they had printed nonsense about the attempted robbery, when it occurred and what allegedly happened, then I find her comment perfectly
normal.
All she told the police in her statement was that there had been an attempted robbery a week previously at her apartment, that it was unsuccessful and that nothing was taken.
Mrs Fenn cannot be held responsible for the timing of her police interview. It is clear from her statement of August 20th that there had already been contact between her family and the police and that her niece Carol Tranmer had already, at that stage, spoken to the police.
It is not unreasonable to believe that the P.J. had already spoken to Mrs Fenn well before they invited her in to give her official statement on August 20th '07. She lived directly above the crime scene after all, and was at home when the alleged crime occurred!
Her information wasn't that important. All she could confirm for them was that a child had been crying and therefore unsupervised for an hour and a half two nights before Madeleine went missing.
I do agree that the media attempted to exaggerate Mrs. Fenn's robbery to support the abduction claim but cannot see that she is to blame for this. Nor can I see how her claim to have heard Madeleine crying is anything but detrimental to the McCanns' cause.
Phoebe- Posts : 1367
Activity : 3046
Likes received : 1659
Join date : 2017-03-01
Page 3 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Similar topics
» 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
» 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
» Did Mrs Fenn hear ' the sub ' crying on Tuesday night?
» The Tale of Pamela Fenn: A Crying Game
» The Possible Dry Run By The Alleged Abductor That Possibly Caused The Alleged Crying Incident.
» 10 REASONS WHICH SUGGEST THAT PAMELA FENN DID NOT HEAR ANY CHILD CRYING ON TUESDAY 1 MAY 2007
» Did Mrs Fenn hear ' the sub ' crying on Tuesday night?
» The Tale of Pamela Fenn: A Crying Game
» The Possible Dry Run By The Alleged Abductor That Possibly Caused The Alleged Crying Incident.
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Madeleine Beth McCann :: McCann Case: The most important areas of research
Page 3 of 7
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum