The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Mm11

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Regist10

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Page 20 of 41 Previous  1 ... 11 ... 19, 20, 21 ... 30 ... 41  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by lj on 20.06.15 23:16

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I've brought this over from the other forum, as it puts the whole affair of WBM into perspective. There will be winners or losers no matter what the truth is.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]  Resistor Today at 8:59 pm


Then that is 100% at odds with the reply they allegedly sent to Isabel McFadden when the office manager claimed the date was wrong.  Both version s cannot be right so which one is it?

Wayback are screwed if that date turn s out to be wrong. Gamble and the McCanns are screwed if it is not. Be interesting to see who gets thrown the wolves.


Yep, the technical aspects go way over my head, but the consequences are very clear and only can go one way or the other. 

With already admitting to  a "glitch" and altering the date (as I understand they did) any court proceeding they were expert witness in is now open for appeal, and wayback can expect some nice suits.

Unless of course the date was correct

pop2

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
lj
lj

Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by canada12 on 20.06.15 23:19

I'm posting this because I'm genuinely curious.

The page which started out this discussion was:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
in the WBM.

When the WBM tried to archive this page:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
in 2008, it archived a "Page Not Found" page.
That happened twice in 2008.
It tried for the last time on September 4, 2009, with the same result.

Apologies if I'm missing something but... if the April 30 page didn't exist when the WBM archived it, why didn't it return a "Page Not Found" page?
avatar
canada12

Posts : 1461
Activity : 1697
Likes received : 210
Join date : 2013-10-28

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by lj on 20.06.15 23:19

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I will only be happy if WMB can show they same error for other pages (lots of them) on that date and others.

If it's just this one page they can take a jump..

Now that I can understand, and I agree.

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
lj
lj

Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by whatsupdoc on 20.06.15 23:23

To see the calendar use...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

which adds the * after the date / time stamp. Hovering over the 30th April 2007 you can see the snapshot of 12.09.52


I've just tried the link from Roy Rovers on page 1 again and it's still working...including a pic of Madeleine when you hover and click on the snapshot...for 30th April 2007...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
whatsupdoc
whatsupdoc

Posts : 601
Activity : 953
Likes received : 320
Join date : 2011-08-04

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by whatsupdoc on 20.06.15 23:30

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I'm posting this because I'm genuinely curious.

The page which started out this discussion was:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
in the WBM.

When the WBM tried to archive this page:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
in 2008, it archived a "Page Not Found" page.
That happened twice in 2008.
It tried for the last time on September 4, 2009, with the same result.

Apologies if I'm missing something but... if the April 30 page didn't exist when the WBM archived it, why didn't it return a "Page Not Found" page?

When I checked the /mccann.html page a couple of days ago it was only viewable 30th April till the end of August 2007 on the calendar page.
whatsupdoc
whatsupdoc

Posts : 601
Activity : 953
Likes received : 320
Join date : 2011-08-04

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Syn on 20.06.15 23:36

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
"I will posit that a lot of techies are coming out of the woodwork to debunk this discovery"


Yes.


They're not bothered about other Madeleine issues.


But they signed up to tell us all we're wrong on this issue.


What a game.

----

PS.... I think it might be an innocent mistake. However I would like an explanation... and people signing up to post BS gets my back up and makes me wonder.
So I'm not bothered about other Madeleine issues then? A game?  Really.  You know bugger all about me and what I believe.  Here are just some of my posts re the McCann debacle.  

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

You also clearly did not read my Greptweet http://greptweet.com/u/syn0nymph/syn0nymph.txt (ignore the last few days worth as it has primarily been in relation to the 30/4 issue)

I am not a forumite by nature and have only every posted about the McCann case on twitter until recent months when I was invited to join MCF and I have been posting there regularly and now feel comfortable with forums.  I decided to join this forum today as I could respond to the question about orphan files and how Wayback deals with them.  You and I may disagree regarding the 30/04 issue but that does not give you the right to be derogatory or question my motives. I stand for justice for Madeleine, Goncalo and for Brenda.  I will not stand by and stay silent when misinformation is being perpetuated such as in the case here regarding the 30/04 issue.

And now it is time for my bed.  I bid you good night and sweet dreams :)
avatar
Syn

Posts : 109
Activity : 110
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2015-06-20

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by cloak'ndagger on 20.06.15 23:39

I can vouch for Syn.. .she may not be saying what we want to hear but she is an expert in the technological field.
avatar
cloak'ndagger

Posts : 118
Activity : 133
Likes received : 3
Join date : 2014-08-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Guest on 20.06.15 23:43

@MRNOODLES wrote:May I ask a question (or two) re webcrawlers... forgive me if I sound thick.

Is the page source/ view element part of each web page able to be found by web crawlers?

Reason why I ask.  Norwich City FC had a 'shirtgate' incident a few years back.  The club intended to unveil their new football shirts on such and such date.  But some bright spark a day of two before, had a good gander at the website's 'pagesource' and found pictures of the new shirt already on the site.  Cut a long story short the chief exec accused this person of hacking, but it never came to anything because it came down to the web developers for being sloppy for storing them on the site early and viewing the page source is fair game to be viewed.

I sort of visualise it in my non techie brain as, normal website above ground, page source below ground.  So therefore can these crawlers ferret out stuff below ground.

Sorry if that sounds a bit dense.

I am only 17 pages behind, so apologies if this has been done to death.

Given an Internet URL (address) I can often find out extra information that the web tekkies did not intend me to see.  It depends on how lazy or how dumb the web developers were.

There are times I can find unpublished links, sub-directories, parent directories and more.  If the tekkies have done their job properly, I get blocked on all of this.

Everything hinges on how well the site (CEOP 2007) was built and how well the site (WM 2007) was built.

PS.  My opinion is that it is a WM weakness, rather than a CEOP cover-up.

But as I have explained, I am still 17 pages behind, with midnight fast approaching.
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by whatsupdoc on 20.06.15 23:48

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I can vouch for Syn.. .she may not be saying what we want to hear but she is an expert in the technological field.

I'll second that. I know of syn0nymph from Twitter.

I don't think we should be knocking newcomers either.
whatsupdoc
whatsupdoc

Posts : 601
Activity : 953
Likes received : 320
Join date : 2011-08-04

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by canada12 on 20.06.15 23:49

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I'm posting this because I'm genuinely curious.

The page which started out this discussion was:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
in the WBM.

When the WBM tried to archive this page:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
in 2008, it archived a "Page Not Found" page.
That happened twice in 2008.
It tried for the last time on September 4, 2009, with the same result.

Apologies if I'm missing something but... if the April 30 page didn't exist when the WBM archived it, why didn't it return a "Page Not Found" page?

When I checked the /mccann.html page a couple of days ago it was only viewable 30th April till the end of August 2007 on the calendar page.

Interesting. Well... you can click on 2008 now and see two instances of "Page Not Found", and in 2009 one instance of "Page Not Found."
avatar
canada12

Posts : 1461
Activity : 1697
Likes received : 210
Join date : 2013-10-28

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Tony Bennett on 21.06.15 0:19

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I can vouch for Syn.. .she may not be saying what we want to hear but she is an expert in the technological field.

I'll second that. I know of syn0nymph from Twitter.
'Syn0nymph' is Denise Thomson on Twitter - and all I know about her so far is that she has written (mostly on Twitter AFAIK) about the CATS file 19309 on Gerry McCann, and has made references to Jim Gamble in that connection. She has made certain claims about this. I am not sure how many have been substantiated, however.  

I believe she may also be 'Pseudo Nym' on the 'Laid Bare' blog, who was the author of '20 FACTS ABOUT THE DISAPPEARANCE OF MADELEINE McCANN', recently featured on our forum. As she also writes on the 'Laid Bare' blog as 'Syn0nymph', and as the writing styles are very similar, I think it is a reasonable assumption that 'Syn', 'Syn0nymph' and 'Pseudo Nym' are all one and the same individual.

The '20 FACTS' leaflet had some good material in it, but on first scanning it I noted that 'Fact No. 6' about 'Smithman' was very inaccurate and, because of that, perpetuated the unsupported myth (IMO) that 'Smithman' really did see someone and that that someone was Gerry McCann.

I wrote a critique of 'Fact No. 6', here:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The author did not seem to be aware that Martin Smith soon resiled from his curious semi-identification of the man he said he saw as Gerry McCann - because the facts are that he has been co-operating fully with the McCann Team (and now Operation Grange) ever since December 2007. Indeed he has made public statements sympathising with the McCanns and urging the public to 'find the abductor'.

@ Syn   If you are the author of the '20 FACTS' post, or have influence on whoever wrote it, please remove 'Fact No. 6', or at least re-write it so as not to give the impression that 'Smithman' is Gerry McCann. There is no simply no evidence whatsoever that Martin Smith did see Gerry McCann - and his claim to have seen anyone at all is doubtful

____________________

Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"

Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".  

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
Researcher

Posts : 16166
Activity : 23820
Likes received : 3583
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 73
Location : Shropshire

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by whodunnit on 21.06.15 0:37

lj Yesterday at 11:16 pm
sallypelt wrote:I've brought this over from the other forum, as it puts the whole affair of WBM into perspective. There will be winners or losers no matter what the truth is.

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty  Resistor Today at 8:59 pm


Then that is 100% at odds with the reply they allegedly sent to Isabel McFadden when the office manager claimed the date was wrong.  Both version s cannot be right so which one is it?

Wayback are screwed if that date turn s out to be wrong. Gamble and the McCanns are screwed if it is not. Be interesting to see who gets thrown the wolves.


Yep, the technical aspects go way over my head, but the consequences are very clear and only can go one way or the other. 

With already admitting to  a "glitch" and altering the date (as I understand they did) any court proceeding they were expert witness in is now open for appeal, and wayback can expect some nice suits.


Unless of course the date was correct

~~

The dates are correct. Contrary to what some are trying to imply you do not need to be a software engineer to understand the basic operating procedures of the wayback machine any more than you need to be a mechanical engineer in order to operate an automobile. It truly is very simple. Attempts to confuse the issue notwithstanding, this basic fact remains unchanged: a mccann.html subpage of the CEOP website, with a picture of Madeleine McCann, a broken image file, an link to a .pdf file/poster [which automatically updated when the poster was added or changed later], and the text 'Help Find Madeleine Mccan' existed on the internet on April 30, 2007. Until someone from Wayback Machine can PROVE this capture was in error this fact HAS and will remain unchallenged.
Anonymous
whodunnit
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Just Askin on 21.06.15 6:55

Is it just a coincidence that also on the 30th of April 2007 it is alleged that Barroso was shown a photograph of Madeleine McCann.
Anonymous
Just Askin
Guest


Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by aiyoyo on 21.06.15 7:34

Having read the professionals (and laymen as well) opinions on this matter, I'm not an inch wiser if WMB's explanation that it was "glitch" holds true.
 
The fact that they gave two separate/different answers - an unmeasured one followed by a measured one after the seriousness of the situation and implication had been drawn to their attention, it seems (1) either they are very negligent in maintaining and monitoring accuracy or (2) they were not telling the truth.  If this abnormality applies only to archiving of the CEOP server, it would be weird in extremity.  Surely not again yet another one of the multitude of coincidences to do everything related to the McCanns. 
If the "error" is something that is prevalent/rampant in their archiving structure/system that applies across the board - affecting some or all other archiving cases-data as well - then perhaps their "glitch" claim is not sinister, but that would no doubt leave a hugh impact on their reliability.
  

Either which one, they have undermined their integrity given their proclamation that their archiving records had been used in judicial cases in the past, how do they now hope to taken seriously for future reference by judicial systems if their housekeeping
( so to speak) isn't in order.
aiyoyo
aiyoyo

Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by PeterMac on 21.06.15 7:41

whodunnit wrote:

Wayback are screwed if that date turn s out to be wrong. Gamble and the McCanns are screwed if it is not. Be interesting to see who gets thrown the wolves.
Yep, the technical aspects go way over my head, but the consequences are very clear and only can go one way or the other. 


In that respect it is similar to the Last Photo.
If it was taken at 2:29 3/5/7 then it is just a photo
If it was taken on 29/4/7 then the date has been altered, and several consequences arise.

(The fact is: it cannot possibly have been taken on 3/5/7 )
PeterMac
PeterMac
Investigator

Posts : 12011
Activity : 14832
Likes received : 1893
Join date : 2010-12-06

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by BlueBag on 21.06.15 7:49

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I'm fobbing no-one off.  You clearly do not understand that WB appends JAVA  to the HTML whenever it archives a page

Example from 13/05/2007





//var __wm = (function(){
var wbPrefix = "/web/";
var wbCurrentUrl = "http://www.ceop.gov.uk/mccann.html";


Slightly pedantic, but I think if we are going to seriously talk about technology can we at least get the language correct - this is JavaScript / ECMAScript that is added and not Java.  Other than the name sounding similar and involving programming there is virtually nothing in common between the two.
Absolutely.

"Expert" syn signed up here just to teach us nonsense and tell us this is nothing to worry about.

But hey.. lots of people vouch for him/her.

The wall of text post was especially nice.
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 7194
Activity : 10638
Likes received : 3398
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by BlueBag on 21.06.15 7:53

Syn

 I will not stand by and stay silent when misinformation is being perpetuated such as in the case here regarding the 30/04 issue.


By you and Nuala?
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 7194
Activity : 10638
Likes received : 3398
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by BlueBag on 21.06.15 7:57

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I can vouch for Syn.. .she may not be saying what we want to hear but she is an expert in the technological field.

I'll second that. I know of syn0nymph from Twitter.

I don't think we should be knocking newcomers either.
History shows we should be highly suspicious of new comers.

Especially hot single issue ones come to "correct" us.
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 7194
Activity : 10638
Likes received : 3398
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by BlueBag on 21.06.15 7:57

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I can vouch for Syn.. .she may not be saying what we want to hear but she is an expert in the technological field.
She knows jack about java and web pages.
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 7194
Activity : 10638
Likes received : 3398
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by aiyoyo on 21.06.15 8:03

Every time any new member joins to participate in the discussion on their specialised field, they are regarded with suspicions?  Why? 

Why is there a need to denigrate new members? 

How do we hope to attract and more importantly retain talented members if we adopt that kind of attitude all the time?
aiyoyo
aiyoyo

Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by BlueBag on 21.06.15 8:13

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Every time any new member joins to participate in the discussion on their specialised field, they are regarded with suspicions?  Why? 

Why is there a need to denigrate new members? 

How do we hope to attract and more importantly retain talented members if we adopt that kind of attitude all the time?
1) Because there are people already here who are also specialised in the same field and smell the BS, epecially when people sign up just to tell us we are wrong.  

2) History of this forum shows we should be wary, after 8 years a real "new member" is rare.

3) We don't adopt this attitude all the time.


The other thing to watch out for is starting David Icke Forum type "crazy" theories - diminish the good stuff by surrounding it with the nutty... "hey look... they're all nuts".
The David Icke forum is a great example of the interesting thing being deliberately smothered by the wacky. Now it's all wacky as the good posters went away.

Protecting forum integrity is important.
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 7194
Activity : 10638
Likes received : 3398
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by aiyoyo on 21.06.15 8:24

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Protecting forum integrity is important.

What?  How?

By descending to denigrating new members willy nilly?

Sorry I don't agree with you that it's a given that new comers are disruptive.
Some actually do contribute rather well.

Just a general observation applying to general posters.
aiyoyo
aiyoyo

Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Syn on 21.06.15 8:27

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I can vouch for Syn.. .she may not be saying what we want to hear but she is an expert in the technological field.

I'll second that. I know of syn0nymph from Twitter.
'Syn0nymph' is Denise Thomson on Twitter - and all I know about her so far is that she has written (mostly on Twitter AFAIK) about the CATS file 19309 on Gerry McCann, and has made references to Jim Gamble in that connection. She has made certain claims about this. I am not sure how many have been substantiated, however.  

I believe she may also be 'Pseudo Nym' on the 'Laid Bare' blog, who was the author of '20 FACTS ABOUT THE DISAPPEARANCE OF MADELEINE McCANN', recently featured on our forum. As she also writes on the 'Laid Bare' blog as 'Syn0nymph', and as the writing styles are very similar, I think it is a reasonable assumption that 'Syn', 'Syn0nymph' and 'Pseudo Nym' are all one and the same individual.

The '20 FACTS' leaflet had some good material in it, but on first scanning it I noted that 'Fact No. 6' about 'Smithman' was very inaccurate and, because of that, perpetuated the unsupported myth (IMO) that 'Smithman' really did see someone and that that someone was Gerry McCann.

I wrote a critique of 'Fact No. 6', here:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The author did not seem to be aware that Martin Smith soon resiled from his curious semi-identification of the man he said he saw as Gerry McCann - because the facts are that he has been co-operating fully with the McCann Team (and now Operation Grange) ever since December 2007. Indeed he has made public statements sympathising with the McCanns and urging the public to 'find the abductor'.

@ Syn   If you are the author of the '20 FACTS' post, or have influence on whoever wrote it, please remove 'Fact No. 6', or at least re-write it so as not to give the impression that 'Smithman' is Gerry McCann. There is no simply no evidence whatsoever that Martin Smith did see Gerry McCann - and his claim to have seen anyone at all is doubtful
Wrong, wrong, wrong.  I am not Pseudo Nym on the Laidbare blog - I do know who runs it and have given permission for the author to use stuff that I have written via twitlonger on there like here http://laidbareblog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/unreliable-dogs.html.  So please address your issues re Smithman to the blog owner and not to me.

I have written on twitter about CATS 19309, have a look at my greptweet and you will see what I have written. It won't be what you expect it to be a that is yet another conspiracy theory.

I have already said I am Syn0nymph on Twitter and I am Syn on MCF - I am not Pseudo Nym. Your powers of deduction are way off.

I will address your post again further later this evening as I am out for the day now.
avatar
Syn

Posts : 109
Activity : 110
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2015-06-20

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by Syn on 21.06.15 8:28

Thanks to those who have vouched for me :)  Have a lovely day all :)
avatar
Syn

Posts : 109
Activity : 110
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2015-06-20

Back to top Go down

Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007" - Page 20 Empty Re: Claim by 'Stevo' - "CEOP show Maddie is missing on 30th April 2007"

Post by BlueBag on 21.06.15 8:30

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Protecting forum integrity is important.

What?  How?

By descending to denigrating new members willy nilly?

Sorry I don't agree with you that it's a given that new comers are disruptive.
Some actually do contribute rather well.

Just a general observation applying to general posters.
We don't denigrate all new posters.

Just the disruptive ones and the ones on a mission to put us right about a hot issue.

Yes some new comers do contribute rather well.
BlueBag
BlueBag

Posts : 7194
Activity : 10638
Likes received : 3398
Join date : 2014-06-06

Back to top Go down

Page 20 of 41 Previous  1 ... 11 ... 19, 20, 21 ... 30 ... 41  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum