The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann. Please note that your username should be different from your email address!

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

(Please note: if you register with the sole intention of disrupting or spamming, please don't expect to be a member for too long.)

Many thanks,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Fund now more than £17,500

Page 1 of 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Fund now more than £17,500

Post by sallypelt on 15.05.15 16:27


sallypelt

Posts : 3591
Reputation : 771
Join date : 2012-11-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by jeanmonroe on 17.05.15 11:30

Where is M Brunt?

Surely the Sky News 'super sleuth' MUST have 'tracked/hunted down/outed' at least ONE of the 1,082 ''non believing, trolls' that have donated to GA's lawyers 'fund', by NOW?

THERE must be, amongst, the 1,082 donators, a 'vulnerable, female, pensioner' he HAS 'door stepped' since the 'fund' was set up, 16 days ago.

WHERE ARE YOU, BRUNT?

Come round to 'interview' me, if you like!

(I say 'female' because Mr Brunt dosen't appear to be too 'keen' to door step, 6' 3" 'non believing, troll/GA 'fund' donating' MEN!)

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5808
Reputation : 1655
Join date : 2013-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by aquila on 17.05.15 11:44

@jeanmonroe wrote:Where is M Brunt?

Surely the Sky News 'super sleuth' MUST have 'tracked/hunted down/outed' at least ONE of the 1,082 ''non believing, trolls' that have donated to GA's lawyers 'fund', by NOW?

THERE must be, amongst, the 1,082 donators, a 'vulnerable, female, pensioner' he HAS 'door stepped' since the 'fund' was set up, 16 days ago.

WHERE ARE YOU, BRUNT?

Come round to 'interview' me, if you like!

(I say 'female' because Mr Brunt dosen't appear to be too 'keen' to door step, 6' 3" 'non believing, troll/GA 'fund' donating' MEN!)
Lazz has a good blog re John Stalker (he hasn't been called a troll, doorstepped for his opinion or sued)

http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/John_Stalker_a_Troll_.html
avatar
aquila

Posts : 8418
Reputation : 1534
Join date : 2011-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Verdi on 24.05.15 23:14

Has anybody researched the background of Leanne Baulch? 

I won't be very popular for saying this but I'm very hesitant to hand over money to an unknown entity.  If I could be assured, without shadow of doubt, that a bone fide fund had been set up to assist Dr. Amaral I wouldn't hesitate but I'm reluctant to consider contributing via a young lady that suddenly appears in cyberworld, out of nowhere, encouraging people to donate, promising to transfer all money raised to another destination.

Even established charities are up to jiggery-pokery, it's asking a lot to put trust in an unknown person picked up on the internet.

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 5391
Reputation : 3195
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by espeland on 25.05.15 0:47

@Verdi wrote:Has anybody researched the background of Leanne Baulch? 

I won't be very popular for saying this but I'm very hesitant to hand over money to an unknown entity.  If I could be assured, without shadow of doubt, that a bone fide fund had been set up to assist Dr. Amaral I wouldn't hesitate but I'm reluctant to consider contributing via a young lady that suddenly appears in cyberworld, out of nowhere, encouraging people to donate, promising to transfer all money raised to another destination.

Even established charities are up to jiggery-pokery, it's asking a lot to put trust in an unknown person picked up on the internet.



If Tony Bennet can be persuaded it's OK, surely you can too?

£100
Tony Bennett
26 mins ago
I have today been advised that all funds raised via this site will go direct to the PJGA fund for Dr Amaral's legal expenses and am pleased to make a modest contribution for these reasons: 1. It is intolerable that anyone accused of libel should have to wait nearly 6 years from the date of service of a writ (June 2009 in this case) for a verdict 2. The verdict by the Lisbon court last month was perverse. Both the Portuguese Appeal Court (October 2010) and the Portuguese Supreme Court (March 2011) held that Dr Amaral's book was a legitimate use of his right to freedom of expression, under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and as a result they allowed his book to be sold, overturning an earlier ban. The Lisbon court should have followed their decisions 3. Dr Amaral has good prospects for success in his appeal, given the previous Appeal & Supreme Court decisions 4. 99% of his book is based on information in the files of the Portuguese Police which in any event has already been in the public domain since July 2008, and all of which can conveniently be accessed via the mccannpjfiles website 5. The McCanns have been able to afford the best lawyers that money can buy to pursue various defensive and offensive legal actions. By contrast, Dr Amaral has had substantial proportions of his captal and income impounded by the state. I hope that the money raised by this appeal will enable him to afford a good quality and influential lawyer

____________________

avatar
espeland

Posts : 205
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-10-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Amy Dean on 25.05.15 8:41

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/thank-you_6.html

A self-explanatory link about the money then sent via GoFundMe.
avatar
Amy Dean

Posts : 281
Reputation : 83
Join date : 2014-11-13
Location : Wherever I hang my hat

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by aquila on 25.05.15 9:02

@Verdi wrote:Has anybody researched the background of Leanne Baulch? 

I won't be very popular for saying this but I'm very hesitant to hand over money to an unknown entity.  If I could be assured, without shadow of doubt, that a bone fide fund had been set up to assist Dr. Amaral I wouldn't hesitate but I'm reluctant to consider contributing via a young lady that suddenly appears in cyberworld, out of nowhere, encouraging people to donate, promising to transfer all money raised to another destination.

Even established charities are up to jiggery-pokery, it's asking a lot to put trust in an unknown person picked up on the internet.
Why are you still poking at this with a stick Verdi, it's already been explained.

If you don't wish to contribute then don't...or are you just being obtuse?

Are you suggesting that Leanne Baulch is possibly bogus and will do a runner with the money?

I would have expected that from a reporter in UK Press, a member of TM or a pink person.

Give over Verdi.

ETA: Where is Rosalinda Hutton's contribution in her own name to Goncalo Amaral's Fund. It doesn't matter if it's a penny or a pound. Where is it? Rosalinda Hutton has written two blogs in the last week and yet still no contribution.

I apologise to the forum for grasping to this like a terrier with a bone, but where does Rosalinda Hutton stand on her support for Goncalo Amaral and the fund...or is she just now given to being a 'media' person and observing from the sidelines in the event of a forthcoming documentary.
avatar
aquila

Posts : 8418
Reputation : 1534
Join date : 2011-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Verdi on 25.05.15 11:30

@aquila wrote:
@Verdi wrote:Has anybody researched the background of Leanne Baulch? 

I won't be very popular for saying this but I'm very hesitant to hand over money to an unknown entity.  If I could be assured, without shadow of doubt, that a bone fide fund had been set up to assist Dr. Amaral I wouldn't hesitate but I'm reluctant to consider contributing via a young lady that suddenly appears in cyberworld, out of nowhere, encouraging people to donate, promising to transfer all money raised to another destination.

Even established charities are up to jiggery-pokery, it's asking a lot to put trust in an unknown person picked up on the internet.
Why are you still poking at this with a stick Verdi, it's already been explained.

If you don't wish to contribute then don't...or are you just being obtuse?

Are you suggesting that Leanne Baulch is possibly bogus and will do a runner with the money?

I would have expected that from a reporter in UK Press, a member of TM or a pink person.

Give over Verdi.

ETA: Where is Rosalinda Hutton's contribution in her own name to Goncalo Amaral's Fund. It doesn't matter if it's a penny or a pound. Where is it? Rosalinda Hutton has written two blogs in the last week and yet still no contribution.

I apologise to the forum for grasping to this like a terrier with a bone, but where does Rosalinda Hutton stand on her support for Goncalo Amaral and the fund...or is she just now given to being a 'media' person and observing from the sidelines in the event of a forthcoming documentary.
I didn't know it had already been explained, I googled and searched on this forum but couldn't find anything that answered my simple question, hence my post.  No I'm not being obtuse, I am interested and thought it a reasonable question.  Although I would never have supported it even if I thought it was genuine, the Find Madeleine Fund is a perfect example of my point as regards doubting authenticity.

Still as you say it's my choice whether or not I contribute so I'll say no more on the subject.

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 5391
Reputation : 3195
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Nina on 25.05.15 11:42

@Verdi wrote:
@aquila wrote:
@Verdi wrote:Has anybody researched the background of Leanne Baulch? 

I won't be very popular for saying this but I'm very hesitant to hand over money to an unknown entity.  If I could be assured, without shadow of doubt, that a bone fide fund had been set up to assist Dr. Amaral I wouldn't hesitate but I'm reluctant to consider contributing via a young lady that suddenly appears in cyberworld, out of nowhere, encouraging people to donate, promising to transfer all money raised to another destination.

Even established charities are up to jiggery-pokery, it's asking a lot to put trust in an unknown person picked up on the internet.
Why are you still poking at this with a stick Verdi, it's already been explained.

If you don't wish to contribute then don't...or are you just being obtuse?

Are you suggesting that Leanne Baulch is possibly bogus and will do a runner with the money?

I would have expected that from a reporter in UK Press, a member of TM or a pink person.

Give over Verdi.

ETA: Where is Rosalinda Hutton's contribution in her own name to Goncalo Amaral's Fund. It doesn't matter if it's a penny or a pound. Where is it? Rosalinda Hutton has written two blogs in the last week and yet still no contribution.

I apologise to the forum for grasping to this like a terrier with a bone, but where does Rosalinda Hutton stand on her support for Goncalo Amaral and the fund...or is she just now given to being a 'media' person and observing from the sidelines in the event of a forthcoming documentary.
I didn't know it had already been explained, I googled and searched on this forum but couldn't find anything that answered my simple question, hence my post.  No I'm not being obtuse, I am interested and thought it a reasonable question.  Although I would never have supported it even if I thought it was genuine, the Find Madeleine Fund is a perfect example of my point as regards doubting authenticity.

Still as you say it's my choice whether or not I contribute so I'll say no more on the subject.
I cannot ignore this. Leanne is a personal friend and a lovely young woman. It is your choice whether you contribute to helping towards legal fees for GA but please stop trying to cast doubt about Leanne.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.
avatar
Nina

Posts : 2821
Reputation : 307
Join date : 2011-06-16
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Joss on 25.05.15 12:27

@Nina wrote:
@Verdi wrote:
@aquila wrote:
@Verdi wrote:Has anybody researched the background of Leanne Baulch? 

I won't be very popular for saying this but I'm very hesitant to hand over money to an unknown entity.  If I could be assured, without shadow of doubt, that a bone fide fund had been set up to assist Dr. Amaral I wouldn't hesitate but I'm reluctant to consider contributing via a young lady that suddenly appears in cyberworld, out of nowhere, encouraging people to donate, promising to transfer all money raised to another destination.

Even established charities are up to jiggery-pokery, it's asking a lot to put trust in an unknown person picked up on the internet.
Why are you still poking at this with a stick Verdi, it's already been explained.

If you don't wish to contribute then don't...or are you just being obtuse?

Are you suggesting that Leanne Baulch is possibly bogus and will do a runner with the money?

I would have expected that from a reporter in UK Press, a member of TM or a pink person.

Give over Verdi.

ETA: Where is Rosalinda Hutton's contribution in her own name to Goncalo Amaral's Fund. It doesn't matter if it's a penny or a pound. Where is it? Rosalinda Hutton has written two blogs in the last week and yet still no contribution.

I apologise to the forum for grasping to this like a terrier with a bone, but where does Rosalinda Hutton stand on her support for Goncalo Amaral and the fund...or is she just now given to being a 'media' person and observing from the sidelines in the event of a forthcoming documentary.
I didn't know it had already been explained, I googled and searched on this forum but couldn't find anything that answered my simple question, hence my post.  No I'm not being obtuse, I am interested and thought it a reasonable question.  Although I would never have supported it even if I thought it was genuine, the Find Madeleine Fund is a perfect example of my point as regards doubting authenticity.

Still as you say it's my choice whether or not I contribute so I'll say no more on the subject.
I cannot ignore this. Leanne is a personal friend and a lovely young woman. It is your choice whether you contribute to helping towards legal fees for GA but please stop trying to cast doubt about Leanne.
Oh that's cool, didn't know she was a personal friend of yours.
avatar
Joss

Posts : 1950
Reputation : 182
Join date : 2011-09-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Ashwarya on 25.05.15 14:21

Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
avatar
Ashwarya

Posts : 141
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2011-04-23

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Verdi on 25.05.15 14:58

@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
Ashwarya, I resent that comment if directed at me, which it appears very much to be as I'm the one that asked a question.

For your information I have no allegiance with the McCann faction in any way shape or form.  If as a member you care to check my profile statistics,  past comments should clarify exactly where I stand on the subject!  I have read the link you posted and I'm totally aware of Dr. Amaral's plight resulting from the McCanns avaricious, evil and vindictive motives.  That has nothing to do with my orignal question.

I said I wasn't going to speak on the subject again but I won't be subjcted to false unfounded insinuations without defending myself.  I find it deeply offensive to be accused of being associated with the McCann support network.   Nina has now made the position clear, I have no desire to continue the subject.  Be assured I meant no malice.

As an aside, I taken great pains in the past to defend this forum against unreasonable accusations of having an agenda or being a closed shop or people not being welcome unless they toe the line or being closet McCann'ites - please don't give me cause to regret supporting you guys.

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 5391
Reputation : 3195
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Nina on 25.05.15 15:00

@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
roses

____________________
Not one more cent from me.
avatar
Nina

Posts : 2821
Reputation : 307
Join date : 2011-06-16
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Joss on 25.05.15 15:06

@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
But perhaps not everyone, and by that i am talking about relatively new posters to the forum, or posters that hardly ever post on here, would be aware of the PJGA website seeing as it was set up some years ago? I wasn't aware of it myself until a while ago, and joined here a few years ago. And some people are just very sketch about giving their personal details to donate money to anything and err on the side of caution. Just my 2cents worth.

I think it is also silly to think that there's a McC shill around every corner, comes across as being a bit paranoid IMO.

____________________
avatar
Joss

Posts : 1950
Reputation : 182
Join date : 2011-09-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by plebgate on 25.05.15 15:07

@Verdi wrote:
@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
Ashwarya, I resent that comment if directed at me, which it appears very much to be as I'm the one that asked a question.

For your information I have no allegiance with the McCann faction in any way shape or form.  If as a member you care to check my profile statistics,  past comments should clarify exactly where I stand on the subject!  I have read the link you posted and I'm totally aware of Dr. Amaral's plight resulting from the McCanns avaricious, evil and vindictive motives.  That has nothing to do with my orignal question.

I said I wasn't going to speak on the subject again but I won't be subjcted to false unfounded insinuations without defending myself.  I find it deeply offensive to be accused of being associated with the McCann support network.   Nina has now made the position clear, I have no desire to continue the subject.  Be assured I meant no malice.

As an aside, I taken great pains in the past to defend this forum against unreasonable accusations of having an agenda or being a closed shop or people not being welcome unless they toe the line or being closet McCann'ites - please don't give me cause to regret supporting you guys.
verdi please don't take this the wrong way and apologies if I have got it wrong, but I thought you posted last week that you were fairly new to the case and that is why you and others were asking questions which had been "done to death" in the past because you wanted to quickly to gain as much knowledge as possible.

I just wonder, if you are new to the case, how you were able to defend this forum in the past?

plebgate

Posts : 5980
Reputation : 1667
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Guest on 25.05.15 15:09

deleted
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Joss on 25.05.15 15:22

@Verdi wrote:
@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
Ashwarya, I resent that comment if directed at me, which it appears very much to be as I'm the one that asked a question.

For your information I have no allegiance with the McCann faction in any way shape or form.  If as a member you care to check my profile statistics,  past comments should clarify exactly where I stand on the subject!  I have read the link you posted and I'm totally aware of Dr. Amaral's plight resulting from the McCanns avaricious, evil and vindictive motives.  That has nothing to do with my orignal question.

I said I wasn't going to speak on the subject again but I won't be subjcted to false unfounded insinuations without defending myself.  I find it deeply offensive to be accused of being associated with the McCann support network.   Nina has now made the position clear, I have no desire to continue the subject.  Be assured I meant no malice.

As an aside, I taken great pains in the past to defend this forum against unreasonable accusations of having an agenda or being a closed shop or people not being welcome unless they toe the line or being closet McCann'ites - please don't give me cause to regret supporting you guys.
Verdi, IMO you don't need to justify yourself. Its a public forum, not a courtroom, lol, don't worry about it, i for one enjoy posting with you and look forward to reading your well thought out posts, :)
avatar
Joss

Posts : 1950
Reputation : 182
Join date : 2011-09-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by plebgate on 25.05.15 15:31

I disagree joss.   Verdi made a post which might have been taken to mean that Leanne B could not be trusted and posters are entitled to take issue with the post if they think necessary.

If verdi, in your opinion, does not need to justify his/herself then why does Leanne B?

There is a very prominent thread on the site about the fund set up for Goncalo Amaral and I cannot see how it could be missed in search.   Many threads/posts are difficult to find but this is such a recent thread even I would be able to find it and I am absolutely useless with search.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11245-brits-already-forking-out-en-masse-for-maddie-cop-libel-appeal

plebgate

Posts : 5980
Reputation : 1667
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Verdi on 25.05.15 15:35

@plebgate wrote:
@Verdi wrote:
@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
Ashwarya, I resent that comment if directed at me, which it appears very much to be as I'm the one that asked a question.

For your information I have no allegiance with the McCann faction in any way shape or form.  If as a member you care to check my profile statistics,  past comments should clarify exactly where I stand on the subject!  I have read the link you posted and I'm totally aware of Dr. Amaral's plight resulting from the McCanns avaricious, evil and vindictive motives.  That has nothing to do with my orignal question.

I said I wasn't going to speak on the subject again but I won't be subjcted to false unfounded insinuations without defending myself.  I find it deeply offensive to be accused of being associated with the McCann support network.   Nina has now made the position clear, I have no desire to continue the subject.  Be assured I meant no malice.

As an aside, I taken great pains in the past to defend this forum against unreasonable accusations of having an agenda or being a closed shop or people not being welcome unless they toe the line or being closet McCann'ites - please don't give me cause to regret supporting you guys.
verdi please don't take this the wrong way and apologies if I have got it wrong, but I thought you posted last week that you were fairly new to the case and that is why you and others were asking questions which had been "done to death" in the past because you wanted to quickly to gain as much knowledge as possible.

I just wonder, if you are new to the case, how you were able to defend this forum in the past?
No, I've followed the case since May 2007 but I've never been a seasoned member (as in long term) of any membership only fora, I have spasmodically posted on various blogs.  For privacy and my own peace of mind I'd rather not be more specific, past experience has taught me to be very cautious in that respect.  My previous comment you mention only related to past discussions on this forum (which I admit to finding hard to navigate sometimes), I don't spend a great deal of my time on the internet so I'm a bit retarded on many issues.  

I was a member of this forum (can't recall how long for) as admin will no doubt be aware but I left because I was disgusted with the way certain now departed members turned against the forum.  Just for the record I returned under a different user name.

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 5391
Reputation : 3195
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by plebgate on 25.05.15 15:37

Thank you verdi.

I believed that you had been on the fourm before.

plebgate

Posts : 5980
Reputation : 1667
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Verdi on 25.05.15 15:41

@Joss wrote:
@Verdi wrote:
@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
Ashwarya, I resent that comment if directed at me, which it appears very much to be as I'm the one that asked a question.

For your information I have no allegiance with the McCann faction in any way shape or form.  If as a member you care to check my profile statistics,  past comments should clarify exactly where I stand on the subject!  I have read the link you posted and I'm totally aware of Dr. Amaral's plight resulting from the McCanns avaricious, evil and vindictive motives.  That has nothing to do with my orignal question.

I said I wasn't going to speak on the subject again but I won't be subjcted to false unfounded insinuations without defending myself.  I find it deeply offensive to be accused of being associated with the McCann support network.   Nina has now made the position clear, I have no desire to continue the subject.  Be assured I meant no malice.

As an aside, I taken great pains in the past to defend this forum against unreasonable accusations of having an agenda or being a closed shop or people not being welcome unless they toe the line or being closet McCann'ites - please don't give me cause to regret supporting you guys.
Verdi, IMO you don't need to justify yourself. Its a public forum, not a courtroom, lol, don't worry about it, i for one enjoy posting with you and look forward to reading your well thought out posts, :)
Thanks for the vote of confidence but I'm beginning to lose the will to live.  I'm going down the boozer at least they know I'm the genuine article!

Bottoms up!

____________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made" - Groucho Marx
avatar
Verdi
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 5391
Reputation : 3195
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Joss on 25.05.15 15:44

@plebgate wrote:I disagree joss.   Verdi made a post which might have been taken to mean that Leanne B could not be trusted and posters are entitled to take issue with the post if they think necessary.

If verdi, in your opinion, does not need to justify his/herself then why does Leanne B?

There is a very prominent thread on the site about the fund set up for Goncalo Amaral and I cannot see how it could be missed in search.   Many threads/posts are difficult to find but this is such a recent thread even I would be able to find it and I am absolutely useless with search.
Neither Verdi or Leanne B have to justify themselves IMO. There is some derogatory stuff i have read about LB online,twitter i think a while back when she started the gofundme, but i have no clue about her really. Other people say they do know her, and that she's a good person, and that's fine. We all know how the internet can be though. I think she has stuck her neck out for GA and good for her to help him, because he needs some back up i'm sure with the ongoing fiasco that is the McCann case. I wish them both every success with their venture, and hope that GA's appeal is successful.

____________________
avatar
Joss

Posts : 1950
Reputation : 182
Join date : 2011-09-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Joss on 25.05.15 15:50

@Verdi wrote:
@Joss wrote:
@Verdi wrote:
@Ashwarya wrote:Shades of McCann tactics here, I think.  I am sure there is at least one person on their payroll dedicated to discrediting anything that might alleviate the desperate plight of Goncalo Amaral.  Surely anyone genuinely in doubt about Leanne's fund would find their way to the PJGA website to check out what they had to say, and then there would be no need to raise any doubts in public.

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/
Ashwarya, I resent that comment if directed at me, which it appears very much to be as I'm the one that asked a question.

For your information I have no allegiance with the McCann faction in any way shape or form.  If as a member you care to check my profile statistics,  past comments should clarify exactly where I stand on the subject!  I have read the link you posted and I'm totally aware of Dr. Amaral's plight resulting from the McCanns avaricious, evil and vindictive motives.  That has nothing to do with my orignal question.

I said I wasn't going to speak on the subject again but I won't be subjcted to false unfounded insinuations without defending myself.  I find it deeply offensive to be accused of being associated with the McCann support network.   Nina has now made the position clear, I have no desire to continue the subject.  Be assured I meant no malice.

As an aside, I taken great pains in the past to defend this forum against unreasonable accusations of having an agenda or being a closed shop or people not being welcome unless they toe the line or being closet McCann'ites - please don't give me cause to regret supporting you guys.
Verdi, IMO you don't need to justify yourself. Its a public forum, not a courtroom, lol, don't worry about it, i for one enjoy posting with you and look forward to reading your well thought out posts, :)
Thanks for the vote of confidence but I'm beginning to lose the will to live.  I'm going down the boozer at least they know I'm the genuine article!

Bottoms up!
Hey Verdi, don't you be thinking like that now. I am a survivor and if i can find the will to live so can you. I have been through it and sometimes don't know why i am still here, but i am, and there is a reason. Have a drink for me too while you are there, take care. empathy
avatar
Joss

Posts : 1950
Reputation : 182
Join date : 2011-09-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by plebgate on 25.05.15 16:00

Back on topic.

After the bank holiday and pay day for many the end of the week.   Maybe the target will be reached then.

plebgate

Posts : 5980
Reputation : 1667
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Fund now more than £17,500

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 25.05.15 17:15

Some people may not be aware of who Leanne Baulch is, especially if they don't use Facebook or Twitter - many of us do know who she is because we use facebook and can see which groups she is a member of, mine being one of them, so isn't it only right that questions are asked about someone who suddenly sets up a fund asking for £25k when there is already the PJGA fund in existence for the very same purpose?

In Verdi's defence he doesn't know Leanne and clearly wasn't aware of LG's explanation about the Fund so I don't think it's unreasonable to have doubts and ask questions https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11245p230-brits-already-forking-out-en-masse-for-maddie-cop-libel-appeal#310496

I didn't have any doubts at all about donating via that site as I know Leanne, and I recognised many familiar names who were also donating, and am very pleased she set it up as it's easier (for me, anyway) to donate there than the PJGA site and it's fantastic to see the total going up (so fast!!) - nearly £21,000 in just 26 days!

Some of the money donated to Leanne's gofundme site has already been transferred to the PJGA Fund account and kazlux from MaddieCaseFiles forum has written a thank you note: http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/thank-you_6.html?m=1

Hopefully this issue has now been resolved.
avatar
Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 9298
Reputation : 4671
Join date : 2009-11-25
Location : parallel universe

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
McCanns apt & hire car


Blood and cadaver alerts
dismissed by UK Government


Retired DCI Gonçalo Amaral: "The English can always present the conclusions to which they themselves arrived in 2007. Because they know, they have the evidence of what happened - they don't need to investigate anything. All this is now a mere 'show off'."

Retired murder DCI Colin Sutton: "I would also like to make the point that Operation Grange was so restricted from the start as to be destined to fail."

Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley made public on national TV that Operation Grange is a complete fraud.

Ex-DCI Andy Redwood had a "revelation moment" on BBC's Crimewatch on 14th October 2013 when he announced that Operation Grange had eliminated the Tanner sighting - which opened up the 'window of opportunity', in accordance with their remit, to allow the fake abduction to happen.

Despite "irrelevant behaviour" from blood and cadaver dogs in the McCann's apartment, on Kate McCann's clothes, and in the car they hired three weeks after Maddie disappeared, Ex-Chief Inspector, Ian Horrocks, said: "The thought that Kate and Gerry McCann had anything to do with the death of their daughter is frankly preposterous."

Gerry McCann called for example to be made of 'trolls'. SKY News reporter Martin Brunt doorstepped Brenda Leyland on 2 October 2014. She was then found dead in a Leicester hotel room. Brenda paid the price. She paid with her life.

Ex-Deputy Chief Constable, Jim Gamble QPM, congratulated SKY reporter, Martin Brunt, on twitter for doorstepping Brenda Leyland on behalf of Gerry McCann.

Prime Minister Theresa May introduces Prime Suspect Kate McCann to Royalty: The Duchess of Gloucester.

Good Cop Down: The reality of being a police whistleblower
https://goodcopdown.wordpress.com/